|
Awesome post. Tells a lot of truth...
|
On December 04 2012 21:35 Pursuit_ wrote:Show nested quote +On December 04 2012 21:31 Yello wrote:On December 04 2012 21:26 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 21:18 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 21:11 Pursuit_ wrote:On December 04 2012 21:06 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 20:55 Shady Sands wrote:On December 04 2012 20:52 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 20:18 mrvidek wrote:On December 04 2012 19:38 JediMasterBETTY wrote: [quote]
yea right, zerg op coz huyn won 14 ipl fight clubs in a row.. you can look at it another way, u know: in the last 14 ipl fight clubs, no zerg except HuyN won!! wow! he just is doing very well in IPL fight club. Another thing, in 14 finals he only met 1 zerg, the other 13 finalists were mostly P and some T. HyuN and Life are the only 2 zergs that made it to IPL fight club finals in the last 14 weeks!!
another thing, let's look at last month major tournaments (I mention the first and 2nd prize): WCS pvp creator vs parting for USD 100k/40k GSL zvz Sniper vs HyuN USD 42k/17k IPL5 zvz leenock vs violet USD 40k/20k WCG's pvp final parting vs adelscott for USD 25k/10k IEM Singapore's tvp sting vs grubby final for USD 6.5k/3.3k Dreamhack winter's pvt hero vs taeja final for USD 37k/15k
Protoss total earnings: USD 215.3k wcs 100+40 wcg 25+10 IEM 3.3 dh: 37
Zerg total earnings: USD : 119k gsl 42+17 ipl5 40+20
Terran total earnings: USD : 21.5k IEM 6.5 dh: 15
Not to mention IPTL season 1 where in the finals only parting, mvp and squirtle won games, with a price of USD 9k so that kindof goes to either P or T.
So what's op again? Sure fungal is good, but so is bunker, medivac, marauder, so is forcefield and immortal, vortex or any other thing u can think correctly executed. Just try to play the game, infestor broodlord is not by far imba. Harass works great against it. Try not to be biassed. These are my thoughts (EU master zerg). You must be kidding. Or at least i hope u posted in the wrong thread by mistake. Just because 2 protoss got into WCS final and won A LOT of money means P>Z overall. Oh cool. This means protoss is 10x better than terran. guess not. Try again. No, it doesnt mean P>Z overall. But neither does HyuN's IPL fight club or 2 zvz finals mean Z>P overall. From my personal experience, i have the best win rate in zvz. Of course this is not relevant, but check the pro win rates. You will find them quite balanced: GSL November Code S: PvZ 50.0% TvZ 53.1% GSL November Code A: PvZ 56.00% TvZ 51.85% How is Z op when it has a subunitary WLR?? Moreover, the graphs in Ver's post show that foreigners don't win much vs koreans as terran. That's because current foreigner terrans aren't in that good of a shape. I mean... lucifron? thorzain? not really ... When terran had a 65% win ratio in tvz (a year ago) it was normal. Now that zerg wins ALMOST 50% of the games vs terran Z is op. Please explain the logic, coz just saying "zerg op" "infestor op" "you gotta be kidding me" "no skill a move race" really is not a logical explanation. Oh hai there new social media smurfbot. Earning your 40 bucks for setting up this account, I see. Can you please explain how you know how to find specific league stats in TLPD while only having two posts on teamliquid? Hi there rude human. I never had a TL account because i generally dont post (well i never posted on TL, .. i did post 2-3 comments on reddit and that's it). I have internet access, i follow and play sc:bw and now sc2 since 1998. Finding statistics is very easy: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/2012_Global_StarCraft_II_League_Season_5 > go to Code S Statistics / Code A Statistics. Anything else i can help you with? Thanks for caring. Now can we get back on topic and can you say something constructive like for example that you agree with me, or if not, bring some real proof that zerg is op. followed your link and instructions Code S TvZ: 18-34 (34.62%) Code A TvZ: 3-6 (33%) this is for the most recent season of GSL. haha ok my bad :D you are right. i was looking at GSL november 2011 statistics  ) well this was constructive :D still, it was stupid for me to give as an example a tournament that ended in a zvz final. Anyone knows stats for dreamhack/WCS? never mind, i found them: DH Winter: TvZ: 61% PvZ: 56% WCS: TVZ: 50% PVZ: 59% amirite? GSL and IPL are indeed zerg dominated, but, being the two tournaments won by zerg, that kindof makes sense. i find the racial balance fine as it is Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaase post the source to your statistics. You failed once and these statistics look weird considering there were only 2 Terrans in the Round of 12 of Dreamhack Winter and WCS Finals had only 4 Terrans out of 32 players... It's the Taeja effect. He 2-0's or 3-0's a bunch of Foreigner Zergs and makes TvZ look balanced if you only look at stats.
so a terran winning messes with the statistics while a zerg winning is op? I think a stat is a stat. In GSL zergs did great, in DH terrans did great.
|
Even though its a little biased at some points and im not sure i agree with the reason behind why they dont nerf the infestor. But your point might be valid. But all in all i agree with most of the things said about Zerg/Infestors.
I really really hope they make some changes soon. My favorite matchup by far is TvZ, both watching and playing. But as soon as the BL army comes out, its usualy such a drag, unless the terran is waaay in front/way way better.
But ZvP is even worse. I kinda feel Toss has a way worse chance to deal with Zerg in the lategame then Terran. But in response they just do attack timings all the time to avoid broodlords entirely. And hit before too many infestors are out. And that really makes the matchup so boring, same shit every time. Timing by Toss or broodlord win for Zerg.
|
On December 04 2012 21:39 JediMasterBETTY wrote:Show nested quote +On December 04 2012 21:31 Yello wrote:On December 04 2012 21:26 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 21:18 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 21:11 Pursuit_ wrote:On December 04 2012 21:06 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 20:55 Shady Sands wrote:On December 04 2012 20:52 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 20:18 mrvidek wrote:On December 04 2012 19:38 JediMasterBETTY wrote: [quote]
yea right, zerg op coz huyn won 14 ipl fight clubs in a row.. you can look at it another way, u know: in the last 14 ipl fight clubs, no zerg except HuyN won!! wow! he just is doing very well in IPL fight club. Another thing, in 14 finals he only met 1 zerg, the other 13 finalists were mostly P and some T. HyuN and Life are the only 2 zergs that made it to IPL fight club finals in the last 14 weeks!!
another thing, let's look at last month major tournaments (I mention the first and 2nd prize): WCS pvp creator vs parting for USD 100k/40k GSL zvz Sniper vs HyuN USD 42k/17k IPL5 zvz leenock vs violet USD 40k/20k WCG's pvp final parting vs adelscott for USD 25k/10k IEM Singapore's tvp sting vs grubby final for USD 6.5k/3.3k Dreamhack winter's pvt hero vs taeja final for USD 37k/15k
Protoss total earnings: USD 215.3k wcs 100+40 wcg 25+10 IEM 3.3 dh: 37
Zerg total earnings: USD : 119k gsl 42+17 ipl5 40+20
Terran total earnings: USD : 21.5k IEM 6.5 dh: 15
Not to mention IPTL season 1 where in the finals only parting, mvp and squirtle won games, with a price of USD 9k so that kindof goes to either P or T.
