• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 21:51
CEST 03:51
KST 10:51
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall9HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL50Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?12FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event16Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster16Weekly Cups (June 16-22): Clem strikes back1
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Statistics for vetoed/disliked maps Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster How does the number of casters affect your enjoyment of esports?
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Semi Finals & Finals $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event HomeStory Cup 27 (June 27-29)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady
Brood War
General
Help: rep cant save Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall Player “Jedi” cheat on CSL
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Trading/Investing Thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Blogs
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 583 users

Production Note of ‘New Gettysburg’

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
1 2 Next All
Jacky_
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Korea (South)47 Posts
July 08 2016 08:18 GMT
#1
#0

[image loading]

It’s the first original map since 792 days; this is SK Telecom Starcraft II Proleague 2016 Season – 3rd Round new map, New Gettysburg.

'New Gettysburg' is famous for being a core region on Tarsonis of planet where Sara Kerrigan was taken by the Zerg, and ‘Gettysburg’, a motif of 'New Gettysburg' was a ferocious battlefield of the Civil War.

Later on, Gettysburg became the watershed of the Civil War. This map is named as such to hope for great matches reminiscent of the cutthroat battles of the Civil War.

I release production note of ‘New Gettysburg’ for the first time. I want to show the processes and intentions in making an official map. Perhaps, a map may seem very simple but it needs constantly thinking and improvement to complete it.

This Column may be heavy, I write to ease understanding at most. I hope to be interesting for Starcraft II officials, community users and map freaks.


#1 Understanding the map-meta.

Acting as an official map creator, I have made many maps to show for new and fun match. But not all maps were good. Among the maps, I recently made ‘Sky Shield’ which is also hard to be remembered as a good map.

[image loading]
Record of Sky Shield’ used by 2016 GSL Season 1. It is bad balance except for ZvP.

Upon this problem, I need to think more about ‘Legacy Of The Void’’s map.

Recently, Blizzard has used large maps such as ‘Lerilak Crest’ and ‘Dusk Towers’ in ladder pool. Early in LOTV, we couldn’t watch smooth games. On ‘Lerilak Crest’, players used aggressive strategy, since natural was wide open, ‘Central Protocol’ was the same. But ‘Dusk Towers’ showed different results.

Early in LOTV, the Starcraft II map community didn’t prefer the map liked ‘Dusk Tower’. Large map is hard to do SimCity and to arrange troops. But as time went by, it showed a good balance and varied matches. I thought it was suitable for LOTV to analyse a few maps for my next map.


#2 Analysing ‘Dusk Towers’

[image loading]

First, through analysing ‘Dusk Towers’, I focus on showing more stable and fun matches. Its core level design elements are as below.
  • The natural of ‘Dusk towers’ is large like that of ‘Lerilak Crest’, but not unstable. It has the backdoor natural. When player gets the natural, it is enough to produce troops.

  • But the natural must not large in maps where player has to get the natural first. Otherwise, it thickens the aggressive tendency as ‘Lerilak Crest’ showed.

  • Central outpost expansions have been used. In other words, It is bad balance, since for Terran it is easy to defend and to attack. However, ‘Dusk Towers’ also has central one, but it is away from main battlefield. So it is hard to act as outpost.

  • It is actually close direction, you have to across narrow path if you go to the shortest distance. In late game, it is tough for large-scale troops are to cross the shortest route. Thus, it has an effect that troops bypass by way of wide path.

  • Being close in late game, player uses wide path frequently. Therefore, player can attack and defend expansions are located outline naturally. Map being used widely is indication of good flow.

  • Player can secure next expansion selectively after getting the natural, and there is made to be advantage and disadvantage for each. Central expansion is close to defend easily from the natural but it adjoins to a harrassable hill. The other is farther from the natural than central one but it is farther from enemy than central one.

  • Extruded terrain to the enemy’s main direction on rich expansion is probably to encourage using Swarm Host.
    (‘Rogue’ introduced it : [SPL2016] Rogue(Jin Air) vs Dark(SKT) Set1 - 11:50~)

  • It is important to spread units due to the addition of the Liberator, Disruptor, Lurker, etc. that can range attack in LOTV. So ‘Dusk Towers’ is designed to be a large battlefield.

