• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 05:19
CET 11:19
KST 19:19
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners11Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting12[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11
Community News
Weekly Cups (Nov 3-9): Clem Conquers in Canada2SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA6StarCraft, SC2, HotS, WC3, Returning to Blizzcon!45$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship7[BSL21] RO32 Group Stage4
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Nov 3-9): Clem Conquers in Canada SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA Mech is the composition that needs teleportation t Craziest Micro Moments Of All Time? RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close"
Tourneys
Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest Tenacious Turtle Tussle Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship Merivale 8 Open - LAN - Stellar Fest
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened Mutation # 496 Endless Infection
Brood War
General
FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [ASL20] Ask the mapmakers — Drop your questions Where's CardinalAllin/Jukado the mapmaker?
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL20] Grand Finals [BSL21] RO32 Group A - Saturday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO32 Group B - Sunday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Current Meta PvZ map balance How to stay on top of macro? Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? Path of Exile Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Dyadica Gospel – a Pulp No…
Hildegard
Coffee x Performance in Espo…
TrAiDoS
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Reality "theory" prov…
perfectspheres
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1743 users

Official State of the Game Podcast Thread - Page 2573

Forum Index > SC2 General
54608 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2571 2572 2573 2574 2575 2731 Next
LuckoftheIrish
Profile Joined November 2011
United States4791 Posts
November 26 2012 01:28 GMT
#51441
On November 26 2012 10:17 Fyodor wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 26 2012 09:21 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 08:29 kckkryptonite wrote:
On November 26 2012 02:41 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 01:04 gruff wrote:
On November 24 2012 11:20 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
The thing is that he's tended to be right more often than not. Generally the sequence has gone: Idra makes a controversial prediction or statement -> it doesn't happen -> everyone LOLs -> it happens -> everyone has already forgotten.

Show me your statistical analysis of Idra's statements/predictions then.


No. Do your own damn work.

Except the claim wasn't made by him...


If he cares enough to want an analysis, then he's more than welcome to it.

sure, but it's your work since you brought it up. You're the one being lazy.


Just because there's not a quote in my post doesn't mean I wasn't responding to folks.

And frankly, I've got nothing invested in that statement and I intend to keep it that way. This isn't science or maths. It's the internet, and I'm not required to show my work.
On Twitter @GosuGamers_LotI | Grubby has a huge head!
NonY
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
8751 Posts
November 26 2012 01:41 GMT
#51442
I've gotta side with LuckoftheIrish here. He's allowed to meet whatever standards he likes. His comment can be taken at its word. Or it can be a suggestion that prompts the reader to consult their own memories and knowledge. Or it can be a claim that prompts an investigation into the facts. Everyone is allowed to choose the level of support they want for their own opinions. And everyone is allowed to choose the level of support they want to put out there to attempt to change others' opinions. If you want to refuse to acknowledge his idea because he hasn't laid out the facts in front of you, then that's fine. If he doesn't care that you aren't convinced, then deal with it.

If it was a mean or potentially harmful comment, we might hold him to a higher standard.
"Fucking up is part of it. If you can't fail, you have to always win. And I don't think you can always win." Elliott Smith ---------- Yet no sudden rage darkened his face, and his eyes were calm as they studied her. Then he smiled. 'Witness.'
Account252508
Profile Joined February 2012
3454 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-26 01:57:04
November 26 2012 01:55 GMT
#51443
--- Nuked ---
itmeJP
Profile Joined February 2010
United States1101 Posts
November 26 2012 02:13 GMT
#51444
Hey guys!

Sorry for the lack of updates -- been busy with ESPORTS and this crazy ass end-of-year-extravaganza; and Thanksgiving!

We probably won't be able to do a show this upcoming week either due to IPL5 occurring and I fly out Monday morning at 7AM. Will try and do a show the following week! Thanks!
Twitter.com/itmeJP -- Twitch.tv/itmeJP -- YouTube.com/itmeJP
LuckoftheIrish
Profile Joined November 2011
United States4791 Posts
November 26 2012 02:22 GMT
#51445
On November 26 2012 11:13 itmeJP wrote:
Hey guys!

