|
On May 15 2012 07:07 arQ wrote:Show nested quote +On May 15 2012 07:04 S_SienZ wrote:On May 15 2012 07:02 arQ wrote:On May 15 2012 07:00 StriderDoom wrote: "The ones who live in the house right now are all Startale members except Parting."
am I reading this right? Yes. What's up? Wait. PartinG left? No. It's bad Swedish-English translation or just bad grammar. He is saying that everyone in Startale but Parting lives in the house.
The English translation has better grammar than the Swedish original, if that's any consolation.
|
On May 15 2012 06:34 Hardigan wrote:Show nested quote +On May 15 2012 06:25 Eee wrote:On May 15 2012 06:20 Blennd wrote: Lefty (lefties) = someone who is left-handed Leftist = someone whose political beliefs are on the far left
Good interview. Kind of curious why Huk would think naniwa doesn't deserve the Code S spot, considering he earned it through the exchange program, and Huk's seeds have been awarded based on judgment calls. Thank you, fixed it now. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" I think HuK just think his achievments in 2012 were a lot better than Naniwas, kind of makes me think anout when he was criticizing the TL powerranking for MLG because there were people he beat at a previous MLG ahead of him in the ranking. Which makes no sense at all as Huk himself said that he didn't "earn" his up and down seat. It's probably something else
HUK said "it wasn't the seed he wanted". People like you thought he was being humble Jinro style. I always thought he meant he wanted the code S seed.
|
On May 15 2012 14:37 narkissos wrote:Show nested quote +On May 15 2012 06:34 Hardigan wrote:On May 15 2012 06:25 Eee wrote:On May 15 2012 06:20 Blennd wrote: Lefty (lefties) = someone who is left-handed Leftist = someone whose political beliefs are on the far left
Good interview. Kind of curious why Huk would think naniwa doesn't deserve the Code S spot, considering he earned it through the exchange program, and Huk's seeds have been awarded based on judgment calls. Thank you, fixed it now. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" I think HuK just think his achievments in 2012 were a lot better than Naniwas, kind of makes me think anout when he was criticizing the TL powerranking for MLG because there were people he beat at a previous MLG ahead of him in the ranking. Which makes no sense at all as Huk himself said that he didn't "earn" his up and down seat. It's probably something else HUK said "it wasn't the seed he wanted". People like you thought he was being humble Jinro style. I always thought he meant he wanted the code S seed. Is there a way to find that tweet, because i don't remember him saying that (in that way)
|
nvm. nice interview, thanks for the read.
|
On May 15 2012 07:04 polyphonyEX wrote:2 days for this? I got permed for quoting a meme... Weird. You don't look perm banned to me.
|
What really happened between Naniwa and HuK:
Day9 was doing a daily a while ago about HuK's PvP, Day9 tweeted something about HuK's PvP being really solid, Naniwa literally replied with the builds he regularly does (such as 2gate proxy, dt rush etc.), implying that HuK's PvP isn't solid. And seeing as he's beating players like Oz while losing over and over to players like Hasuobs, mid GM player Seiplo etc, I think it was a pretty fair tweet. HuK does take a tonnn of risks, especially in PvP.
HuK's response to this was something like "Naniwa, you shouldn't talk shit about my play when you go emo every time I call your code S spot unworthy"- then HuK blocks Naniwa's twitter immediatly. Naniwa never bothered to reply anything but " " to this tweet.
If you look back thru their twitter history you can find the exact tweets, I can't be bothered searching them up right now.
|
On May 15 2012 17:20 ErAsc2 wrote:What really happened between Naniwa and HuK: Day9 was doing a daily a while ago about HuK's PvP, Day9 tweeted something about HuK's PvP being really solid, Naniwa literally replied with the builds he regularly does (such as 2gate proxy, dt rush etc.), implying that HuK's PvP isn't solid. And seeing as he's beating players like Oz while losing over and over to players like Hasuobs, mid GM player Seiplo etc, I think it was a pretty fair tweet. HuK does take a tonnn of risks, especially in PvP. HuK's response to this was something like "Naniwa, you shouldn't talk shit about my play when you go emo every time I call your code S spot unworthy"- then HuK blocks Naniwa's twitter immediatly. Naniwa never bothered to reply anything but " data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" " to this tweet. If you look back thru their twitter history you can find the exact tweets, I can't be bothered searching them up right now.
Pot calling kettle black. If anything that strengthens the statement that it started with Huk calling Naniwa's code S spot unworthy. Not that it really matters.
|
|
|
|