  • Large fly zone behind the natural gives a chance for the opponent to harrass the backdoor natural. This design prevents boring matchs where players just get the natural and the third to concentrate on gathering resources.

#3 Analysing ‘Ulrena’

[image loading]

I think the only remaining season 1 ladder maps, ‘Ulrena’, along with ‘Dusk Towers’ also needs analysis. Generally, many strategic games through the short route occurs in this map, and so it presents another fun aspect where small troops fight each other fiercely.
  • Since aggressive play occurs at high frequencies due to short rush distance, the map is designed such that players can easely defend their expansions. The natural and the third are close together, and afterwards there are series of expansions.

  • If troops of medium-size attack the enemy through the rush route, they’ll be destroyed one by one. So ‘Ulrena’ encourages the players to use the terrain on the right side after the mid game. Also, players can block the short distance perfectly by building cheap buildings such as ‘Supply Depot’ and ‘Pylon’.

  • Xel`Naga Tower on the rush route highlights the importantance of the short distance in the mid-late game. When player secures it, he or she can detect enemy troops in the short air route.

  • Most of all, we can watch dynamic matches not seen in other maps.

‘Ulrena’ showed many strategic games to suit its concept, but couldn’t avoid a few negative results.
  • Because of its short rush distance, aggressive strategies were frequent. Thus, many players couldn’t defend the enemy despite the fact that they knew about the attack. So this map was stressful for some.

  • The island expansion has rich mineral fields, but it is structured such that players can’t secure it in practice. It is very close to enemy’s main and player can see the creep of hatchery in it though the Xel’Naga Tower.

  • Troops of mid-size or more use wide path, not short one. However, players only used the middle path after destroying the destructible debris, instead of using the east of this map. This is bad because only part of the map was used.

However, like ‘Dusk Towers’, ‘Ulrena’ is pretty successful map . It demonstrated which map design is suitable. Currently, Blizzard has a policy of using maps of various styles, ‘Ulrena’ is suitable for this.


#4 From the Player’s Point of View

[image loading]

While some like new maps, other don’t, because of excessive concept and imbalance, it is hard for players to adjust through normal play styles. For example, in the recently excluded ‘Korhal Carnage Knockout’, If a player isn't familiar with the map, he or she would not know the starting position of the enemy. Rock tower and shared main to main base also confuses players.

Map creator may think that the general player can easly adjust to a concept map, but not everyone is professional about map design. Some may say that ‘This map is very complicated’. Not all Starcraft II players are ‘diamond’, ‘master’ and ‘grand master’ rankers; new and novel map may require a lot of time to player to adjust to it. We play game for fun, not to study. Even progamers need time and lots of games to familiarize to the maps.

So I made goal for my next to be to 'reflect the existing elements well'. If novel element is added in the map, I think they should be intuitive to players and clear. However, existing elements should be maintained.


#5 Participating TLMC (TeamLiquid Map Contest)

Some maps of TLMC Finalist are selected as ladder maps. The 7th TLMC was the first map contest of LOTV. In other words, It was an opportunity to have the first ladders maps for LOTV.

I had been making tournament map for progamers. However, this time, I participated in TLMC to make the ladder map that all Starcraft II players enjoy.

[image loading]
Process of Making ‘New Gettysburg’

[image loading]
Early Version of TLMC#7

Personally, ‘Ulrena’ is very appealing, but it gives negative experiences to players. Since it has a very short rush distance, its positive elements are forgotten. For example, the army movement in the early game created a tense atmosphere which is enjoyable for payers and viewers alike.

[image loading]

To complement these disadvantages, I decided to apply the advantage of ‘Akilon Wastes’. In HOTS, this was the map which set an example as a late game map. So, I applied the advantages of ‘Ulrena’ and ‘Akilon Wastes’ to ‘New Gettysburg’.


Strategic Element of ‘Ulrena’
  • Close distance between The Naturals: Closer than a macro map, but farther than 'Ulrena'. This induces nail-biting games.

