• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 12:02
CEST 18:02
KST 01:02
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed14Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll6Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Who will win EWC 2025? The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL How to choose the right travel agency for trips? [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion
Tourneys
Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches CSL Xiamen International Invitational [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2025!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 853 users

Official State of the Game Podcast Thread - Page 2573

Forum Index > SC2 General
54608 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2571 2572 2573 2574 2575 2731 Next
LuckoftheIrish
Profile Joined November 2011
United States4791 Posts
November 26 2012 01:28 GMT
#51441
On November 26 2012 10:17 Fyodor wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 26 2012 09:21 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 08:29 kckkryptonite wrote:
On November 26 2012 02:41 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 01:04 gruff wrote:
On November 24 2012 11:20 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
The thing is that he's tended to be right more often than not. Generally the sequence has gone: Idra makes a controversial prediction or statement -> it doesn't happen -> everyone LOLs -> it happens -> everyone has already forgotten.

Show me your statistical analysis of Idra's statements/predictions then.


No. Do your own damn work.

Except the claim wasn't made by him...


If he cares enough to want an analysis, then he's more than welcome to it.

sure, but it's your work since you brought it up. You're the one being lazy.


Just because there's not a quote in my post doesn't mean I wasn't responding to folks.

And frankly, I've got nothing invested in that statement and I intend to keep it that way. This isn't science or maths. It's the internet, and I'm not required to show my work.
On Twitter @GosuGamers_LotI | Grubby has a huge head!
NonY
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
8748 Posts
November 26 2012 01:41 GMT
#51442
I've gotta side with LuckoftheIrish here. He's allowed to meet whatever standards he likes. His comment can be taken at its word. Or it can be a suggestion that prompts the reader to consult their own memories and knowledge. Or it can be a claim that prompts an investigation into the facts. Everyone is allowed to choose the level of support they want for their own opinions. And everyone is allowed to choose the level of support they want to put out there to attempt to change others' opinions. If you want to refuse to acknowledge his idea because he hasn't laid out the facts in front of you, then that's fine. If he doesn't care that you aren't convinced, then deal with it.

If it was a mean or potentially harmful comment, we might hold him to a higher standard.
"Fucking up is part of it. If you can't fail, you have to always win. And I don't think you can always win." Elliott Smith ---------- Yet no sudden rage darkened his face, and his eyes were calm as they studied her. Then he smiled. 'Witness.'
Account252508
Profile Joined February 2012
3454 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-26 01:57:04
November 26 2012 01:55 GMT
#51443
--- Nuked ---
itmeJP
Profile Joined February 2010
United States1101 Posts
November 26 2012 02:13 GMT
#51444
Hey guys!

Sorry for the lack of updates -- been busy with ESPORTS and this crazy ass end-of-year-extravaganza; and Thanksgiving!

We probably won't be able to do a show this upcoming week either due to IPL5 occurring and I fly out Monday morning at 7AM. Will try and do a show the following week! Thanks!
Twitter.com/itmeJP -- Twitch.tv/itmeJP -- YouTube.com/itmeJP
LuckoftheIrish
Profile Joined November 2011
United States4791 Posts
November 26 2012 02:22 GMT
#51445
On November 26 2012 11:13 itmeJP wrote:
Hey guys!

Sorry for the lack of updates -- been busy with ESPORTS and this crazy ass end-of-year-extravaganza; and Thanksgiving!

We probably won't be able to do a show this upcoming week either due to IPL5 occurring and I fly out Monday morning at 7AM. Will try and do a show the following week! Thanks!


No worries, JP. Thanks for checking in. GLHF at IPL!
On Twitter @GosuGamers_LotI | Grubby has a huge head!
sharky246
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
1197 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-26 02:23:41
November 26 2012 02:23 GMT
#51446
On November 26 2012 10:28 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 26 2012 10:17 Fyodor wrote:
On November 26 2012 09:21 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 08:29 kckkryptonite wrote:
On November 26 2012 02:41 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 01:04 gruff wrote:
On November 24 2012 11:20 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
The thing is that he's tended to be right more often than not. Generally the sequence has gone: Idra makes a controversial prediction or statement -> it doesn't happen -> everyone LOLs -> it happens -> everyone has already forgotten.

