EPTGOM switches free quality of GSL back to low - Page 13
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
REyeM
2674 Posts
| ||
|
SpazeNeko
Netherlands3 Posts
On June 10 2015 20:03 -Kyo- wrote: I hate when people lie to try to get you to give them their money. Their investment in stream equipment and venue has already been made. What should matter next is actually creating great content so that people then decide hey, they are worth giving money to after all. While I agree with the notion that they already bought the equipment, they do have other sources that cost money, sound/production/casters, etc. I don't agree with their step, but saying they have no other cost after buying equipment is a little short sighted imo. On June 10 2015 20:12 xM(Z wrote: does anyone even know what's the price difference between broadcasting in Low quality vs broadcasting in Medium?. i thought twitch gives quality settings on streams for free provided you get a number of X viewers. I thought you always broadcast on source quality, the changes made for the other qualities high, medium, and low are made in the dashboard. Also the bitrate changes, and actual scaling happens on the Twitch server side of things, so saying production cost increased because of streaming on medium is just blatantly lying to your "would be customers". | ||
|
y0su
Finland7871 Posts
On June 10 2015 20:32 SpazeNeko wrote: While I agree with the notion that they already bought the equipment, they do have other sources that cost money, sound/production/casters, etc. I don't agree with their step, but saying they have no other cost after buying equipment is a little short sighted imo. I thought you always broadcast on source quality, the changes made for the other qualities high, medium, and low are made in the dashboard. Also the bitrate changes, and actual scaling happens on the Twitch server side of things, so saying production cost increased because of streaming on medium is just blatantly lying to your "would be customers". The cost between HD and low (not even medium) is already paid for... (how else could subscribers watch HD?) | ||
|
-Kyo-
Japan1926 Posts
On June 10 2015 20:32 SpazeNeko wrote: While I agree with the notion that they already bought the equipment, they do have other sources that cost money, sound/production/casters, etc. I don't agree with their step, but saying they have no other cost after buying equipment is a little short sighted imo. I thought you always broadcast on source quality, the changes made for the other qualities high, medium, and low are made in the dashboard. Also the bitrate changes, and actual scaling happens on the Twitch server side of things, so saying production cost increased because of streaming on medium is just blatantly lying to your "would be customers". I would be understanding of this fact if it wasn't for the fact that none of the korean sites have a pay wall, all GSL(high wcs tournaments) are supposed to have 720p at least etc. etc. It's just a greedy justification, and when put into perspective they are literally just to try to make money off international fans. This alone wouldn't be a problem, because obviously companies have to make money, but to essentially make the tournament unwatchable and then say 'oh we are not profiting enough' yet allowing another source quality location for free and restricting its access makes this decision ... sort of questionable at best. | ||
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37032 Posts
On June 10 2015 19:52 BisuDagger wrote: This is a terrible move. GSL on mobile is my only way of watching. At low quality it is completely unwatchable. I'm very disappointed. Why is this your only way of watching? | ||
|
oOKamuOo
2 Posts
| ||
|
c0ldfusion
United States8293 Posts
On June 10 2015 15:46 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: lol kiss my tush you greedy frickers. GOM has always been greedy.. or mismanaged, whichever. | ||
|
Darkdwarf
Sweden960 Posts
 | ||
|
nkr
Sweden5451 Posts
On June 10 2015 20:41 oOKamuOo wrote: Thanks to addblocker .... if this wouldn't exist we had a high quality stream... pretty much, but at the same time if there werent so many sites abusing invasive ads, we wouldnt have adblocker | ||
|
fruity.
England1711 Posts
| ||
|
marttorn
Norway5211 Posts
| ||
|
{ToT}ColmA
Japan3260 Posts
On June 10 2015 20:41 oOKamuOo wrote: Thanks to addblocker .... if this wouldn't exist we had a high quality stream... having a choice is most of the times good  besides that i dont see me watching gsl much, just trying today, it feels like i am watching h.o.t forever back in 2000 with the 240p streams -_- tastosis casting isnt something that draws me in so quality of the stream is pretty important  | ||
|
oGoZenob
France1503 Posts
| ||
|
fofa2000
Canada548 Posts
| ||
BisuDagger
Bisutopia19257 Posts
I wake up when the second set of players play (GSL)/ second Proleague match happens (6:30 EST.) GSL runs while I'm getting ready for work so I keep my tablet by my side as I'm getting ready and then can use my wifi at work to finish watching. | ||
|
TheBloodyDwarf
Finland7524 Posts
| ||
|
BisuDagger
Bisutopia19257 Posts
On June 10 2015 21:05 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: just opened stream. Low quality is not so bad. I can see all the texts and other It's not end of the world. I have a couple things I can't see because low quality hurts my color blindness. I actually can't see blinding cloud in most cases. | ||
|
TheBloodyDwarf
Finland7524 Posts
On June 10 2015 21:05 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: just opened stream. Low quality is not so bad. I can see all the texts and other Maybe im just used to horrible video quality... :/ On June 10 2015 21:08 BisuDagger wrote: It's not end of the world. I have a couple things I can't see because low quality hurts my color blindness. I actually can't see blinding cloud in most cases. That sucks  | ||
|
LOLingBuddha
Netherlands697 Posts
| ||
|
usopsama
6502 Posts
| ||
| ||
