EPTCrack: Custom Bnet2 server by chinese modders? - Page 11
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
Chill (1:38 July 05 KST): Discussing the cracked Bnet2 is acceptable in this thread. DO NOT post any links to websites explaining how to install / use the crack. DO NOT explain in your post how to install / use the crack. Thank you. | ||
|
oBlade
United States5583 Posts
| ||
|
a_flayer
Netherlands2826 Posts
And hey, since we're all buds now, why not release something official? It's already out there, might as well make it official and maybe Blizzard can get some more control/money back in their hands -that- way. Since that's what they're after. Just release a limited version of THEIR bnetd for a reasonable price to LANs so that they can host their own servers in a totally legit way. This is not unreasonable is it? People would prefer to host legit servers at their official events over anything else, I imagine. | ||
|
Golgotha
Korea (South)8418 Posts
| ||
|
VPCursed
1044 Posts
On July 05 2011 07:57 oBlade wrote: Like splitting the community into a Korean, European, and NA community? no, like making sub communities within those regions. Making it much harder for ppl who pick up the game to find high level players/see high level play. because they're not in the "community" | ||
|
Ashur
Czech Republic646 Posts
| ||
|
Marradron
Netherlands1586 Posts
On July 05 2011 07:49 Rasun wrote: Please excuse my ignorance, but can someone please explain why Blizzard was okay with Iccup existing but are absolutely zero tolerance with SC2. When did / what were the reasons for this shift in policy, I know the main reason is to root out piracy, but what made it okay for private servers to exist in BW and not SC2, I have never fully understood this. Iccup was doing something for a 'dead' game. They ofcourse knew of the limitations of their own servers and wanted to keep the community allive for sc2. I doubt there were a big fan of the downloadable version but either way most people on Iccup had at one point bought sc1. | ||
|
oBlade
United States5583 Posts
On July 05 2011 08:01 VPCursed wrote: no, like making sub communities within those regions. Making it much harder for ppl who pick up the game to find high level players/see high level play. because they're not in the "community" Oh, okay, I understand. Like fracturing a global community into subcommunities. There is nothing good about Blizzard having a monopoly on ladders to their own game. E-sports is ground-up, not top-down. Games grow when third parties swarm to do stuff for them. | ||
|
VPCursed
1044 Posts
On July 05 2011 08:05 oBlade wrote: Oh, okay, I understand. Like fracturing a global community into subcommunities. There is nothing good about Blizzard having a monopoly on ladders to their own game. E-sports is ground-up, not top-down. Games grow when third parties swarm to do stuff for them. What monopoly? They're doing fine. This isn't BW days where BNET was utter shit. there is a Great ladder system in place along with solid Matchmaking. There is no need for a private server. | ||
|
Ashur
Czech Republic646 Posts
On July 05 2011 08:08 VPCursed wrote: What monopoly? They're doing fine. This isn't BW days where BNET was utter shit. there is a Great ladder system in place along with solid Matchmaking. There is no need for a private server. This will change over time. | ||
|
oBlade
United States5583 Posts
On July 05 2011 08:08 VPCursed wrote: What monopoly? They're doing fine. This isn't BW days where BNET was utter shit. there is a Great ladder system in place along with solid Matchmaking. There is no need for a private server. Monopoly means there is no alternative. This is in principle not good for us. And that's debatable: the list of things Battle.net 2.0 is missing is longer than Canata vs Shine. | ||
|
Firesilver
United Kingdom1190 Posts
| ||
|
ZiegFeld
351 Posts
On July 05 2011 00:43 echO [W] wrote: You can't sue the Chinese. That's like trying to stop porn. Even if you stop one server, five more will pop up.They're going to get sued and shut down. There's no way this will be used in any sort of mainstream/productive manner, given how involved Blizzard is with all the major SC2 tournaments and lans. The only way I can see LAN in SC2 is if Blizzard themselves implemented it. | ||
|
BearStorm
United States795 Posts
| ||
|
Jago
Finland390 Posts
| ||
|
a_flayer
Netherlands2826 Posts
On July 05 2011 08:29 Jago wrote: So Iccup is okay, but this isn't? They sued the creators of bnetd (which is used by iccup, right?) as well. | ||
|
TheyPerch
5 Posts
On July 05 2011 08:29 Jago wrote: So Iccup is okay, but this isn't? ICCUP and SC:BW is a totally different ballgame. SC:BW had LAN built into the game, SC2 doesn't. | ||
|
StuBob
United States373 Posts
On July 05 2011 08:36 TheyPerch wrote: ICCUP and SC:BW is a totally different ballgame. SC:BW had LAN built into the game, SC2 doesn't. No, I look at them the same. iCCup was a hacked/private server (against the blizzard TOS) | ||
|
AngryFarmer
United States560 Posts
On July 05 2011 08:24 ZiegFeld wrote: You can't sue the Chinese. That's like trying to stop porn. Even if you stop one server, five more will pop up. This is exactly how it works. First of all, it's almost impossible to find the people responsible in China. If you end up finding these people, the government wont give you the opportunity to sue successfully. If you do end up sueing successfully, they will be replaced by other people and it will continue. | ||
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On July 05 2011 08:08 VPCursed wrote: What monopoly? They're doing fine. This isn't BW days where BNET was utter shit. there is a Great ladder system in place along with solid Matchmaking. There is no need for a private server. Match makings cool, most of the ladder maps sucks and we have to rely on blizzard to create new maps and add them every 3 months. I would kill to have a private server again for sc2 like in BW. I miss those days at times like these. | ||
|
StuBob
United States373 Posts
| ||
| ||