Show me your statistical analysis of Idra's statements/predictions then.


No. Do your own damn work.

Except the claim wasn't made by him...


If he cares enough to want an analysis, then he's more than welcome to it.

sure, but it's your work since you brought it up. You're the one being lazy.


Just because there's not a quote in my post doesn't mean I wasn't responding to folks.

And frankly, I've got nothing invested in that statement and I intend to keep it that way. This isn't science or maths. It's the internet, and I'm not required to show my work.

This is teamliquid, where posters in general are expect to maintain certain standards. That means backing up a claim with abit of evidence. If people could post whatever they're thinking without some proof behind it, well this site would be as bad as reddit, which it isn't, because people here engage in more intellectual discussions.
On January 03 2011 13:14 IdrA wrote: being high on the ladder doesnt get you any closer to your goal. Avoiding practice to protect your rating is absurd. If you want to be good go play 40 games a day and stop thinking about becoming a pro.
LuckoftheIrish
Profile Joined November 2011
United States4791 Posts
November 26 2012 02:35 GMT
#51447
On November 26 2012 11:23 sharky246 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 26 2012 10:28 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 10:17 Fyodor wrote:
On November 26 2012 09:21 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 08:29 kckkryptonite wrote:
On November 26 2012 02:41 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 01:04 gruff wrote:
On November 24 2012 11:20 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
The thing is that he's tended to be right more often than not. Generally the sequence has gone: Idra makes a controversial prediction or statement -> it doesn't happen -> everyone LOLs -> it happens -> everyone has already forgotten.

Show me your statistical analysis of Idra's statements/predictions then.


No. Do your own damn work.

Except the claim wasn't made by him...


If he cares enough to want an analysis, then he's more than welcome to it.

sure, but it's your work since you brought it up. You're the one being lazy.


Just because there's not a quote in my post doesn't mean I wasn't responding to folks.

And frankly, I've got nothing invested in that statement and I intend to keep it that way. This isn't science or maths. It's the internet, and I'm not required to show my work.

This is teamliquid, where posters in general are expect to maintain certain standards. That means backing up a claim with abit of evidence. If people could post whatever they're thinking without some proof behind it, well this site would be as bad as reddit, which it isn't, because people here engage in more intellectual discussions.


This entire discussion has been nothing but a series of short posts, started by a fairly simple and obtuse characterization of Inside the Game. There aren't any groundbreaking moments here. There are some attempts to read meaning into other people's words, if you're interested in those. Other than that, there's really nothing backing anything at all up. One guy thinks it's bad that a player says things about another player. Another guy doesn't. And that's really all there is to see. If someone is interested enough in the statistical probability of that one guy's assertions being truthful to ask for an analysis, he should pick up Matlab and do it himself.

On Twitter @GosuGamers_LotI | Grubby has a huge head!
dAPhREAk
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Nauru12397 Posts
November 26 2012 02:52 GMT
#51448
On November 26 2012 11:23 sharky246 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 26 2012 10:28 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 10:17 Fyodor wrote:
On November 26 2012 09:21 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 08:29 kckkryptonite wrote:
On November 26 2012 02:41 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 01:04 gruff wrote:
On November 24 2012 11:20 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
The thing is that he's tended to be right more often than not. Generally the sequence has gone: Idra makes a controversial prediction or statement -> it doesn't happen -> everyone LOLs -> it happens -> everyone has already forgotten.

Show me your statistical analysis of Idra's statements/predictions then.


No. Do your own damn work.

Except the claim wasn't made by him...


If he cares enough to want an analysis, then he's more than welcome to it.

sure, but it's your work since you brought it up. You're the one being lazy.


Just because there's not a quote in my post doesn't mean I wasn't responding to folks.