  • Island Expansion: Used four island expansions (Now two.). Used 'Air-Blockers' for ease of defense.

  • Fly Zone behind The Natural: Allow for more strategic playstyles.

Economic Element of ‘Akilon Wastes'
  • Connected Expansions and Large Battlefield: Applied to allow for easily securable expansions and effective battles.

  • Simple Rush Path, Easy Defence: Intruduce general elements to be familiar for player. Easy defence induces the stable flow in both strategic and economic games.

  • Elements for Prolonged Games: Secureing the third induces economic game, since it is harder to harrass the natural and the main base.

[image loading]

I used a new element : ‘Air Blocker’ to make island expansion easier to defend and to encourage strategic use. To make it easily recognizable, I paint them red to highlight that it is not passable. When I applied them, I approach the island expansion to patch its disadvantages so that player can easily adapt to it.


#6 Change of View

[image loading]
Explanation of ‘New Gettysburg’ introduced 'TLMC7 Finalists Announced'

‘New Gettysburg’ entered the finalists of TLMC. The total of 15 maps is chosen by four categories (Macro, Rush, New and Gold)

Chosen 15 maps were used in the Map Test Tournament by BasetradeTV to test their balance through Starcraft II Progamers. This is arranged so that map creators could watch their map played and to alter balance or bugs before the final vote.

The best match of ‘New Gettysburg’ shown by Lambo(Z) vs. Beastyqt(T)

When the finalists are opened, ‘New Gettysburg’ was seen as a failed candidate. Looking at the overview, it looks monotonous, and a simple economic map. People thought that players wouldn’t take the island expansions. But through 9 times games in ‘New Gettysburg’, it was shown that the island expansion with ‘Air Blockers’ was not only enough to become a strategic element but also was able to show ecomomic games.

From the overview, it looked bland, but many people recognize the possibility of ‘New Gettysburg’ through Map Test Tournament and…


#7 Win the Map Contest

[image loading]

‘New Gettysburg’ won the map contest by the 7th TLMC opened.


#8 Closing the Column

Later on, ‘New Gettysburg’ was altered to reduce boring elements and it was chosen to be used as SK Telecom Starcraft II Proleague 2016 Season – 3 Round map. Starcraft II Balance Team also seem to view the map positively, so I look forward to the map in the future.

Through this map making process, I got the foothold about element of LOTV’s map in the future and it becomes a good opportunity to be recognised by others.

Actually, it was possible to suggest several candidate maps internally to become an official map. Yes, if an official map creator did not even place in the contest, his or her status will nosedive. But I thought that familiar and comfortable environment would make me lazy. if I want to make better maps. It becomes valuable experience to be for a 1st-generation Starcraft II map creator to be recognized even till now.

Finally, I would like to sincerely thank the Starcraft II balance design team, Rifkin, and KeSPA MisoPri(Donggu). Also, I want to also thank the voters and foreigner mapmakers who saw the possibilities of my map voted for it.

GL HF!




[image loading]
Written by Jacky (Geun ho Park)
Reviewed by Semmo (Sun woo Kim)
Presented by JACKMADE
Jacky || Starcraft2 Official Map Designer || Master of JACKMADE || jackmade.tistory.com/ || twitter.com/JackSolute
Shkudde
Profile Joined February 2011
Netherlands709 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-07-08 10:29:58
July 08 2016 10:28 GMT
#2
This is awesome, thank you!

Edit: Spotlight perchance?
$O$ | herO[jOin] | Zest hwaiting!
gab12
Profile Joined June 2016
Poland147 Posts
July 08 2016 11:05 GMT
#3
Great map cant wait to see it on ladder
iMrising
Profile Blog Joined March 2012
United States1099 Posts
July 08 2016 11:17 GMT
#4
Great insight. I now look forward to playing on it
$O$ | soO
Salteador Neo
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Andorra5591 Posts
July 08 2016 11:19 GMT
#5
I love that "making of" gif, heh :D

Sweet stuff!
Revolutionist fan
Silvana
Profile Blog Joined September 2013
3713 Posts
July 08 2016 13:48 GMT
#6
Absolutely loved this post. You tought me a few things about maps here

