• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 15:24
CEST 21:24
KST 04:24
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation3$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced2Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles5[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66
StarCraft 2
General
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
ASL20 Preliminary Maps BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ i aint gon lie to u bruh... [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall SC uni coach streams logging into betting site
Tourneys
[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Summer Games Done Quick 2024!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 582 users

competitive play issues - Page 9

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 7 8 9 10 11 22 Next All
Fen
Profile Blog Joined June 2006
Australia1848 Posts
September 05 2007 13:29 GMT
#161
On September 05 2007 14:33 YinYang69 wrote:
Wouldn't a easier interface still give the higher APM player more things to do and therefore still be better than their opponent? So instead of like the old game where you have to fight the outdated/bad interface to storm and build zealots in a few seconds, now you can storm, web, maelstrom, build zealots, do two simultaneous drops, expand and get a few extra gateways all in the span of like five seconds. Doesn't that sound better?


Nope, because the human brain is technically incapabale of mutitasking concious actions, Sure you can do one action and quickly switch to another making it look like you did both at the same time, but you really didnt. Starcraft works on this brilliantly, becuase you cannot control a base and an army at the same time, even if the interface allowed you to do so. So to make the game easier for you, you would ask that one action is really easy to do so you can focus on the other. Way to take out the difficulty in starcraft. Starcraft is about mulitasking, which is the hardest thing for the concious brain to do. This is what makes it hard, not the handspeed requirements. Dont remove this multitasking focus.

Btw for anyone who thinks they can mutltitask. Place your hands in front of you with your two fingers pointing together. Now rotate ure fingers around each other in the same direction. After youve done that, rotate them in the opposite direction. Then After than try and rotate them in different directions at the same time. If you can do so, PM me because you are one of the few people in the world who are able to actually multitask.
Liquid`Jinro
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
Sweden33719 Posts
September 05 2007 13:32 GMT
#162
On September 05 2007 19:17 Brutalisk wrote:
1esu pretty much nailed it. I liked the Go comparison. That's a good one... in Starcraft, basically, in order to "use" your troops you need to do a tedious action first that is quite out of place (it does require more skill but it is something stupid). So why not just remove it.

Because it requires more skill and is not stupid, but fun?


That's also what I meant in my post about priorities: the part of macro that is clicking through your factories is stupid, time-consuming and may make the game become more and more macro based. It does introduce a new skill element, but this element is misplaced. Might as well do a stupid mini-game each time before you are able to build units.

Fihsugdufy8hu8iiuufdhg

Having MBS will enable the players to pay more attention to the "real" game.
Of course, the real game should then offer a big enough strategical and tactical depth. It's hard to tell at this point. We also haven't seen the Zerg yet. But with all the new possibilities like walking over terrain, the moving phase cannons, being able to deploy your troops anywhere on the map (warp gates, nydus worm), and very dangerous AoE attackers like Banshee, Mothership or Phoenix, the game has at least the potential to become more intense and fast-paced than BW ever was. You will need to pay more attention to your units, and you probably won't be able to feel so safe in your base.

Ok, try to understand what I'm saying this time, I recognize that you might not think the same way about this but at least you'll understand why I think what you say is completely unsatisfactory:

All these features add to the micro aspect of the game. So you add to the micro, remove a lot of the macro, what do you get? The balance between the two is ruined, I want these new features you speak of, they seem fun and cool but they should not be added instead of macro, it's like removing rushing from the game and adding some cool late game scenario instead.


Also, many people who are against MBS forget that Starcraft wasn't always this way. It's just that everyone is MUCH more skilled today than back in 1999-2001, and they basically exploit one weakness of the game nowadays: it's less important to take care of your troops than simply reproducing them. Reproducing them is hard, so it is a (questionable) skill, but the problem is that it's more rewarding. I can simply choose to have 10 zealots die doing almost nothing (at least much less damage that they could have done) when I can rebuild them from 10 gateways within a very short time. Of course this doesn't apply to early or mid game, but late game.
So basically, not having MBS will cause players to concentrate much more on the macro side (the micro players will have less and less success as time goes on) and will cause them to get more and more sloppy with their armies (A+click, let many units die) and more and more risky/greedy with their build orders.

It's not a questionable skill, it is a skill.

