|
On August 18 2011 17:34 ondik wrote:Show nested quote +On August 18 2011 17:21 taLbuk wrote:On August 18 2011 16:40 ondik wrote:On August 18 2011 16:14 JoeSchmoe wrote:On August 17 2011 01:10 EGalex wrote: After receiving permission from Victor "Nazgul" Goossens, the owner of Liquid, we entered negotiations with HuK, and quickly came to a verbal agreement. Well according to Kennigit's twitter, that never happened unfortunately -.- what a surprise! Funny how people can take a quote out of context, the very next tweet kennigit said that it was 100% fine with a few things that could have been done different but weren't really relevant to the final outcome. what tweet?
James(Kennigit) made a twitter post saying EG never asked for permission to talk to HuK, instead Liquid giving permission TO HuK to talk to other teams. EG only came to Liquid once the deal was almost done.
Problem is, the poster only commented with one part of the twitter post and not the "But it was fine" part. He was just clarifying. Which at the same time, EGAlex's post could have been talking about HuK receiving permission.
Either way, Nothing was done wrong.
|
On August 18 2011 16:40 hunts wrote:Show nested quote +On August 18 2011 16:34 JoeSchmoe wrote:On August 18 2011 16:22 SafeAsCheese wrote:On August 18 2011 16:14 JoeSchmoe wrote:On August 17 2011 01:10 EGalex wrote: After receiving permission from Victor "Nazgul" Goossens, the owner of Liquid, we entered negotiations with HuK, and quickly came to a verbal agreement. Well according to Kennigit's twitter, that never happened unfortunately -.- Kennigit's twitter said nothing about asking for permission, just that EG never asked specifically to talk to him. Which is totally pointless, as they basically said multiple teams were approaching him anyway. He said us as in the TL organization, not him specifically. The point is, don't say you received permission from Nazgul and then talked to Huk when Nazgul knew nothing about it until the very end when the agreement was almost complete. It's just to make yourself look better. so it's EGs word vs a post on twitter, and you believe the twitter? Why not EG? With no actual proof neither side is more trustworthy than the other. Is this just an innate dislike of EG then? I think EG is telling the truth and kennigit is then not tleling the truth to make EG look bad. Does that make me more right? No it doesn't since again neither side has proof.
At some point the e-sports scene is going to discover that the computers can also be used for this thing called e-mail.
I am a huge proponent of talking to people in person for things but then you send an e-mail with the same thing so everything is in writing ...
|
well the clan tag of liquid sounds way cooler, so sad to hear huk changed teams ^^. But anyway gl to him ^^. But meee that puma moves back or stays in korea (lost track of that :3 ).
|
On August 18 2011 17:46 EZSkull wrote:Show nested quote +On August 18 2011 17:34 ondik wrote:On August 18 2011 17:21 taLbuk wrote:On August 18 2011 16:40 ondik wrote:On August 18 2011 16:14 JoeSchmoe wrote:On August 17 2011 01:10 EGalex wrote: After receiving permission from Victor "Nazgul" Goossens, the owner of Liquid, we entered negotiations with HuK, and quickly came to a verbal agreement. Well according to Kennigit's twitter, that never happened unfortunately -.- what a surprise! Funny how people can take a quote out of context, the very next tweet kennigit said that it was 100% fine with a few things that could have been done different but weren't really relevant to the final outcome. what tweet? James(Kennigit) made a twitter post saying EG never asked for permission to talk to HuK, instead Liquid giving permission TO HuK to talk to other teams. EG only came to Liquid once the deal was almost done. Problem is, the poster only commented with one part of the twitter post and not the "But it was fine" part. He was just clarifying. Which at the same time, EGAlex's post could have been talking about HuK receiving permission. Either way, Nothing was done wrong. I read the tweets and there was nothing even close to "kennigit said that it was 100% fine with a few things that could have been done different but weren't really relevant to the final outcome.". That's why I asked him what tweet.
|
I have to say, at least this time EG seems to have done their business well. Hopefully, we'll see idra turn around his practice habits in Korea as well.
|
|
On August 18 2011 09:43 mathsucks wrote:Show nested quote +On August 18 2011 09:38 Badfatpanda wrote:On August 18 2011 09:11 mathsucks wrote:On August 18 2011 09:10 Lordwar wrote:On August 18 2011 09:08 jonathan1 wrote: over 6 figures means over the 6 figure marker (meaning 100,000) Im not sure what you meant but if you meant that "over 6 figures" mean 100 000 then you are wrong He's right. $100,001 is "over 6 figures" No need to insult someones education, especially when you're incorrect too. (in your previous post) because of your name it's either ironic or troll worthy I'm a financial analyst...it's ironic  Using all this logic, why wouldn't you say "7 figures" then? Can we effectively skip the odd "figures" then since over 6 means 7?  On topic -- I'm super happy for HuK...jersey doesn't matter when you're a fan of the player  You are financial analyst and you still think that 100 001 is "over 6 figures"?
