EPTGSTL May Teams - no IM - Page 10
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
NHY
1013 Posts
| ||
|
Sandro
897 Posts
While a team full of mediocre players like Choya, Leenock and Sc get a spot, what a joke. | ||
|
blooblooblahblah
Australia4163 Posts
| ||
|
NeonFox
2373 Posts
| ||
|
Dhalphir
Australia1305 Posts
Having the two (arguably) best SC2 players (Nestea and Mvp) does not automatically make your team the best, and its time for IM to face the consequences of having relied on those two players for so long without having their other players post any significant 1v1 results. | ||
|
TheBB
Switzerland5133 Posts
| ||
|
omisa
United States494 Posts
| ||
|
Raambo11
United States828 Posts
On May 10 2011 17:06 Dhalphir wrote: if IM was the best team, they'd be in. Having the two (arguably) best SC2 players (Nestea and Mvp) does not automatically make your team the best, and its time for IM to face the consequences of having relied on those two players for so long without having their other players post any significant 1v1 results. The problem with this argument is that IM is already proven to be the best team, because they won the first GSTL, and placed 2nd in the last GSTL we have had. No other team has come even close to these accomplishments, which were a team effort. | ||
|
arbitrageur
Australia1202 Posts
| ||
|
arbitrageur
Australia1202 Posts
if IM was the best team, they'd be in. Having the two (arguably) best SC2 players (Nestea and Mvp) does not automatically make your team the best, and its time for IM to face the consequences of having relied on those two players for so long without having their other players post any significant 1v1 results. "if IM was the best team, they'd be in". This is indicative of an untrained or stupid-but-educated brain. Why do you simply assume that MAX(1.6y + 1x) maximises our skill/performance expectation for a given team? This is an arbitrary model plucked out of thin air and no body has demonstrated that those teams that score higher are better or will perform better in GSTL. In fact past performance of IM serves to debunk this model quite thoroughly (unless they're an outlier). Not that I blame them they need something like this to prevent subjective and unfair selection but your assertion was plain ridonculous. | ||
|
Highways
Australia6122 Posts
So many weak teams are able to qualify by flooding code A with very weak players. GOM should really think about fans before coming up with ridiculous non sensical formulas. People don't wanna pay to watch code A no namer dropouts. | ||
|
Warchariot
United Kingdom42 Posts
It is a team league after all | ||
|
ALPINA
3791 Posts
| ||
|
gengka
Malaysia461 Posts
On May 10 2011 17:05 Sandro wrote: Lets see, a top team with people like Losira, and 2 two time finalists MVP and NesTea dont deserve a spot. While a team full of mediocre players like Choya, Leenock and Sc get a spot, what a joke. SC is not a mediocre player anymore! He is a force to be reckoned with after reaching Ro4 Code S and forced Nestea to play till the 5th set. | ||
|
r3SpaVVn
Germany109 Posts
| ||
|
arbitrageur
Australia1202 Posts
On May 10 2011 17:18 Alpina wrote: Well IM is the best team atm imo. That's sad ;/ Pretty much this. One of the best teams can't get in because their selection methodology is severely flawed. | ||
|
SilverJohnny
United States885 Posts
| ||
|
RPR_Tempest
Australia7799 Posts
| ||
|
Sandro
897 Posts
| ||
|
Nesquik
United Kingdom600 Posts
On May 10 2011 17:06 Dhalphir wrote: if IM was the best team, they'd be in. Having the two (arguably) best SC2 players (Nestea and Mvp) does not automatically make your team the best, and its time for IM to face the consequences of having relied on those two players for so long without having their other players post any significant 1v1 results. Nestea, MVP, Lorisa, IMNuts + Show Spoiler + Nestea is in the finals for GSL agian. MVP was in the finals came second(Code a) Lorisa RO8 IMNuts RO16 They deserve to be in there imo. If you want the best games than you need the best gamers and IM has them. Fact. | ||
| ||