And personally, I like the shift of focus that happens as you move from early game to midgame, from midgame to late game and from late game to extreme late game (when it basically becomes a micro map).
Moderatortell the guy that interplanatar interaction is pivotal to terrans variety of optionitudals in the pre-midgame preperatories as well as the protosstinal deterriggation of elite zergling strikes - Stimey n | Formerly FrozenArbiter
alffla
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Hong Kong20321 Posts
September 05 2007 13:47 GMT
#163
On September 05 2007 22:29 Fen wrote:

Btw for anyone who thinks they can mutltitask. Place your hands in front of you with your two fingers pointing together. Now rotate ure fingers around each other in the same direction. After youve done that, rotate them in the opposite direction. Then After than try and rotate them in different directions at the same time. If you can do so, PM me because you are one of the few people in the world who are able to actually multitask.


done

it wasn't really that hard >_> i think the one hand with closed fist going up and down and 1 open palm sliding forwards and backwards thing is harder lol
Graphicssavior[gm] : What is a “yawn” rape ;; Masumune - It was the year of the pig for those fucking defilers. Chill - A clinic you say? okum: SC without Korean yelling is like porn without sex. konamix: HAPPY BIRTHDAY MOMMY!
Fen
Profile Blog Joined June 2006
Australia1848 Posts
September 05 2007 13:49 GMT
#164
On September 05 2007 19:17 Brutalisk wrote:
It's less important to take care of your troops than simply reproducing them. Reproducing them is hard, so it is a (questionable) skill, but the problem is that it's more rewarding. I can simply choose to have 10 zealots die doing almost nothing (at least much less damage that they could have done) when I can rebuild them from 10 gateways within a very short time. Of course this doesn't apply to early or mid game, but late game.
So basically, not having MBS will cause players to concentrate much more on the macro side (the micro players will have less and less success as time goes on) and will cause them to get more and more sloppy with their armies (A+click, let many units die) and more and more risky/greedy with their build orders.


Ok I think this is the fourth time ive argued this point in the last 2 days. Getting kinda annoying because the point keeps coming up and the proMBS ppl seem to think it really supports their cause.

In starcraft units range from the shit units to the good units. A Zealot is a shit unit. The Zealots role is to absorb damage and to force a player to take em out before they get close. They cost 100 minerals (bugger all). They are an expendable unit. So yes, you dont care when they die and you build more to replace without problems. Lets look at a carrier now. A carrier is a good unit. It does large amounts of damage, cost a lot of money, and is high up in the tech tree. If a carrier dies, its a big deal. You dont just attack move a bunch of carriers into an enemy force of goliathsm forget about them and build more, because they are worth something. This is a gameplay style of starcraft. Crap units are expendable and therefore you use them throughout the game as meatshields or extra damage etc. It doesnt matter when they die. Good units are expensive and hard to produce, you protect these units because they are the real might of your army. They are the factor that will cause you to win or lose a game.

The expendability of crap units in no way supports or works against MBS, or macro at all. These units are part of a structure that starcraft has which makes crap units worth getting even in the late stages of a game
Liquid`Jinro
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
Sweden33719 Posts
Last Edited: 2007-09-05 14:00:10
September 05 2007 13:52 GMT
#165
On September 05 2007 22:47 alffla wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 05 2007 22:29 Fen wrote:

Btw for anyone who thinks they can mutltitask. Place your hands in front of you with your two fingers pointing together. Now rotate ure fingers around each other in the same direction. After youve done that, rotate them in the opposite direction. Then After than try and rotate them in different directions at the same time. If you can do so, PM me because you are one of the few people in the world who are able to actually multitask.


done

it wasn't really that hard >_> i think the one hand with closed fist going up and down and 1 open palm sliding forwards and backwards thing is harder lol

I think that one is WAY easier haha T_T
This one was hard for me aka I havent succeeded yet.

Ahhhh it feels like moving into a wall when I try to do th is. Mind goes like blank when I try to figure out how I should be moving them.
Moderatortell the guy that interplanatar interaction is pivotal to terrans variety of optionitudals in the pre-midgame preperatories as well as the protosstinal deterriggation of elite zergling strikes - Stimey n | Formerly FrozenArbiter
Fen
Profile Blog Joined June 2006
Australia1848 Posts
September 05 2007 13:52 GMT
#166
On September 05 2007 22:47 alffla wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 05 2007 22:29 Fen wrote:

Btw for anyone who thinks they can mutltitask. Place your hands in front of you with your two fingers pointing together. Now rotate ure fingers around each other in the same direction. After youve done that, rotate them in the opposite direction. Then After than try and rotate them in different directions at the same time. If you can do so, PM me because you are one of the few people in the world who are able to actually multitask.


done

it wasn't really that hard >_> i think the one hand with closed fist going up and down and 1 open palm sliding forwards and backwards thing is harder lol


Im calling BS on that, Brain physiology doesnt allow it. Im assuming that your doing it wrong. Its not the same as rubbing your tummy and patting your head. Both of these actions at the same time require the same nerve to give different signals, a nerve can only produce 1 signal at a time.