So what's op again? Sure fungal is good, but so is bunker, medivac, marauder, so is forcefield and immortal, vortex or any other thing u can think correctly executed. Just try to play the game, infestor broodlord is not by far imba. Harass works great against it. Try not to be biassed. These are my thoughts (EU master zerg). You must be kidding. Or at least i hope u posted in the wrong thread by mistake. Just because 2 protoss got into WCS final and won A LOT of money means P>Z overall. Oh cool. This means protoss is 10x better than terran. guess not. Try again. No, it doesnt mean P>Z overall. But neither does HyuN's IPL fight club or 2 zvz finals mean Z>P overall. From my personal experience, i have the best win rate in zvz. Of course this is not relevant, but check the pro win rates. You will find them quite balanced: GSL November Code S: PvZ 50.0% TvZ 53.1% GSL November Code A: PvZ 56.00% TvZ 51.85% How is Z op when it has a subunitary WLR?? Moreover, the graphs in Ver's post show that foreigners don't win much vs koreans as terran. That's because current foreigner terrans aren't in that good of a shape. I mean... lucifron? thorzain? not really ... When terran had a 65% win ratio in tvz (a year ago) it was normal. Now that zerg wins ALMOST 50% of the games vs terran Z is op. Please explain the logic, coz just saying "zerg op" "infestor op" "you gotta be kidding me" "no skill a move race" really is not a logical explanation. Oh hai there new social media smurfbot. Earning your 40 bucks for setting up this account, I see. Can you please explain how you know how to find specific league stats in TLPD while only having two posts on teamliquid? Hi there rude human. I never had a TL account because i generally dont post (well i never posted on TL, .. i did post 2-3 comments on reddit and that's it). I have internet access, i follow and play sc:bw and now sc2 since 1998. Finding statistics is very easy: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/2012_Global_StarCraft_II_League_Season_5 > go to Code S Statistics / Code A Statistics. Anything else i can help you with? Thanks for caring. Now can we get back on topic and can you say something constructive like for example that you agree with me, or if not, bring some real proof that zerg is op. followed your link and instructions Code S TvZ: 18-34 (34.62%) Code A TvZ: 3-6 (33%) this is for the most recent season of GSL. haha ok my bad :D you are right. i was looking at GSL november 2011 statistics  ) well this was constructive :D still, it was stupid for me to give as an example a tournament that ended in a zvz final. Anyone knows stats for dreamhack/WCS? never mind, i found them: DH Winter: TvZ: 61% PvZ: 56% WCS: TVZ: 50% PVZ: 59% amirite? GSL and IPL are indeed zerg dominated, but, being the two tournaments won by zerg, that kindof makes sense. i find the racial balance fine as it is Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaase post the source to your statistics. You failed once and these statistics look weird considering there were only 2 Terrans in the Round of 12 of Dreamhack Winter and WCS Finals had only 4 Terrans out of 32 players... The source is http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/2012_DreamHack_Open/WinterI counted the maps won: TheStC 1 2 Stephano TaeJa 2 0 Stephano TheStC 0 2 Snute TaeJa 2 1 Snute ForGG 2 0 Ret ThorZaIN 1 2 Ret TaeJa 3 0 Nerchio 11 7 TvZ: 61.11 % Stephano 0 2 fraer Stephano 2 1 elfi Snute 0 2 elfi Snute 2 1 fraer Bly 2 1 StarNaN Bly 2 1 SaSe Bly 0 2 Socke Bly 0 2 MaNa Bly 2 1 Feast Nerchio 0 2 monchi TLO 2 1 monchi DIMAGA 0 2 monchi TargA 0 2 monchi TLO 2 1 Bischu Nerchio 2 0 Bischu DIMAGA 2 0 Bischu TargA 0 2 Bischu Ret 1 2 HerO Ret 1 2 NaNiwa Ret 0 2 NightEnD Nerchio 3 1 Fraer Nerchio 3 0 MaNa Snute 0 3 Hero 26 33 PvZ: 55.93 %
you know how few sense it makes to take stats from a tournament where one race's participation is below 20%?
|
On December 04 2012 19:51 oZe wrote: LOL he said ez mode terran was hard to play ^^^^^^^^ Just never tried toss or zerg I guess... Is it the 4aaaad5s6d that is soooooooooo hard =) Is having to press T one time to win any battle really that insanely hard?
Any zerg player can switch to terran and enjoy similar or better win rate within one week. I seriously doubt a terran player could switch and do as well as fast. I think a protoss player also can make the one week transition. Terran has the easiest macro, the most effective micro, walling nirvana, most versatile units & the best unit combinations. Zerg T3 cannot even shoot air. Toss have to jump around on map just to macro.
Only problem with terran is storm but everyone is complaining about kid sister fungal ^^ Do these "terran so hard"-trolls even play the game???
Well there seems to exist only one way to make this input even worse: Wait some more pages, then come back, quote yourself and give a "self-highfive" like:
Yeah man, I fully agree! Best post ever. Nuff said...
|
On December 04 2012 21:36 weiliem wrote: As a zerg player, i cant understand why other zerg players still cant admit that zerg is currently OP in the late game, mostly due to infestors. I do miss mmm vs mutaling play, where you have to fly around harassing with your mutas sniping as many tanks as possible. but there has been a point where mutaling play just isnt enough anymore, a good mix of mmm tanks and thors causing the mid game fights to be more and more 1 sided, u can clearly see this in games where zerg players like drg or idra try to bring back mutaling into the scene only to fail horribly. Personally, i would really like to c mmm vs mutaling to come back into play rather than the boring infestorlings, it is way more exciting to watch in the progaming scene. But for that to exist, a nerf on infestor must be done but must be accompanied by some buff on the zerg side for that midgame in TvZ will not be so 1 sided, a buff in mutas may be the answer to this, but protoss players will start complaining about mutas again. And protoss players should NOT even complain about infestors. We are forced to use it due to the imbalanced broken forcefield shit. I mean come on man, u expect roach hydra to beat your forcefield shit army?? I am happy of where ZvP is going although late game can be very boring but i have to admit that ZvT is broken. It is not easy to nerf infestors to a level that it is still usable in mid game and yet not imbalanced in the late game.
I totally agree blizz should nerf infestor and buff muta OR nerf marine (stim)/medivac. The possible muta buff could be similar to the ideea for hots:
2. Mutalisk buff to speed and/or acceleration http://eu.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/5966979955
|
Such a great writing. Thanks for this informative and entertaining OP.
