• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 01:39
CEST 07:39
KST 14:39
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202548RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams4Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread RSL Season 1 - Final Week The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [Update] ShieldBattery: 1v1 Fastest Support! Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series ASL20 Preliminary Maps BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams
Tourneys
CSL Xiamen International Invitational [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 663 users

Lag hack on NA ladder - Page 48

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 46 47 48 49 50 57 Next
TT1
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada10009 Posts
July 04 2011 02:56 GMT
#941
aaaaaaaaaarggggguu i got drop hacked 6 times today
ab = tl(i) + tl(pc), the grand answer to every tl.net debate
Noro
Profile Joined March 2011
Canada991 Posts
July 04 2011 02:57 GMT
#942
I'm legit so confused how blizzard is letting this happen so much @_@
Talk not to me of blasphemy, man; I'd strike the sun if it insulted me.
13JackaL
Profile Joined March 2011
United States577 Posts
July 04 2011 03:02 GMT
#943
We must band together to castrate these bastards!

But in all seriousness, blizz needs to act immediately.
and my axe
Onlinejaguar
Profile Joined April 2010
Australia2823 Posts
July 04 2011 03:03 GMT
#944
If there's a way to cheat someone will use it. Pretty sad but that's how it is.
kedinik
Profile Joined September 2010
United States352 Posts
July 04 2011 03:05 GMT
#945
Some guy scouted cross-map directly into my main, lost his whole mineral line to banes, and drop hacked me when he had nothing left but 4 lings.

T.O.P. *
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Hong Kong4685 Posts
July 04 2011 03:05 GMT
#946
On July 04 2011 05:40 novabossa wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 04 2011 05:13 Musketeer wrote:
On July 04 2011 04:22 Furlqt wrote:
Made an account to try and clarify some thing about what exactly the Lag/Drop Hack is and how it works.

Essentially, the Battle.Net protocol is based around players sending events to the server and the server sending those events back to all the players in a match. These events all have unique IDs, and the codes for these events are relatively sparse (that is to say, if you pick a random number between 1 and 24 million, chances are it's not a valid event). However, the server does no filtering as to whether an event is valid--it sends the event down the pipe regardless of validity.

So, the drop hack works, essentially, by abusing this system to DoS your client. It spams the B.Net server with gibberish event IDs as fast as the Drop-Hacker's network can handle, and the B.Net server sends this back to your client, where your client is left confused trying to figure out why the server sent it a gibberish event. It looks up the event in all the game files and goes through all the rhetoric--but, these gibberish events are coming down the pipe so fast that the client locks itself up through this.

I think, also, but I'm not sure, that when a client encounters a gibberish event it tries to ask the server to resend the event, meaning one gibberish event might strike a chain of events that can't stop itself.

Now, this is also why when you're looking at a replay of these hackers that it slows down your client, since the replay is just a copy of the events that your client received during the match. A small test in a custom game showed that about 5 seconds of using one of these Drop-hacks on myself, through my very low bandwidth connection, produced a replay with an events file that was 917KB long (this gets compressed substantially, since the gibberish is produced in a very simple manner), compared to a normal replay which would be about 100KB of events uncompressed over 30 minutes.


All that would be required for Blizzard to fix this is to do a very simple filtering on events. I highly doubt this would slow down their server very much at all, if properly implemented, and it would take a 3-year-old about 2 minutes to implement. Why they have yet to patch their server, I have no idea.

[edit/addendum] The only limiting factor for the drop hacker is his upload bandwidth. The limiting factors for the person being drop hacked are his download bandwidth and his CPU speed. If the drop hacker has your average American cable connection, his upload bandwidth is maybe 384kBps. The person being drophacked would need something like a 1MBps download and something like an i7 to properly fend against it. Running SC2 from a SSD (hard drive) probably doesn't hurt, either.


I couldn't defend it with a Phenom X6 and 8 MB down.


Then the person drop-hacking you probably had a comparable or better upload/CPU....the point is that you need to have a far better CPU / download bandwidth to negate the hack.