Congratulations on winning the TLMC! Keep up the good work!
Cyro
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom20285 Posts
July 08 2016 16:47 GMT
#7
Thanks for the post!
"oh my god my overclock... I got a single WHEA error on the 23rd hour, 9 minutes" -Belial88
BronzeKnee
Profile Joined March 2011
United States5217 Posts
July 08 2016 16:59 GMT
#8
It is good to see so much thinking put into maps. I do wonder how much thinking was put into maps like Slag Pits.
-NegativeZero-
Profile Joined August 2011
United States2141 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-07-08 18:02:46
July 08 2016 18:02 GMT
#9
On July 09 2016 01:59 BronzeKnee wrote:
It is good to see so much thinking put into maps. I do wonder how much thinking was put into maps like Slag Pits.

"hey david, the new ladder season starts tomorrow, but we've only got 6 maps right now. what should we do?"

"hmm... didn't we just get a new intern a couple days ago? why don't we let him take care of it?"

"you mean bob? he's doing software QA for WoW, i'm not sure he's even played starcraft, let alone touched the editor..."

"no problem, just show him a few of our maps, and i'm sure he'll be ok"
vibeo gane,
lastride
Profile Joined April 2014
2390 Posts
July 08 2016 18:58 GMT
#10
Thanks for the analysis. Great work indeed!
TwiggyWan
Profile Blog Joined December 2013
France329 Posts
July 08 2016 22:29 GMT
#11
Very good article that describes your good work very well!

Please do more of these in the future to explain map making concepts!
No bad days
Gen.Rolly
Profile Joined September 2011
United States200 Posts
July 09 2016 01:22 GMT
#12
Artists don't often share their craft, especially in such an open way, so thank you for that and keep up the great work!
Vector locked in.
TheHangman89
Profile Joined July 2016
1 Post
July 09 2016 01:37 GMT
#13
Very enlightening read!

Personally i have no issue with the short rush distance on Ulrena, the problem for me as a protoss player is walling in in PVZ. Because of the small natural, large ramp and proximity of the gases to the ramp, its very difficult to wall in properly on that map.

As a result of the large ramp and the awkward building placement, it is hard to make a good concave at the top of the ramp which gives a zerg player an advantage when attacking the protoss player. This is especially true when the Zerg uses a ravanger roach rush timing
Gwavajuice
Profile Joined June 2014
France1810 Posts
July 09 2016 02:09 GMT
#14
Thank you Sir!
Dear INno and all the former STX boys.
Turi
Profile Joined November 2011
Germany86 Posts
July 09 2016 09:44 GMT
#15
Just sad that your map does not work.
It is not your fault, but Blizzards pathfinding does not deal well with air blockers. Which means every map that does use them has a problem and should not be in a pool which is the basis for every high level tournament. And lets be clear, that is a bug, not a feature. If i give air units a move command, i expect all units to reach their target, no matter where i want them to go.

There is also the problem of the idea that maps like Ulrena open up "new and fun strategies". They do not.
All they do is to lock players in a very narrow range of strategies which are clearly superior to others. While every map favors certain strategies, good maps keep the difference small enough to allow for the widest range possible.
But here is Gettysburg not the worst offender, considering the horrible Desan Station and (after the chances Blizzard did) Galactic Process. In fact i thing Gettyburg damps down the early rush potential enough to allow for longer games, if you are good in defending.

I will still not play a single game on this map, as long as Blizzard does not fix it's pathfinding.
glacierxx
Profile Joined July 2016
1 Post
July 09 2016 19:53 GMT
#16
Didn't realize the islands were back to two, I suppose it's better for less air-blocker problems through the center of the map but I'm excited to try out this iteration! You did an excellent job and you can tell from your explanation how much thought went into it. We can feel this when we play it. Thanks for all your work.
Bill Murray
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States9292 Posts
July 09 2016 20:11 GMT
#17
I LOVE THIS MAP
University of Kentucky Basketball #1
Gwavajuice
Profile Joined June 2014
France1810 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-07-09 21:43:45
July 09 2016 21:43 GMT
#18
On July 09 2016 18:44 Turi wrote:
Just sad that your map does not work.
It is not your fault, but Blizzards pathfinding does not deal well with air blockers. Which means every map that does use them has a problem and should not be in a pool which is the basis for every high level tournament. And lets be clear, that is a bug, not a feature. If i give air units a move command, i expect all units to reach their target, no matter where i want them to go.

