EPTMeatyOwlLegs first player to 4000 points! - Page 8
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
ROOTdrewbie
Canada1392 Posts
| ||
|
arnold(soTa)
Sweden352 Posts
 | ||
|
qxc
United States550 Posts
http://sc2ranks.com/masters/eu like 3700 real points. If you know how division tiers work you'll understand. | ||
|
Shinkugami
England74 Posts
On January 05 2011 01:41 Fregate wrote: He is 26-2 in the last 3 days, and he is the top MMR now, so he played only Top players. I think that Ladder Matchmaking could have helped him in the first 70-80 matches or so, but then it's just a matter of pure skill. This guy is insanely good You realize 26-2 isn't realistic in the slightest even if you were to have ungodly luck ? 26-2 doesn't ring the "good" bell, it rings the "lame cheeser" bell. | ||
|
Allscorpion
United Kingdom319 Posts
On January 05 2011 05:31 qxc wrote: He only has http://sc2ranks.com/masters/eu like 3700 real points. If you know how division tiers work you'll understand. Only!!! ^_^ | ||
|
LynxKerr
Canada173 Posts
On January 05 2011 05:33 Shinkugami wrote: You realize 26-2 isn't realistic in the slightest even if you were to have ungodly luck ? 26-2 doesn't ring the "good" bell, it rings the "lame cheeser" bell. What a tool. The guy has been on fire lately and he's been demolishing pro's. I've seen him play BratOK, Morrow, and both game were 25 minute macro annihilations. Let me line up 28 pro's for you and let you cheese every time and I'll see how that works out for you. Naniwa has just plain figured shit out lately. I don't care if he beats young children at the park, that's not for me to worry about. This is a forum about a video game, not morality and ethics. While he might need work on the second, he's as good as anyone at the first. Put down the haterade. | ||
|
Cripp
Germany165 Posts
On January 05 2011 05:33 Shinkugami wrote: You realize 26-2 isn't realistic in the slightest even if you were to have ungodly luck ? 26-2 doesn't ring the "good" bell, it rings the "lame cheeser" bell. Imagine he cheesed in 20 out of these 28 games. And imagine he lost 2 games in these 20 where he cheesed. Only 2 looses in 20 games with cheese against the elite of europe? Seems a bit unreal to me to only lose 2 games of 20. | ||
|
BroboCop
United States373 Posts
| ||
|
ChickenLips
2912 Posts
On January 05 2011 05:39 Question132 wrote: is it me, or is it ironic that "chickenlips" is all over them "meatyowllegs"? ^_^ I enjoy my nickname, thank you very much | ||
NonY
8748 Posts
| ||
|
drag_
England425 Posts
It's also hard to believe how a guy who struggles to place well in tournaments miraculously discovered how to destroy all the top EU players. | ||
|
FrostShadow
United States335 Posts
This ladder means nothing until he can get his shit together or show a decent performance in a tournament. | ||
|
NonY
8748 Posts
well, qxc still has a point. it's really ignorant of people to celebrate milestones in displayed points when we know they aren't what really matter. people have put in hard work to figure out real points and how to constantly update and display real points and rankings on a web site. tl.net of all places should respect that and go about these things intelligently | ||
|
Cripp
Germany165 Posts
| ||
|
AkobeS
Sweden25 Posts
On January 05 2011 05:43 Liquid`Tyler wrote: I don't see how he continued to get so many points for wins at the top (even with bonus pool). Something weird going on with his MMR or Europe is just extremely inflated compared to NA or something :o imo you cannot play normally, win just 177 games and hit 4k points on NA (even with a bad division) If you watch the Match History you'll see he didnt get that much point in the end, the last game was 21pts, against Socke, but the 10-15 games before that was all under 10 pts each. | ||
|
holynorth
United States590 Posts
On January 05 2011 03:04 Krafty wrote: Yeah, sorry perhaps I was a little bit harsh. But it really bothers me that someone can get away with this and make it seem as if he earned 4000 points already. Did you even read the thread that you keep posting? You realize he is still in first in points after the division modifier, correct? It's not like the people he is playing are worse because of his division. He is still playing the best players possible. And to people complaining about bonus pool. He's still in first even if you subtract the pool from everyone. Stop being so stupid. | ||
|
HypaSnipa
64 Posts
A wins a win and 70-80% wins is astonishing especially at the top of the EU ladder. Grats to Naniwa, drop all the jealousy you freaks :o | ||
|
AkobeS
Sweden25 Posts
On January 05 2011 05:51 HypaSnipa wrote: I cant even understand the direction this thread has taken. He is 4000 points on the blizzard ladder. Thats all there is to it. Doesnt matter if another website says its 3700, doesnt matter if he cheesed some games and macroed others. A wins a win and 70-80% wins is astonishing especially at the top of the EU ladder. Grats to Naniwa, drop all the jealousy you freaks :o Dont think i could have put it any better myself! | ||
|
Numy
South Africa35471 Posts
On January 05 2011 05:51 HypaSnipa wrote: I cant even understand the direction this thread has taken. He is 4000 points on the blizzard ladder. Thats all there is to it. Doesnt matter if another website says its 3700, doesnt matter if he cheesed some games and macroed others. A wins a win and 70-80% wins is astonishing especially at the top of the EU ladder. Grats to Naniwa, drop all the jealousy you freaks :o The point many of made is that he isn't 4000 points on the Blizzard ladder because points in different divisions are weighted differently. So yes it matters if a website says 3700 because that's the real points. It's unfair on everyone if you just take the points at face value because they just aren't comparable. If you want to celebrate something, at least have a fair medium of doing so. I doubt anyone really thinks that Naniwa is bad, he's good he's no.1 on EU ladder but he is not first to break 4k points and if you want to celebrate anything celebrate him being good. | ||
|
AkobeS
Sweden25 Posts
On January 05 2011 05:54 Numy wrote: The point many of made is that he isn't 4000 points on the Blizzard ladder because points in different divisions are weighted differently. So yes it matters if a website says 3700 because that's the real points. It's unfair on everyone if you just take the points at face value because they just aren't comparable. If you want to celebrate something, at least have a fair medium of doing so. I doubt anyone really thinks that Naniwa is bad, he's good he's no.1 on EU ladder but he is not first to break 4k points and if you want to celebrate anything celebrate him being good. But thats not the only thing mentioned in this thread is it? There's no 8 pages of ppl bashing someone doing a great job laddering, even taking up diffrent "assumptions" on how he could have cheated and what not. | ||
| ||
