They arrn't in the pedia afa I seen.
Thx
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
MESeidel
Germany326 Posts
They arrn't in the pedia afa I seen. Thx | ||
|
Grovbolle
Denmark3815 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + Sjow-elfi 2-1 IdrA - Huk 2-0 Huk - Dimaga 0-2 IdrA - WhiteRa 0-2 WhiteRa - Dimaga 2-1 | ||
|
Sangyerians
Australia248 Posts
On November 06 2011 19:32 TotalBiscuit wrote: Show nested quote + On November 06 2011 19:31 Sangyerians wrote: Why are do the showmatches have half the prize pool of the main tournament? I'd much rather a $14,000 prize pool and just $200 each show match. You are not playing the tournament and I'm pretty sure the players would prefer a more even distribution and more chances at money. The prizepool and its distribution should not matter to spectators. Obviously I'm not playing the tournament. The prize pool is obviously a matter to spectators. Production value matters, of course, but a $100,000 has more on the line than, say, a $1000 tournament and to me, the common spectator who I guess you guys are trying to appeal to, the higher the prize pool the higher the stakes, and the higher the excitement form e. If players prefer a more even distribution why don't you just give them $2000 each and let them play some games then be on their way? I know you want some exciting show matches but that's just how I feel. | ||
|
BrodiaQ
United States892 Posts
On November 06 2011 22:49 Grovbolle wrote: Showmatch result: + Show Spoiler + Sjow-elfi 2-1 IdrA - Huk 2-0 Huk - Dimaga 0-2 IdrA - WhiteRa 0-2 WhiteRa - Dimaga 2-1 Thanks you! | ||
|
bLah.
Croatia497 Posts
On November 06 2011 23:53 Sangyerians wrote: Obviously I'm not playing the tournament. The prize pool is obviously a matter to spectators. Production value matters, of course, but a $100,000 has more on the line than, say, a $1000 tournament and to me, the common spectator who I guess you guys are trying to appeal to, the higher the prize pool the higher the stakes, and the higher the excitement form e. If players prefer a more even distribution why don't you just give them $2000 each and let them play some games then be on their way? I know you want some exciting show matches but that's just how I feel. better players = better competition = more excitement. If there are nice games most of people won't care about prize pool. Take a look at MLG, they give 5k$ to the winner and they still have great tournaments | ||
|
TotalBiscuit
United Kingdom5437 Posts
On November 06 2011 23:53 Sangyerians wrote: Show nested quote + On November 06 2011 19:32 TotalBiscuit wrote: On November 06 2011 19:31 Sangyerians wrote: Why are do the showmatches have half the prize pool of the main tournament? I'd much rather a $14,000 prize pool and just $200 each show match. You are not playing the tournament and I'm pretty sure the players would prefer a more even distribution and more chances at money. The prizepool and its distribution should not matter to spectators. Obviously I'm not playing the tournament. The prize pool is obviously a matter to spectators. Production value matters, of course, but a $100,000 has more on the line than, say, a $1000 tournament and to me, the common spectator who I guess you guys are trying to appeal to, the higher the prize pool the higher the stakes, and the higher the excitement form e. If players prefer a more even distribution why don't you just give them $2000 each and let them play some games then be on their way? I know you want some exciting show matches but that's just how I feel. I am trying to figure out how anyone could think that saying what you just said is reasonable. "Why don't you just give everyone $2000 each", oh I dunno, maybe because money is a pretty fucking good motivation for competitive gaming? | ||
|
DusTerr
2520 Posts
On November 07 2011 02:18 TotalBiscuit wrote: Show nested quote + On November 06 2011 23:53 Sangyerians wrote: On November 06 2011 19:32 TotalBiscuit wrote: On November 06 2011 19:31 Sangyerians wrote: Why are do the showmatches have half the prize pool of the main tournament? I'd much rather a $14,000 prize pool and just $200 each show match. You are not playing the tournament and I'm pretty sure the players would prefer a more even distribution and more chances at money. The prizepool and its distribution should not matter to spectators. Obviously I'm not playing the tournament. The prize pool is obviously a matter to spectators. Production value matters, of course, but a $100,000 has more on the line than, say, a $1000 tournament and to me, the common spectator who I guess you guys are trying to appeal to, the higher the prize pool the higher the stakes, and the higher the excitement form e. If players prefer a more even distribution why don't you just give them $2000 each and let them play some games then be on their way? I know you want some exciting show matches but that's just how I feel. I am trying to figure out how anyone could think that saying what you just said is reasonable. "Why don't you just give everyone $2000 each", oh I dunno, maybe because money is a pretty fucking good motivation for competitive gaming? Also, if you look at how the tournament + showmatch ended.. $7k for Idra $3k for SeleCT $2k for White-Ra $1k for Dimaga, Elfi and SjoW. Only Huk and Ret went home without prize money. When it comes to prize distribution in tournaments... that's pretty good! | ||
|
Imascotsman
255 Posts
| ||
|
Arnovic
Netherlands49 Posts
![]() He dominated that admin dude | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Other Games |
|
Replay Cast
WardiTV Weekly
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Afreeca Starleague
Monday Night Weeklies
GSL
PiGosaur Cup
Replay Cast
The PondCast
IntoTheTV X SOOP
[ Show More ] CranKy Ducklings
|
|
|