There is also the problem of the idea that maps like Ulrena open up "new and fun strategies". They do not.
All they do is to lock players in a very narrow range of strategies which are clearly superior to others. While every map favors certain strategies, good maps keep the difference small enough to allow for the widest range possible.
But here is Gettysburg not the worst offender, considering the horrible Desan Station and (after the chances Blizzard did) Galactic Process. In fact i thing Gettyburg damps down the early rush potential enough to allow for longer games, if you are good in defending.

I will still not play a single game on this map, as long as Blizzard does not fix it's pathfinding.


I respectfull disagree with all your statement.

1- the path thing is not an issue. To give you an example, every terran had some day a game where they are wrecking their opponent, outmacro, outmicro, better decision making, but the guy does not die and after a while you're like why the F this game is not over and you go to your factos and see 15 tanks (or 10 thors) stuck in corner cause the turret you added 10 mins ago blocked their way out. Every terran had this. Then they learnt and got this in a corner of their mind : "I must build my base so big units can get out"


With New Gettysburg it the same. Every player will have a game where a bunch units are goofing in the air blocker. And tehn we'll learn to babysit units and check minimap, and it will never happen again. We will even have better control on other map too cause we'll keep in mind that there is something between our base the opponent's and maybe we should pay attention to what happens to our units in this space.

2 - Ulrena was a decent map, with actually some long macro games, but as Jacky pointed out it caused stress to people to be under the threat of their opponent right from the very early game. But it was a good map, esp in the way bases 4, 5, 6, 7 were set.

So it was not a narrow set of strategies, just a very caustious early game into whatever style you like.

3- you haven't played glactic process with blizard changes, it's not available. If were not so fast to judge maybe it would have occured to your mind that 12 pool gling won't be in your base much beofre 2'15, and that speed lings will need 30 seconds to cross the whole map. To me there are reasonable possibilities taht T and P will be able to find a proper way to defend.

This change from blizzard could even be a good thing for this map which was very closed in early game.
Dear INno and all the former STX boys.
zyce
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States649 Posts
July 10 2016 19:57 GMT
#19
Amazing post! Thank you Jacky, you are a true legend.
Beauty is not the goal of competitive sports, but high-level sports are a prime venue for the expression of human beauty. The relation is roughly that of courage to war.
DSK
Profile Blog Joined February 2015
England1110 Posts
July 10 2016 20:17 GMT
#20
Very nice thread, analysis and explanation. Please do keep up the good work, Jacky
**@ YT: SC2POVs at https://www.youtube.com/c/SC2POVsTV | https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/SC2POVs @**
1 2 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
HSC 27: Groups C
CranKy Ducklings131
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 250
NeuroSwarm 164
CosmosSc2 68
StarCraft: Brood War
Aegong 59
NaDa 31
Icarus 7
League of Legends
JimRising 860
Counter-Strike
taco 1073
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox613
Other Games
summit1g9235
shahzam1384
Day[9].tv917
Artosis601
ViBE251
Mew2King91
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV129
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki11
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift5223
• Jankos1609
• masondota2758
Other Games
• Day9tv917
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
8h 10m
herO vs SHIN
Reynor vs Cure
OSC
11h 10m
WardiTV European League
14h 10m
Scarlett vs Percival
Jumy vs ArT
YoungYakov vs Shameless
uThermal vs Fjant
Nicoract vs goblin
Harstem vs Gerald
FEL
14h 10m
Korean StarCraft League
1d 1h
CranKy Ducklings
1d 8h
RSL Revival
1d 8h
FEL
1d 14h
RSL Revival
2 days
FEL
2 days
[ Show More ]
BSL: ProLeague
2 days
Dewalt vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-06-28
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.