| Forum Index > Tech Support |
|
j0k3r
United States577 Posts
On December 14 2011 06:40 Nabutso wrote: It always boots fine. I got the CPU for free used, yes. I am using DDR2. It crashes with and without the overclock. Temperatures are all fine. If you haven't already, update to the latest video drivers and also do a windows update. Also try the other DVI port. | ||
|
Nabutso
351 Posts
| ||
|
HJG
Netherlands9 Posts
for example: The crucial m4 128gb has 119gb usable memory. Now im confused to why that is. Some people say its: 1. Because they advertise using the metric system while windows uses a binary system. which would be 128 / 1,024^3 = ~119gb (exactly the correct number, but dont feel like recalculating it again). It would imo be weird if they used that exact number as spare area. 2. Its used as spare area. On the other hand you have the intel 320. The 300gb version has 20 nand chips of 16 gb = 320gb. So the 20 gb is used as backup spare area?? You allso see 279gb. So does it have 20gb extra spare area, besides the standard spare area or is the metric vs binary explination the correct one? -totally confused- | ||
|
skyR
Canada13817 Posts
On December 14 2011 11:57 HJG wrote:+ Show Spoiler + I'm confused about SSD and "real" usable memory. for example: The crucial m4 128gb has 119gb usable memory. Now im confused to why that is. Some people say its: 1. Because they advertise using the metric system while windows uses a binary system. which would be 128 / 1,024^3 = ~119gb (exactly the correct number, but dont feel like recalculating it again). It would imo be weird if they used that exact number as spare area. 2. Its used as spare area. On the other hand you have the intel 320. The 300gb version has 20 nand chips of 16 gb = 320gb. So the 20 gb is used as backup spare area?? You allso see 279gb. So does it have 20gb extra spare area, besides the standard spare area or is the metric vs binary explination the correct one? -totally confused- That's correct. Intel 320 and Crucial M4 both have the amount of memory as advertised. Though only the binary amount is usable in Windows and the remaining is used for spare area. | ||
|
MrStorkie
United Kingdom697 Posts
I recently purchased a new monitor -- LG E2251VR (http://www.lg.com/hk/it-product/monitor/LG-home-E2251VR.jsp) Everything seems to be fine but until i started to do some photoshop on this picture: http://www.teamliquid.net/staff/Waxangel/naniwa3_small.png The background colour should be orange, but when displayed on my 2nd monitor (yes, I'm making it my desktop background.. gonna love dem probe rush and oh, the irony too), the newly purchased LG, it seems to be more yellow than it is orange! I've tried changing the RGB and the hue settings but I don't that should be the way to fix this colour "error". Help!! Edit: OMG I just realised that it could be my laptop monitor not displaying the right colours all these while! Can someone verify it for me? Is the naniwa picture background colour more yellow or orange? I'm seeing a bright yellow on my LG and a deep orange on my dell XPS1530 monitor. I tried to take a picture to let you guys have a good comparison, but the camera correctly registers both colours as orange. PS: There is nothing wrong with my eyes, I assure you. Edit2: Here's a good comparison. The orange is actually brighter than that, and the yellow is also significantly more yellow-ish. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/x2ppP.jpg) | ||
|
skyR
Canada13817 Posts
| ||
|
MrStorkie
United Kingdom697 Posts
On December 14 2011 13:44 skyR wrote: The picture appears as yellow on all three of my displays. Thanks. I'm glad the monitor is displaying the correct colour.. but man.. so frustrated at how long I've been working with the wrong colours all these while. On a totally related note, i think the orange version looks much better =) and i shouldn't have gotten another TN panel.. just realised how important colour accuracy is. | ||
|
Peanut Butter
Canada155 Posts
I have a HP Pavilion Dv6 notebook + Show Spoiler + Operating System MS Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit SP1 CPU Intel Core i5 @ 2.27GHz 68 °C Arrandale 32nm Technology RAM 4.00 GB Dual-Channel DDR3 @ 532MHz (7-7-7-20) Motherboard Hewlett-Packard 3659 (CPU) 75 °C Graphics Generic PnP Monitor (1366x768@60Hz) 512MB GeForce G105M (HP) 61 °C Hard Drives 488GB TOSHIBA TOSHIBA MK5056GSY (SATA) Optical Drives hp DVDRAM GT30L SVK QJ4T23KL SCSI CdRom Device Audio IDT High Definition Audio CODEC The IO manager has detected a violation by the driver that is being verified. The faulty driver that is being verified must be debugged and replaced with a working version Stop 0x00000C9 (0x000000000000E22E) (0xFFFFF88001138888) (0xFFFFF9800170HEA0)(0x000000000000000) I cannot find any relevant data for this code on the Microsoft Technet Website Forgive the wall of text please; I wanted to get as much data in there as I could | ||