Sorry for the lack of updates -- been busy with ESPORTS and this crazy ass end-of-year-extravaganza; and Thanksgiving!

We probably won't be able to do a show this upcoming week either due to IPL5 occurring and I fly out Monday morning at 7AM. Will try and do a show the following week! Thanks!


No worries, JP. Thanks for checking in. GLHF at IPL!
On Twitter @GosuGamers_LotI | Grubby has a huge head!
sharky246
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
1197 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-26 02:23:41
November 26 2012 02:23 GMT
#51446
On November 26 2012 10:28 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 26 2012 10:17 Fyodor wrote:
On November 26 2012 09:21 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 08:29 kckkryptonite wrote:
On November 26 2012 02:41 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 01:04 gruff wrote:
On November 24 2012 11:20 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
The thing is that he's tended to be right more often than not. Generally the sequence has gone: Idra makes a controversial prediction or statement -> it doesn't happen -> everyone LOLs -> it happens -> everyone has already forgotten.

Show me your statistical analysis of Idra's statements/predictions then.


No. Do your own damn work.

Except the claim wasn't made by him...


If he cares enough to want an analysis, then he's more than welcome to it.

sure, but it's your work since you brought it up. You're the one being lazy.


Just because there's not a quote in my post doesn't mean I wasn't responding to folks.

And frankly, I've got nothing invested in that statement and I intend to keep it that way. This isn't science or maths. It's the internet, and I'm not required to show my work.

This is teamliquid, where posters in general are expect to maintain certain standards. That means backing up a claim with abit of evidence. If people could post whatever they're thinking without some proof behind it, well this site would be as bad as reddit, which it isn't, because people here engage in more intellectual discussions.
On January 03 2011 13:14 IdrA wrote: being high on the ladder doesnt get you any closer to your goal. Avoiding practice to protect your rating is absurd. If you want to be good go play 40 games a day and stop thinking about becoming a pro.
LuckoftheIrish
Profile Joined November 2011
United States4791 Posts
November 26 2012 02:35 GMT
#51447
On November 26 2012 11:23 sharky246 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 26 2012 10:28 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 10:17 Fyodor wrote:
On November 26 2012 09:21 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 08:29 kckkryptonite wrote:
On November 26 2012 02:41 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 01:04 gruff wrote:
On November 24 2012 11:20 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
The thing is that he's tended to be right more often than not. Generally the sequence has gone: Idra makes a controversial prediction or statement -> it doesn't happen -> everyone LOLs -> it happens -> everyone has already forgotten.

Show me your statistical analysis of Idra's statements/predictions then.


No. Do your own damn work.

Except the claim wasn't made by him...


If he cares enough to want an analysis, then he's more than welcome to it.

sure, but it's your work since you brought it up. You're the one being lazy.


Just because there's not a quote in my post doesn't mean I wasn't responding to folks.

And frankly, I've got nothing invested in that statement and I intend to keep it that way. This isn't science or maths. It's the internet, and I'm not required to show my work.

This is teamliquid, where posters in general are expect to maintain certain standards. That means backing up a claim with abit of evidence. If people could post whatever they're thinking without some proof behind it, well this site would be as bad as reddit, which it isn't, because people here engage in more intellectual discussions.


This entire discussion has been nothing but a series of short posts, started by a fairly simple and obtuse characterization of Inside the Game. There aren't any groundbreaking moments here. There are some attempts to read meaning into other people's words, if you're interested in those. Other than that, there's really nothing backing anything at all up. One guy thinks it's bad that a player says things about another player. Another guy doesn't. And that's really all there is to see. If someone is interested enough in the statistical probability of that one guy's assertions being truthful to ask for an analysis, he should pick up Matlab and do it himself.