If you still beleive you can do it, make a video, ill be glad to watch it
mikeymoo
Profile Blog Joined October 2006
Canada7170 Posts
September 05 2007 14:23 GMT
#167
On September 05 2007 22:52 Fen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 05 2007 22:47 alffla wrote:
On September 05 2007 22:29 Fen wrote:

Btw for anyone who thinks they can mutltitask. Place your hands in front of you with your two fingers pointing together. Now rotate ure fingers around each other in the same direction. After youve done that, rotate them in the opposite direction. Then After than try and rotate them in different directions at the same time. If you can do so, PM me because you are one of the few people in the world who are able to actually multitask.


done

it wasn't really that hard >_> i think the one hand with closed fist going up and down and 1 open palm sliding forwards and backwards thing is harder lol


Im calling BS on that, Brain physiology doesnt allow it. Im assuming that your doing it wrong. Its not the same as rubbing your tummy and patting your head. Both of these actions at the same time require the same nerve to give different signals, a nerve can only produce 1 signal at a time.

If you still beleive you can do it, make a video, ill be glad to watch it


Just because he's "one in the few" (personally I think SC players would be better at this anyway) doesn't mean he's doing it wrong. I did it too. Maybe I'm wrong as well?

Let me get this straight.

Start with two fingers pointing at each other. Rotate them, say, clockwise. Then counterclockwise. Then in opposite directions?
o_x | Ow. | 1003 ESPORTS dollars | If you have any questions about bans please PM Kennigit
Fen
Profile Blog Joined June 2006
Australia1848 Posts
September 05 2007 14:27 GMT
#168
yep, place your hands in front of you, with your index fingers pointing together (not touching)
Now its easy to rotate em around each other in the same direction, its easy rotate em around each other in the opposite direction. But virtually impossible to do different directions at the same time without looking like a total goof.
lololol
Profile Joined February 2006
5198 Posts
September 05 2007 14:31 GMT
#169
I thought this thread was about MBS and automine???
I'll call Nada.
alffla
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Hong Kong20321 Posts
September 05 2007 14:33 GMT
#170
On September 05 2007 23:27 Fen wrote:
yep, place your hands in front of you, with your index fingers pointing together (not touching)
Now its easy to rotate em around each other in the same direction, its easy rotate em around each other in the opposite direction. But virtually impossible to do different directions at the same time without looking like a total goof.


wtf seriously are you sure? i'm uploading a video soon

and lolololol who cares about MBS and automine this is much more interesting
Graphicssavior[gm] : What is a “yawn” rape ;; Masumune - It was the year of the pig for those fucking defilers. Chill - A clinic you say? okum: SC without Korean yelling is like porn without sex. konamix: HAPPY BIRTHDAY MOMMY!
alffla
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Hong Kong20321 Posts
Last Edited: 2007-09-05 14:57:19
September 05 2007 14:38 GMT
#171
http://www.youtube.com/v/o4NbJjbRRiM

:/

FENFENFENFENFNEFENFENFEN IS THIS RIGHT?
Graphicssavior[gm] : What is a “yawn” rape ;; Masumune - It was the year of the pig for those fucking defilers. Chill - A clinic you say? okum: SC without Korean yelling is like porn without sex. konamix: HAPPY BIRTHDAY MOMMY!
Brutalisk
Profile Joined February 2007
794 Posts
Last Edited: 2007-09-05 14:45:02
September 05 2007 14:39 GMT
#172
On September 05 2007 22:32 FrozenArbiter wrote:
All these features add to the micro aspect of the game. So you add to the micro, remove a lot of the macro, what do you get? The balance between the two is ruined, I want these new features you speak of, they seem fun and cool but they should not be added instead of macro, it's like removing rushing from the game and adding some cool late game scenario instead.
[/b]

The balance is already ruined! Making macro tedious and "hard" made micro less important. We need micro to become more important again. I've noticed how BW turned from a micro-based game into a macro-based one. And I don't want SC2 to "suffer" the same fate.

@ Fen:
Yes the zealot is a "crap" unit, but that doesn't mean that you pointlessly waste it. I'm not even talking about using it as a meatshield, which would be a useful tactic. I'm really talking about making the mistake of sending them into certain death (e.g. sending them in a group of lurkers) without having any advantage from it. But also no big disadvantage, because you need only ~15 seconds to rebuild them all. And that's the problem, and the reason why BW has become a macro game: in late game it's often about rebuilding your stuff faster than your opponent, the rest is A+click. (Yes I'm exaggerating, of course there is micro needed with some units, but not nearly enough to be as important as macroing).
lololol
Profile Joined February 2006
5198 Posts
Last Edited: 2007-09-05 15:04:23
September 05 2007 14:46 GMT
#173
OMG, alffla, I'm DEEPLY offended and I will delete my helpful post about your K-line!

