EPTEG vs mouz rivalry on twitter - Page 19
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
ReaperX
Hong Kong1758 Posts
| ||
|
CPTBadAss
United States594 Posts
| ||
|
MattO1337
United States203 Posts
On December 03 2011 10:49 Kloudi wrote: they were only two good American team in NA scene and it was 3D an complexity EG get rape everytime they go to Europe by B-team and Mouz have one of the strongest team in Europe atm. you cleary know nothing about CS scene maybe esport start for you with sc2 You're fucking right, 3D and Complexity were the 2 best in NA. Good thing the complexity team (Frod,Warden,Storm)left complexity and joined EG. Next. Also complexity's 2nd CS 1.6(hero,dboorn) team also left them to join EG. | ||
|
Aetherial
Australia917 Posts
| ||
|
skrotcyk
Sweden432 Posts
On December 03 2011 10:43 empty.bottle wrote: My bad, name 2 successful players from sc2, that haven't been bought by EG in the past year. sc2 was released ~ a year ago and besides why does it matter if they bought them later instead? stop this silly bullshitcrapplz | ||
|
Kloudi
Sweden21 Posts
On December 03 2011 10:51 MattO1337 wrote: You're fucking right, 3D and Complexity were the 2 best in NA. Good thing the complexity team left complexity and joined EG. Next. then lack of result Mouz still better , better players better result next | ||
|
mikodrak
Czech Republic78 Posts
| ||
|
sechkie
United States334 Posts
and I wouldn't say that liquid bought zenio and hero.. zenio and hero joined through the relationship of tl and ogs. EG has a lot of money and basically threw money at huk and puma to join them. | ||
|
arChieSC2
Spain162 Posts
On December 03 2011 10:51 MattO1337 wrote: You're fucking right, 3D and Complexity were the 2 best in NA. Good thing the complexity team left complexity and joined EG. Next. dude, take a pill, in the last 3 matches mouz 18-12 EG mouz 15-15 EG and mouz 12-18 EG those are kinda "old" matches but i think u cant tell EG is better than mouz at 1.6 even more with the new lineup EG has (which in my oppinion is weaker) | ||
|
MasterBlasterCaster
United States568 Posts
| ||
|
Skilledblob
Germany3392 Posts
| ||
|
AIOL!
France962 Posts
LOL @ EG1.6 > Mouz1.6 xD Did you ever follow the 1.6 scene?? (in which EU>>>>>>>>>>US) | ||
|
empty.bottle
685 Posts
On December 03 2011 10:54 Skilledblob wrote: i got your back there ;D | ||
|
Fishriot
United States621 Posts
| ||
|
OKMarius
Norway469 Posts
On December 03 2011 10:46 MattO1337 wrote: Oh I almost forgot WC3. EG WC3 > Mouz WC3. Mouz was around forever in WC3, always a force to be reckoned with. (Some players that has played for mouz: SaSe, Fly, Happy, Farseer, Shortround, FoV, th000 ToD, Spell, even Moon for a bit) EG didn't exist before the WC3scene started going downhill, so tbh Mouz > EG in WC3. | ||
|
dtz
5834 Posts
On December 03 2011 10:52 MasterBlasterCaster wrote: What do you mean by buying players? Isn't every player bought? I mean, no one is doing anything for free here, right? Wouldn't buying a player be like signing a player, which literally every professional sport that has ever existed and had teams has done? I mean, how do you go from an idea of a team to a real team without some sort of transactions being made? Players just popping up out of thin air to compose a team? Developed would be the word i guess. As stated in the transfer statement of HuK, EG thanked Huk and give a lot of credit to Liquid for making Huk the player that he is. A lot of people argue that EG does not really develop their players while Mouz and Liquid does. Like Hero has definitely improved leaps and bounds in terms of play and fame after the acquisition. Huk and Idra had been a very famous top player even before EG. So yea bought is probably a bad word since everyone is a professional. I don't really care much to be honest but i think that's what a lot of people mean. | ||
|
seiferoth10
3362 Posts
On December 03 2011 10:52 MasterBlasterCaster wrote: What do you mean by buying players? Isn't every player bought? I mean, no one is doing anything for free here, right? Wouldn't buying a player be like signing a player, which literally every professional sport that has ever existed and had teams has done? I mean, how do you go from an idea of a team to a real team without some sort of transactions being made? Players just popping up out of thin air to compose a team? It's the favorite disqualification of bitter fans whose favorite team doesn't have the means to pay their successful players more, thus causing those players to leave. Thus they have bitter resentment to the team that those players end up on. | ||
|
MattO1337
United States203 Posts
On December 03 2011 10:54 AIOL! wrote: LOL @ EG1.6 > Mouz1.6 xD Did you ever follow the 1.6 scene?? (in which EU>>>>>>>>>>US) Of course I followed the scene. The majority of euro teams > the majority of NA teams. However, EG 1.6 > Mouz 1.6 | ||
|
skrotcyk
Sweden432 Posts
On December 03 2011 10:52 sechkie wrote: in things like cs euro esports is way better than na.... and I wouldn't say that liquid bought zenio and hero.. zenio and hero joined through the relationship of tl and ogs. EG has a lot of money and basically threw money at huk and puma to join them. LOL. ur so fucking biased it's even sad that u exist. User was temp banned for this post. | ||
|
Skillig
Belgium141 Posts
| ||
| ||
