EPTAfreeca reveals GSL details for 2017 - Page 3
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37101 Posts
| ||
|
Elentos
55593 Posts
On December 22 2016 03:20 Seeker wrote: Not really sure if we can categorize players as "A-team/B-team" players anymore. There are no more teams they're representing. Saying B-teamers is still the easiest way to summarize players like Hush, Impact, etc. though. Because what we associate with B-teamers is not just that they're often not used in team leagues but also that they struggle to break through in individual leagues. | ||
|
JimmyJRaynor
Canada17737 Posts
On December 21 2016 21:35 Olli wrote: The sustainability of GSL comes before anything else. With three seasons of GSL, they were always going to have to cut down on something - and I'm perfectly fine with that being Code A. I can tell that the Admins here are pretty smart because they agree with me.  | ||
|
Cluster__
United States328 Posts
| ||
|
alukarD
Mexico396 Posts
| ||
|
AKAvg
Brazil298 Posts
Surprised, really. I wanted to be hyped by my passion died with Proleague  | ||
|
jedi1982
United States172 Posts
| ||
|
Cashling
United States49 Posts
| ||
|
rednusa
651 Posts
| ||
|
Samba
Germany452 Posts
| ||
|
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
On December 22 2016 02:03 Thax wrote: Welcome to how SC2 works for the rest of the world. I don't know how many foreign pros can live with the money they get from teams tbh. But even so, it still changes the situation in korea negatively. It being like that in the rest of the world might be true, but doesn't affect koreans at all. It will be harder to get better, the best players might be ok with streaming and living off earned money for a bit and other players might need to retire because they have no real chance to compete anymore. Especially now that you only have 32 players who get money from GSL. So yeah i expect quite a lot of retirements :/ | ||
|
KappaKingPrime
United States468 Posts
On December 22 2016 07:27 rednusa wrote: Does this mean the end of Wolf and Valdes for sc2 casting? Seems like it, Wolf is already quite busy casting Overwatch. | ||
|
Devolved
United States2753 Posts
It's pretty awesome Afreeca is expanding GSL even when most of the Korean teams disbanded. I'm looking forward to it. | ||
|
MilkDud
Canada73 Posts
It's pretty awesome Afreeca is expanding GSL even when most of the Korean teams disbanded. I'm looking forward to it. I agree. It is the best we can hope for until SC3. | ||
|
Silvana
3713 Posts
gonna miss Code A tho, in terms of fun it delivered more than the main tournament a lot of times. | ||
|
BronzeKnee
United States5225 Posts
On December 21 2016 21:35 Olli wrote: The sustainability of GSL comes before anything else. With three seasons of GSL, they were always going to have to cut down on something - and I'm perfectly fine with that being Code A. You're starting to sound like the guy running Sears and K-mart into the ground... "well the business is failing anyway, so let's cut costs where we can so we can hold onto it as long as possible to milk it..." The problem with getting rid of Code A is that is begins to erode the future player base that is necessary for a sustainable future. But you've already predicted doom for the future too... On December 21 2016 19:03 Olli wrote: Pretty sure it won't. There's not enough new talent coming up anyway. And people say I am the negative one. We've got to have hope that Blizzard will make the game more enjoyable so it will attract more players and the scene can rebuild itself. Of course, if you incorrectly diagnose why SC2 is failing, you can't correct the course. On December 22 2016 03:36 JimmyJRaynor wrote: I can tell that the Admins here are pretty smart because they agree with me. That is funny because I was thinking exactly the opposite, thinking this is some Jimmy would write | ||
|
JimmyJRaynor
Canada17737 Posts
On December 23 2016 00:00 BronzeKnee wrote: Of course, if you incorrectly diagnose why SC2 is failing, you can't correct the course. SC2 is doing fine especially considering its Blizzard's #6 priority. Pacman and Space Invaders are "failing" though. | ||
|
N30Z
19 Posts
Yeah, they're getting rid of some things. But they're also looking for new ideas so that's heart warming. | ||
| ||