On Twitter @GosuGamers_LotI | Grubby has a huge head!
dAPhREAk
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Nauru12397 Posts
November 26 2012 02:52 GMT
#51448
On November 26 2012 11:23 sharky246 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 26 2012 10:28 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 10:17 Fyodor wrote:
On November 26 2012 09:21 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 08:29 kckkryptonite wrote:
On November 26 2012 02:41 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 01:04 gruff wrote:
On November 24 2012 11:20 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
The thing is that he's tended to be right more often than not. Generally the sequence has gone: Idra makes a controversial prediction or statement -> it doesn't happen -> everyone LOLs -> it happens -> everyone has already forgotten.

Show me your statistical analysis of Idra's statements/predictions then.


No. Do your own damn work.

Except the claim wasn't made by him...


If he cares enough to want an analysis, then he's more than welcome to it.

sure, but it's your work since you brought it up. You're the one being lazy.


Just because there's not a quote in my post doesn't mean I wasn't responding to folks.

And frankly, I've got nothing invested in that statement and I intend to keep it that way. This isn't science or maths. It's the internet, and I'm not required to show my work.

This is teamliquid, where posters in general are expect to maintain certain standards. That means backing up a claim with abit of evidence. If people could post whatever they're thinking without some proof behind it, well this site would be as bad as reddit, which it isn't, because people here engage in more intellectual discussions.

when was this rule implemented? bc i dont think most of the users got the memo.
NonY
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
8751 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-26 03:15:29
November 26 2012 03:14 GMT
#51449
On November 26 2012 11:35 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 26 2012 11:23 sharky246 wrote:
On November 26 2012 10:28 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 10:17 Fyodor wrote:
On November 26 2012 09:21 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 08:29 kckkryptonite wrote:
On November 26 2012 02:41 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 01:04 gruff wrote:
On November 24 2012 11:20 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
The thing is that he's tended to be right more often than not. Generally the sequence has gone: Idra makes a controversial prediction or statement -> it doesn't happen -> everyone LOLs -> it happens -> everyone has already forgotten.

Show me your statistical analysis of Idra's statements/predictions then.


No. Do your own damn work.

Except the claim wasn't made by him...


If he cares enough to want an analysis, then he's more than welcome to it.

sure, but it's your work since you brought it up. You're the one being lazy.


Just because there's not a quote in my post doesn't mean I wasn't responding to folks.

And frankly, I've got nothing invested in that statement and I intend to keep it that way. This isn't science or maths. It's the internet, and I'm not required to show my work.

This is teamliquid, where posters in general are expect to maintain certain standards. That means backing up a claim with abit of evidence. If people could post whatever they're thinking without some proof behind it, well this site would be as bad as reddit, which it isn't, because people here engage in more intellectual discussions.


This entire discussion has been nothing but a series of short posts, started by a fairly simple and obtuse characterization of Inside the Game. There aren't any groundbreaking moments here. There are some attempts to read meaning into other people's words, if you're interested in those. Other than that, there's really nothing backing anything at all up. One guy thinks it's bad that a player says things about another player. Another guy doesn't. And that's really all there is to see. If someone is interested enough in the statistical probability of that one guy's assertions being truthful to ask for an analysis, he should pick up Matlab and do it himself.


It's funny that an endless amount of unsupported claims can be made without anybody caring until someone makes a claim which has an obvious line of investigation and then all of the sudden that investigation must be done or else that claim ought to be thrown out and the author ought to be ashamed. Claims that are investigatable ought to be respected more even if the investigation hasn't been done yet. Most of the things I read on TL.net, I can only respond "yeah, well, that's just like your opinion, man." If someone really cares about what they're discussing, they should be happy to discover an investigation they can do to benefit the discussion. Calling out someone else for not having done it yet is only discouraging people with good ideas (but not enough time to support them) from saying anything at all.
"Fucking up is part of it. If you can't fail, you have to always win. And I don't think you can always win." Elliott Smith ---------- Yet no sudden rage darkened his face, and his eyes were calm as they studied her. Then he smiled. 'Witness.'
Mauldo
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States750 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-26 04:33:17
November 26 2012 04:32 GMT
#51450
On November 26 2012 12:14 Liquid`NonY wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 26 2012 11:35 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 11:23 sharky246 wrote:
On November 26 2012 10:28 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 10:17 Fyodor wrote:
On November 26 2012 09:21 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 08:29 kckkryptonite wrote:
On November 26 2012 02:41 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 01:04 gruff wrote:
On November 24 2012 11:20 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
The thing is that he's tended to be right more often than not. Generally the sequence has gone: Idra makes a controversial prediction or statement -> it doesn't happen -> everyone LOLs -> it happens -> everyone has already forgotten.