I would definately give you a star for this!
|
On December 04 2012 21:43 TeeTS wrote:Show nested quote +On December 04 2012 21:39 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 21:31 Yello wrote:On December 04 2012 21:26 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 21:18 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 21:11 Pursuit_ wrote:On December 04 2012 21:06 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 20:55 Shady Sands wrote:On December 04 2012 20:52 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 20:18 mrvidek wrote: [quote]
You must be kidding. Or at least i hope u posted in the wrong thread by mistake. Just because 2 protoss got into WCS final and won A LOT of money means P>Z overall. Oh cool. This means protoss is 10x better than terran. guess not. Try again. No, it doesnt mean P>Z overall. But neither does HyuN's IPL fight club or 2 zvz finals mean Z>P overall. From my personal experience, i have the best win rate in zvz. Of course this is not relevant, but check the pro win rates. You will find them quite balanced: GSL November Code S: PvZ 50.0% TvZ 53.1% GSL November Code A: PvZ 56.00% TvZ 51.85% How is Z op when it has a subunitary WLR?? Moreover, the graphs in Ver's post show that foreigners don't win much vs koreans as terran. That's because current foreigner terrans aren't in that good of a shape. I mean... lucifron? thorzain? not really ... When terran had a 65% win ratio in tvz (a year ago) it was normal. Now that zerg wins ALMOST 50% of the games vs terran Z is op. Please explain the logic, coz just saying "zerg op" "infestor op" "you gotta be kidding me" "no skill a move race" really is not a logical explanation. Oh hai there new social media smurfbot. Earning your 40 bucks for setting up this account, I see. Can you please explain how you know how to find specific league stats in TLPD while only having two posts on teamliquid? Hi there rude human. I never had a TL account because i generally dont post (well i never posted on TL, .. i did post 2-3 comments on reddit and that's it). I have internet access, i follow and play sc:bw and now sc2 since 1998. Finding statistics is very easy: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/2012_Global_StarCraft_II_League_Season_5 > go to Code S Statistics / Code A Statistics. Anything else i can help you with? Thanks for caring. Now can we get back on topic and can you say something constructive like for example that you agree with me, or if not, bring some real proof that zerg is op. followed your link and instructions Code S TvZ: 18-34 (34.62%) Code A TvZ: 3-6 (33%) this is for the most recent season of GSL. haha ok my bad :D you are right. i was looking at GSL november 2011 statistics  ) well this was constructive :D still, it was stupid for me to give as an example a tournament that ended in a zvz final. Anyone knows stats for dreamhack/WCS? never mind, i found them: DH Winter: TvZ: 61% PvZ: 56% WCS: TVZ: 50% PVZ: 59% amirite? GSL and IPL are indeed zerg dominated, but, being the two tournaments won by zerg, that kindof makes sense. i find the racial balance fine as it is Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaase post the source to your statistics. You failed once and these statistics look weird considering there were only 2 Terrans in the Round of 12 of Dreamhack Winter and WCS Finals had only 4 Terrans out of 32 players... The source is http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/2012_DreamHack_Open/WinterI counted the maps won: TheStC 1 2 Stephano TaeJa 2 0 Stephano TheStC 0 2 Snute TaeJa 2 1 Snute ForGG 2 0 Ret ThorZaIN 1 2 Ret TaeJa 3 0 Nerchio 11 7 TvZ: 61.11 % Stephano 0 2 fraer Stephano 2 1 elfi Snute 0 2 elfi Snute 2 1 fraer Bly 2 1 StarNaN Bly 2 1 SaSe Bly 0 2 Socke Bly 0 2 MaNa Bly 2 1 Feast Nerchio 0 2 monchi TLO 2 1 monchi DIMAGA 0 2 monchi TargA 0 2 monchi TLO 2 1 Bischu Nerchio 2 0 Bischu DIMAGA 2 0 Bischu TargA 0 2 Bischu Ret 1 2 HerO Ret 1 2 NaNiwa Ret 0 2 NightEnD Nerchio 3 1 Fraer Nerchio 3 0 MaNa Snute 0 3 Hero 26 33 PvZ: 55.93 % you know how few sense it makes to take stats from a tournament where one race's participation is below 20%?
the number of participants influences in no way the wlr of that race. between my post and yours i consider yours as having no sense.
|
On December 04 2012 21:41 JediMasterBETTY wrote:Show nested quote +On December 04 2012 21:35 Pursuit_ wrote:On December 04 2012 21:31 Yello wrote:On December 04 2012 21:26 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 21:18 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 21:11 Pursuit_ wrote:On December 04 2012 21:06 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 20:55 Shady Sands wrote:On December 04 2012 20:52 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 20:18 mrvidek wrote: [quote]
You must be kidding. Or at least i hope u posted in the wrong thread by mistake. Just because 2 protoss got into WCS final and won A LOT of money means P>Z overall. Oh cool. This means protoss is 10x better than terran. guess not. Try again. No, it doesnt mean P>Z overall. But neither does HyuN's IPL fight club or 2 zvz finals mean Z>P overall. From my personal experience, i have the best win rate in zvz. Of course this is not relevant, but check the pro win rates. You will find them quite balanced: GSL November Code S: PvZ 50.0% TvZ 53.1% GSL November Code A: PvZ 56.00% TvZ 51.85% How is Z op when it has a subunitary WLR?? Moreover, the graphs in Ver's post show that foreigners don't win much vs koreans as terran. That's because current foreigner terrans aren't in that good of a shape. I mean... lucifron? thorzain? not really ... When terran had a 65% win ratio in tvz (a year ago) it was normal. Now that zerg wins ALMOST 50% of the games vs terran Z is op. Please explain the logic, coz just saying "zerg op" "infestor op" "you gotta be kidding me" "no skill a move race" really is not a logical explanation. Oh hai there new social media smurfbot. Earning your 40 bucks for setting up this account, I see. Can you please explain how you know how to find specific league stats in TLPD while only having two posts on teamliquid? Hi there rude human. I never had a TL account because i generally dont post (well i never posted on TL, .. i did post 2-3 comments on reddit and that's it). I have internet access, i follow and play sc:bw and now sc2 since 1998. Finding statistics is very easy: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/2012_Global_StarCraft_II_League_Season_5 > go to Code S Statistics / Code A Statistics. Anything else i can help you with? Thanks for caring. Now can we get back on topic and can you say something constructive like for example that you agree with me, or if not, bring some real proof that zerg is op. followed your link and instructions Code S TvZ: 18-34 (34.62%) Code A TvZ: 3-6 (33%) this is for the most recent season of GSL. haha ok my bad :D you are right. i was looking at GSL november 2011 statistics  ) well this was constructive :D still, it was stupid for me to give as an example a tournament that ended in a zvz final. Anyone knows stats for dreamhack/WCS? never mind, i found them: DH Winter: TvZ: 61% PvZ: 56% WCS: TVZ: 50% PVZ: 59% amirite? GSL and IPL are indeed zerg dominated, but, being the two tournaments won by zerg, that kindof makes sense. i find the racial balance fine as it is Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaase post the source to your statistics. You failed once and these statistics look weird considering there were only 2 Terrans in the Round of 12 of Dreamhack Winter and WCS Finals had only 4 Terrans out of 32 players... It's the Taeja effect. He 2-0's or 3-0's a bunch of Foreigner Zergs and makes TvZ look balanced if you only look at stats. so a terran winning messes with the statistics while a zerg winning is op? I think a stat is a stat. In GSL zergs did great, in DH terrans did great.
