• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 02:56
CEST 08:56
KST 15:56
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview9[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt2: Take-Off7[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt1: Runway132v2 & SC: Evo Complete: Weekend Double Feature4Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy13
Community News
LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments2Weekly Cups (August 25-31): Clem's Last Straw?39Weekly Cups (Aug 18-24): herO dethrones MaxPax6Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris48Weekly Cups (Aug 11-17): MaxPax triples again!15
StarCraft 2
General
Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy Weekly Cups (August 25-31): Clem's Last Straw? Heaven's Balance Suggestions (roast me) Geoff 'iNcontroL' Robinson has passed away Speculation of future Wardii series
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around Mutation # 487 Think Fast Mutation # 486 Watch the Skies
Brood War
General
ASL20 General Discussion BW General Discussion Pros React To: herO's Baffling Game BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BSL Polish World Championship 2025 20-21 September
Tourneys
Is there English video for group selection for ASL [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [ASL20] Ro24 Group F
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
General RTS Discussion Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale
Blogs
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
How Culture and Conflict Imp…
TrAiDoS
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
INDEPENDIENTE LA CTM
XenOsky
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1271 users

[D] Do SC2-maps need more diversified expansions?

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
1 2 Next All
sleepingdog
Profile Joined August 2008
Austria6145 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-17 16:23:27
December 17 2010 16:21 GMT
#1
Hi everyone, I'd like to discuss something with you that caught my special attention after watching some BW games again - the problem of the "structure", the "nature" (or something similar to that) of expansions.
Everything below relates mostly to the creation of custom maps for tournaments since I don't believe Blizz would implement something like that because it would make the game (even more) harder for newcomers.

We all know what expansions look like in SC2: We have either 8 mineral patches with 2 geysers or 6 gold mineral patches with 2 geysers.
There's no strategical value to the question "which expansion do I take" whatsoever, the "defendability" is simply all that matters. Now in BW there are all kinds of expansions, mineral-only expos, expos where it's sometimes advisable to place the main close(r) to the gas and just mine gas etc. I think SC2 could profit hugely if there were maps with different kinds of expansions.

There's one aspect that I think could really add much strategical depth: geysers. In SC2 we have now 2 geyers instead of one as the "standard" type of expansion. Here I think more differentiated expansions could highly improve the strategic diversity of the game. I could think of the "classic" easy to take and hold mineral only expansions, expansions with just one geyser, but maybe also expansions with even three geysers, kinda like the gold expansions "geyser-wise" (those needed to be ridiculously hard to defend obviously) - scouting those expansions correctly and drawing the right conclusions concerning the strategy of your opponent would imo lead to more exciting games. The decision which expansion to take would become much "harder" in the sense that the player always needed to decide which strategy to pursue because the "type" of expansion would be directly correlated to the units he could produce afterwards.

Also this would add another element of "playing greedy" if you want to call it this way. Right now on most maps it isn't even possible to take the gold right away. Nevertheless I found this always to be something exciting, to see if the zerg gets away with early gold on scrap station for example. If now there were "better and worse" expansions, not only defense-wise but also concerning the "quality", concerning what they yield, this would create a whole new dimension to questions like early aggression vs defensive play.

What do you think, would you like to see something like that in maps too, or does this sound absurd to you?
"You see....YOU SEE..." © 2010 Sen
Cheticus
Profile Joined May 2010
United States83 Posts
December 17 2010 16:24 GMT
#2
I think it would be interesting to see, however if memory serves, there is SOME more diversification to expansions on the current map pool (albeit slightly). I think islands only have 7 mineral patches typically.
AcrossFiveJulys
Profile Blog Joined September 2005
United States3612 Posts
December 17 2010 16:24 GMT
#3
I agree that this particular aspect of the current map pool has been overlooked. I suspect that blizzard standardized the maps this way to make their balancing job easier, but I don't see why we can't start diversifying maps as the game progresses.
iGrok
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States5142 Posts
December 17 2010 16:31 GMT
#4
I encourage all of you to look around the Custom Maps section. While most maps use regular bases, 8M3V expos have been seen, 9G, 4V, 16M4V (double expo), and half&half Gold&Blue expos.
(M=mineral, V=Vespene, G=Gold)

At this point in the game, messing with main resources is taboo, but otherwise we're trying to broaden the spectrum of expansions!
MOTM | Stim.tv | TL Mafia | Fantasy Fighting! | SNSD
Najda
Profile Joined June 2010
United States3765 Posts
December 17 2010 16:33 GMT
#5
Yeah it would be nice if we could play on other maps.
adius
Profile Joined May 2007
United States249 Posts
December 17 2010 16:34 GMT
#6
First you have to get GOMtv and other tournament organizations to actually consider using maps that aren't in the ladder pool. Otherwise this is all moot (and the game is probably in trouble)
MoreFaSho
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States1427 Posts
December 17 2010 16:36 GMT
#7
Island expos tend to have fewer mineral patches, or even the semi-island ones on Scrap Station (the one's behind the rocks that don't get taken that often), don't have 8 mineral patches. Part of the problem is that the gas-less units just scale way too differently than they did in BW, but yea, people should definitely experiment.
I always try to shield slam face, just to make sure it doesnt work
sleepingdog
Profile Joined August 2008
Austria6145 Posts
December 17 2010 16:40 GMT
#8
On December 18 2010 01:36 MoreFasho wrote:
Island expos tend to have fewer mineral patches, or even the semi-island ones on Scrap Station (the one's behind the rocks that don't get taken that often), don't have 8 mineral patches.


Perfectly valid point, I forgot about this because I was way too focused on the geysers.

Part of the problem is that the gas-less units just scale way too differently than they did in BW, but yea, people should definitely experiment.


