EPThttp://www.ebay.com/itm/291544248218?rmvSB=true
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread - Page 598
| Forum Index > Tech Support |
When using this resource, please read the opening post. The Tech Support forum regulars have helped create countless of desktop systems without any compensation. The least you can do is provide all of the information required for them to help you properly. | ||
|
Disregard
China10252 Posts
http://www.ebay.com/itm/291544248218?rmvSB=true | ||
|
Firkraag8
Sweden1006 Posts
1080p 1440p 4K Not overclocked, founders edition and the averages come from the gaming tests with a 390X as baseline. Source if anyone doesn't care that it's in Swedish and want to see the individual tests. | ||
|
Disregard
China10252 Posts
| ||
|
Incognoto
France10239 Posts
| ||
|
bluegarfield
Singapore1128 Posts
On May 17 2016 23:10 Incognoto wrote: How much is the 1070 going to cost? Around US$400 I think. And holycow benchmark, gtx1080 look really really strong, esp with oc | ||
|
Incognoto
France10239 Posts
| ||
|
Duvon
Sweden2360 Posts
On May 17 2016 19:23 Firkraag8 wrote: You'll want the latest USB in this case 3.1 I guess, otherwise it's all the same mostly. For processor get a Skylake for sure, 6600k should last you a long time and is very fast. I would replace your PSU considering the age of your system, I threw together a little upgrade that should be fine in all regards: + Show Spoiler + You will want to upgrade the GPU at a later date too depending on which R9 you actually have.. Thanks for the quick reply. That mobo seems to have a bit of everything, though what are you referring to when you say that it's "mostly" the same? (across different mobos). The gfx card is a 270x so OK for at least a year? I think the build you linked changed from when I first looked at it? or for some reason I remember looking at a mobo with a M.2 line earlier today. | ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20345 Posts
On May 17 2016 23:10 Incognoto wrote: How much is the 1070 going to cost? 1070 = probably roughly 980ti performance at $379 MSRP 1080 = like 30% better (just took a glance at reviews cause i g2g) - http://www.overclock.net/t/1600401/various-gtx-1080-reviews/ Maybe the 1060 will be interesting. Maybe, but if you're considering that performance level and looking primarily for price/performance you might be more interested in the flood of used 970/980/390/390x's hitting the market. Unless you want next-gen NVENC and a passive cooled GPU lol  | ||
|
Craton
United States17303 Posts
| ||
|
Incognoto
France10239 Posts
On May 18 2016 00:53 Cyro wrote: 1070 = probably roughly 980ti performance at $379 MSRP 1080 = like 30% better (just took a glance at reviews cause i g2g) - http://www.overclock.net/t/1600401/various-gtx-1080-reviews/ Maybe, but if you're considering that performance level and looking primarily for price/performance you might be more interested in the flood of used 970/980/390/390x's hitting the market. Unless you want next-gen NVENC and a passive cooled GPU lol Yeah lol pretty much I don't need a new card <_< though upgrades are getting sexier and sexier | ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20345 Posts
![[image loading]](http://tpucdn.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_1080/images/perfwatt_1920_1080.png) 2.78x the perf/watt of Hawaii @1080p*, which is one of the most popular GPU's right now. Nvidia seems to like claiming 2x perf/watt when they're actually nowhere close, they have to cherry pick a number to get that and then next gen they claim 2x perf/watt again, cherry picking it in a different way that conflicts with what they said last generation. Perf/watt hasn't improved by 4x since Kepler, it has improved by maybe 3x - 3.2x or so (hard to say exactly). AMD was claiming 2.5x perf/watt this gen with Polaris i think, which would put them in the same ballpark as Pascal but still slightly behind if they deliver on it. *Perf/watt is a little bit friendlier for AMD if you look at high resolutions - http://tpucdn.