I have Sandy Bridge quad core + 100Mbps download and I still can't defend it.
Oracle comes in, Scvs go down, never a miscommunication.
Azzur
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia6259 Posts
July 04 2011 03:12 GMT
#947
On July 04 2011 04:22 Furlqt wrote:
Made an account to try and clarify some thing about what exactly the Lag/Drop Hack is and how it works.

Essentially, the Battle.Net protocol is based around players sending events to the server and the server sending those events back to all the players in a match. These events all have unique IDs, and the codes for these events are relatively sparse (that is to say, if you pick a random number between 1 and 24 million, chances are it's not a valid event). However, the server does no filtering as to whether an event is valid--it sends the event down the pipe regardless of validity.

So, the drop hack works, essentially, by abusing this system to DoS your client. It spams the B.Net server with gibberish event IDs as fast as the Drop-Hacker's network can handle, and the B.Net server sends this back to your client, where your client is left confused trying to figure out why the server sent it a gibberish event. It looks up the event in all the game files and goes through all the rhetoric--but, these gibberish events are coming down the pipe so fast that the client locks itself up through this.

I think, also, but I'm not sure, that when a client encounters a gibberish event it tries to ask the server to resend the event, meaning one gibberish event might strike a chain of events that can't stop itself.

Now, this is also why when you're looking at a replay of these hackers that it slows down your client, since the replay is just a copy of the events that your client received during the match. A small test in a custom game showed that about 5 seconds of using one of these Drop-hacks on myself, through my very low bandwidth connection, produced a replay with an events file that was 917KB long (this gets compressed substantially, since the gibberish is produced in a very simple manner), compared to a normal replay which would be about 100KB of events uncompressed over 30 minutes.


All that would be required for Blizzard to fix this is to do a very simple filtering on events. I highly doubt this would slow down their server very much at all, if properly implemented, and it would take a 3-year-old about 2 minutes to implement. Why they have yet to patch their server, I have no idea.

[edit/addendum] The only limiting factor for the drop hacker is his upload bandwidth. The limiting factors for the person being drop hacked are his download bandwidth and his CPU speed. If the drop hacker has your average American cable connection, his upload bandwidth is maybe 384kBps. The person being drophacked would need something like a 1MBps download and something like an i7 to properly fend against it. Running SC2 from a SSD (hard drive) probably doesn't hurt, either.

Well, you're probably correct on how the hack is working. However, don't act as if it's such a simple thing to fix and that Blizzard is being stupid. A change, however simple, needs to be thoroughly tested before being released. What if their filter actually made the game worse for a lot of others? Also, have you proven that the "simple" filter will actually work?
TT1
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada10009 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-07-04 03:28:26
July 04 2011 03:17 GMT
#948
ok im giving up at 8 discs;;
i swear to god if blizzard does a qualification tour for blizzcon with the top 16 players on the ladder imma be pissed
ab = tl(i) + tl(pc), the grand answer to every tl.net debate
schmutttt
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Australia3856 Posts
July 04 2011 03:20 GMT
#949
I'm assuming NowGtTheFkUp is one of these cheaters? I mean he is 206/6 on NA....
seansye
Profile Joined November 2010
United States1722 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-07-04 03:22:27
July 04 2011 03:22 GMT
#950
Fuck me man... i got like 6 ddrop hacked* today.
I will master Speshul Taktics.!
pig-dude
Profile Joined March 2011
United States170 Posts
July 04 2011 03:24 GMT
#951
On July 04 2011 12:20 schmutttt wrote:
I'm assuming NowGtTheFkUp is one of these cheaters? I mean he is 206/6 on NA....

I heard reading last two pages of thread is hard.
101toss
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
3232 Posts
July 04 2011 03:29 GMT
#952
The fact that blizzard hasn't done anything just further damages the legitimacy of the ladder.

