This will make the final really boring too, since they players will split the prize money 100% and it doesn't really matter who wins. Exactly the opposite of what they want with this I guess.

It's weird as IEM was to most rational organization concerning prize money distribution so far, with every player getting 600$ at least. They went from the least top heavy to the other extreme

ArchangelJada

Canada910 Posts

January 27 2014 19:28 GMT

#23

This seems senseless for the players....what is the upside to this prize pool distribution dont see how its good for anyone.

shinobi112

19 Posts

January 27 2014 19:28 GMT

#24

I personally think this is fine as long as the tournament is a small number of players, which it is going to be. If it was a larger number of players than all the games played to get nothing would be silly, with 16 players it is nice. Besides it is not like ALL the tournaments are going to be like this, just the grand finals.

Schelim

Austria11528 Posts

January 27 2014 19:28 GMT

#25

On January 28 2014 04:24 DinoMight wrote:

Show nested quote +

That's what she said.

wow. i... well played, good sir.

also this is nothing short of insane.

Hot_Bid

Braavos36401 Posts

January 27 2014 19:29 GMT

#26

they're definitely going to split the prize here, its just gonna be nervous for the player who doesn't officially win

GodOfWarAReS

Germany105 Posts

January 27 2014 19:29 GMT

#27

first place 50.000 second 30.000 third and fourth 2x10.000 sounds better. 100.000k for the winner and the others dont get anything at all? what motivation you would have if you know that your gonna get only second or third place? plus many players dont have that much money but are still very skilled. then they get second place but dont get any money at all.
and the winner is probably a cheeser who knows that he doesnt have a chance in macro games

Makro

France16890 Posts

January 27 2014 19:29 GMT

#28

the hotel and flight is paid for all the player,so at least they have nothing to lose

Dexington

Canada7276 Posts

January 27 2014 19:30 GMT

#29

Horrible idea

Plansix

United States60190 Posts

January 27 2014 19:31 GMT

#30

MLG is back. GSL is back in form. WCS is awesome and leaves room for other. Shoutcraft is running a team league.

And IEM just threw down with 100k and plane tickets to fight over it. It's a good day to be a Starcraft fan.

Liquid`Nazgul

22427 Posts

January 27 2014 19:31 GMT

#31

On January 28 2014 04:25 DinoMight wrote:

Show nested quote +

For the players, maybe. But for the fans I don't think it's bad. I think it makes it a lot more tense and exciting to watch.

And the more peole watch esports the better it is for the players.. Even if that money was distributed among the top 3, you still have 13 guys going home with nothing. I think more viewers, sponsors etc. will benefit the scene better than prize money for the players since most get none anyway.

You're making all kinds of assumptions without properly valuing each part of what you say. An increase of viewers doesn't simply outweigh everything with no further questions asked. For example, for the players, an increase of 5% in viewers isn't worth such a ridiculous structure at all. However if viewers increase by 1000% then yes maybe it is good for the players. When it comes to players, there is just no way this is good.

ProBot

Canada170 Posts

January 27 2014 19:31 GMT

#32

To the cats that have posted here already i think this should be a helpful link www.kleenex.com. Oh noes only one player gets paid out of a free expense paid tournament!?!?!?! Killing e-sports!!!! I think it's a brilliant idea, it shouldn't become the standard but one tournament a year with single elim and a massive payout is going to make for some entertaining sc2. Honestly tho, most of you just bitch for the sake of bitching and it's really turning the community into a bit of a joke.

InSSerenity

117 Posts

January 27 2014 19:31 GMT

#33

I just hope this was made clear to all players and teams ahead of time, unless all accommodations are being paid for that risk doesn't seem worth the money unless the exposure the tournaments gets is massive. Would have much preferred them to consolidate just the first and second place prize winnings in a winner take all if they really felt the need to do this.

Xxio

Canada5565 Posts

January 27 2014 19:32 GMT

#34

uhhh...seriously?

iViNtaGe

United States254 Posts

January 27 2014 19:33 GMT

#35

Not a fan of winner takes all to get a blizzcon-esque tournament with a huge grand prize....

Should be a good tourney though. That polish crowd

NovaMB

Germany9534 Posts

January 27 2014 19:33 GMT

#36

So who is getting invited after (P)

herO wins Sao Paolo?

Also, everyone qualifying will get all expenses paid, and 10 of the 16 players already have an atleast 4k prize from the other IEM.

But whatever you do IEM, please dont invite any players, let them qualify.

miniskirt

France487 Posts

January 27 2014 19:34 GMT

#37

that's stupid

what the hell, isn't carmack still running this? he used to be a great sponsor of smaller more regular events, spreading the money to build the scene instead of huge cash for a single yearly winner

Canucklehead

Canada5074 Posts

January 27 2014 19:34 GMT

#38

I'm all for players colluding and splitting the pot here. Question is the collusion has to be under the table and only the winner will get paid, so what happens if he doesn't keep his end of the bargain? The 2nd place person can't go public because then they would be admitting to pot splitting right?