EPTNada leaves team oGs - Page 32
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Chvol
United States200 Posts
| ||
|
Praetorial
United States4241 Posts
| ||
|
Quadratic
Canada249 Posts
| ||
|
babylon
8765 Posts
On February 08 2012 06:34 Fionn wrote: Nada is already established, he has money and he's his own brand. If he wanted, to let's say, take over ZeNex and make that team his own, like Boxer and Slayers, he could do that. Brilliant idea. NaDamall should sponsor ZeNEX. | ||
|
Xivsa
United States1009 Posts
| ||
ImbaTosS
United Kingdom1699 Posts
On February 08 2012 06:39 Demorase wrote: A player of his caliber should have won a GSL by now, especially during the early days of SC2 when terran was much stronger, the GSL was his for the taking all it took was a bunker rush and good micro back then. And yet, all he's managed to get in a whole year and a half is a quarter finals. I think Nada's playstyle is way too passive, it might have worked in SC1 but in SC2 terran is an aggressive race, and his playstyle is completely unadapted. He's got a lot of work cut out for him if he wants to win a GSL, he needs to rework his entire playstyle. Also, he's old. | ||
|
Demorase
136 Posts
On February 08 2012 06:40 Fionn wrote: I think Nada had a great shot at winning GSL May, but then Inca cheesed him to death and we never got the epic finals of Nada vs. Nestea. Oh Inca. You can't blame Inca for abusing Nada's passivity, if Inca managed to exploit it so easily I don't see how Nada would have won a best of 7 in the finals anyway. No, the problem is his playstyle, he plays Terran like Protoss, sitting forever macroing defending without ever attacking, except unlike Protoss he can't get a powerful death ball that can win in a straight battle maxed out. His playstyle makes no sense for Terran in SC2. | ||
|
Sumahi
Guam5609 Posts
| ||
|
Wampaibist
United States478 Posts
On February 08 2012 06:06 disciple wrote: I think NaDa shouldn't be a mercenary for his name's sake and legacy. The most decorated BW player and one of the greatest ESPORTS legends in a foreign team for money ? I hope not. Imo he should start his own thing or join Slayers. The prospect of him joining a team with a say year long CJ B-teamer is disturbing for me. I like team liquid for the types of players they pick up, Would I want sheth ( or any TL player) to be the flash of sc2 to give up being as sweet as he (they) is? nonono I wouldn't Give Nada a chance liquid Nada gogo | ||
|
snively
United States1159 Posts
First MC, now NaDa... | ||
|
Demorase
136 Posts
He's not older than Nestea, who has won 3 championships so far, of which 1 was when his race was 2 times less powerful than Terran and still managed to win. There's really no angle to explain Nada's underwhelming results so far, except that maybe he picked the absolute wrong race for his playstyle, i.e. passivity and reaction. | ||
|
Jetaap
France4814 Posts
| ||
|
Swede
New Zealand853 Posts
On February 08 2012 06:45 Demorase wrote: You can't blame Inca for abusing Nada's passivity, if Inca managed to exploit it so easily I don't see how Nada would have won a best of 7 in the finals anyway. No, the problem is his playstyle, he plays Terran like Protoss, sitting forever macroing defending without ever attacking, except unlike Protoss he can't get a powerful death ball that can win in a straight battle maxed out. His playstyle makes no sense for Terran in SC2. Have you watched his stream? That isn't his playstyle at all. Maybe it was once upon a time, but just because it was once doesn't mean it is now. He does all the standard Terran harrassment: banshees, hellions, drops etc and timing attacks too. He also remains one of the most consistent players in SC2 just like he was in BW, so it's a tough argument to say that his playstyle was failing badly at any one point. Admittedly his win ratio has never been exceptional, but it's definitely been consistently decent. | ||
|
Blasterion
China10272 Posts
| ||
|
CeriseCherries
6170 Posts
| ||
|
Chocolatiere
Poland7 Posts
| ||
|
dukem
Norway189 Posts
On February 08 2012 05:01 Sm1Le wrote: incoming SlayerS_Nada or even IMNada !!! ^__^ Either and my life is complete | ||
|
Demorase
136 Posts
On February 08 2012 06:51 Swede wrote: Have you watched his stream? That isn't his playstyle at all. Maybe it was once upon a time, but just because it was once doesn't mean it is now. He does all the standard Terran harrassment: banshees, hellions, drops etc and timing attacks too. He also remains one of the most consistent players in SC2 just like he was in BW, so it's a tough argument to say that his playstyle was failing badly at any one point. Admittedly his win ratio has never been exceptional, but it's definitely been consistently decent. Nada is extremely passive, he will NEVER be willing to risk it all on an all-in for example, and that's his Achilles heel. Everybody in the GSL knows it, he's no threat in the early-mid game, and everybody knows how to exploit his passivity by either cheesing him or outmacroing him by expanding more. He's like Idra a year ago, except Idra is aware of it and has worked a lot to be less predictable, whereas Nada has made virtually no adjustement. And Idra plays a more passive race, and even then his passivity was a problem, let alone for a Terran. | ||
|
cristo1122
Australia505 Posts
On February 07 2012 20:03 pycho wrote: "i want new challenges" - progamers "i want more money" he already pretty well off so i would say this is not the case | ||
|
Al Bundy
7257 Posts
Sorry, you're right, I should have explained my opinion in a more detailed fashion. | ||
| ||