Custom games/4v4 gogogogogo (no hackers here, so more fun experience)
Math doesn't kill champions and neither do wards
Furlqt
Profile Joined July 2011
United States23 Posts
July 04 2011 03:30 GMT
#953
On July 04 2011 12:12 Azzur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 04 2011 04:22 Furlqt wrote:
Made an account to try and clarify some thing about what exactly the Lag/Drop Hack is and how it works.

Essentially, the Battle.Net protocol is based around players sending events to the server and the server sending those events back to all the players in a match. These events all have unique IDs, and the codes for these events are relatively sparse (that is to say, if you pick a random number between 1 and 24 million, chances are it's not a valid event). However, the server does no filtering as to whether an event is valid--it sends the event down the pipe regardless of validity.

So, the drop hack works, essentially, by abusing this system to DoS your client. It spams the B.Net server with gibberish event IDs as fast as the Drop-Hacker's network can handle, and the B.Net server sends this back to your client, where your client is left confused trying to figure out why the server sent it a gibberish event. It looks up the event in all the game files and goes through all the rhetoric--but, these gibberish events are coming down the pipe so fast that the client locks itself up through this.

I think, also, but I'm not sure, that when a client encounters a gibberish event it tries to ask the server to resend the event, meaning one gibberish event might strike a chain of events that can't stop itself.

Now, this is also why when you're looking at a replay of these hackers that it slows down your client, since the replay is just a copy of the events that your client received during the match. A small test in a custom game showed that about 5 seconds of using one of these Drop-hacks on myself, through my very low bandwidth connection, produced a replay with an events file that was 917KB long (this gets compressed substantially, since the gibberish is produced in a very simple manner), compared to a normal replay which would be about 100KB of events uncompressed over 30 minutes.


All that would be required for Blizzard to fix this is to do a very simple filtering on events. I highly doubt this would slow down their server very much at all, if properly implemented, and it would take a 3-year-old about 2 minutes to implement. Why they have yet to patch their server, I have no idea.

[edit/addendum] The only limiting factor for the drop hacker is his upload bandwidth. The limiting factors for the person being drop hacked are his download bandwidth and his CPU speed. If the drop hacker has your average American cable connection, his upload bandwidth is maybe 384kBps. The person being drophacked would need something like a 1MBps download and something like an i7 to properly fend against it. Running SC2 from a SSD (hard drive) probably doesn't hurt, either.

Well, you're probably correct on how the hack is working. However, don't act as if it's such a simple thing to fix and that Blizzard is being stupid. A change, however simple, needs to be thoroughly tested before being released. What if their filter actually made the game worse for a lot of others? Also, have you proven that the "simple" filter will actually work?


The simple filter would just be a boolean hashmap into a function call, nothing fancy, and yes, in the current game design, it would work. Now, yes, it would need to be properly tested, and you are right in that even if they were addressing the issue right now they wouldn't be able to patch their server so quickly. Nevertheless, there are no CS reps banning the hackers right now, no real action at all from Blizzard really.

And, as far as I can tell, I think the only path to immunity might be to throttle one's download to a really low rate like 5kBps so your client doesn't get flooded so easily--not the CPU/Network speed stuff I was spewing earlier
CScythe
Profile Joined June 2009
Canada810 Posts
July 04 2011 03:50 GMT
#954
Watching anybody stream NA ladder is just disgusting these days. Endless drophackers... Ladder is absolute garbage right now.
Heavenly
Profile Joined January 2011
2172 Posts
July 04 2011 03:52 GMT
#955
At least ban the people like CombatEZ, sixraxterran, and NowGtTheFckUp. how long does that take? jesus christ.
"thx for all my fans i'm many lost but cheer for me .. i lost but so happy my power is fans i will good play this is promise my fans" - oGsMC
aksfjh
Profile Joined November 2010
United States4853 Posts
July 04 2011 03:52 GMT
#956
On July 04 2011 12:30 Furlqt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 04 2011 12:12 Azzur wrote:
On July 04 2011 04:22 Furlqt wrote:
Made an account to try and clarify some thing about what exactly the Lag/Drop Hack is and how it works.

