| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
cari-kira
Germany655 Posts
On November 06 2011 19:43 TotalBiscuit wrote: That's a fairly terrible analogy. What they will get is good games from popular players. true, but not very deep. think for the future. if popularity decides about the income chances for players, you should better give them a chance to get popular instead of abusing this popularity -.- | ||
|
TotalBiscuit
United Kingdom5437 Posts
On November 06 2011 19:47 cari-kira wrote: true, but not very deep. think for the future. if popularity decides about the income chances for players, you should better give them a chance to get popular instead of abusing this popularity -.- Irrelevant point, it is an invitational. Popularity already determined the income chances for the players by inviting them to begin with. Players have plenty of opportunities to get popular since the vast majority of tournaments are qualification-based/open-bracket, not invitational format. | ||
|
nam nam
Sweden4672 Posts
On November 06 2011 19:41 cari-kira wrote: this voting is stupid. its like asking your 5-year-old what he wants to eat, and his answer is everyday:"candy". later he will get mad at you because he lost all his teeth. You must hate all-star games. I know many have complained about the quality of the all-star games in the nhl but I don't see many question the voting process. | ||
|
cari-kira
Germany655 Posts
sry fior my bad placed input and gl with the cast^^ | ||
|
Synche
United States1345 Posts
On November 06 2011 19:32 TotalBiscuit wrote: You are not playing the tournament and I'm pretty sure the players would prefer a more even distribution and more chances at money. The prizepool and its distribution should not matter to spectators. That's ridiculous. All aspects, including prize pool distribution, effect how successful a tournament is. By your logic we shouldn't care about player treatment or stipends or whether tournaments pay out on time or a year late. We want successful tournaments, we want successful esports, therefore it all matters. | ||
|
Leru
Romania257 Posts
| ||
|
WaSa
Sweden749 Posts
| ||
|
Leru
Romania257 Posts
On November 06 2011 20:13 WaSa wrote: huk outplaying dimaga hard. Not quite  .. But I don't think he'll call Dimaga any names after losing  | ||
|
HolydaKing
21254 Posts
On November 06 2011 20:13 WaSa wrote: huk outplaying dimaga hard. not really huh :D he really needed some zealots earlier | ||
|
Jakalo
Latvia2350 Posts
On November 06 2011 20:13 WaSa wrote: huk outplaying dimaga hard. And gg by huk. | ||
|
WaSa
Sweden749 Posts
On November 06 2011 20:16 Leru wrote: Not quite .. But I don't think he'll call Dimaga any names after losing lol he did by the time I wrote that. He donated 20 probes and basically gave dimaga the game. You did watch the game right? EDIT: There you go TB just confirmed Huk didn't know that third base of Dimaga and donated half his probes. | ||
|
Kreb
4834 Posts
On November 06 2011 19:32 TotalBiscuit wrote: You are not playing the tournament and I'm pretty sure the players would prefer a more even distribution and more chances at money. The prizepool and its distribution should not matter to spectators. Should not matter? Maybe, I could agree with that. Does not matter? Hell no. Theres a reason Valve hosted a 1M Dota tourny, not a 5k. I can agree that logically it shouldnt matter, but humans arent very logical. Usually its better to accept the way humans work and adapt to that rather than trying to please them the way you think they should work. (That was in regards to distribution not mattering, not regarding 14k prize pool would be better. Im not saying it would be better with 14k rather than 10k, but its a valid opinion though) | ||
|
Leru
Romania257 Posts
On November 06 2011 20:17 WaSa wrote: lol he did by the time I wrote that. He donated 20 probes and basically gave dimaga the game. You did watch the game right? EDIT: There you go TB just confirmed Huk didn't know that third base of Dimaga and donated half his probes. Yeah, but I think it was balanced before that.. Huk made some mistakes early on, then started playing better for a while and then threw the game away. | ||
|
WaSa
Sweden749 Posts
On November 06 2011 20:18 Leru wrote: Yeah, but I think it was balanced before that.. Huk made some mistakes early on, then started playing better for a while and then threw the game away. You think wrong. He was on the lead by the time he donated his probes. It was three bases vs three bases and dimaga was massively behind on upgrades and had no tech whatsoever asides the spire. | ||
|
Jakalo
Latvia2350 Posts
| ||
|
Leru
Romania257 Posts
Huk sloppy again | ||
|
scsnow
Slovenia515 Posts
| ||
|
scsnow
Slovenia515 Posts
| ||
|
scsnow
Slovenia515 Posts
| ||
|
sparklyresidue
United States5524 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
WardiTV Weekly
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Afreeca Starleague
Monday Night Weeklies
GSL
PiGosaur Cup
Replay Cast
The PondCast
IntoTheTV X SOOP
CranKy Ducklings
|
|
|
EPT