You have to look at stats in context or they become meaningless. I doubt you would say Playhem statistics are as valuable as Dreamhack, which in turn aren't as valuable as GSL which inarguably has the highest level of play. A top level player beating mediocre European Zergs and Stephano isn't really indicative of anything.
But if Stat's are all that matter to you, here's another stat. According to SC2 Gears I have a 38% win rate TvZ, a 56% Win Rate TvP and a 69% win Rate TvT.
|
Only zergs are winning TT so imba! :D
http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Premier_Tournaments
if infestors are that good, why do zergs lose games? \
infested terrans are really imbalanced, because you can trade mana on units, that's not fair, it needs nerf, but fungals are ok, its almost same with being off position and trapped by forcefields or losing some units to siege tanks, you just need to be more careful with your units, especially in late game. I think that zergs sucked a lot, but then they started thinking more and playing different, instead of playing muta ling baneling T2 forever or slow transition into T3 they started rushing for T3, almost no terrans except for Taeja or MVP rush for T3, they keep spaming marines tanks vs broodlords, make late transition, being at big disadvantage they try to come back in the game, but they just cant because of big disadvantage, and its gg. The same with protoss players, a lot of toss players keep fighting with broodlords infestors having only stalkers, of course with better micro you can beat zerg army with pure stalkers, but if zerg is as good as you he wont allow you, and look at Squirtle, if he sees that zerg is not agressive he is teching to carriers and when zerg player has broodlord infestor army, he immediately has a good answer. People complain on infestor, yes, this unit is very good and universal, but without it it's impossible to beat other races, in big fights you should spam infested terrans, neural parasite opponent's units and also fungal units, its microing one unit but that anywat requires micro, because your units can get stormed or vortexed or can catch seeker missile and it's immediately gg.
Players are always finding out something new, a year ago people played without knowing all the timing till almost 20th minute, games were very short, you couldnt really see a lot of 40-50 minute games, because players didnt think about late late late game, they were focusing on middle game, right now zergs are almost always teching to T3. How it was before: zergs was forever on t2, then zerg after failing at t2 started teching to hive, then zerg started teching straight to hive but died to timing attacks, then zerg learned how to defend timing attacks, defended with first broodlords and it was immediately gg for opponent, then opponents learned how to counter broodlord counter attacks, now it's developed further, and it's developing more and more, players got many stuff to learn and to practice, and with Hots there will be even more units and blizzard is making it more casual because it will be even harder to count perfect unit composition, to position your army, to micro ALL you units ^^
I think terrans forgot about thor drop on LT, siege pushes on steppes of war and of course... 5 rax reapers :D I remember terrans said: hey, zergs, you are just bad! you'd better learn to play instead of whine! same shit here ^^
|
On December 04 2012 20:34 Godwrath wrote:Show nested quote +On December 04 2012 19:55 Beatmania wrote:On December 04 2012 19:51 oZe wrote: LOL he said ez mode terran was hard to play ^^^^^^^^ Just never tried toss or zerg I guess... Is it the 4aaaad5s6d that is soooooooooo hard =) Is having to press T one time to win any battle really that insanely hard?
Any zerg player can switch to terran and enjoy similar or better win rate within one week. I seriously doubt a terran player could switch and do as well as fast. I think a protoss player also can make the one week transition. Terran has the easiest macro, the most effective micro, walling nirvana, most versatile units & the best unit combinations. Zerg T3 cannot even shoot air. Toss have to jump around on map just to macro.
Only problem with terran is storm but everyone is complaining about kid sister fungal ^^ Do these "terran so hard"-trolls even play the game???
Bronze to Gold?  Even at those levels protoss is less demanding mechanically speaking.
I was just asking because the statements he made didn't show any actual understanding of the game. Infact the complete opposite was shown and it made me feel a bit unwell.
|
On December 04 2012 21:47 JediMasterBETTY wrote:Show nested quote +On December 04 2012 21:43 TeeTS wrote:On December 04 2012 21:39 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 21:31 Yello wrote:On December 04 2012 21:26 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 21:18 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 21:11 Pursuit_ wrote:On December 04 2012 21:06 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 20:55 Shady Sands wrote:On December 04 2012 20:52 JediMasterBETTY wrote: [quote]
No, it doesnt mean P>Z overall. But neither does HyuN's IPL fight club or 2 zvz finals mean Z>P overall. From my personal experience, i have the best win rate in zvz. Of course this is not relevant, but check the pro win rates. You will find them quite balanced: GSL November Code S: PvZ 50.0% TvZ 53.1%
GSL November Code A: PvZ 56.00% TvZ 51.85%
How is Z op when it has a subunitary WLR?? Moreover, the graphs in Ver's post show that foreigners don't win much vs koreans as terran. That's because current foreigner terrans aren't in that good of a shape. I mean... lucifron? thorzain? not really ... When terran had a 65% win ratio in tvz (a year ago) it was normal. Now that zerg wins ALMOST 50% of the games vs terran Z is op. Please explain the logic, coz just saying "zerg op" "infestor op" "you gotta be kidding me" "no skill a move race" really is not a logical explanation. Oh hai there new social media smurfbot. Earning your 40 bucks for setting up this account, I see. Can you please explain how you know how to find specific league stats in TLPD while only having two posts on teamliquid? Hi there rude human. I never had a TL account because i generally dont post (well i never posted on TL, .. i did post 2-3 comments on reddit and that's it). I have internet access, i follow and play sc:bw and now sc2 since 1998. Finding statistics is very easy: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/2012_Global_StarCraft_II_League_Season_5 > go to Code S Statistics / Code A Statistics. Anything else i can help you with? Thanks for caring. Now can we get back on topic and can you say something constructive like for example that you agree with me, or if not, bring some real proof that zerg is op. followed your link and instructions Code S TvZ: 18-34 (34.62%) Code A TvZ: 3-6 (33%) this is for the most recent season of GSL. haha ok my bad :D you are right. i was looking at GSL november 2011 statistics  ) well this was constructive :D still, it was stupid for me to give as an example a tournament that ended in a zvz final. Anyone knows stats for dreamhack/WCS? never mind, i found them: DH Winter: TvZ: 61% PvZ: 56% WCS: TVZ: 50% PVZ: 59% amirite? GSL and IPL are indeed zerg dominated, but, being the two tournaments won by zerg, that kindof makes sense. i find the racial balance fine as it is Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaase post the source to your statistics. You failed once and these statistics look weird considering there were only 2 Terrans in the Round of 12 of Dreamhack Winter and WCS Finals had only 4 Terrans out of 32 players... The source is http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/2012_DreamHack_Open/WinterI counted the maps won: TheStC 1 2 Stephano TaeJa 2 0 Stephano TheStC 0 2 Snute TaeJa 2 1 Snute ForGG 2 0 Ret ThorZaIN 1 2 Ret TaeJa 3 0 Nerchio 11 7 TvZ: 61.11 % Stephano 0 2 fraer Stephano 2 1 elfi Snute 0 2 elfi Snute 2 1 fraer Bly 2 1 StarNaN Bly 2 1 SaSe Bly 0 2 Socke Bly 0 2 MaNa Bly 2 1 Feast Nerchio 0 2 monchi TLO 2 1 monchi DIMAGA 0 2 monchi TargA 0 2 monchi TLO 2 1 Bischu Nerchio 2 0 Bischu DIMAGA 2 0 Bischu TargA 0 2 Bischu Ret 1 2 HerO Ret 1 2 NaNiwa Ret 0 2 NightEnD Nerchio 3 1 Fraer Nerchio 3 0 MaNa Snute 0 3 Hero 26 33 PvZ: 55.93 % you know how few sense it makes to take stats from a tournament where one race's participation is below 20%? the number of participants influences in no way the wlr of that race. between my post and yours i consider yours as having no sense.