Essentially, the Battle.Net protocol is based around players sending events to the server and the server sending those events back to all the players in a match. These events all have unique IDs, and the codes for these events are relatively sparse (that is to say, if you pick a random number between 1 and 24 million, chances are it's not a valid event). However, the server does no filtering as to whether an event is valid--it sends the event down the pipe regardless of validity.

So, the drop hack works, essentially, by abusing this system to DoS your client. It spams the B.Net server with gibberish event IDs as fast as the Drop-Hacker's network can handle, and the B.Net server sends this back to your client, where your client is left confused trying to figure out why the server sent it a gibberish event. It looks up the event in all the game files and goes through all the rhetoric--but, these gibberish events are coming down the pipe so fast that the client locks itself up through this.

I think, also, but I'm not sure, that when a client encounters a gibberish event it tries to ask the server to resend the event, meaning one gibberish event might strike a chain of events that can't stop itself.

Now, this is also why when you're looking at a replay of these hackers that it slows down your client, since the replay is just a copy of the events that your client received during the match. A small test in a custom game showed that about 5 seconds of using one of these Drop-hacks on myself, through my very low bandwidth connection, produced a replay with an events file that was 917KB long (this gets compressed substantially, since the gibberish is produced in a very simple manner), compared to a normal replay which would be about 100KB of events uncompressed over 30 minutes.


All that would be required for Blizzard to fix this is to do a very simple filtering on events. I highly doubt this would slow down their server very much at all, if properly implemented, and it would take a 3-year-old about 2 minutes to implement. Why they have yet to patch their server, I have no idea.

[edit/addendum] The only limiting factor for the drop hacker is his upload bandwidth. The limiting factors for the person being drop hacked are his download bandwidth and his CPU speed. If the drop hacker has your average American cable connection, his upload bandwidth is maybe 384kBps. The person being drophacked would need something like a 1MBps download and something like an i7 to properly fend against it. Running SC2 from a SSD (hard drive) probably doesn't hurt, either.

Well, you're probably correct on how the hack is working. However, don't act as if it's such a simple thing to fix and that Blizzard is being stupid. A change, however simple, needs to be thoroughly tested before being released. What if their filter actually made the game worse for a lot of others? Also, have you proven that the "simple" filter will actually work?


The simple filter would just be a boolean hashmap into a function call, nothing fancy, and yes, in the current game design, it would work. Now, yes, it would need to be properly tested, and you are right in that even if they were addressing the issue right now they wouldn't be able to patch their server so quickly. Nevertheless, there are no CS reps banning the hackers right now, no real action at all from Blizzard really.

And, as far as I can tell, I think the only path to immunity might be to throttle one's download to a really low rate like 5kBps so your client doesn't get flooded so easily--not the CPU/Network speed stuff I was spewing earlier


So, basically drop yourself before they can hack you?
Daozzt
Profile Joined July 2010
United States1263 Posts
July 04 2011 03:54 GMT
#957
On July 04 2011 12:30 Furlqt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 04 2011 12:12 Azzur wrote:
On July 04 2011 04:22 Furlqt wrote:
Made an account to try and clarify some thing about what exactly the Lag/Drop Hack is and how it works.

Essentially, the Battle.Net protocol is based around players sending events to the server and the server sending those events back to all the players in a match. These events all have unique IDs, and the codes for these events are relatively sparse (that is to say, if you pick a random number between 1 and 24 million, chances are it's not a valid event). However, the server does no filtering as to whether an event is valid--it sends the event down the pipe regardless of validity.

So, the drop hack works, essentially, by abusing this system to DoS your client. It spams the B.Net server with gibberish event IDs as fast as the Drop-Hacker's network can handle, and the B.Net server sends this back to your client, where your client is left confused trying to figure out why the server sent it a gibberish event. It looks up the event in all the game files and goes through all the rhetoric--but, these gibberish events are coming down the pipe so fast that the client locks itself up through this.