And frankly, I've got nothing invested in that statement and I intend to keep it that way. This isn't science or maths. It's the internet, and I'm not required to show my work.

This is teamliquid, where posters in general are expect to maintain certain standards. That means backing up a claim with abit of evidence. If people could post whatever they're thinking without some proof behind it, well this site would be as bad as reddit, which it isn't, because people here engage in more intellectual discussions.

when was this rule implemented? bc i dont think most of the users got the memo.
NonY
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
8748 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-26 03:15:29
November 26 2012 03:14 GMT
#51449
On November 26 2012 11:35 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 26 2012 11:23 sharky246 wrote:
On November 26 2012 10:28 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 10:17 Fyodor wrote:
On November 26 2012 09:21 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 08:29 kckkryptonite wrote:
On November 26 2012 02:41 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 01:04 gruff wrote:
On November 24 2012 11:20 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
The thing is that he's tended to be right more often than not. Generally the sequence has gone: Idra makes a controversial prediction or statement -> it doesn't happen -> everyone LOLs -> it happens -> everyone has already forgotten.

Show me your statistical analysis of Idra's statements/predictions then.


No. Do your own damn work.

Except the claim wasn't made by him...


If he cares enough to want an analysis, then he's more than welcome to it.

sure, but it's your work since you brought it up. You're the one being lazy.


Just because there's not a quote in my post doesn't mean I wasn't responding to folks.

And frankly, I've got nothing invested in that statement and I intend to keep it that way. This isn't science or maths. It's the internet, and I'm not required to show my work.

This is teamliquid, where posters in general are expect to maintain certain standards. That means backing up a claim with abit of evidence. If people could post whatever they're thinking without some proof behind it, well this site would be as bad as reddit, which it isn't, because people here engage in more intellectual discussions.


This entire discussion has been nothing but a series of short posts, started by a fairly simple and obtuse characterization of Inside the Game. There aren't any groundbreaking moments here. There are some attempts to read meaning into other people's words, if you're interested in those. Other than that, there's really nothing backing anything at all up. One guy thinks it's bad that a player says things about another player. Another guy doesn't. And that's really all there is to see. If someone is interested enough in the statistical probability of that one guy's assertions being truthful to ask for an analysis, he should pick up Matlab and do it himself.


It's funny that an endless amount of unsupported claims can be made without anybody caring until someone makes a claim which has an obvious line of investigation and then all of the sudden that investigation must be done or else that claim ought to be thrown out and the author ought to be ashamed. Claims that are investigatable ought to be respected more even if the investigation hasn't been done yet. Most of the things I read on TL.net, I can only respond "yeah, well, that's just like your opinion, man." If someone really cares about what they're discussing, they should be happy to discover an investigation they can do to benefit the discussion. Calling out someone else for not having done it yet is only discouraging people with good ideas (but not enough time to support them) from saying anything at all.
"Fucking up is part of it. If you can't fail, you have to always win. And I don't think you can always win." Elliott Smith ---------- Yet no sudden rage darkened his face, and his eyes were calm as they studied her. Then he smiled. 'Witness.'
Mauldo
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States750 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-26 04:33:17
November 26 2012 04:32 GMT
#51450
On November 26 2012 12:14 Liquid`NonY wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 26 2012 11:35 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 11:23 sharky246 wrote:
On November 26 2012 10:28 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 10:17 Fyodor wrote:
On November 26 2012 09:21 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 08:29 kckkryptonite wrote:
On November 26 2012 02:41 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 01:04 gruff wrote:
On November 24 2012 11:20 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
The thing is that he's tended to be right more often than not. Generally the sequence has gone: Idra makes a controversial prediction or statement -> it doesn't happen -> everyone LOLs -> it happens -> everyone has already forgotten.

Show me your statistical analysis of Idra's statements/predictions then.


No. Do your own damn work.

Except the claim wasn't made by him...


If he cares enough to want an analysis, then he's more than welcome to it.

sure, but it's your work since you brought it up. You're the one being lazy.