P.S. Don't spam the D2 thread ^_^

P.S.S. Yes, BW is a macro game and SC2 needs to tip the balance in favor of micro and MBS and automining are the right choice.
I'll call Nada.
Fen
Profile Blog Joined June 2006
Australia1848 Posts
Last Edited: 2007-09-05 14:57:28
September 05 2007 14:49 GMT
#174
On September 05 2007 23:39 Brutalisk wrote:
@ Fen:
Yes the zealot is a "crap" unit, but that doesn't mean that you pointlessly waste it. I'm not even talking about using it as a meatshield, which would be a useful tactic. I'm really talking about making the mistake of sending them into certain death (e.g. sending them in a group of lurkers) without having any advantage from it. But also no big disadvantage, because you need only ~15 seconds to rebuild them all. And that's the problem, and the reason why BW has become a macro game: in late game it's often about rebuilding your stuff faster than your opponent, the rest is A+click. (Yes I'm exaggerating, of course there is micro needed with some units, but not nearly enough to be as important as macroing).


No-one said that you deliberatly waste it, but yeha if you lose it late game when your economy is going, its not so bad, its a crap unit. At the start of the game, a zealot is importnat but it loses that value as the game goes on. The expensive units however will never reach that status unless your playing fastest or somehting. This is a gameplay style of starcraft. Why should you bother microing your crappy units, they are there to die, if you lose them due to mistake, ok bad luck. If you lose your 8 carriers due to mistake, you probs gonna have to GG pretty soon.

EDIT: Affla - Wow Im surprised at how well you can do that, thats beyond what the average person can do. Granted the motion isnt as fluid as when your going the same way, but remember that is very simple multitasking, the human brain is not good at multitasking. That would have required a decent amount of concentration to pull off. Even though youve surprised me and pulled it off, it doesnt change the fact that multitasking is still damn hard.
Liquid`Jinro
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
Sweden33719 Posts
September 05 2007 15:08 GMT
#175
On September 05 2007 23:46 lololol wrote:
OMG, alffla, I'm DEEPLY offended and I will delete my helpful post about your K-line!

P.S. Don't spam the D2 thread ^_^

P.S.S. Yes, BW is a macro game and SC2 needs to tip the balance in favor of micro and MBS and automining are the right choice.

wtf no
If you want a micro game, go play war3.

BW has a shitload of micro, no need to make the balance 90% micro 10% macro like in war3, the 40/60 of BW is fine.
Moderatortell the guy that interplanatar interaction is pivotal to terrans variety of optionitudals in the pre-midgame preperatories as well as the protosstinal deterriggation of elite zergling strikes - Stimey n | Formerly FrozenArbiter
Liquid`Jinro
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
Sweden33719 Posts
Last Edited: 2007-09-05 15:13:56
September 05 2007 15:12 GMT
#176
On September 05 2007 23:39 Brutalisk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 05 2007 22:32 FrozenArbiter wrote:
All these features add to the micro aspect of the game. So you add to the micro, remove a lot of the macro, what do you get? The balance between the two is ruined, I want these new features you speak of, they seem fun and cool but they should not be added instead of macro, it's like removing rushing from the game and adding some cool late game scenario instead.


The balance is already ruined! Making macro tedious and "hard" made micro less important. We need micro to become more important again. I've noticed how BW turned from a micro-based game into a macro-based one. And I don't want SC2 to "suffer" the same fate.
[/b]
Macro is not tedious.

BW has not gone from micro to macro, it's just that everyone (pro) has sick micro nowadays so it doesn't stand out the way it did in the past when only a few people had sick micro and most had avg. macro.

+ A lot of it is how playstyle and maps have changed, BW could become what it was years ago if balance changes were made that nerfed the power of fast expanding.

@ Fen:
Yes the zealot is a "crap" unit, but that doesn't mean that you pointlessly waste it. I'm not even talking about using it as a meatshield, which would be a useful tactic. I'm really talking about making the mistake of sending them into certain death (e.g. sending them in a group of lurkers) without having any advantage from it. But also no big disadvantage, because you need only ~15 seconds to rebuild them all. And that's the problem, and the reason why BW has become a macro game: in late game it's often about rebuilding your stuff faster than your opponent, the rest is A+click. (Yes I'm exaggerating, of course there is micro needed with some units, but not nearly enough to be as important as macroing).