I think, also, but I'm not sure, that when a client encounters a gibberish event it tries to ask the server to resend the event, meaning one gibberish event might strike a chain of events that can't stop itself.

Now, this is also why when you're looking at a replay of these hackers that it slows down your client, since the replay is just a copy of the events that your client received during the match. A small test in a custom game showed that about 5 seconds of using one of these Drop-hacks on myself, through my very low bandwidth connection, produced a replay with an events file that was 917KB long (this gets compressed substantially, since the gibberish is produced in a very simple manner), compared to a normal replay which would be about 100KB of events uncompressed over 30 minutes.


All that would be required for Blizzard to fix this is to do a very simple filtering on events. I highly doubt this would slow down their server very much at all, if properly implemented, and it would take a 3-year-old about 2 minutes to implement. Why they have yet to patch their server, I have no idea.

[edit/addendum] The only limiting factor for the drop hacker is his upload bandwidth. The limiting factors for the person being drop hacked are his download bandwidth and his CPU speed. If the drop hacker has your average American cable connection, his upload bandwidth is maybe 384kBps. The person being drophacked would need something like a 1MBps download and something like an i7 to properly fend against it. Running SC2 from a SSD (hard drive) probably doesn't hurt, either.

Well, you're probably correct on how the hack is working. However, don't act as if it's such a simple thing to fix and that Blizzard is being stupid. A change, however simple, needs to be thoroughly tested before being released. What if their filter actually made the game worse for a lot of others? Also, have you proven that the "simple" filter will actually work?


The simple filter would just be a boolean hashmap into a function call, nothing fancy, and yes, in the current game design, it would work. Now, yes, it would need to be properly tested, and you are right in that even if they were addressing the issue right now they wouldn't be able to patch their server so quickly. Nevertheless, there are no CS reps banning the hackers right now, no real action at all from Blizzard really.

And, as far as I can tell, I think the only path to immunity might be to throttle one's download to a really low rate like 5kBps so your client doesn't get flooded so easily--not the CPU/Network speed stuff I was spewing earlier



How about they just ban guest accounts from laddering, which would solve everything.
aepal
Profile Joined May 2010
Netherlands123 Posts
July 04 2011 03:56 GMT
#958
Also a victim of oGsBisu... cheaters getting famous for cheating.
Backwards world we live in Blizzard!
aksfjh
Profile Joined November 2010
United States4853 Posts
July 04 2011 04:00 GMT
#959
On July 04 2011 12:52 Heavenly wrote:
At least ban the people like CombatEZ, sixraxterran, and NowGtTheFckUp. how long does that take? jesus christ.


SC2 isn't a service based game (like MMOs). The SC2 team is most likely off for the next day or 2.
pig-dude
Profile Joined March 2011
United States170 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-07-04 04:04:20
July 04 2011 04:01 GMT
#960
On July 04 2011 13:00 aksfjh wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 04 2011 12:52 Heavenly wrote:
At least ban the people like CombatEZ, sixraxterran, and NowGtTheFckUp. how long does that take? jesus christ.


SC2 isn't a service based game (like MMOs). The SC2 team is most likely off for the next day or 2.

Yes it is. Except for vs. AI, the game is worthless without bnet working due to no LAN and no alternate servers.
Prev 1 46 47 48 49 50 57 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 4h 22m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft601
StarCraft: Brood War
firebathero 1015
Leta 576
ggaemo 281
Zeus 117
Noble 62
Icarus 7
Britney 0
League of Legends
JimRising 805
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K567
Other Games
summit1g11260
hungrybox210
ViBE201
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1467
BasetradeTV60
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• practicex 52
• Sammyuel 13
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki36
• iopq 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Scarra2356
• Stunt486
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
4h 22m
Reynor vs Zoun
Solar vs SHIN
Classic vs ShoWTimE
Cure vs Rogue
Esports World Cup
1d 5h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
5 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.