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_1080/images/perfwatt_3840_2160.png ------------- On May 17 2016 23:08 Disregard wrote: The 1070 looks like a good price point for my next upgrade from a 760, still waiting for benchmarks. You should be able to roughly compare it to the 980ti for FPS as that fits in with what was said and where the 1080 has landed (some 1.3x faster) - It may be a bit off that number and be better at certain things, but for a general performance level that's about right. Efficiency should be gtx1080-class but probably a bit worse because Nvidia is claiming to get 1.43x the bandwidth from gddr5x at the same power as gddr5; power consumption will be lower (1.2x lower?). We don't actually know that much on paper but it's easy enough to make accurate educated guesses. The 680 is a little better than your 760 - http://anandtech.com/bench/product/1719?vs=1715 The 760 and 1070 are roughly the same class of GPU as well (same position in the product stack) but the 1070 is ahead on manufacturing process (16nm from 28nm) and two architectural revisions. I think that there's already enough information to make a buying choice, but we should have a few more floods of info in the coming weeks about the 1080 and then 1070 (: | ||
TheEmulator
28104 Posts
| ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20345 Posts
We could also get something like the higher end GPU only being available in a Titan priced card for 4-6 months ---------- ![[image loading]](http://tpucdn.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_1080/images/fallout4_1600_900.png) AMD still needs to improve their drivers for CPU efficiency. It's been over 2 years now since Nvidia took a huge lead, it looks like ~1.38x there. | ||
|
Disregard
China10252 Posts
On May 18 2016 03:57 Cyro wrote: I'm prob waiting for the HBM2 flagships - 16GB of VRAM and plausibly another 25-50% overall performance. 2.78x the perf/watt of Hawaii @1080p*, which is one of the most popular GPU's right now. Nvidia seems to like claiming 2x perf/watt when they're actually nowhere close, they have to cherry pick a number to get that and then next gen they claim 2x perf/watt again, cherry picking it in a different way that conflicts with what they said last generation. Perf/watt hasn't improved by 4x since Kepler, it has improved by maybe 3x - 3.2x or so (hard to say exactly). AMD was claiming 2.5x perf/watt this gen with Polaris i think, which would put them in the same ballpark as Pascal but still slightly behind if they deliver on it. *Perf/watt is a little bit friendlier for AMD if you look at high resolutions - http://tpucdn.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_1080/images/perfwatt_3840_2160.png ------------- On May 17 2016 23:08 Disregard wrote: The 1070 looks like a good price point for my next upgrade from a 760, still waiting for benchmarks. You should be able to roughly compare it to the 980ti for FPS as that fits in with what was said and where the 1080 has landed (some 1.3x faster) - It may be a bit off that number and be better at certain things, but for a general performance level that's about right. Efficiency should be gtx1080-class but probably a bit worse because Nvidia is claiming to get 1.43x the bandwidth from gddr5x at the same power as gddr5; power consumption will be lower (1.2x lower?). We don't actually know that much on paper but it's easy enough to make accurate educated guesses. The 680 is a little better than your 760 - http://anandtech.com/bench/product/1719?vs=1715 The 760 and 1070 are roughly the same class of GPU as well (same position in the product stack) but the 1070 is ahead on manufacturing process (16nm from 28nm) and two architectural revisions. I think that there's already enough information to make a buying choice, but we should have a few more floods of info in the coming weeks about the 1080 and then 1070 (: 680 is higher tier though, considering the price back then. I think it was ~$100 more than my Windforce which I got for $240ish or a bit more. | ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20345 Posts
680 is higher tier though, considering the price back then It is, it was just the closest GPU to compare with on the list | ||
|
Narw
Poland884 Posts
If GTX 1070 will offer same or slighlty lower perf as GTX 980 TI for 370$ i will be very impressed and will buy it in few months, will be good card for 1440p gaming. Mid to high end for graphic cards atm seems to look like that 960 >380> 970 > 390 > 390X > 980> R9Nano> Fury(X)> 1070 (if Nvidia delivers on its promises) > 980TI >1080 | ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20345 Posts
| ||
|
Disregard
China10252 Posts
| ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20345 Posts
i don't think 1070 price will change very much for a while | ||
|
Firkraag8
Sweden1006 Posts
source | ||
| ||
![[image loading]](https://inetimg.se/img/tiny/forum-divider.png)
