EPTNada leaves team oGs - Page 33
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Grobyc
Canada18410 Posts
| ||
|
vijeze
Netherlands719 Posts
| ||
|
MaestrO_
United States591 Posts
| ||
|
Drake
Germany6146 Posts
On February 07 2012 20:00 Strike_ wrote: WHAT NOOOO why ? if he have more motivation he will start to be good again, atm in oGs he was falling more and more apart and soon would be out of the pro scene On February 08 2012 06:42 Chvol wrote: I don't think it hurts oGs that much to lose him. He hasn't really been a contender for a code S championship, ever. I think oGs probably could have kept him if they wanted to, seeing as they just got a new sponsor or two and a partnership. you've no idea ^^ its like you lose michael jordan in basketball in the end, perhaps he not the fastest anymore, perhaps hes not the biggest not the best and not even the most talented BUT his name alone makes your team 1million times bigger | ||
|
jinorazi
Korea (South)4948 Posts
 | ||
|
TrojanSC2
United States82 Posts
| ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On February 08 2012 06:56 Demorase wrote: Nada is extremely passive, he will NEVER be willing to risk it all on an all-in for example, and that's his Achilles heel. Everybody in the GSL knows it, he's no threat in the early-mid game, and everybody knows how to exploit his passivity by either cheesing him or outmacroing him by expanding more. He's like Idra a year ago, except Idra is aware of it and has worked a lot to be less predictable, whereas Nada has made virtually no adjustement. And Idra plays a more passive race, and even then his passivity was a problem, let alone for a Terran. You have seen Nada vs keen the first time they met? Passive is a word i would absolutly not attribute to that game. | ||
|
Nazeron
Canada1046 Posts
| ||
|
Swede
New Zealand853 Posts
On February 08 2012 06:56 Demorase wrote: Nada is extremely passive, he will NEVER be willing to risk it all on an all-in for example, and that's his Achilles heel. Everybody in the GSL knows it, he's no threat in the early-mid game, and everybody knows how to exploit his passivity by either cheesing him or outmacroing him by expanding more. He's like Idra a year ago, except Idra is aware of it and has worked a lot to be less predictable, whereas Nada has made virtually no adjustement. And Idra plays a more passive race, and even then his passivity was a problem, let alone for a Terran. I'm sorry, but never all-inning isn't the same as being extremely passive. He makes aggressive moves, all-in or not, and therefore by definition he isn't passive. I also disagree with the sentiment that Terran is necessarily a more aggressive race. There are playstyles that don't revolve around aggression which have been successful (mech is the easy example), and a lot of recent styles have had a bigger focus on expanding at Zerg-like speed than being aggressive (I have seen Nada play this style). Anyway, maybe you're right that Nada has to add the occasional all-in to his play to achieve real success at this game, but in my opinion that says much more about SC2 as a game than anything else. | ||
|
Steel
Japan2283 Posts
| ||
|
TemplarCo.
Mexico2870 Posts
| ||
|
Sovano
United States1503 Posts
| ||
|
Pocky52
United States463 Posts
 | ||
|
ampson
United States2355 Posts
| ||
|
Aserrin
Uruguay231 Posts
| ||
|
RoboBob
United States798 Posts
I can understand MC dumping OGS for SK if there was enough money involved. But Nada? He was making a ton of money in BW and he threw it all away in order to pursue SC2. It just doesn't make sense. | ||
|
JagerGard
Sweden135 Posts
Thanks for all the oGs memories, now I have no one except Fin to root for in oGs. | ||
|
MrSparkle
Canada135 Posts
| ||
|
tdt
United States3179 Posts
| ||
|
Bippzy
United States1466 Posts
Just trollin. I wonder if nada didn't have a good enough training schedule at oGs? The argument could be made that he is A) looking for more money or B) looking for better practice. I want it to be B | ||
| ||