You are either troll or your education is not really good.
Figure, digit: 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 Number = for an example 12,123. This number has 5 digits.
"over 6 digits" means number that has more than 6 digits in its value. If the precision is for one dollar or more, then "over 6 digits" is atleast one million. If precision is for 10th of dollar then 100 000,0 would be "over 6 digits" because we also take note on that zero but the value of this number is still the same! Also i dont think that polls maker really meant, that if Huk earns 100 000,1 either....
I cannot believe I need to teach this kind of thing to someone.
User was warned for this post
|
Australia8532 Posts
On August 18 2011 20:27 Lordwar wrote:Show nested quote +On August 18 2011 09:43 mathsucks wrote:On August 18 2011 09:38 Badfatpanda wrote:On August 18 2011 09:11 mathsucks wrote:On August 18 2011 09:10 Lordwar wrote:On August 18 2011 09:08 jonathan1 wrote: over 6 figures means over the 6 figure marker (meaning 100,000) Im not sure what you meant but if you meant that "over 6 figures" mean 100 000 then you are wrong He's right. $100,001 is "over 6 figures" No need to insult someones education, especially when you're incorrect too. (in your previous post) because of your name it's either ironic or troll worthy I'm a financial analyst...it's ironic  Using all this logic, why wouldn't you say "7 figures" then? Can we effectively skip the odd "figures" then since over 6 means 7?  On topic -- I'm super happy for HuK...jersey doesn't matter when you're a fan of the player  You are financial analyst and you still think that 100 001 is "over 6 figures"? You are either troll or your education is not really good. Figure, digit: 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 Number = for an example 12,123. This number has 5 digits. "over 6 digits" means number that has moret han 6 digits in its value. If the precision is for one dollar or more, then "over 6 digits" is atleast one million. If precision is for 10th of dollar then 100 000,0 would be "over 6 digits" because we also take note on that zero but the value of this number is still the same! Also i dont think that polls maker really meant, that if Huk earns 100 000,1 either.... I cannot believe I need to teach this kind of thing to someone. Stop arguing a completely irrelevant and useless point. It is beyond me that you can devote so much of your life to such a pointless end. It is a question of language and interpretation. Depending on how you interpet the phrase you will understand it as something different. I have always thought that the accepted english expression "over 6 figures" means anything from 6 figures to 7 figures, at which point it becomes "over 7 figures". It can be interpreted both ways. So congratulations you are both correct!
Either way i just want to see HuK play! I hope EG treat him well because he is 1 in a million when it comes to dedication!
|
On August 18 2011 20:39 bkrow wrote:Show nested quote +On August 18 2011 20:27 Lordwar wrote:On August 18 2011 09:43 mathsucks wrote:On August 18 2011 09:38 Badfatpanda wrote:On August 18 2011 09:11 mathsucks wrote:On August 18 2011 09:10 Lordwar wrote:On August 18 2011 09:08 jonathan1 wrote: over 6 figures means over the 6 figure marker (meaning 100,000) Im not sure what you meant but if you meant that "over 6 figures" mean 100 000 then you are wrong He's right. $100,001 is "over 6 figures" No need to insult someones education, especially when you're incorrect too. (in your previous post) because of your name it's either ironic or troll worthy I'm a financial analyst...it's ironic  Using all this logic, why wouldn't you say "7 figures" then? Can we effectively skip the odd "figures" then since over 6 means 7?  On topic -- I'm super happy for HuK...jersey doesn't matter when you're a fan of the player  You are financial analyst and you still think that 100 001 is "over 6 figures"? You are either troll or your education is not really good. Figure, digit: 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 Number = for an example 12,123. This number has 5 digits. "over 6 digits" means number that has moret han 6 digits in its value. If the precision is for one dollar or more, then "over 6 digits" is atleast one million. If precision is for 10th of dollar then 100 000,0 would be "over 6 digits" because we also take note on that zero but the value of this number is still the same! Also i dont think that polls maker really meant, that if Huk earns 100 000,1 either.... I cannot believe I need to teach this kind of thing to someone. Stop arguing a completely irrelevant and useless point. It is beyond me that you can devote so much of your life to such a pointless end. It is a question of language and interpretation. Depending on how you interpet the phrase you will understand it as something different. I have always thought that the accepted english expression "over 6 figures" means anything from 6 figures to 7 figures, at which point it becomes "over 7 figures". It can be interpreted both ways. So congratulations you are both correct! Either way i just want to see HuK play! I hope EG treat him well because he is 1 in a million when it comes to dedication! No, "over 6" does not mean 6.