Womwomwom
5930 Posts
On December 14 2011 13:49 MrStorkie wrote: Thanks. I'm glad the monitor is displaying the correct colour.. but man.. so frustrated at how long I've been working with the wrong colours all these while. On a totally related note, i think the orange version looks much better =) and i shouldn't have gotten another TN panel.. just realised how important colour accuracy is. TN panels can get good colour accuracy through eyeballing or using a $80 Spyder 3. IPS panels look good because most have been pre-calibrated in some capacity before leaving the factory. What IPS panels real offer is native 8/10 bit support (e-IPS panels you probably would get are all 6 bit anyway), no colour shift, and no colour crushing where dark colours tend to be impossible to differentiate between many shades of black/grey. | ||
|
enemy2010
Germany1972 Posts
My browser (Firefox) says that the site is still loading (showing this circle thing next to the page name in the tab title) but the site is fully displayed and available....? Edit: Seems like some ads keep on loading, the content of the site itself is 100% there.... | ||
|
Bleak
Turkey3059 Posts
| ||
|
Medrea
10003 Posts
| ||
|
krisss
Luxembourg305 Posts
On December 13 2011 20:02 Womwomwom wrote: No don't do that. It is a very bad idea to SLI very old graphics cards because performance will be pathetic. Either get a new, current generation GPU relevant to your screen's resolution or wait a month to see what AMD has cooked up. thanks for your suggestion. I have another simple question: On Sunday theres a big $20 mio. Poker Tourney on Pokerstars. I'd like to play with a good friend of mine. Unfortunately you cannot play pokerstars tourneys with 2 accounts on 1 IP (we already tried 2 times). How do i change the IP on my laptop, so we can play sitting next to each other? Thanks already | ||
|
Mordanis
United States893 Posts
P.S. Is this the correct place to post this type of question or would somewhere else be better? | ||
|
Medrea
10003 Posts
I have a 60 FPS video encoded in handbrake. How do I make it 60 FPS on youtube? Because I don't think I can above 240p anymore. Is this true? This might not be a simple answer. | ||
|
Womwomwom
5930 Posts
Because I don't think I can above 240p anymore. Is this true? True. Youtube updated their check system so everything pretty much gets converted to 30 FPS. | ||
|
Medrea
10003 Posts
Fucking youtube. SHMUPS look like garbage at not 60FPS honestly. | ||
|
nam nam
Sweden4672 Posts
On December 16 2011 15:36 Mordanis wrote: Hey, I'm looking into upgrading my processor because my plans for a new rig have been delayed by quite a bit. My computer is already really old, so I need to get a socket AM2 cpu. My question is if I need to take anything into consideration for getting a new processor other than the socket and wattage. Thanks a lot! P.S. Is this the correct place to post this type of question or would somewhere else be better? You could ask in the computer build thread. Maybe you'll get more responses there. But as long as the cpu fits your motherboard you should be fine. | ||
|
FourFace
701 Posts
Details: I don't know what a chassis fan is but asrockoc says it doesn't work (0rpm), broken power fan (these 2 may be the main problem or may not be) When I manually set the ram frequency to 533 which would result in 1066 FSB just like I planned, the computer doesn't boot up. (Win XP SP3, newest Bios for model) I'm actually scared to try lesser speeds like 400 or even 333 because i don't even know what speed auto has chosen automatically (setting which seems to work but i don't want to stay at 266 fsb obviously when I should have 1066) Asrockoc also shows bus/clock ratio 11.5 and voltage 1.20 which seem to be normal according to Intel Please don't ask additional questions about power supply model, mouse and keyboard and mouse pad model and penis-size etc. if you don't know what's going on. | ||
|
a176
Canada6688 Posts
1066mhz = 266 * 4 (quad-pumped fsb) 266 * 2 = DDR2-533 so the maths work out. what are you trying to do? are you saying your computer wont boot? you dont have to change anything, just let bios auto read the memory itself | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
The PondCast
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
OSC
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
OSC
Replay Cast
RSL Revival
Serral vs Bunny
ByuN vs GgMaChine
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