Yes it does. If you had 100 bronze league Zergs, 2 bronze league Terrans and one Taeja in a tournament it HUGELY affects the win rate of Terran as opposed to, say, 100 bronze Zergs and 99 bronze Terran and one Taeja. Obviously you have no idea how stats work.
|
On December 04 2012 21:48 Pursuit_ wrote:Show nested quote +On December 04 2012 21:41 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 21:35 Pursuit_ wrote:On December 04 2012 21:31 Yello wrote:On December 04 2012 21:26 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 21:18 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 21:11 Pursuit_ wrote:On December 04 2012 21:06 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 20:55 Shady Sands wrote:On December 04 2012 20:52 JediMasterBETTY wrote: [quote]
No, it doesnt mean P>Z overall. But neither does HyuN's IPL fight club or 2 zvz finals mean Z>P overall. From my personal experience, i have the best win rate in zvz. Of course this is not relevant, but check the pro win rates. You will find them quite balanced: GSL November Code S: PvZ 50.0% TvZ 53.1%
GSL November Code A: PvZ 56.00% TvZ 51.85%
How is Z op when it has a subunitary WLR?? Moreover, the graphs in Ver's post show that foreigners don't win much vs koreans as terran. That's because current foreigner terrans aren't in that good of a shape. I mean... lucifron? thorzain? not really ... When terran had a 65% win ratio in tvz (a year ago) it was normal. Now that zerg wins ALMOST 50% of the games vs terran Z is op. Please explain the logic, coz just saying "zerg op" "infestor op" "you gotta be kidding me" "no skill a move race" really is not a logical explanation. Oh hai there new social media smurfbot. Earning your 40 bucks for setting up this account, I see. Can you please explain how you know how to find specific league stats in TLPD while only having two posts on teamliquid? Hi there rude human. I never had a TL account because i generally dont post (well i never posted on TL, .. i did post 2-3 comments on reddit and that's it). I have internet access, i follow and play sc:bw and now sc2 since 1998. Finding statistics is very easy: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/2012_Global_StarCraft_II_League_Season_5 > go to Code S Statistics / Code A Statistics. Anything else i can help you with? Thanks for caring. Now can we get back on topic and can you say something constructive like for example that you agree with me, or if not, bring some real proof that zerg is op. followed your link and instructions Code S TvZ: 18-34 (34.62%) Code A TvZ: 3-6 (33%) this is for the most recent season of GSL. haha ok my bad :D you are right. i was looking at GSL november 2011 statistics  ) well this was constructive :D still, it was stupid for me to give as an example a tournament that ended in a zvz final. Anyone knows stats for dreamhack/WCS? never mind, i found them: DH Winter: TvZ: 61% PvZ: 56% WCS: TVZ: 50% PVZ: 59% amirite? GSL and IPL are indeed zerg dominated, but, being the two tournaments won by zerg, that kindof makes sense. i find the racial balance fine as it is Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaase post the source to your statistics. You failed once and these statistics look weird considering there were only 2 Terrans in the Round of 12 of Dreamhack Winter and WCS Finals had only 4 Terrans out of 32 players... It's the Taeja effect. He 2-0's or 3-0's a bunch of Foreigner Zergs and makes TvZ look balanced if you only look at stats. so a terran winning messes with the statistics while a zerg winning is op? I think a stat is a stat. In GSL zergs did great, in DH terrans did great. You have to look at stats in context or they become meaningless. I doubt you would say Playhem statistics are as valuable as Dreamhack, which in turn aren't as valuable as GSL which inarguably has the highest level of play. A top level player beating mediocre European Zergs and Stephano isn't really indicative of anything. But if Stat's are all that matter to you, here's another stat. According to SC2 Gears I have a 38% win rate TvZ, a 56% Win Rate TvP and a 69% win Rate TvT.
if you look at my original post in this reply/reply/repy chain, the discussion started from me saying that zergs dont have the most earnings (USD) in the last month. Protoss do (mostly from the pvp WCS and WCG finals). Ok GSL is a lot more relevant than Dreamhack, of course. But WCS is irrelevant as well? There we have 50% TvZ and 59% PvZ. And you can't say that we did not have good koreans in WCS or that THE tourney with the biggest prize ever did not pose any interest for the koreans. Dont forget OSL too, where we had only one zerg in the ro8.
