|
On March 12 2011 23:03 Holdinga wrote:Show nested quote +On March 12 2011 22:31 cubert wrote: I hope they will be banned everywhere forever, not the same as broodwar's 1-2 years ban. Absolutely agree. There is no excuse for hacking. People that hack do not deserve to play the game ever. In this instance, I'm glad Blizzard merged the B.Net accounts so when they do actually ban someone, EVERY game they own gets banned. And even if they have separate B.Net IDs/Emails, they have to buy the game again in order to play. :D
|
On March 12 2011 23:49 Avaloch wrote:Show nested quote +On March 12 2011 23:03 Holdinga wrote:On March 12 2011 22:31 cubert wrote: I hope they will be banned everywhere forever, not the same as broodwar's 1-2 years ban. Absolutely agree. There is no excuse for hacking. People that hack do not deserve to play the game ever. In this instance, I'm glad Blizzard merged the B.Net accounts so when they do actually ban someone, EVERY game they own gets banned. And even if they have separate B.Net IDs/Emails, they have to buy the game again in order to play. :D That's incorrect.
|
On March 12 2011 22:45 andrewwiggin wrote: wow. gotta love the 1st perspective cam features. Blizzard did good with that.
.. AND why haven't they banned him yet.. ??????
hate nub hackers.
Any decent SC2 maphack has a feature to lock camera view on replays while you look at the enemy base.
|
215-13 in 2v2 is insane. I'm pretty sure there's something fishy going on with the igware-sorcery team. Not even a 2v2 team with MC and MVP would have a 95% win rate.
|
On March 13 2011 00:25 MangoTango wrote: 215-13 in 2v2 is insane. I'm pretty sure there's something fishy going on with the igware-sorcery team. Not even a 2v2 team with MC and MVP would have a 95% win rate.
yep. the advantage you have with maphack in team games is a much larger advantage than you would in 1v1...
always felt something was fishy when i saw his records
|
Even more disgusting to me then this worthless idiot hacking is the trash in this thread denying that he is or defending him
User was warned for this post
|
Maybe a little off topic but i wonder why Blizzard hasnt done anything about the hacking site, we dont want to mention, yet? I mean WTF this site is out for years and offered hacks for every Blizzard game as far as i remember..
|
On March 13 2011 00:41 TheAntZ wrote: Even more disgusting to me then this worthless idiot hacking is the trash in this thread denying that he is or defending him
After all... for like the last 10 pages, most of the people were defending him over "circumstantial evidence".
|
I've seen bronze league players build 6 bunkers blindly.
But this is higher level gaming, and no ovie sac->baneling counter with 6 bunker roach? And suspicous w/l ratio and staggering increase in rank? How is that not obvious hacking? igware even admitted to hacking. [/topic]
|
I refrained myself from posting since I wasn't too sure myself. However, when I read about what ostojiy and others said about blindly constructing 6 bunkers and a wall of barracks.... I started to become very suspicious of iGware. I'm happy to see that it ended this way. BTW, floorexercise, I completely agree with you. Production tab hack is baffling. It reveals so much information and you can hide yourself from doing any suspicious actions. Very powerful indeed. Blizzard needs to get on that.
|
I wonder why they bothered "apologizing" for hacking instead of just admitting with something along the lines of "ya we hack deal with it". I doubt they meant what they said. It's rather disturbing that a hacker can get top 5 in the world so easily though. I guess you either hack or you don't, which is why most of us don't get why they would do it in the first place. *shrug*
|
On March 13 2011 01:33 SkCom wrote: I wonder why they bothered "apologizing" for hacking instead of just admitting with something along the lines of "ya we hack deal with it". I doubt they meant what they said. It's rather disturbing that a hacker can get top 5 in the world so easily though. I guess you either hack or you don't, which is why most of us don't get why they would do it in the first place. *shrug*
they kinda blamed eachother. "he gave me the hack! i just did it for him!" and "i dont hack.hes the one hacking!".
both try to pull out of this. both should get all their accs banned and never touch this game again.
|
Yeah, it was pretty obvious, you can't go 210-10 with mediocre play and no scouting, no-one is that lucky. Goes to show how important scouting is though, apparently people aren't being completely out-multitasked yet, relatively bad players can still keep up if they know what is going on.
|
On March 13 2011 00:25 MangoTango wrote: 215-13 in 2v2 is insane. I'm pretty sure there's something fishy going on with the igware-sorcery team. Not even a 2v2 team with MC and MVP would have a 95% win rate.
The OP has a 2v2 team with a pretty high win rate of 85%.
http://sc2ranks.com/team/4836785
|
On March 13 2011 00:25 MangoTango wrote: 215-13 in 2v2 is insane. I'm pretty sure there's something fishy going on with the igware-sorcery team. Not even a 2v2 team with MC and MVP would have a 95% win rate.
I don't agree with this, really. I think it takes real good sense of both 2on2 and very good players to get to those levels, but if you look Aristeo+Cuberts stats on EU, they are pretty close to those 94% as well, while not hacking 100% for sure. If you play those guys though you can see how they outplay you by watching the replay, rather than being startled by random-looking decisions like those of iGware+X. Some other teams are quite high in the 80%s as well, so the percentage might be suspicious, but it's not close to being any for of proof, imho.
Anyways I am really sad about this whole story, mostly because up to now I was being so naive, thinking that hacks and such wouldn't make a breakthrough in SC2. Way too much blind trust in Blizz' anti-hack functions I guess. Just thought, since you are logged in all-time now it would make stuff way harder. So sad. :'(
|
On March 13 2011 02:11 DomiNater wrote:Show nested quote +On March 13 2011 00:25 MangoTango wrote: 215-13 in 2v2 is insane. I'm pretty sure there's something fishy going on with the igware-sorcery team. Not even a 2v2 team with MC and MVP would have a 95% win rate. The OP has a 2v2 team with a pretty high win rate of 85%. http://sc2ranks.com/team/4836785
there is a HUGE difference between 85% and 95%. Then again... maybe it takes one to know one? how on earth do you manage to detect this many hackers anyway; i havent suspected any opponent i've ever played in sc2 or broodwar of hacking but of course im sure it happened once in a while.
|
Sorcery was just banned by Liquid`Nazgul.
That account was created on 2010-09-14 07:08:32 and had 2 posts.
Reason: Admitted hacker.
|
On March 13 2011 00:13 acidfreak wrote:Show nested quote +On March 12 2011 22:45 andrewwiggin wrote: wow. gotta love the 1st perspective cam features. Blizzard did good with that.
.. AND why haven't they banned him yet.. ??????
hate nub hackers. Any decent SC2 maphack has a feature to lock camera view on replays while you look at the enemy base.
Seems like someone knows a bit too much about maphack...
|
If anyone seriously believes this guy is somehow that good and it's "game sense" somehow they are just blatantly wrong. You don't get top of the ladder with that speed of play, you get it with magical insight to what opponent is doing, it couldn't be more clear.
Edit: Ah i see he even admitted now. Maybe PinkPrincess you shouldn't defend people in future just because you know them.
|
I hope Sorcery gets that 5000-500 record account banned. I'm like 4-6 vs him. I honestly had a ton of respect for him/Sublime. Even though they would mass win AT vs RT teams I could always tell they had talent with unit control in some of the games versus them. However when you hack and you can get counters before they come, I lose all respect.
I just hope I can chat with him before his account gets banned. What a fake.
Great find ProTech.
|
|
|
|