EPTWCG 2005 Footage - Artosis, Day9 and Tasteless - Page 48
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Xiphiass
Latvia144 Posts
| ||
|
Fadetowhite
Korea (South)302 Posts
On March 06 2011 20:04 Xiphiass wrote: This is amazingly cool, but what did Artosis do at around 2:11, when he went through all his keys 1-9? piano slide hotkeying his CC to every key | ||
|
Technique
Netherlands1542 Posts
On March 06 2011 17:30 Pasado wrote: He didn't win 6 matches out of 10, not sure where you got that. He was 3-0d in the first Bo5, and won 3-2 in the second. So he actually won 3 out of 8 games. He only had to win one Bo5 since he was in the winners bracket, while NonY was from the losers bracket and had to win two. Thus Tasteless qualified and not NonY. So what's questionable about that? Every1 gets a chance to lose in a double elim setup... | ||
|
Golden Ghost
Netherlands1041 Posts
| ||
|
hooktits
United States972 Posts
Tasteless, Artosis and Day9 Fighting!! (and Incontrol nasl  )May you all take starcraft to the next level for us foreigners for many years to come ! USA "Winning!" | ||
|
Fitzhunt1
United States169 Posts
| ||
|
Zuxo
Sweden395 Posts
| ||
|
Stylus
United States157 Posts
On March 06 2011 21:58 Golden Ghost wrote: Because it's just retarded to do 2 sets. If you want to give the guy from the winners bracket an advantage you let him start the set with 1-0 or something like that. It's double elimination. Why should the winner of the winner's bracket be the only one that has to be eliminated once? | ||
vicariouscheese
United States589 Posts
| ||
|
Zeetee
United States153 Posts
On March 07 2011 00:19 Stylus wrote: It's double elimination. Why should the winner of the winner's bracket be the only one that has to be eliminated once? form my interpretation, the thing that is controversial is that tasteless won every one of his games on the same map. he had some kind of crazy strategy that only worked on this one island map, and since loser picks the map, the games looked something like this: first bo5: nony wins 3-0 first game, second bo5: tasteless picks his good map and wins second game: Nony wins third game: tasteless picks same map, same strategy, wins forth game: Nony wins fifth game: tasteless picks same map, same strategy, wins honestly, i can understand why nony is a little upset about the loss. | ||
|
ThunderJim
Norway23 Posts
| ||
NonY
8751 Posts
| ||
|
RifleCow
Canada637 Posts
On March 06 2011 20:14 Fadetowhite wrote: piano slide hotkeying his CC to every key Watch the vod of Nada vs CheckPrime, Nada does the same thing in the beginning. Mayb this is Artosis' attempt to emulate the Genius Terran. | ||
Chill
Calgary25990 Posts
Giving the person in the winners' bracket a set up is standard protocol. Giving them a game doesn't make sense and is not standard. Okay, let's discuss new stuff! | ||
|
Technique
Netherlands1542 Posts
On March 07 2011 02:06 Liquid`Tyler wrote: Extended series discussions are a poison that will kill us all if we let them. Fight them off! Who is talking about extended series? Simply double elim tournaments aka winner of the winner bracket has not used his right to lose yet, hence ''double elim''. | ||
|
Sek-Kuar
Czech Republic593 Posts
Day[9] looked much better back there, he actually looks like bigger nerd now  And Tasteless looks much much batter now, he looked like criminal there, I would be scared when meet him in dark alley :o EDIT: He looked more like J. Travolta in Pult fiction with shorter and scarier hair | ||
|
NonY
8751 Posts
On March 07 2011 02:13 Technique wrote: Who is talking about extended series? Simply double elim tournaments aka winner of the winner bracket has not used his right to lose yet, hence ''double elim''. What is the point of this post? You know that I know the format. You don't provide any defense of the format. You don't understand the connection to extended series. You contribute absolutely nothing. If you don't understand something, don't participate in a discussion about it. | ||
|
Robinsa
Japan1333 Posts
| ||
|
Technique
Netherlands1542 Posts
On March 07 2011 02:32 Liquid`Tyler wrote: What is the point of this post? You know that I know the format. You don't provide any defense of the format. You don't understand the connection to extended series. You contribute absolutely nothing. If you don't understand something, don't participate in a discussion about it. So your comment was in the wrong topic. Nothing wrong with the double elim tournament system, infact any other way would make no sense. | ||
|
nvs.
Canada3609 Posts
On March 07 2011 02:41 Technique wrote: So your comment was in the wrong topic. Nothing wrong with the double elim tournament system, infact any other way would make no sense. Do you feel the wind when things pass that quickly over your head? | ||
| ||
