EPTTY: Second Sunrise - Rank 7 - Road to BlizzCon - Page 2
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Argonauta
Spain4948 Posts
| ||
|
Elentos
55550 Posts
On October 20 2017 02:12 Charoisaur wrote: soO above TY is a joke. But I guess with soO playing for Twice Liquid the TL bias is going strong there They both hardly played in anything with the added bonus of TY failing in the Super Tournament qualifiers. Like I personally think TY is stronger than soO atm, but there's so little recent data (65 games in 2 months for TY, 127 in 2 months for soO) that you can essentially make this a toss up. | ||
|
Otsdarva
4 Posts
On October 20 2017 00:00 JWD[9] wrote: I always wonder if Mizenhauer is a native speaker or my english is just bad. Why would you call TY a prodigal talent? I think by "prodigal" they meant "prodigious". Those two words are often confused but they have very different meanings. I think "prodigious talent" would be appropriate in context. | ||
|
Charoisaur
Germany15961 Posts
On October 20 2017 02:54 Elentos wrote: They both hardly played in anything with the added bonus of TY failing in the Super Tournament qualifiers. Like I personally think TY is stronger than soO atm, but there's so little recent data (65 games in 2 months for TY, 127 in 2 months for soO) that you can essentially make this a toss up. GSL vs the world was relatively recent and TY made the finals there, trashing soO in the semis. | ||
|
JWD[9]
364 Posts
On October 20 2017 03:00 Otsdarva wrote: I think by "prodigal" they meant "prodigious". Those two words are often confused but they have very different meanings. I think "prodigious talent" would be appropriate in context. Yeah, this was one thing I was rather sure to be wrong. Though there are instances where his writing-style leaves me just confused. For example I never saw willing used in a context like this: "Those fans who had ardently, futilely willing him on up until that point, inadvertently spawned a new version of TY." What does it mean to will someone on? "He often seems far better suited of the role of fool than the all conquering hero." Is "suited of the role" a thing? Why does this only bother me, does noone else read these things? | ||
|
Fango
United Kingdom8987 Posts
On October 20 2017 03:39 Charoisaur wrote: GSL vs the world was relatively recent and TY made the finals there, trashing soO in the semis. ZvT has been soO's weakness for years. Any decent KR terran could probably trash him even if he is the better player overall | ||
|
starkiller123
United States4030 Posts
On October 20 2017 03:45 JWD[9] wrote: Yeah, this was one thing I was rather sure to be wrong. Though there are instances where his writing-style leaves me just confused. For example I never saw willing used in a context like this: "Those fans who had ardently, futilely willing him on up until that point, inadvertently spawned a new version of TY." What does it mean to will someone on? "He often seems far better suited of the role of fool than the all conquering hero." Is "suited of the role" a thing? Why does this only bother me, does noone else read these things? It makes perfect sense to me, are you a native English speaker? | ||
|
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
On October 20 2017 03:52 Fango wrote: ZvT has been soO's weakness for years. Any decent KR terran could probably trash him even if he is the better player overall soO beat Elentos in the LRTL so I'm willing to give his ZvT some credit. | ||
|
Otsdarva
4 Posts
On October 20 2017 04:17 starkiller123 wrote: It makes perfect sense to me, are you a native English speaker? I'm a native English speaker...and while it's easy enough to understand what Miz is trying to say, there's a lot of tense confusion (had willing makes no sense, should read "had been willing") that could make some clauses ambiguous. Also, one is suited *to* a role, not "of" a role. It bothers me too, but to me it's just another grammatically imperfect post on the internet and generally not worth commenting on in terms of word choice and mechanics. I'd much rather complain about sOs and Maru not making it (again). | ||
|
[PkF] Wire
France24202 Posts
| ||
|
JWD[9]
364 Posts
On October 20 2017 04:17 starkiller123 wrote: It makes perfect sense to me, are you a native English speaker? No I am not, that is why I wonder.  | ||
|
JWD[9]
364 Posts
On October 20 2017 04:30 Otsdarva wrote: I'm a native English speaker...and while it's easy enough to understand what Miz is trying to say, there's a lot of tense confusion (had willing makes no sense, should read "had been willing") that could make some clauses ambiguous. Also, one is suited *to* a role, not "of" a role. It bothers me too, but to me it's just another grammatically imperfect post on the internet and generally not worth commenting on in terms of word choice and mechanics. I'd much rather complain about sOs and Maru not making it (again). As a non-native it is a little like reading Herman Melville, just with mistakes. So I have to look up many words and get confused, when someone with a much bigger vocabulary makes mistakes. That is why it bothered me, I guess I better stick to reading books until I have more confidence in my english. :< Thanks by the way, really needed a native's perspective on this. | ||
Mizenhauer
United States1876 Posts
On October 20 2017 04:39 JWD[9] wrote: As a non-native it is a little like reading Herman Melville, just with mistakes. So I have to look up many words and get confused, when someone with a much bigger vocabulary makes mistakes. That is why it bothered me, I guess I better stick to reading books until I have more confidence in my english. :< Thanks by the way, really needed a native's perspective on this. Writers and editors aren't perfect at catching every error. We do our best. | ||
|
JWD[9]
364 Posts
On October 20 2017 04:42 mizenhauer wrote: Writers and editors aren't perfect at catching every error. We do our best. Hey man. You cleary put effort and emphasis on lively writing. What I really appreciate are the actual points you make. Your articles have a very nice structure to it. I was wondering though, if there might is too much focus on colorful words and not enough on keeping scentences succinct an clear. I would have never guessed you had an editor, then your best has to become better as I deliberately didn't point out the typos. | ||
|
Drfilip
Sweden590 Posts
| ||
|
Boggyb
2855 Posts
On October 20 2017 03:52 Fango wrote: ZvT has been soO's weakness for years. Any decent KR terran could probably trash him even if he is the better player overall I wouldn't read too much into SSL Challenger since some players barely tried (e.g. Rogue some weeks), but soO went 3-0 in the second stage beating Bunny (3-2), ByuN (3-1), and jjakji (3-2). | ||
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
| ||
|
Boggyb
2855 Posts
On October 20 2017 06:42 Shellshock wrote: TY should be #1 on potential alone. In 15 years when he's finally 20 years old he'll break out. so young Rogue's sexiness > TY's potential. | ||
|
Cricketer12
United States13974 Posts
On October 20 2017 06:42 Shellshock wrote: TY should be #1 on potential alone. In 15 years when he's finally 20 years old he'll break out. so young What a hidden bongjwa. Amazing Boxer didn't find him. | ||
|
seopthi
391 Posts
On October 20 2017 07:01 Cricketer12 wrote: What a hidden bongjwa. Amazing Boxer didn't find him. I remember when sc2 came out, Boxer thought the sc2 bonjwa could be KeeN | ||
| ||