Just because there's not a quote in my post doesn't mean I wasn't responding to folks.

And frankly, I've got nothing invested in that statement and I intend to keep it that way. This isn't science or maths. It's the internet, and I'm not required to show my work.

This is teamliquid, where posters in general are expect to maintain certain standards. That means backing up a claim with abit of evidence. If people could post whatever they're thinking without some proof behind it, well this site would be as bad as reddit, which it isn't, because people here engage in more intellectual discussions.


This entire discussion has been nothing but a series of short posts, started by a fairly simple and obtuse characterization of Inside the Game. There aren't any groundbreaking moments here. There are some attempts to read meaning into other people's words, if you're interested in those. Other than that, there's really nothing backing anything at all up. One guy thinks it's bad that a player says things about another player. Another guy doesn't. And that's really all there is to see. If someone is interested enough in the statistical probability of that one guy's assertions being truthful to ask for an analysis, he should pick up Matlab and do it himself.


It's funny that an endless amount of unsupported claims can be made without anybody caring until someone makes a claim which has an obvious line of investigation and then all of the sudden that investigation must be done or else that claim ought to be thrown out and the author ought to be ashamed. Claims that are investigatable ought to be respected more even if the investigation hasn't been done yet. Most of the things I read on TL.net, I can only respond "yeah, well, that's just like your opinion, man." If someone really cares about what they're discussing, they should be happy to discover an investigation they can do to benefit the discussion. Calling out someone else for not having done it yet is only discouraging people with good ideas (but not enough time to support them) from saying anything at all.


What's even better is the fact that unsupported "factual" statements are uttered all the time, and people accept them as truth on here until there's a mod edit or Nazgul comes in and shits on everyone for blindly joining the bandwagon. I love TL, and I the team, but to say that we hold ourselves to a "higher standard of posting" when we fall victim to nearly as much witch-hunting and sponsor-emailing as Reddit is in and of itself a "factual" statement that is patently wrong.

And no, I won't back up my facts with links to threads. If someone seriously wants proof, and can't think of any examples of a TL witchhunt themselves, then they're not being honest with themselves.
B_Type13X2
Profile Joined October 2012
Canada122 Posts
November 26 2012 06:12 GMT
#51451
On November 26 2012 11:13 itmeJP wrote:
Hey guys!

Sorry for the lack of updates -- been busy with ESPORTS and this crazy ass end-of-year-extravaganza; and Thanksgiving!

We probably won't be able to do a show this upcoming week either due to IPL5 occurring and I fly out Monday morning at 7AM. Will try and do a show the following week! Thanks!


No this is BS you must put out content or else my sad pathetic life will have no meaning. I mean like whats the point I'm just gonna go kill myself now using a weasel tied to a stick.

....

....

....

....
Now that I have earned the Ire of everyone here, Have fun JP and when this year end stuff is over take a vacation. People burn themselves out too fast by burning the candle at both ends.
Half the fun of the internet is untwisting the 20 layers of BS around everything
Astro-Penguin
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
554 Posts
November 26 2012 07:21 GMT
#51452
On November 26 2012 15:12 B_Type13X2 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 26 2012 11:13 itmeJP wrote:
Hey guys!

Sorry for the lack of updates -- been busy with ESPORTS and this crazy ass end-of-year-extravaganza; and Thanksgiving!

We probably won't be able to do a show this upcoming week either due to IPL5 occurring and I fly out Monday morning at 7AM. Will try and do a show the following week! Thanks!


No this is BS you must put out content or else my sad pathetic life will have no meaning. I mean like whats the point I'm just gonna go kill myself now using a weasel tied to a stick.

....

....

....

....
Now that I have earned the Ire of everyone here, Have fun JP and when this year end stuff is over take a vacation. People burn themselves out too fast by burning the candle at both ends.


SOTG makes nerds feel like they have friends (Myself included), with that being said each of us have gone plenty of years without having friends so what's another week of loneliness!