Uh you still need to control your units late game, but the fact that the balance between micro/macro tips in macros favour doesnt bother me at all, once you get into extreme lategame suddenly the macro aspect is all but gone, just as it is in early game.
Moderatortell the guy that interplanatar interaction is pivotal to terrans variety of optionitudals in the pre-midgame preperatories as well as the protosstinal deterriggation of elite zergling strikes - Stimey n | Formerly FrozenArbiter
Fen
Profile Blog Joined June 2006
Australia1848 Posts
September 05 2007 15:14 GMT
#177
On September 05 2007 23:46 lololol wrote:
Yes, BW is a macro game and SC2 needs to tip the balance in favor of micro and MBS and automining are the right choice.


Err, No, Starcraft is about expanding your base to cover the map, building large armies and clashing them together and effectivly being in charge of a war machine, not moving a few units around and killing everything with them.
Liquid`Jinro
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
Sweden33719 Posts
September 05 2007 15:29 GMT
#178
On September 05 2007 23:38 alffla wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/v/o4NbJjbRRiM

:/

FENFENFENFENFNEFENFENFEN IS THIS RIGHT?

My fingers hurt. I dont think I've managed a full circle yet --
Moderatortell the guy that interplanatar interaction is pivotal to terrans variety of optionitudals in the pre-midgame preperatories as well as the protosstinal deterriggation of elite zergling strikes - Stimey n | Formerly FrozenArbiter
lololol
Profile Joined February 2006
5198 Posts
Last Edited: 2007-09-05 15:48:56
September 05 2007 15:46 GMT
#179
On September 06 2007 00:14 Fen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 05 2007 23:46 lololol wrote:
Yes, BW is a macro game and SC2 needs to tip the balance in favor of micro and MBS and automining are the right choice.


Err, No, Starcraft is about expanding your base to cover the map, building large armies and clashing them together and effectivly being in charge of a war machine, not moving a few units around and killing everything with them.


You're describing SupCom.

On September 06 2007 00:08 FrozenArbiter wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 05 2007 23:46 lololol wrote:
OMG, alffla, I'm DEEPLY offended and I will delete my helpful post about your K-line!

P.S. Don't spam the D2 thread ^_^

P.S.S. Yes, BW is a macro game and SC2 needs to tip the balance in favor of micro and MBS and automining are the right choice.

wtf no
If you want a micro game, go play war3.

BW has a shitload of micro, no need to make the balance 90% micro 10% macro like in war3, the 40/60 of BW is fine.


If you want a macro game go play SupCom.
War3 micro is NOTHING like BW micro.
I'll call Nada.
Doctorasul
Profile Blog Joined October 2004
Romania1145 Posts
September 05 2007 15:48 GMT
#180
I think the solution has been posted before, and that is keep MBS and automine but introduce new strictly macro tasks that are very difficult to execute perfectly without compromising some micro, more than just warpgates. It's the guys at Blizz that have the creativity to come up with them, but I really think it's the only way to satisfy both pro and anti MBS and automine players.

Oh, and this is my go on the finger thingy
"I believe in Spinoza's god who reveals himself in the harmony of all that exists, but not in a god who concerns himself with the fate and actions of human beings." - Albert Einstein
Prev 1 7 8 9 10 11 22 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV European League
16:00
Swiss Groups Day 3
Krystianer vs YoungYakovLIVE!
WardiTV1136
TKL 345
IndyStarCraft 261
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
TKL 345
IndyStarCraft 261
BRAT_OK 131
MindelVK 47
StarCraft: Brood War
Mini 1098
Bisu 1040
EffOrt 651
firebathero 342
Soulkey 267
Dewaltoss 53
Aegong 45
Dota 2
Gorgc11029
qojqva2421
League of Legends
Grubby3224
Counter-Strike
pashabiceps702
oskar650
byalli649
flusha370
Foxcn281
sgares106
Stewie2K36
Super Smash Bros
AZ_Axe19
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu411
Other Games
tarik_tv22421
gofns16469
FrodaN2111
Beastyqt751
ceh9622
ToD189
elazer166
KnowMe143
mouzStarbuck123
Trikslyr57
QueenE48
Sick2
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick53430
BasetradeTV3
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 20 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Reevou 3
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix6
• Pr0nogo 2
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota2520
• Ler118
League of Legends
• Jankos2196
• TFBlade1454
Other Games
• Scarra1892
• imaqtpie1600
• Shiphtur291
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Monday
4h 37m
The PondCast
14h 37m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
20h 37m
WardiTV European League
20h 37m
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
Replay Cast
1d 4h
RSL Revival
1d 14h
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
Classic vs Cure
FEL
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
[ Show More ]
FEL
3 days
FEL
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL Season 20
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.