EPTMLG Season Numbers - Page 2
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Bagration
United States18282 Posts
| ||
|
Sea_Food
Finland1612 Posts
| ||
|
thragar
Canada450 Posts
| ||
|
jinixxx123
543 Posts
| ||
|
Velr
Switzerland10668 Posts
On December 06 2011 23:52 Manslayer wrote: sup Dreamhack? Only proofs that quality (i'm not talking about the players) is not the main reason for success. It's stupid hype, which MLG and everything "US" excells at. But grats MLG, you beat a Lanparty... | ||
|
jinixxx123
543 Posts
On December 07 2011 00:21 windzor wrote: Yea MTV don't have great numbers in that agespan, But I imagine that Comedy Centrals has males between 18-24 as one of their prime audiences. And males between 18-24 is the audience that MLG can sell stuff to. Not a large part of their audience is much older, and below don't really have much money to use, or for their potential sponsor/advertisers to sell stuff to. So in that way that graph makes perfect sense. no mtv if anything has there largest audience between 18-24.. I watch alot of the reality shows. Who you think watches 16 and pregnant, jersey shore, real world challenges , 40 year olds? mtv is for younge people around the ages quoted here, That statisic is very impressive, however im curious how they actually know what age are the viewers ( this goes out to both mtv and mlg, unless a survey is done its just guess work) | ||
|
zaii
Guam2611 Posts
On December 07 2011 00:27 sabas123 wrote: bigger than comedy central0_o why dont they go on real tv? Because TV is not the way to go for eSports, Well just my opinion. | ||
|
bounca
140 Posts
| ||
|
vertical101
Hong Kong311 Posts
its like they wait for DH numbers for so long then 100k on it. DH didnt even put Sweden national tv viewers count. | ||
|
windzor
Denmark1013 Posts
On December 07 2011 00:31 jinixxx123 wrote: no mtv if anything has there largest audience between 18-24.. I watch alot of the reality shows. Who you think watches 16 and pregnant, jersey shore, real world challenges , 40 year olds? mtv is for younge people around the ages quoted here, That statisic is very impressive, however im curious how they actually know what age are the viewers ( this goes out to both mtv and mlg, unless a survey is done its just guess work) Okay should say age and sexspan. Male between 18 and 24 watching 16 and pregnant i would call men  that programs agespan I would say i 20-30 age women. | ||
|
Jiddra
Sweden2685 Posts
On December 07 2011 00:27 sabas123 wrote: bigger than comedy central0_o why dont they go on real tv? Beacuse streams make the numbers happen. What channel would reach 175 countries with the low cost of streams? | ||
|
nooboon
2602 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + That being said, because of their low prize pools MLG should have lots of money in the bank. 2012 is going to be an awesome year. | ||
|
FrostedMiniWheats
United States30730 Posts
Hope 2012 is even better! :D | ||
|
delo
United States333 Posts
On December 07 2011 00:05 Pandemona wrote: That bit doesn't really matter about the MLG network having greater numbers than MTV/CC because they used "males between 18-24" as the study lol which i think is a bit silly thus throwing that graph to a pointless statistic. Pretty sure if something about Bieber was on, under 18 girls would of flocked to watch it on MTV or some shit. Wasnt VMAs on 1 of the weekends of MLG aswell? Surely that would of out rated MLG The graph might seem pointless to you, but it probably resonates with sponsors quite a bit, especially since it's focusing on the 18-24 male demographic, one of the most sought after demos AFAIK. And MLG does amazing in that regard. As for MTV achieving higher peak viewership because of VMA's/Bieber/etc, that's likely true, but that's also probably part of why MLG went with average quarter hour (I would assume over the duration of the tournament) vs. MTV's Nielson ratings for the same metric. After all, how often does MTV have VMA's? And how long are they? MTV may have higher peaks for brief periods, but what that graph is saying is that MLG has a much higher average viewership when it's "airing", so to speak. For sponsors, that's incredibly useful information - they can invest in MLG and reap a higher average viewership relative to MTV's standard programming for the same demographic. Might even be cheaper/more profitable than paying a crapload for a small ad to air during the VMA's or whatever. Anywho, my 2 cents. | ||
|
Linwelin
Ireland7554 Posts
| ||
|
FallDownMarigold
United States3710 Posts
On December 06 2011 23:58 robih wrote: cant compete with americans in records they find a record everywhere. like every NFL game 304732947932649362 records are set. dont read too much into american statistics about american events and how much they hype the statistics LOL. Actually you're kinda right about NFL games.... Hahahaa it really does seem like you see some record being broken in every NFL game, including the most obscure categories of records like "most pass yards after a third quarter deficit" and so on. That said, your jab/generalization concerning "American statistics, events, hype, ... so on and so forth" is uncalled for/stupid, just like the "sup Dreamhack" comment | ||
|
Spaceneil8
United States317 Posts
On December 07 2011 00:31 Velr wrote: Only proofs that quality (i'm not talking about the players) is not the main reason for success. It's stupid hype, which MLG and everything "US" excells at. But grats MLG, you beat a Lanparty... No... The reason DH wasn't so high probably was due to scheduling over thanksgiving, and bad hours for Americans. But MLG's quality is good imo. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + It is hard to compare to TV though, because TV station are limited to 1 country mostly, unless you have a satellite but (in Belgium) almost nobody has that. | ||
|
ALPINA
3791 Posts
| ||
|
DreamOen
Spain1400 Posts
| ||
| ||
