• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 03:15
CEST 09:15
KST 16:15
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall9HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL61Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?13FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event21Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster16Weekly Cups (June 16-22): Clem strikes back1
StarCraft 2
General
Statistics for vetoed/disliked maps Program: SC2 / XSplit / OBS Scene Switcher The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? PiG Sty Festival #5: Playoffs Preview + Groups Recap
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Korean Starcraft League Week 77 Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Semi Finals & Finals
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady
Brood War
General
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL Player “Jedi” cheat on CSL ASL20 Preliminary Maps SC uni coach streams logging into betting site BGH Mineral Boosts Tutorial Video
Tourneys
[BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Blogs
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 510 users

Analysis of Macro - Page 23

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 21 22 23 All
Mojar
Profile Joined January 2011
Australia185 Posts
May 06 2011 02:18 GMT
#441
For some reason i had not read this post till now, but i will say that the underlying point of it is really coming out in today's play. Protoss and Terrans sitting on their 2-3 bases maxing out and just walking over 5-6 base Zergs. The extra bases provide no real benefit to the Zerg apart from slightly better production (as you are not going to be building more then 4-5 queens for the purpose of inject).
tosog
Profile Joined March 2011
64 Posts
May 06 2011 02:36 GMT
#442
On May 06 2011 11:18 Mojar wrote:
For some reason i had not read this post till now, but i will say that the underlying point of it is really coming out in today's play. Protoss and Terrans sitting on their 2-3 bases maxing out and just walking over 5-6 base Zergs. The extra bases provide no real benefit to the Zerg apart from slightly better production (as you are not going to be building more then 4-5 queens for the purpose of inject).

As a terran player, let me tell you about how much mech would absolutely be not viable if we had to start securing more than 3 bases.
Zerg can take all those bases because they are such a mobile race. If each base increased your income equally then Zerg would be quite overpowered in my theorycrafting opinion.
Frozenserpent
Profile Joined September 2007
United States143 Posts
May 06 2011 02:50 GMT
#443
On May 06 2011 11:36 tosog wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 06 2011 11:18 Mojar wrote:
For some reason i had not read this post till now, but i will say that the underlying point of it is really coming out in today's play. Protoss and Terrans sitting on their 2-3 bases maxing out and just walking over 5-6 base Zergs. The extra bases provide no real benefit to the Zerg apart from slightly better production (as you are not going to be building more then 4-5 queens for the purpose of inject).

As a terran player, let me tell you about how much mech would absolutely be not viable if we had to start securing more than 3 bases.
Zerg can take all those bases because they are such a mobile race. If each base increased your income equally then Zerg would be quite overpowered in my theorycrafting opinion.


The thing is that the extra base doesn't increase your overall income at all.

Essentially, 70 workers on 3 bases will mine just as much as 70 workers on 6 bases.

What's the strength of mech? It's really strong in a straight-up fight, and it's really cost-efficient in such a fight.

What's the weakness? It gives up map control. But what if map control doesn't provide that much benefit because having >3 bases isn't as helpful? Doesn't seem like it is a good design.

Contrast this to BW where workers quickly get diminishing returns. Personally I think the curve of mining efficiency to # workers mining is quite nice in BW. Then, you get a bit of a boost in income solely for having more bases. It makes map control quite important.
MurdeR
Profile Joined May 2004
Argentina89 Posts
May 06 2011 02:52 GMT
#444
[image loading]

GREAT POST! Thanks a lot
Comunidad Argentina de SC2: www.latingamers.net
Dapper_Cad
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United Kingdom964 Posts
May 12 2011 19:59 GMT
#445
Just got around to reading this amazing post. It's absolutely true that BW is a better game to watch because the 4th/5th/Nth expansions matter so much more, this results in much more army on army conflict in the game as people try to expand / deny from start to finish. It also means you're more likely to see effective tactical plays like drops and army splits have a sharp impact as the whole game is more spread out. It's a real shame that so many games currently revolve around key 2 or 3 base attacks that 9 times out of 10 end up with not one real fight before and one player dead after.

As both a fan and a casual player, if there was a poll, i'd vote for 300 food now, balance concerns later.
But he is never making short-term prediction, everyone of his prediction are based on fundenmentals, but he doesn't exactly know when it will happen... So using these kind of narrowed "who-is-right" empirical analysis makes little sense.
thurst0n
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States611 Posts
May 12 2011 21:56 GMT
#446
This is very very interesting. Thank you for all your effort and insight.