Show me your statistical analysis of Idra's statements/predictions then.


No. Do your own damn work.

Except the claim wasn't made by him...


If he cares enough to want an analysis, then he's more than welcome to it.

sure, but it's your work since you brought it up. You're the one being lazy.


Just because there's not a quote in my post doesn't mean I wasn't responding to folks.

And frankly, I've got nothing invested in that statement and I intend to keep it that way. This isn't science or maths. It's the internet, and I'm not required to show my work.

This is teamliquid, where posters in general are expect to maintain certain standards. That means backing up a claim with abit of evidence. If people could post whatever they're thinking without some proof behind it, well this site would be as bad as reddit, which it isn't, because people here engage in more intellectual discussions.


This entire discussion has been nothing but a series of short posts, started by a fairly simple and obtuse characterization of Inside the Game. There aren't any groundbreaking moments here. There are some attempts to read meaning into other people's words, if you're interested in those. Other than that, there's really nothing backing anything at all up. One guy thinks it's bad that a player says things about another player. Another guy doesn't. And that's really all there is to see. If someone is interested enough in the statistical probability of that one guy's assertions being truthful to ask for an analysis, he should pick up Matlab and do it himself.


It's funny that an endless amount of unsupported claims can be made without anybody caring until someone makes a claim which has an obvious line of investigation and then all of the sudden that investigation must be done or else that claim ought to be thrown out and the author ought to be ashamed. Claims that are investigatable ought to be respected more even if the investigation hasn't been done yet. Most of the things I read on TL.net, I can only respond "yeah, well, that's just like your opinion, man." If someone really cares about what they're discussing, they should be happy to discover an investigation they can do to benefit the discussion. Calling out someone else for not having done it yet is only discouraging people with good ideas (but not enough time to support them) from saying anything at all.


What's even better is the fact that unsupported "factual" statements are uttered all the time, and people accept them as truth on here until there's a mod edit or Nazgul comes in and shits on everyone for blindly joining the bandwagon. I love TL, and I the team, but to say that we hold ourselves to a "higher standard of posting" when we fall victim to nearly as much witch-hunting and sponsor-emailing as Reddit is in and of itself a "factual" statement that is patently wrong.

And no, I won't back up my facts with links to threads. If someone seriously wants proof, and can't think of any examples of a TL witchhunt themselves, then they're not being honest with themselves.
B_Type13X2
Profile Joined October 2012
Canada122 Posts
November 26 2012 06:12 GMT
#51451
On November 26 2012 11:13 itmeJP wrote:
Hey guys!

Sorry for the lack of updates -- been busy with ESPORTS and this crazy ass end-of-year-extravaganza; and Thanksgiving!

We probably won't be able to do a show this upcoming week either due to IPL5 occurring and I fly out Monday morning at 7AM. Will try and do a show the following week! Thanks!


No this is BS you must put out content or else my sad pathetic life will have no meaning. I mean like whats the point I'm just gonna go kill myself now using a weasel tied to a stick.

....

....

....

....
Now that I have earned the Ire of everyone here, Have fun JP and when this year end stuff is over take a vacation. People burn themselves out too fast by burning the candle at both ends.
Half the fun of the internet is untwisting the 20 layers of BS around everything
Astro-Penguin
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
554 Posts
November 26 2012 07:21 GMT
#51452
On November 26 2012 15:12 B_Type13X2 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 26 2012 11:13 itmeJP wrote:
Hey guys!

