GM / Master map hacker and general hacking and cheating th…

On September 28 2014 21:40 KingAlphard wrote:


He'll be banned soon at least from the forum hopefully, just like imbatoss, lionheart and others.

On September 27 2014 23:59 rekterino wrote:
Hacker name [NDGame]Kellerman
Server: NA
League: Grandmaster


goes for a blink build but cancels it without any scout because somehow sees my bunkers.

http://drop.sc/386506

On September 28 2014 22:10 rekterino wrote:
takes one to know one boys

User was banned for this post.

On September 29 2014 00:09 playa wrote:
I don't think he should have been banned on here... unless you're talking about blatant hackers, what he said is largely true. If Blizzard can't allow you to not play against them, at least give them the chance to contribute something... even if they were wrong. Now they can offer nothing.

On September 29 2014 00:23 TheFlexN wrote:

Could you explain? because all he did was posting replays of him maphacking against people that werent maphacking.

On September 29 2014 00:38 playa wrote:


Yeah, sure. It's pretty easy to imagine that if two people are hacking, then the odds of them being able to identify each other as hackers is going to be far greater than a legit player versus a maphacker who is trying to not be blatant. Kellerman might not be hacking, but the idea is highlighted, still. If that is a typical move of someone hacking, then how many legit players could even draw suspicion to it? Not all of us watch our replays, and, even if we do, we're probably more interested in how we can improve than whether someone was acting on information they shouldn't have had. Usually they have to be pretty blatant, like the barcode toss on team Ascension who doesn't scout on 4 player maps. Who just magically counters everything and goes to attack you without scouting where your base is. And even then people are dubious. So, personally, I'd like to hear who hackers think are hacking. I imagine, generally, that games between hackers would further highlight that they aren't playing legit.

If you don't allow hackers to post their games, then you probably eliminate the pool of games that are most suspicious.

On September 29 2014 02:27 TheFlexN wrote:

What you ask for are detectives that are familiar with using map hacking, the thing is, the majority of players arent map hackers and people that complain about map hackers, and they post here a lot, are also not using map hacks. What happened now is that a map hacker, blatant one too, reported people that dont use map hacks as map hackers, but as I remarked before, he was probably just trolling he thread, getting his newly made account banned. It will be nice to see ex-map hackers do go on and say "hey here is a list of maphackers and replays with analysis" or something like that, but dont expect something like this. The bottom line, this guy didnt report map hackers as a map hacker vigilante, he was map hacking innocent people, one going for stalker aggression into colossi followup and the other going for hidden tech DTs and then just harras and push at the same time, but got hard countered by a non scouting terran that was acting all suspicious and also calling out that the player was trying to drop DTs even though he never scouted the tech, ever.

On September 18 2014 07:20 MiCroLiFe wrote:
Everyone report Stormberg!

http://drop.sc/386225

i bet my life that he hacks he checks my base 10+ times, and know where my banshe comes and drop comes every time

On September 29 2014 00:38 playa wrote:


Yeah, sure. It's pretty easy to imagine that if two people are hacking, then the odds of them being able to identify each other as hackers is going to be far greater than a legit player versus a maphacker who is trying to not be blatant. Kellerman might not be hacking, but the idea is highlighted, still. If that is a typical move of someone hacking, then how many legit players could even draw suspicion to it? Not all of us watch our replays, and, even if we do, we're probably more interested in how we can improve than whether someone was acting on information they shouldn't have had. Usually they have to be pretty blatant, like the barcode toss on team Ascension who doesn't scout on 4 player maps. Who just magically counters everything and goes to attack you without scouting where your base is. And even then people are dubious. So, personally, I'd like to hear who hackers think are hacking. I imagine, generally, that games between hackers would further highlight that they aren't playing legit.

If you don't allow hackers to post their games, then you probably eliminate the pool of games that are most suspicious.

On September 29 2014 04:56 Mazi4 wrote:
Hacker name: IIIIIIIIIII
Server: EU
League: Diamond
Description: Blind 2rax on four player map, very short game and obvious mh.

http://drop.sc/386541

profile: http://eu.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/1053058/2/IIIIIIIIIII/

On September 29 2014 04:54 duckk wrote:


Hackers accuse everyone of hacking so I am not sure they are the best at finding hackers. Fun fact, If somebody accuses someone else of hacking (who is not actually hacking) then there is a ~85% chance that player is hacking(obvious exceptions are skilless clueless joke of players like avilo)

Legit players are far better at finding hackers. There is a huge gap in hacker's macro/micro compared to their scouting. Then you have the skilled players who get tired of playing hackers and download it themselves and there is not a disparity between their skill and "perfect" scouting. This is where you catch them via their army movements. When playing someone like this who you suspect of hacking it is best to do unorthodox things like take a early random hidden base and see how they react.