If you're looking for differant ways at looking at things, it seems another simple elegant solution to making the 3rd/4th/5th/6th base more important is to reduce the amount of minerals at each node.

This has been mentioned before I just want to elaborate some of my own thoughts. I do not claim this to be my original idea.

This will not effect the amount of economy(Minerals per Minute) you have at early stages of the game, saturation requirements (workers per patch/base) remain the same; it only shortens the amount of time you can sit on 1 base, or 2 base before getting that 3rd base.
If you happen to get your 3rd base early you will mine out of your main sooner than in the current maps.

I'm no SC Guru, but I feel that the game should focus around expanding and having map control safely against all-in timings. After an all-in you should be punished since you haven't expanded, but in the current state it seems to me you can all in a few times before your main base runs out, not to mention 2 base timings..

I may be way off base (no pun intended) in the previous paragraph I'd love to hear more discussion about decreasing minerals in each node to force more expansions earlier and at every stage of the game, forcing you to have better map control. Perhaps it's just better in theory or in my own head.

Perhaps just expansions have less minerals per node?
P.S. I'm nub. If you'd like you can follow me @xthurst but its not worth it ill be honest
dave333
Profile Joined August 2010
United States915 Posts
May 12 2011 22:16 GMT
#447
Whatever happened to half or mineral only expansions? Another factor to 3base play is that there are usually you have 3 full expansions available to you, which is easily enough to cover for a while. Instead of having rocks at full expansions, just have an open half expansion that one can take for safety, or risk going for a bigger third.

theliman2000
Profile Joined August 2010
United States45 Posts
May 15 2011 03:26 GMT
#448
swedish people are so amazing
zodde
Profile Joined October 2010
Sweden1908 Posts
May 15 2011 04:57 GMT
#449
Very interesting read, even if I'm not playing the game seriously enough anymore to really be able to add much to the discussion. :D

Good job LaLush!
ArchDC
Profile Joined May 2011
Malaysia1996 Posts
September 16 2011 19:10 GMT
#450
I just read this thanks to whatthefat's post.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=266019

This is a really good article and was there a follow-up? Plenty of people (myself included) have posted about how SC2 does not feel like BW (the fights feel less epic, less things are going on n battles last so much shorter). I thought this was due to camera size (everything is a lot smaller and players see a bigger piece of the map on the screen), lower mechanical ceiling (you can practically send an entire army forward w one click).

Due to the article, it is clearer that it is also because there is less incentive to have more than 3 bases operating at one time (another lower mechanical ceiling) given both income and supply cap.

I second the notion that Blizzard should increase supply to 300 and re-figure out balancing through new units and patching of old units through HoTs and the protoss expansion. This will also bring back the feel of having bigger armies fighting all over the map for longer periods of time which makes for much more epic games when two highly skilled players go at it.
figq
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
12519 Posts
September 16 2011 22:20 GMT
#451
Maybe the Korean Weekly / ESV could introduce maps with 300 cap; they are the frontrunners of map experimentation on progaming level, and first started introducing larger and macro-friendly maps.
If you stand next to my head, you can hear the ocean. - Day[9]
JuTo
Profile Joined December 2010
United States30 Posts
September 19 2011 02:44 GMT
#452
well written article, not only entertaining, but educational. and it looks like you did your research.
plus you managed to keep my attention for the WHOLE article, which is an accomplishment hahaha. well done
"Roach/Immortal is pretty good against Stalkers"
Prev 1 21 22 23 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 46m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
Leta 541
Larva 262
Barracks 59
Dota 2
XaKoH 667
League of Legends
JimRising 760
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1121
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor195
Other Games
WinterStarcraft660
SortOf113
kaitlyn54
ProTech47
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH358
• Hupsaiya 94
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2222
League of Legends
• Lourlo1305
• Stunt479
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
2h 46m
Clem vs Classic
SHIN vs Cure
FEL
4h 46m
WardiTV European League
4h 46m
BSL: ProLeague
10h 46m
Dewalt vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
1d 16h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
WardiTV European League
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
FEL
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
FEL
6 days
FEL
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 2v2 Season 3
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.