| Forum Index > Tech Support |
|
EngrishTeacher
Canada1109 Posts
It'll mostly be for work purposes, and I'll most likely just play SC2 and some older games like oblivion occasionally on it. All other specs should be similar, both being Thinkpads. Which one would be faster and by how much for gaming? Thanks! edit: both have integrated intel HD graphics, the i5 being sandy bridge HD 3000 and the ivy bridge i3 with HD 4000. | ||
|
iTzSnypah
United States1738 Posts
| ||
|
EngrishTeacher
Canada1109 Posts
| ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20285 Posts
| ||
|
Zax19
Czech Republic1136 Posts
| ||
|
EngrishTeacher
Canada1109 Posts
![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/knZVRfz) Dying to get a dedicated gaming rig once I settle down and pay off other more important things... | ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20285 Posts
^probably not gpu limited on anything | ||
|
EngrishTeacher
Canada1109 Posts
On December 20 2013 23:06 Cyro wrote: If you're benchmarking sc2 you need a decent sized fight to compare cpu's http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUZrLywPd8s ^probably not gpu limited on anything Yah about that, how do you properly benchmark SC2? At the beginning of games everything is >100 FPS, but later on nothing is consistent. Could you transfer saves? O_O | ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20285 Posts
| ||
|
EngrishTeacher
Canada1109 Posts
Oblivion savegame playthrough - Outdoors, forest - 1366 x 768, medium settings: i3: Min. 19, Max. 43, Avg. 35.449. i5: Min. 24, Max. 60, Avg. 42.272. SC2 replay - 150/200 battle 1v1 - 1366 x 768, lowest settings: i3: Min. 14, Max. 62, Avg. 39.731. i5: Min. 38, Max. 85, Avg. 56.911. Really surprising results TBH, I guess the i3 really is a low-end part. I was completely ready to believe you guys too thinking HD 4000 must > HD 3000, even though it's an i3 vs. an i5. So yah, Sandy Bridge i5 HD3000 > Ivy Bridge i3 HD4000, apparently. | ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20285 Posts
So yah, Sandy Bridge i5 HD3000 > Ivy Bridge i3 HD4000, apparently. Pretty sure that's not true (i got food so cant google stuff atm) but AFAIK there's not multiple igpu's with the same name, hd3k is hd3k and hd4k is hd4k and also, that's a massive performance difference in sc2. 42% higher average? The i5 is on worse architecture clocked only a little bit higher | ||
|
Myrmidon
United States9452 Posts
i3-3310M - 2C/4T, 2.4 GHz, Ivy Bridge, standard 35W TDP HD 3000 - 12 EU, clock speed depends on processor (1200 MHz max on i5-2410M) HD 4000 - 16 EU, clock speed depends on processor (1000 MHz max on i3-3310M) Recheck clock speeds for CPU and GPU (check power profiles too) on a separate monitor while benches are running. It should be closer than that. | ||
|
MrCon
France29748 Posts
Then we have 2.9GHz vs 2.4GHz, which is a lot higher, especially on sc2 where higher clock = higher fps. The results are making sense imo (except too much difference in sc2 but not "that" much compared to the clock speed difference) | ||
|
Rollin
Australia1552 Posts
On December 21 2013 02:27 Cyro wrote: Pretty sure that's not true (i got food so cant google stuff atm) but AFAIK there's not multiple igpu's with the same name, hd3k is hd3k and hd4k is hd4k and also, that's a massive performance difference in sc2. 42% higher average? The i5 is on worse architecture clocked only a little bit higher Turbo and base graphics speeds vary between different models. All full voltage parts have the same number of EUs though. | ||
|
Myrmidon
United States9452 Posts
On December 21 2013 09:31 MrCon wrote: Aren't you overestimating Sandy to Ivy ? Iirc the gain was 8% max in ideal conditions, which makes it close to 5% in real usage. And it was on desktop architectures. Then we have 2.9GHz vs 2.4GHz, which is a lot higher, especially on sc2 where higher clock = higher fps. The results are making sense imo (except too much difference in sc2 but not "that" much compared to the clock speed difference) It shouldn't be hitting the 1-core-active-only 2.9 GHz Turbo Boost bin when running games usually, only the 2.6 GHz one and possibly not even that 100% of the time depending on how it's configured and the cooling and GPU load. So 2.4 GHz Ivy to 2.6 GHz (sometimes 2.3 GHz? possibly sometimes 2.9 GHz?) Sandy should be close, mostly a wash. | ||
|
T.O.P.
Hong Kong4685 Posts
On December 21 2013 04:23 Myrmidon wrote: i5-2410M - 2C/4T, 2.3 GHz (2.6/2.9 GHz on Turbo), Sandy Bridge, standard 35W TDP i3-3310M - 2C/4T, 2.4 GHz, Ivy Bridge, standard 35W TDP HD 3000 - 12 EU, clock speed depends on processor (1200 MHz max on i5-2410M) HD 4000 - 16 EU, clock speed depends on processor (1000 MHz max on i3-3310M) Recheck clock speeds for CPU and GPU (check power profiles too) on a separate monitor while benches are running. It should be closer than that. I have done some tests before. If you want to run at max GPU speed, you can't be in a turbo clock with the CPU. I'm really surprised at the results too. I guess CPU speed is all that matters in SC2. Less EUs using less of the TDP share might help. | ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20285 Posts
| ||
|
Rollin
Australia1552 Posts
| ||
|
EngrishTeacher
Canada1109 Posts
| ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20285 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games |
|
FEL
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Online Event
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
The PondCast
Replay Cast
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
|
|
|
EPT