WhiteDog
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
France8650 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-26 10:58:38
November 26 2012 10:57 GMT
#51453
On November 26 2012 12:14 Liquid`NonY wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 26 2012 11:35 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 11:23 sharky246 wrote:
On November 26 2012 10:28 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 10:17 Fyodor wrote:
On November 26 2012 09:21 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 08:29 kckkryptonite wrote:
On November 26 2012 02:41 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 01:04 gruff wrote:
On November 24 2012 11:20 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
The thing is that he's tended to be right more often than not. Generally the sequence has gone: Idra makes a controversial prediction or statement -> it doesn't happen -> everyone LOLs -> it happens -> everyone has already forgotten.

Show me your statistical analysis of Idra's statements/predictions then.


No. Do your own damn work.

Except the claim wasn't made by him...


If he cares enough to want an analysis, then he's more than welcome to it.

sure, but it's your work since you brought it up. You're the one being lazy.


Just because there's not a quote in my post doesn't mean I wasn't responding to folks.

And frankly, I've got nothing invested in that statement and I intend to keep it that way. This isn't science or maths. It's the internet, and I'm not required to show my work.

This is teamliquid, where posters in general are expect to maintain certain standards. That means backing up a claim with abit of evidence. If people could post whatever they're thinking without some proof behind it, well this site would be as bad as reddit, which it isn't, because people here engage in more intellectual discussions.


This entire discussion has been nothing but a series of short posts, started by a fairly simple and obtuse characterization of Inside the Game. There aren't any groundbreaking moments here. There are some attempts to read meaning into other people's words, if you're interested in those. Other than that, there's really nothing backing anything at all up. One guy thinks it's bad that a player says things about another player. Another guy doesn't. And that's really all there is to see. If someone is interested enough in the statistical probability of that one guy's assertions being truthful to ask for an analysis, he should pick up Matlab and do it himself.


It's funny that an endless amount of unsupported claims can be made without anybody caring until someone makes a claim which has an obvious line of investigation and then all of the sudden that investigation must be done or else that claim ought to be thrown out and the author ought to be ashamed. Claims that are investigatable ought to be respected more even if the investigation hasn't been done yet. Most of the things I read on TL.net, I can only respond "yeah, well, that's just like your opinion, man." If someone really cares about what they're discussing, they should be happy to discover an investigation they can do to benefit the discussion. Calling out someone else for not having done it yet is only discouraging people with good ideas (but not enough time to support them) from saying anything at all.

Maybe because saying that IdrA is right in his predictions goes 1) against what most people think 2) is a comment that is easily attributed to a biased pro IdrA TLer, which makes his claim even less interesting.
"every time WhiteDog overuses the word "seriously" in a comment I can make an observation on his fragile emotional state." MoltkeWarding
Yorbon
Profile Joined December 2011
Netherlands4272 Posts
November 26 2012 11:08 GMT
#51454
On November 26 2012 11:13 itmeJP wrote:
Hey guys!

Sorry for the lack of updates -- been busy with ESPORTS and this crazy ass end-of-year-extravaganza; and Thanksgiving!

We probably won't be able to do a show this upcoming week either due to IPL5 occurring and I fly out Monday morning at 7AM. Will try and do a show the following week! Thanks!
Well, i'm looking forward to it, have fun at ipl!
Glurkenspurk
Profile Joined November 2010
United States1915 Posts
November 26 2012 11:19 GMT
#51455
On November 26 2012 13:32 Mauldo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 26 2012 12:14 Liquid`NonY wrote:
On November 26 2012 11:35 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 11:23 sharky246 wrote:
On November 26 2012 10:28 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 10:17 Fyodor wrote:
On November 26 2012 09:21 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 08:29 kckkryptonite wrote:
On November 26 2012 02:41 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 01:04 gruff wrote:
[quote]
Show me your statistical analysis of Idra's statements/predictions then.


No. Do your own damn work.

Except the claim wasn't made by him...