Sorry for the lack of updates -- been busy with ESPORTS and this crazy ass end-of-year-extravaganza; and Thanksgiving!

We probably won't be able to do a show this upcoming week either due to IPL5 occurring and I fly out Monday morning at 7AM. Will try and do a show the following week! Thanks!


No this is BS you must put out content or else my sad pathetic life will have no meaning. I mean like whats the point I'm just gonna go kill myself now using a weasel tied to a stick.

....

....

....

....
Now that I have earned the Ire of everyone here, Have fun JP and when this year end stuff is over take a vacation. People burn themselves out too fast by burning the candle at both ends.


SOTG makes nerds feel like they have friends (Myself included), with that being said each of us have gone plenty of years without having friends so what's another week of loneliness!

WhiteDog
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
France8650 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-26 10:58:38
November 26 2012 10:57 GMT
#51453
On November 26 2012 12:14 Liquid`NonY wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 26 2012 11:35 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 11:23 sharky246 wrote:
On November 26 2012 10:28 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 10:17 Fyodor wrote:
On November 26 2012 09:21 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 08:29 kckkryptonite wrote:
On November 26 2012 02:41 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 01:04 gruff wrote:
On November 24 2012 11:20 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
The thing is that he's tended to be right more often than not. Generally the sequence has gone: Idra makes a controversial prediction or statement -> it doesn't happen -> everyone LOLs -> it happens -> everyone has already forgotten.

Show me your statistical analysis of Idra's statements/predictions then.


No. Do your own damn work.

Except the claim wasn't made by him...


If he cares enough to want an analysis, then he's more than welcome to it.

sure, but it's your work since you brought it up. You're the one being lazy.


Just because there's not a quote in my post doesn't mean I wasn't responding to folks.

And frankly, I've got nothing invested in that statement and I intend to keep it that way. This isn't science or maths. It's the internet, and I'm not required to show my work.

This is teamliquid, where posters in general are expect to maintain certain standards. That means backing up a claim with abit of evidence. If people could post whatever they're thinking without some proof behind it, well this site would be as bad as reddit, which it isn't, because people here engage in more intellectual discussions.


This entire discussion has been nothing but a series of short posts, started by a fairly simple and obtuse characterization of Inside the Game. There aren't any groundbreaking moments here. There are some attempts to read meaning into other people's words, if you're interested in those. Other than that, there's really nothing backing anything at all up. One guy thinks it's bad that a player says things about another player. Another guy doesn't. And that's really all there is to see. If someone is interested enough in the statistical probability of that one guy's assertions being truthful to ask for an analysis, he should pick up Matlab and do it himself.


It's funny that an endless amount of unsupported claims can be made without anybody caring until someone makes a claim which has an obvious line of investigation and then all of the sudden that investigation must be done or else that claim ought to be thrown out and the author ought to be ashamed. Claims that are investigatable ought to be respected more even if the investigation hasn't been done yet. Most of the things I read on TL.net, I can only respond "yeah, well, that's just like your opinion, man." If someone really cares about what they're discussing, they should be happy to discover an investigation they can do to benefit the discussion. Calling out someone else for not having done it yet is only discouraging people with good ideas (but not enough time to support them) from saying anything at all.

Maybe because saying that IdrA is right in his predictions goes 1) against what most people think 2) is a comment that is easily attributed to a biased pro IdrA TLer, which makes his claim even less interesting.
"every time WhiteDog overuses the word "seriously" in a comment I can make an observation on his fragile emotional state." MoltkeWarding
Yorbon
Profile Joined December 2011
Netherlands4272 Posts
November 26 2012 11:08 GMT
#51454
On November 26 2012 11:13 itmeJP wrote:
Hey guys!

Sorry for the lack of updates -- been busy with ESPORTS and this crazy ass end-of-year-extravaganza; and Thanksgiving!