|
On December 04 2012 21:49 FXO.Slavik wrote:Only zergs are winning TT so imba! :D http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Premier_Tournamentsif infestors are that good, why do zergs lose games?  \ infested terrans are really imbalanced, because you can trade mana on units, that's not fair, it needs nerf, but fungals are ok, its almost same with being off position and trapped by forcefields or losing some units to siege tanks, you just need to be more careful with your units, especially in late game. I think that zergs sucked a lot, but then they started thinking more and playing different, instead of playing muta ling baneling T2 forever or slow transition into T3 they started rushing for T3, almost no terrans except for Taeja or MVP rush for T3, they keep spaming marines tanks vs broodlords, make late transition, being at big disadvantage they try to come back in the game, but they just cant because of big disadvantage, and its gg. The same with protoss players, a lot of toss players keep fighting with broodlords infestors having only stalkers, of course with better micro you can beat zerg army with pure stalkers, but if zerg is as good as you he wont allow you, and look at Squirtle, if he sees that zerg is not agressive he is teching to carriers and when zerg player has broodlord infestor army, he immediately has a good answer. People complain on infestor, yes, this unit is very good and universal, but without it it's impossible to beat other races, in big fights you should spam infested terrans, neural parasite opponent's units and also fungal units, its microing one unit but that anywat requires micro, because your units can get stormed or vortexed or can catch seeker missile and it's immediately gg. Players are always finding out something new, a year ago people played without knowing all the timing till almost 20th minute, games were very short, you couldnt really see a lot of 40-50 minute games, because players didnt think about late late late game, they were focusing on middle game, right now zergs are almost always teching to T3. How it was before: zergs was forever on t2, then zerg after failing at t2 started teching to hive, then zerg started teching straight to hive but died to timing attacks, then zerg learned how to defend timing attacks, defended with first broodlords and it was immediately gg for opponent, then opponents learned how to counter broodlord counter attacks, now it's developed further, and it's developing more and more, players got many stuff to learn and to practice, and with Hots there will be even more units and blizzard is making it more casual because it will be even harder to count perfect unit composition, to position your army, to micro ALL you units ^^ I think terrans forgot about thor drop on LT, siege pushes on steppes of war and of course... 5 rax reapers :D I remember terrans said: hey, zergs, you are just bad! you'd better learn to play instead of whine! same shit here ^^
What? Zerg learnt to defend or did Blizzard help them by buffing Queen's? All the things that you talked about terrans forgetting were patched out of the game because of zerg whine. Why learn to play better when you can whine like the zergs ddid? same shit here ^^
|
On December 04 2012 21:51 Pursuit_ wrote:Show nested quote +On December 04 2012 21:47 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 21:43 TeeTS wrote:On December 04 2012 21:39 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 21:31 Yello wrote:On December 04 2012 21:26 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 21:18 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 21:11 Pursuit_ wrote:On December 04 2012 21:06 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 20:55 Shady Sands wrote: [quote] Oh hai there new social media smurfbot. Earning your 40 bucks for setting up this account, I see.
Can you please explain how you know how to find specific league stats in TLPD while only having two posts on teamliquid? Hi there rude human. I never had a TL account because i generally dont post (well i never posted on TL, .. i did post 2-3 comments on reddit and that's it). I have internet access, i follow and play sc:bw and now sc2 since 1998. Finding statistics is very easy: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/2012_Global_StarCraft_II_League_Season_5 > go to Code S Statistics / Code A Statistics. Anything else i can help you with? Thanks for caring. Now can we get back on topic and can you say something constructive like for example that you agree with me, or if not, bring some real proof that zerg is op. followed your link and instructions Code S TvZ: 18-34 (34.62%) Code A TvZ: 3-6 (33%) this is for the most recent season of GSL. haha ok my bad :D you are right. i was looking at GSL november 2011 statistics  ) well this was constructive :D still, it was stupid for me to give as an example a tournament that ended in a zvz final. Anyone knows stats for dreamhack/WCS? never mind, i found them: DH Winter: TvZ: 61% PvZ: 56% WCS: TVZ: 50% PVZ: 59% amirite? GSL and IPL are indeed zerg dominated, but, being the two tournaments won by zerg, that kindof makes sense. i find the racial balance fine as it is Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaase post the source to your statistics. You failed once and these statistics look weird considering there were only 2 Terrans in the Round of 12 of Dreamhack Winter and WCS Finals had only 4 Terrans out of 32 players... The source is http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/2012_DreamHack_Open/WinterI counted the maps won: TheStC 1 2 Stephano TaeJa 2 0 Stephano TheStC 0 2 Snute TaeJa 2 1 Snute ForGG 2 0 Ret ThorZaIN 1 2 Ret TaeJa 3 0 Nerchio 11 7 TvZ: 61.11 % Stephano 0 2 fraer Stephano 2 1 elfi Snute 0 2 elfi Snute 2 1 fraer Bly 2 1 StarNaN Bly 2 1 SaSe Bly 0 2 Socke Bly 0 2 MaNa Bly 2 1 Feast Nerchio 0 2 monchi TLO 2 1 monchi DIMAGA 0 2 monchi TargA 0 2 monchi TLO 2 1 Bischu Nerchio 2 0 Bischu DIMAGA 2 0 Bischu TargA 0 2 Bischu Ret 1 2 HerO Ret 1 2 NaNiwa Ret 0 2 NightEnD Nerchio 3 1 Fraer Nerchio 3 0 MaNa Snute 0 3 Hero 26 33 PvZ: 55.93 % you know how few sense it makes to take stats from a tournament where one race's participation is below 20%? the number of participants influences in no way the wlr of that race. between my post and yours i consider yours as having no sense. Yes it does. If you had 100 bronze league Zergs, 2 bronze league Terrans and one Taeja in a tournament it HUGELY affects the win rate of Terran as opposed to, say, 100 bronze Zergs and 99 bronze Terran and one Taeja. Obviously you have no idea how stats work.
if you only want to insult then go ahead, i can start as well. Who exactly are those bronze zergs? Stephano? Nerchio?
|
On December 04 2012 21:53 JediMasterBETTY wrote:Show nested quote +On December 04 2012 21:48 Pursuit_ wrote:On December 04 2012 21:41 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 21:35 Pursuit_ wrote:On December 04 2012 21:31 Yello wrote:On December 04 2012 21:26 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 21:18 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 21:11 Pursuit_ wrote:On December 04 2012 21:06 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 20:55 Shady Sands wrote: [quote] Oh hai there new social media smurfbot. Earning your 40 bucks for setting up this account, I see.