If he cares enough to want an analysis, then he's more than welcome to it.

sure, but it's your work since you brought it up. You're the one being lazy.


Just because there's not a quote in my post doesn't mean I wasn't responding to folks.

And frankly, I've got nothing invested in that statement and I intend to keep it that way. This isn't science or maths. It's the internet, and I'm not required to show my work.

This is teamliquid, where posters in general are expect to maintain certain standards. That means backing up a claim with abit of evidence. If people could post whatever they're thinking without some proof behind it, well this site would be as bad as reddit, which it isn't, because people here engage in more intellectual discussions.


This entire discussion has been nothing but a series of short posts, started by a fairly simple and obtuse characterization of Inside the Game. There aren't any groundbreaking moments here. There are some attempts to read meaning into other people's words, if you're interested in those. Other than that, there's really nothing backing anything at all up. One guy thinks it's bad that a player says things about another player. Another guy doesn't. And that's really all there is to see. If someone is interested enough in the statistical probability of that one guy's assertions being truthful to ask for an analysis, he should pick up Matlab and do it himself.


It's funny that an endless amount of unsupported claims can be made without anybody caring until someone makes a claim which has an obvious line of investigation and then all of the sudden that investigation must be done or else that claim ought to be thrown out and the author ought to be ashamed. Claims that are investigatable ought to be respected more even if the investigation hasn't been done yet. Most of the things I read on TL.net, I can only respond "yeah, well, that's just like your opinion, man." If someone really cares about what they're discussing, they should be happy to discover an investigation they can do to benefit the discussion. Calling out someone else for not having done it yet is only discouraging people with good ideas (but not enough time to support them) from saying anything at all.


What's even better is the fact that unsupported "factual" statements are uttered all the time, and people accept them as truth on here until there's a mod edit or Nazgul comes in and shits on everyone for blindly joining the bandwagon. I love TL, and I the team, but to say that we hold ourselves to a "higher standard of posting" when we fall victim to nearly as much witch-hunting and sponsor-emailing as Reddit is in and of itself a "factual" statement that is patently wrong.

And no, I won't back up my facts with links to threads. If someone seriously wants proof, and can't think of any examples of a TL witchhunt themselves, then they're not being honest with themselves.


To be fair, the bar is set pretty low for having high standards when all we have to compare ourselves to is Reddit.

I love TL, but there are way too many people on this website for it to be possible to prevent all shitposts.
gruff
Profile Joined September 2010
Sweden2276 Posts
November 26 2012 11:36 GMT
#51456
Ok, I retract my original request for his research and just settle with concluding that Idra is wrong more than he's right because I don't have time to do the research myself and will just make such a claim anyway. That's how it's done right?

In any case, my reply was mostly intended to suggest I don't necessarily believe his statement to be true and wanted some kind of clarification of how he could make such a claim. I could have put it in a less snarky way I admit.

Moving on.
Box Score Brian
Profile Joined August 2011
12 Posts
November 30 2012 00:04 GMT
#51457
Eight year olds, dude.
da_head
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
Canada3350 Posts
November 30 2012 04:10 GMT
#51458
On November 26 2012 11:13 itmeJP wrote:
Hey guys!

Sorry for the lack of updates -- been busy with ESPORTS and this crazy ass end-of-year-extravaganza; and Thanksgiving!

We probably won't be able to do a show this upcoming week either due to IPL5 occurring and I fly out Monday morning at 7AM. Will try and do a show the following week! Thanks!

thanks for the update
When they see MC Probe, all the ladies disrobe.
Domus
Profile Joined March 2011
510 Posts
November 30 2012 12:49 GMT
#51459
On November 26 2012 12:14 Liquid`NonY wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 26 2012 11:35 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 11:23 sharky246 wrote:
On November 26 2012 10:28 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 10:17 Fyodor wrote:
On November 26 2012 09:21 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 08:29 kckkryptonite wrote:
On November 26 2012 02:41 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 01:04 gruff wrote:
On November 24 2012 11:20 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
The thing is that he's tended to be right more often than not. Generally the sequence has gone: Idra makes a controversial prediction or statement -> it doesn't happen -> everyone LOLs -> it happens -> everyone has already forgotten.