This is indeed true. But instead of introducing drastic stuff like double expansions, I think you could slightly tweak the whole system by having some easier to defend expos only have 1 geyser for example. I was originally strongly in favour of the two geyser vs one because I thought it would bring more strategical debth - and it did.
By playing around with the amount of geysers each expo has, I think this could lead to even more strategical debth.
"You see....YOU SEE..." © 2010 Sen
WniO
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2706 Posts
December 17 2010 16:47 GMT
#9
I think in the future these different types of expos should come into play, but for right now i think blizzard just needs to keep stuff simple so they can balance the game out.
idonthinksobro
Profile Joined December 2010
3138 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-17 16:52:18
December 17 2010 16:49 GMT
#10
there are maps that only have 7 patches at every expansion e.g. shakuras

but well sc2 and bw are different - in broodwar each race had a minearl only unit that were viable in the lategame - in sc2 that is not the case so no gas expansions are totally useless.
DoubleReed
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States4130 Posts
December 17 2010 16:51 GMT
#11
The main thing I want to see is rich gas geysers. They're in the editor, aren't they? Are they in any maps?
TheGiz
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Canada708 Posts
December 17 2010 18:32 GMT
#12
Multiple-gas expansions or Terrazine (aka Rich Gas) expansions would be really cool. Problem is that they might swing army compositions WAY in favor of whoever secures them.
Life is not about making due with what you have; it's about finding out just how much you can achieve. Never settle for anything less than the best. - - - Read my blog!
BillyTheBanana
Profile Joined June 2010
United States32 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-17 18:51:13
December 17 2010 18:50 GMT
#13
I agree with WniO. Maps should stay simple while the game is young. Drastically changing the resources at expansions is a very technical variation that calls attention to itself. First I'd like to see some more "organic" variations, such as very large maps or maps with many easily protected expansions.
Randomaccount#77123
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States5003 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-17 19:45:36
December 17 2010 18:55 GMT
#14
--- Nuked ---
ToastieNL
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Netherlands845 Posts
December 17 2010 18:56 GMT
#15
On December 18 2010 01:49 idonthinksobro wrote:
there are maps that only have 7 patches at every expansion e.g. shakuras

but well sc2 and bw are different - in broodwar each race had a minearl only unit that were viable in the lategame - in sc2 that is not the case so no gas expansions are totally useless.

Wut?

Marines are the core for any Terran army, super effective in small raid parties.

Zealots with Charge are ridiculous meatshields and do quite the DPS!

Zerglings are superfast, do high damage and are very good in punishing the enemy.

I didn't play BW, but all these units still have their use late- game!!

Also, I always kindo liked the idea of a 3G, 4B, 3V expansion, nice and colourfull !

Kind regards,
Toastie
Zerg lategame is imbalanced as shit. Also: "Protoss is really strong recently. Perhaps, it's time for there to be some changes for Terran." -MMA. Even MMA asks for buffs. Srsly Blizzard. Srsly.
Randomaccount#77123
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States5003 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-17 18:59:46
December 17 2010 18:59 GMT
#16
--- Nuked ---
iGrok
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States5142 Posts
December 17 2010 19:09 GMT
#17
A 9 patch main would be nice because in-base hatch builds would be more viable. The main reason Z needs to expand so fast is Larva, their third resource.
MOTM | Stim.tv | TL Mafia | Fantasy Fighting! | SNSD
`Zapdos
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States935 Posts
December 17 2010 19:11 GMT
#18
I like the idea but mineral only would ruin zerg play seeing as they need lots of gas to get out any sort of anti-air unlike in sc1 where they could get hydras much cheaper D:
www.twitch.tv/thezapdos come watch me :]
iGrok
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States5142 Posts
December 17 2010 19:12 GMT
#19
He means 9 mineral 2 vespene
MOTM | Stim.tv | TL Mafia | Fantasy Fighting! | SNSD
Lingy
Profile Joined December 2010
England201 Posts
December 17 2010 19:30 GMT
#20
All id really want in new released maps are easier expos
Hydraliskuuuuhh
1 2 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
03:00
Mid Season Playoffs
Cham vs ShoWTimELIVE!
CranKy Ducklings168
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 2600
sSak 273
Leta 111
Noble 105
Free 94
Bale 27
JulyZerg 21
Nal_rA 10
Icarus 7
NotJumperer 6
League of Legends
C9.Mang0329
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K801
Other Games
summit1g6404
shahzam746
WinterStarcraft572
JimRising 491
Maynarde121
NeuroSwarm44
semphis_33
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH314
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Stunt496
Other Games
• Shiphtur496
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
3h 4m
Reynor vs Astrea
Classic vs sOs
Maestros of the Game
10h 4m
Serral vs Ryung
ByuN vs Zoun
BSL Team Wars
12h 4m
Team Bonyth vs Team Dewalt
CranKy Ducklings
1d 3h
RSL Revival
1d 3h
GuMiho vs Cham
ByuN vs TriGGeR
Cosmonarchy
1d 7h
TriGGeR vs YoungYakov
YoungYakov vs HonMonO
HonMonO vs TriGGeR
Maestros of the Game
1d 10h
Solar vs Bunny
Clem vs Rogue
[BSL 2025] Weekly
1d 11h
RSL Revival
2 days
Cure vs Bunny
Creator vs Zoun
Maestros of the Game
2 days
Maru vs Lambo
herO vs ShoWTimE
[ Show More ]
BSL Team Wars
2 days
Team Hawk vs Team Sziky
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Monday Night Weeklies
3 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 18: Qualifier 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
HCC Europe

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL Polish World Championship 2025: Warsaw LAN
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
EC S1
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.