Can you please explain how you know how to find specific league stats in TLPD while only having two posts on teamliquid? Hi there rude human. I never had a TL account because i generally dont post (well i never posted on TL, .. i did post 2-3 comments on reddit and that's it). I have internet access, i follow and play sc:bw and now sc2 since 1998. Finding statistics is very easy: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/2012_Global_StarCraft_II_League_Season_5 > go to Code S Statistics / Code A Statistics. Anything else i can help you with? Thanks for caring. Now can we get back on topic and can you say something constructive like for example that you agree with me, or if not, bring some real proof that zerg is op. followed your link and instructions Code S TvZ: 18-34 (34.62%) Code A TvZ: 3-6 (33%) this is for the most recent season of GSL. haha ok my bad :D you are right. i was looking at GSL november 2011 statistics  ) well this was constructive :D still, it was stupid for me to give as an example a tournament that ended in a zvz final. Anyone knows stats for dreamhack/WCS? never mind, i found them: DH Winter: TvZ: 61% PvZ: 56% WCS: TVZ: 50% PVZ: 59% amirite? GSL and IPL are indeed zerg dominated, but, being the two tournaments won by zerg, that kindof makes sense. i find the racial balance fine as it is Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaase post the source to your statistics. You failed once and these statistics look weird considering there were only 2 Terrans in the Round of 12 of Dreamhack Winter and WCS Finals had only 4 Terrans out of 32 players... It's the Taeja effect. He 2-0's or 3-0's a bunch of Foreigner Zergs and makes TvZ look balanced if you only look at stats. so a terran winning messes with the statistics while a zerg winning is op? I think a stat is a stat. In GSL zergs did great, in DH terrans did great. You have to look at stats in context or they become meaningless. I doubt you would say Playhem statistics are as valuable as Dreamhack, which in turn aren't as valuable as GSL which inarguably has the highest level of play. A top level player beating mediocre European Zergs and Stephano isn't really indicative of anything. But if Stat's are all that matter to you, here's another stat. According to SC2 Gears I have a 38% win rate TvZ, a 56% Win Rate TvP and a 69% win Rate TvT. if you look at my original post in this reply/reply/repy chain, the discussion started from me saying that zergs dont have the most earnings (USD) in the last month. Protoss do (mostly from the pvp WCS and WCG finals). Ok GSL is a lot more relevant than Dreamhack, of course. But WCS is irrelevant as well? There we have 50% TvZ and 59% PvZ. And you can't say that we did not have good koreans in WCS or that THE tourney with the biggest prize ever did not pose any interest for the koreans. Dont forget OSL too, where we had only one zerg in the ro8.
Both WCS and OSL qualifications started just after patch before the zergs learnt all the corners they could cut after the Queen patch. GSL also introduce zerg favor maps like WW, Abyssal City.
And if you compare the korean protoss line up at WCS compare to the korean zerg lineup. You can see the top korean zergs (Life, Leenock, etc) weren't there.
|
On December 04 2012 21:56 JediMasterBETTY wrote:Show nested quote +On December 04 2012 21:51 Pursuit_ wrote:On December 04 2012 21:47 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 21:43 TeeTS wrote:On December 04 2012 21:39 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 21:31 Yello wrote:On December 04 2012 21:26 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 21:18 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 21:11 Pursuit_ wrote:On December 04 2012 21:06 JediMasterBETTY wrote:[quote] Hi there rude human. I never had a TL account because i generally dont post (well i never posted on TL, .. i did post 2-3 comments on reddit and that's it). I have internet access, i follow and play sc:bw and now sc2 since 1998. Finding statistics is very easy: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/2012_Global_StarCraft_II_League_Season_5 > go to Code S Statistics / Code A Statistics. Anything else i can help you with? Thanks for caring. Now can we get back on topic and can you say something constructive like for example that you agree with me, or if not, bring some real proof that zerg is op. followed your link and instructions Code S TvZ: 18-34 (34.62%) Code A TvZ: 3-6 (33%) this is for the most recent season of GSL. haha ok my bad :D you are right. i was looking at GSL november 2011 statistics  ) well this was constructive :D still, it was stupid for me to give as an example a tournament that ended in a zvz final. Anyone knows stats for dreamhack/WCS? never mind, i found them: DH Winter: TvZ: 61% PvZ: 56% WCS: TVZ: 50% PVZ: 59% amirite? GSL and IPL are indeed zerg dominated, but, being the two tournaments won by zerg, that kindof makes sense. i find the racial balance fine as it is Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaase post the source to your statistics. You failed once and these statistics look weird considering there were only 2 Terrans in the Round of 12 of Dreamhack Winter and WCS Finals had only 4 Terrans out of 32 players... The source is http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/2012_DreamHack_Open/WinterI counted the maps won: TheStC 1 2 Stephano TaeJa 2 0 Stephano TheStC 0 2 Snute TaeJa 2 1 Snute ForGG 2 0 Ret ThorZaIN 1 2 Ret TaeJa 3 0 Nerchio 11 7 TvZ: 61.11 % Stephano 0 2 fraer Stephano 2 1 elfi Snute 0 2 elfi Snute 2 1 fraer Bly 2 1 StarNaN Bly 2 1 SaSe Bly 0 2 Socke Bly 0 2 MaNa Bly 2 1 Feast Nerchio 0 2 monchi TLO 2 1 monchi DIMAGA 0 2 monchi TargA 0 2 monchi TLO 2 1 Bischu Nerchio 2 0 Bischu DIMAGA 2 0 Bischu TargA 0 2 Bischu Ret 1 2 HerO Ret 1 2 NaNiwa Ret 0 2 NightEnD Nerchio 3 1 Fraer Nerchio 3 0 MaNa Snute 0 3 Hero 26 33 PvZ: 55.93 % you know how few sense it makes to take stats from a tournament where one race's participation is below 20%? the number of participants influences in no way the wlr of that race. between my post and yours i consider yours as having no sense. Yes it does. If you had 100 bronze league Zergs, 2 bronze league Terrans and one Taeja in a tournament it HUGELY affects the win rate of Terran as opposed to, say, 100 bronze Zergs and 99 bronze Terran and one Taeja. Obviously you have no idea how stats work. if you only want to insult then go ahead, i can start as well. Who exactly are those bronze zergs? Stephano? Nerchio?
My point wasn't to say any pro Zerg plays are bronze scrubs, my point was that if a race has small numbers then one good player can really sway the statistics. I could (and probably should have in retrospect) have just as easily switched the numbers for Zerg and Terran and replaced Taeja with Stephano or any other high level Zerg.
Either way, the point is that numerical representation makes a huge difference because it helps to mediate out outliers. In this case, a low Terran representation + the presence of one of, if not the, best Terran player in Taeja (plus every Terran there being Korean or a Tournament Winner) makes the statistics look way more T favored than it should.
|
I basically lost all faith in Blizzard during SC2 beta. I play occasionally because I want to like SC2 and I watch tournaments but it's difficult not to get annoyed by the design. My only wish for SC2 is for it to be a fun and highskilled game and imo terran is the only race that is like that.
Protoss have forcefields and colossus. Colossus feels like a tank that can walk and shoot, it can even walk over your own units so you don't have to worry about bad positioning, you can move them whereever you want. Forcefields also ruins micro. Cast them and then watch as the opponent can't move. Only reason why colossus isn't making protoss OP is that their gateway units are shit. If you buff them however you make warp ins ridiculous.
Zerg have the infestor. Preventing micro from the opponent and get a lucky fungal of and the opponent can't do a thing. You keep casting thoose fungals till he dies and if you need you throw infested terrans. Brood lords is also another unit with no micro potential.