Show me your statistical analysis of Idra's statements/predictions then.


No. Do your own damn work.

Except the claim wasn't made by him...


If he cares enough to want an analysis, then he's more than welcome to it.

sure, but it's your work since you brought it up. You're the one being lazy.


Just because there's not a quote in my post doesn't mean I wasn't responding to folks.

And frankly, I've got nothing invested in that statement and I intend to keep it that way. This isn't science or maths. It's the internet, and I'm not required to show my work.

This is teamliquid, where posters in general are expect to maintain certain standards. That means backing up a claim with abit of evidence. If people could post whatever they're thinking without some proof behind it, well this site would be as bad as reddit, which it isn't, because people here engage in more intellectual discussions.


This entire discussion has been nothing but a series of short posts, started by a fairly simple and obtuse characterization of Inside the Game. There aren't any groundbreaking moments here. There are some attempts to read meaning into other people's words, if you're interested in those. Other than that, there's really nothing backing anything at all up. One guy thinks it's bad that a player says things about another player. Another guy doesn't. And that's really all there is to see. If someone is interested enough in the statistical probability of that one guy's assertions being truthful to ask for an analysis, he should pick up Matlab and do it himself.


It's funny that an endless amount of unsupported claims can be made without anybody caring until someone makes a claim which has an obvious line of investigation and then all of the sudden that investigation must be done or else that claim ought to be thrown out and the author ought to be ashamed. Claims that are investigatable ought to be respected more even if the investigation hasn't been done yet. Most of the things I read on TL.net, I can only respond "yeah, well, that's just like your opinion, man." If someone really cares about what they're discussing, they should be happy to discover an investigation they can do to benefit the discussion. Calling out someone else for not having done it yet is only discouraging people with good ideas (but not enough time to support them) from saying anything at all.


Hmm, it is interesting that you look at it this way. I think it is much worse to present an opinion as something that is based on false/non-existent/biased facts than to present your opinion just as it is, an opinion. It is also something that politicians like to abuse to get horrible things done. The poster presented his opinion as something based on facts, yet it was damn clear that it was his opinion clearly based on...nothing. Claims like his have nothing to do with falsifiablitity, and have no value at all.
NonY
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
8748 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-30 18:46:19
November 30 2012 18:46 GMT
#51460
On November 30 2012 21:49 Domus wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 26 2012 12:14 Liquid`NonY wrote:
On November 26 2012 11:35 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 11:23 sharky246 wrote:
On November 26 2012 10:28 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 10:17 Fyodor wrote:
On November 26 2012 09:21 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 08:29 kckkryptonite wrote:
On November 26 2012 02:41 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 01:04 gruff wrote:
[quote]
Show me your statistical analysis of Idra's statements/predictions then.


No. Do your own damn work.

Except the claim wasn't made by him...


If he cares enough to want an analysis, then he's more than welcome to it.

sure, but it's your work since you brought it up. You're the one being lazy.


Just because there's not a quote in my post doesn't mean I wasn't responding to folks.

And frankly, I've got nothing invested in that statement and I intend to keep it that way. This isn't science or maths. It's the internet, and I'm not required to show my work.

This is teamliquid, where posters in general are expect to maintain certain standards. That means backing up a claim with abit of evidence. If people could post whatever they're thinking without some proof behind it, well this site would be as bad as reddit, which it isn't, because people here engage in more intellectual discussions.


This entire discussion has been nothing but a series of short posts, started by a fairly simple and obtuse characterization of Inside the Game. There aren't any groundbreaking moments here. There are some attempts to read meaning into other people's words, if you're interested in those. Other than that, there's really nothing backing anything at all up. One guy thinks it's bad that a player says things about another player. Another guy doesn't. And that's really all there is to see. If someone is interested enough in the statistical probability of that one guy's assertions being truthful to ask for an analysis, he should pick up Matlab and do it himself.


