| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Thieving Magpie
United States6752 Posts
On June 14 2013 04:31 Taipoka wrote: Now we have a winner. Please close thread. Er. So they all should be offline. Right? And you should fall from code a to b. Right? No, he's saying winning WCS NA should get a Code S Spot  | ||
|
vesicular
United States1310 Posts
On June 14 2013 03:13 Dakure wrote: Why are so many people so mad about Bo1? Because so many people have never watched an OSL before. Really it's the only reason. People complaining about something they've never seen before. Fairly typical. | ||
|
Doublemint
Austria8640 Posts
| ||
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On June 14 2013 06:10 vesicular wrote: Because so many people have never watched an OSL before. Really it's the only reason. People complaining about something they've never seen before. Fairly typical. but what they have seen was the RO32 BO1 GSLs in 2011, which generally were not that high quality, so they're assuming that BO1 OSL will be the same. i think it'll be alright | ||
|
evaniss
53 Posts
On June 13 2013 23:01 Plansix wrote: I think people forget that OSL is a major TV broadcast company in Korea. There is a limited amount of clout that Blizzard has with a company of that size. It would be like a Ubisoft trying to push around the BBC or CBS. Blizzard can't really force them to do anything and if they want to run their own format and that is the price for showing it on TV, Blizzard has to deal with that. These sorts of deals are not made with "Its my way or the highway, take it or leave it" stances. That is not how business deals are made. If you try to act that way, you just burn bridges. Plus OGN has a better card to deal with Blizzard, if you watch broadcasting content on OGN channel for all of week and prime times? SC2 is not Best Contents to guarantee viewers from position of OGN, they has LOL tournaments that the most popular Esports Content Currently that means they are not in desperate state than Blizzard But rather Blizzard wants more to OGN goes to broadcast on TV for promoting WCS in Korea since LOL is The No1 Esports contents in Korea and it made by powered of OGN that broadcasts TV channel to around of Korea | ||
|
mango_destroyer
Canada3914 Posts
| ||
|
Thieving Magpie
United States6752 Posts
On June 14 2013 06:35 mango_destroyer wrote: I guess it is a wait and see approach for me, however I know the players expressed they didn`t like bo1 in interviews last year when kespa players were transitioning. I know Rain said he preferred bo3 for SC2. The better the player the longer he wants the games. More chances to learn, more chances to come back. But do we really want that starting at the round of 32? | ||
|
Sumahi
Guam5609 Posts
| ||
|
nerium
Philippines512 Posts
| ||
|
Thieving Magpie
United States6752 Posts
On June 14 2013 07:29 Sumahi wrote: Bomber, Life and Curious. So much Startale awesome. I really hope one of them goes the distance this time. Is it strange I still think of Squirtle as an ST player? A traitorous ST player, but an ST player still? Parting not as much. | ||
|
xsnac
Barbados1365 Posts
On June 14 2013 06:10 vesicular wrote: Because so many people have never watched an OSL before. Really it's the only reason. People complaining about something they've never seen before. Fairly typical. you kidding me ? this is sc2 not bw . and bo1 is very bad ask any pro gamer what they prefere . | ||
|
FrostedMiniWheats
United States30730 Posts
On June 14 2013 06:31 opterown wrote: but what they have seen was the RO32 BO1 GSLs in 2011, which generally were not that high quality, so they're assuming that BO1 OSL will be the same. i think it'll be alright Well there was also that sc2 OSL we had roughly 1 year ago. We had the same uneasy complaints then too. OSL came and again, idk about the rest of you but I thought it was a very forgettable tournament. Thankfully, the group stages didn't have any real upsets outside of San making it over Byun and Symbol and the Kespa side of things was still in a bit of a flux period but Rain, Flash, etc did make it at least. However, the whole thing just felt totally underwhelming with less opportunities to see really good games. bo3+ at least gives two players more of an opportunity to adapt there play to their opponent and demonstrate varying levels of strategical depth. It tends to favor a more 3-dimensional player. | ||
|
Thieving Magpie
United States6752 Posts
On June 14 2013 08:02 FrostedMiniWheats wrote: Well there was also that sc2 OSL we had roughly 1 year ago. We had the same uneasy complaints then too. OSL came and again, idk about the rest of you but I thought it was a very forgettable tournament. Thankfully, the group stages didn't have any real upsets outside of San making it over Byun and Symbol and the Kespa side of things was still in a bit of a flux period but Rain, Flash, etc did make it at least. However, the whole thing just felt totally underwhelming with less opportunities to see really good games. bo3+ at least gives two players more of an opportunity to adapt there play to their opponent and demonstrate varying levels of strategical depth. It tends to favor a more 3-dimensional player. Its a philosophical difference in tournament structure. Lots of games per round = everyone adapts to opponent: but usually leads to a subpar final because we already got to see the players adapting to opponents over 5 hour stretches in the round of 32. Bo1 in the early rounds means Round of 32 is like watching a bunch of ladder games. You either were the better player, or you weren't. By having both (Bo1 early and BoX late) we get to see players be cheesy and we get to see players be adaptive. | ||
|
Emzeeshady
Canada4203 Posts
| ||
|
Thieving Magpie
United States6752 Posts
On June 14 2013 08:14 Emzeeshady wrote: Well about 8% more people approve of this then I had anticipated... With a large enough sample size there will be people who simply misclicked, misread, trolling, etc... My guess is that only about 4% of that 8% actually voted intentionally. I wish there was a "Meh, whatev', Starcraft yeah!" option. | ||
|
GolemMadness
Canada11044 Posts
On June 14 2013 08:16 Thieving Magpie wrote: With a large enough sample size there will be people who simply misclicked, misread, trolling, etc... My guess is that only about 4% of that 8% actually voted intentionally. I wish there was a "Meh, whatev', Starcraft yeah!" option. If that were the case, then people who intended to click approve also would have accidentally clicked disapprove... | ||
|
VManOfMana
United States764 Posts
On June 14 2013 08:14 Emzeeshady wrote: Well about 8% more people approve of this then I had anticipated... Newsflash: Team Liquid exists long before SC2 | ||
|
Emzeeshady
Canada4203 Posts
| ||
|
VManOfMana
United States764 Posts
On June 14 2013 08:45 Emzeeshady wrote: Thank you for this irrelevant news i already knew. Then you'll probably figure out there is people that unlike you, have seen multiple times and can undersrand the merit of the OSL format. | ||
|
killer1nz
New Zealand164 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games |
|
The PondCast
RSL Revival
Solar vs Zoun
MaxPax vs Bunny
Kung Fu Cup
ByuN vs ShoWTimE
Classic vs Cure
Reynor vs TBD
WardiTV Korean Royale
PiGosaur Monday
RSL Revival
Classic vs Creator
Cure vs TriGGeR
Kung Fu Cup
herO vs TBD
CranKy Ducklings
RSL Revival
herO vs Gerald
ByuN vs SHIN
Kung Fu Cup
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