|
On August 18 2011 19:54 ondik wrote:Show nested quote +On August 18 2011 17:46 EZSkull wrote:On August 18 2011 17:34 ondik wrote:On August 18 2011 17:21 taLbuk wrote:On August 18 2011 16:40 ondik wrote:On August 18 2011 16:14 JoeSchmoe wrote:On August 17 2011 01:10 EGalex wrote: After receiving permission from Victor "Nazgul" Goossens, the owner of Liquid, we entered negotiations with HuK, and quickly came to a verbal agreement. Well according to Kennigit's twitter, that never happened unfortunately -.- what a surprise! Funny how people can take a quote out of context, the very next tweet kennigit said that it was 100% fine with a few things that could have been done different but weren't really relevant to the final outcome. what tweet? James(Kennigit) made a twitter post saying EG never asked for permission to talk to HuK, instead Liquid giving permission TO HuK to talk to other teams. EG only came to Liquid once the deal was almost done. Problem is, the poster only commented with one part of the twitter post and not the "But it was fine" part. He was just clarifying. Which at the same time, EGAlex's post could have been talking about HuK receiving permission. Either way, Nothing was done wrong. I read the tweets and there was nothing even close to "kennigit said that it was 100% fine with a few things that could have been done different but weren't really relevant to the final outcome.". That's why I asked him what tweet.
"Which is fine btw - a few other teams talked to huk as well. But for clarity, EG talked to us once they were ready to sign/buyout."
Close enough
|
Some dude who claimed to be financial analyst said that 100 001 is "over 6 figures". He is obviously wrong, and clearly is either troll or his "financial education" is some very low tier school which does not really teach anything if he does not understand this kind of things at all. He is obviously wrong so we dont need to argue about it.
Other thing that I want to mention is that it is not reasonable to assume that polls maker really meant to pronounce that salary in form of 100,000.0$ which would be "over 6 figures". If he really meant to ask people do they think huk earns 10,000.0 or 100,000.0 dollars, then that polls question about "is his salary more than 6 figures" would be correct, but it is not feasible theory. Also, if salary is announced in that form, then those decimals are usually up to 1/100 of dollar like 10,000.00$ which means that "over 6 figures" would be already at 10,000.00 which is laughable thing to even ask when we take note that we are discussing about Huks salary.
Most reasonable thing to assume is that he meant just in accuracy of one dollar or more when "over 6 figures" is atleast one million.
People are just uneducated and they create misconceptions based on their uneducated beliefs. I want that people atleast now understand that "over 6 figures" DOES NOT MEAN 100 000+, it means atleast one million (first 7 digit number)
|
To the above poster, stfu or ban
|
On August 18 2011 22:59 iamke55 wrote: To the above poster, stfu or ban I just wanna make people understand, they are wrong.
|
On August 18 2011 23:00 Lordwar wrote:I just wanna make people understand, they are wrong.
Gonna go out on a limb here and say, no one really gives a shit Not one single shit
|
I just want to point out how funny automatic cutting of too long strings can be on a website (and it even is on topic - almost literally):
"Liquid and HuK exchange goo…"
|
I think what will hurt Huk the most in his performance is the lack of a good coach. Korean teams have great coaches, whereas foreign teams and EG don't really have coaches that are in the same level as Korean coaches. Coaching makes a huge difference in a person's play, and Huk won't be able to get the benefit of an oGs coach anymore.
|
It's ambiguous, depending on what the preposition "over" applies to, a.(over 6) figures, means 7 figures or more... b. over (6 figures) just means an amount of money larger than 100000, which could include 100001 as well as 7 figures.
|
On August 18 2011 23:20 Random321321 wrote: It's ambiguous, depending on what the preposition "over" applies to, a.(over 6) figures, means 7 figures or more... b. over (6 figures) just means an amount of money larger than 100000, which could include 100001 as well as 7 figures. No it does not. You clearly dont understand this subject at all. What you are trying to force, does not make sense at all. Please stop that bullshit. I already encountered one idiot who PM´d me about that same shit.
6 figures = number which has 6 digits in its value. If it is over "6 figures" it is atleast 1 000 000
|
This confuses me. I thought HuK was pretty hardcore about Liquid. Liquid is the best community by far for SC2 esports, so the change is really unexpected from my perspective.
|
On August 18 2011 23:26 CherubDown wrote: This confuses me. I thought HuK was pretty hardcore about Liquid. Liquid is the best community by far for SC2 esports, so the change is really unexpected from my perspective. well 100 000 for year contract changes minds
|
|
|
|