It's funny that an endless amount of unsupported claims can be made without anybody caring until someone makes a claim which has an obvious line of investigation and then all of the sudden that investigation must be done or else that claim ought to be thrown out and the author ought to be ashamed. Claims that are investigatable ought to be respected more even if the investigation hasn't been done yet. Most of the things I read on TL.net, I can only respond "yeah, well, that's just like your opinion, man." If someone really cares about what they're discussing, they should be happy to discover an investigation they can do to benefit the discussion. Calling out someone else for not having done it yet is only discouraging people with good ideas (but not enough time to support them) from saying anything at all.


Hmm, it is interesting that you look at it this way. I think it is much worse to present an opinion as something that is based on false/non-existent/biased facts than to present your opinion just as it is, an opinion. It is also something that politicians like to abuse to get horrible things done. The poster presented his opinion as something based on facts, yet it was damn clear that it was his opinion clearly based on...nothing. Claims like his have nothing to do with falsifiablitity, and have no value at all.

It's based on his knowledge and memory and ability to see patterns. It is reasonable for us to not put much value in that because we have no way to judge how valuable those skills of his are. But it's also reasonable for him to not investigate further if he himself is comfortable and confident with his judgment. If his life was on the line, I'm sure he'd investigate and present everything he found but his life isn't on the line and he's allowed to commit however little he wants to as long as he isn't hurting anyone. His post still has value because, like I said, it can spark an investigation if someone deems it a hypothesis worth the time and it can also spark readers to reference their own knowledge and memory and make their own judgment. That is, instead of experimenting and researching, you could search your feelings and know it to be true! Or not. But still it's a valuable contribution and I'm laughing at the fact that this particular type of contribution, even though it's valuable, is scorned because it's not valuable enough, while other types of posts are less valuable and do not rile anyone.
"Fucking up is part of it. If you can't fail, you have to always win. And I don't think you can always win." Elliott Smith ---------- Yet no sudden rage darkened his face, and his eyes were calm as they studied her. Then he smiled. 'Witness.'
Prev 1 2571 2572 2573 2574 2575 2731 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV European League
16:00
Swiss Groups Day 4
Fjant vs Babymarine
Mixu vs HiGhDrA
Gerald vs ArT
goblin vs MaNa
Jumy vs YoungYakov
WardiTV110
Liquipedia
OSC
13:00
King of the Hill Weekly #218
CranKy Ducklings185
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 381
RotterdaM 303
mcanning 94
UpATreeSC 10
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 36890
Sea 2935
Larva 2570
EffOrt 1927
firebathero 956
Stork 595
Mini 468
Light 285
Snow 248
actioN 188
[ Show more ]
Zeus 182
PianO 167
Sharp 86
ToSsGirL 71
sSak 63
sas.Sziky 61
Hyun 57
Shine 44
TY 41
Backho 37
scan(afreeca) 25
Rush 21
Terrorterran 18
IntoTheRainbow 12
Noble 7
Hm[arnc] 7
SilentControl 6
Stormgate
NightEnD8
Dota 2
Gorgc12298
singsing3255
qojqva1557
syndereN246
Counter-Strike
sgares667
markeloff457
edward22
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King69
Other Games
FrodaN1430
hiko1228
Beastyqt433
Lowko315
Fuzer 217
KnowMe112
QueenE73
Pyrionflax64
Trikslyr62
ceh915
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2960
StarCraft 2
angryscii 15
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 12
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH140
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota251
League of Legends
• Nemesis3826
• Jankos1238
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
7h 58m
OSC
7h 58m
Epic.LAN
19h 58m
CranKy Ducklings
1d 17h
Epic.LAN
1d 19h
CSO Contender
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Online Event
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
[ Show More ]
Esports World Cup
4 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
5 days
Esports World Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

JPL Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Championship of Russia 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters

Upcoming

CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
K-Championship
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.