Blizzard loves when you can't micro, just look at what they did to the carrier for example. Replacing vulture with hellion.. more micro and interesting gameplay? No hit and tun tactics work vs zerg. Fungal stops all possibilities of escaping. Just imagine playing corsair/reaver vs a zerg with fungal. Warp ins to stop harrasment and what not. But I guess that is needed when you give healing power to the dropship.
Now this is a pretty negative post so I will say I actually tihnk Blizzard did an okay job with the macro mechanics in SC2. I don't tihnk they want SC2 to be terrible. I just don't tihnk they know what they are doing.
|
On December 04 2012 21:49 FXO.Slavik wrote:Only zergs are winning TT so imba! :D http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Premier_Tournamentsif infestors are that good, why do zergs lose games?  \ infested terrans are really imbalanced, because you can trade mana on units, that's not fair, it needs nerf, but fungals are ok, its almost same with being off position and trapped by forcefields or losing some units to siege tanks, you just need to be more careful with your units, especially in late game. I think that zergs sucked a lot, but then they started thinking more and playing different, instead of playing muta ling baneling T2 forever or slow transition into T3 they started rushing for T3, almost no terrans except for Taeja or MVP rush for T3, they keep spaming marines tanks vs broodlords, make late transition, being at big disadvantage they try to come back in the game, but they just cant because of big disadvantage, and its gg. The same with protoss players, a lot of toss players keep fighting with broodlords infestors having only stalkers, of course with better micro you can beat zerg army with pure stalkers, but if zerg is as good as you he wont allow you, and look at Squirtle, if he sees that zerg is not agressive he is teching to carriers and when zerg player has broodlord infestor army, he immediately has a good answer. People complain on infestor, yes, this unit is very good and universal, but without it it's impossible to beat other races, in big fights you should spam infested terrans, neural parasite opponent's units and also fungal units, its microing one unit but that anywat requires micro, because your units can get stormed or vortexed or can catch seeker missile and it's immediately gg. Players are always finding out something new, a year ago people played without knowing all the timing till almost 20th minute, games were very short, you couldnt really see a lot of 40-50 minute games, because players didnt think about late late late game, they were focusing on middle game, right now zergs are almost always teching to T3. How it was before: zergs was forever on t2, then zerg after failing at t2 started teching to hive, then zerg started teching straight to hive but died to timing attacks, then zerg learned how to defend timing attacks, defended with first broodlords and it was immediately gg for opponent, then opponents learned how to counter broodlord counter attacks, now it's developed further, and it's developing more and more, players got many stuff to learn and to practice, and with Hots there will be even more units and blizzard is making it more casual because it will be even harder to count perfect unit composition, to position your army, to micro ALL you units ^^ I think terrans forgot about thor drop on LT, siege pushes on steppes of war and of course... 5 rax reapers :D I remember terrans said: hey, zergs, you are just bad! you'd better learn to play instead of whine! same shit here ^^
The difference back then was that all the cheesy all ins or aggressive plays could be denied through good play. And then if they didn't succeed you could quite easily be at a deficit. What exactly is it Zerg can do that can be punished if they're literally only macroing solidly? Everyone needs to take a step back away from their egos for a second and realise this isn't just Terran whining because they are losing. This is ruining the game as an E-sport slowly. I know too many people previously obsessed with sc who have now quit. Including myself. I don't want to play a game where my favourite race requires me to play so much better than my opponent to win.
I honestly feel really sad that this is the way the game is for now, it left a huge hole in my heart </3
|
On December 04 2012 21:56 JediMasterBETTY wrote:Show nested quote +On December 04 2012 21:51 Pursuit_ wrote:On December 04 2012 21:47 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 21:43 TeeTS wrote:On December 04 2012 21:39 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 21:31 Yello wrote:On December 04 2012 21:26 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 21:18 JediMasterBETTY wrote:On December 04 2012 21:11 Pursuit_ wrote:On December 04 2012 21:06 JediMasterBETTY wrote:[quote] Hi there rude human. I never had a TL account because i generally dont post (well i never posted on TL, .. i did post 2-3 comments on reddit and that's it). I have internet access, i follow and play sc:bw and now sc2 since 1998. Finding statistics is very easy: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/2012_Global_StarCraft_II_League_Season_5 > go to Code S Statistics / Code A Statistics. Anything else i can help you with? Thanks for caring. Now can we get back on topic and can you say something constructive like for example that you agree with me, or if not, bring some real proof that zerg is op. followed your link and instructions Code S TvZ: 18-34 (34.62%) Code A TvZ: 3-6 (33%) this is for the most recent season of GSL. haha ok my bad :D you are right. i was looking at GSL november 2011 statistics  ) well this was constructive :D still, it was stupid for me to give as an example a tournament that ended in a zvz final. Anyone knows stats for dreamhack/WCS? never mind, i found them: DH Winter: TvZ: 61% PvZ: 56% WCS: TVZ: 50% PVZ: 59% amirite? GSL and IPL are indeed zerg dominated, but, being the two tournaments won by zerg, that kindof makes sense. i find the racial balance fine as it is Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaase post the source to your statistics. You failed once and these statistics look weird considering there were only 2 Terrans in the Round of 12 of Dreamhack Winter and WCS Finals had only 4 Terrans out of 32 players... The source is http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/2012_DreamHack_Open/WinterI counted the maps won: TheStC 1 2 Stephano TaeJa 2 0 Stephano TheStC 0 2 Snute TaeJa 2 1 Snute ForGG 2 0 Ret ThorZaIN 1 2 Ret TaeJa 3 0 Nerchio 11 7 TvZ: 61.11 % Stephano 0 2 fraer Stephano 2 1 elfi Snute 0 2 elfi Snute 2 1 fraer Bly 2 1 StarNaN Bly 2 1 SaSe Bly 0 2 Socke Bly 0 2 MaNa Bly 2 1 Feast Nerchio 0 2 monchi TLO 2 1 monchi DIMAGA 0 2 monchi TargA 0 2 monchi TLO 2 1 Bischu Nerchio 2 0 Bischu DIMAGA 2 0 Bischu TargA 0 2 Bischu Ret 1 2 HerO Ret 1 2 NaNiwa Ret 0 2 NightEnD Nerchio 3 1 Fraer Nerchio 3 0 MaNa Snute 0 3 Hero 26 33 PvZ: 55.93 % you know how few sense it makes to take stats from a tournament where one race's participation is below 20%? the number of participants influences in no way the wlr of that race. between my post and yours i consider yours as having no sense. Yes it does. If you had 100 bronze league Zergs, 2 bronze league Terrans and one Taeja in a tournament it HUGELY affects the win rate of Terran as opposed to, say, 100 bronze Zergs and 99 bronze Terran and one Taeja. Obviously you have no idea how stats work. if you only want to insult then go ahead, i can start as well. Who exactly are those bronze zergs? Stephano? Nerchio?
lol calm down no one said that but u
|
|
|
|