We probably won't be able to do a show this upcoming week either due to IPL5 occurring and I fly out Monday morning at 7AM. Will try and do a show the following week! Thanks!
Well, i'm looking forward to it, have fun at ipl!
Glurkenspurk
Profile Joined November 2010
United States1915 Posts
November 26 2012 11:19 GMT
#51455
On November 26 2012 13:32 Mauldo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 26 2012 12:14 Liquid`NonY wrote:
On November 26 2012 11:35 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 11:23 sharky246 wrote:
On November 26 2012 10:28 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 10:17 Fyodor wrote:
On November 26 2012 09:21 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 08:29 kckkryptonite wrote:
On November 26 2012 02:41 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 01:04 gruff wrote:
[quote]
Show me your statistical analysis of Idra's statements/predictions then.


No. Do your own damn work.

Except the claim wasn't made by him...


If he cares enough to want an analysis, then he's more than welcome to it.

sure, but it's your work since you brought it up. You're the one being lazy.


Just because there's not a quote in my post doesn't mean I wasn't responding to folks.

And frankly, I've got nothing invested in that statement and I intend to keep it that way. This isn't science or maths. It's the internet, and I'm not required to show my work.

This is teamliquid, where posters in general are expect to maintain certain standards. That means backing up a claim with abit of evidence. If people could post whatever they're thinking without some proof behind it, well this site would be as bad as reddit, which it isn't, because people here engage in more intellectual discussions.


This entire discussion has been nothing but a series of short posts, started by a fairly simple and obtuse characterization of Inside the Game. There aren't any groundbreaking moments here. There are some attempts to read meaning into other people's words, if you're interested in those. Other than that, there's really nothing backing anything at all up. One guy thinks it's bad that a player says things about another player. Another guy doesn't. And that's really all there is to see. If someone is interested enough in the statistical probability of that one guy's assertions being truthful to ask for an analysis, he should pick up Matlab and do it himself.


It's funny that an endless amount of unsupported claims can be made without anybody caring until someone makes a claim which has an obvious line of investigation and then all of the sudden that investigation must be done or else that claim ought to be thrown out and the author ought to be ashamed. Claims that are investigatable ought to be respected more even if the investigation hasn't been done yet. Most of the things I read on TL.net, I can only respond "yeah, well, that's just like your opinion, man." If someone really cares about what they're discussing, they should be happy to discover an investigation they can do to benefit the discussion. Calling out someone else for not having done it yet is only discouraging people with good ideas (but not enough time to support them) from saying anything at all.


What's even better is the fact that unsupported "factual" statements are uttered all the time, and people accept them as truth on here until there's a mod edit or Nazgul comes in and shits on everyone for blindly joining the bandwagon. I love TL, and I the team, but to say that we hold ourselves to a "higher standard of posting" when we fall victim to nearly as much witch-hunting and sponsor-emailing as Reddit is in and of itself a "factual" statement that is patently wrong.

And no, I won't back up my facts with links to threads. If someone seriously wants proof, and can't think of any examples of a TL witchhunt themselves, then they're not being honest with themselves.


To be fair, the bar is set pretty low for having high standards when all we have to compare ourselves to is Reddit.

I love TL, but there are way too many people on this website for it to be possible to prevent all shitposts.
gruff
Profile Joined September 2010
Sweden2276 Posts
November 26 2012 11:36 GMT
#51456
Ok, I retract my original request for his research and just settle with concluding that Idra is wrong more than he's right because I don't have time to do the research myself and will just make such a claim anyway. That's how it's done right?

In any case, my reply was mostly intended to suggest I don't necessarily believe his statement to be true and wanted some kind of clarification of how he could make such a claim. I could have put it in a less snarky way I admit.

Moving on.
Box Score Brian
Profile Joined August 2011
12 Posts
November 30 2012 00:04 GMT
#51457
Eight year olds, dude.
da_head
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
Canada3350 Posts
November 30 2012 04:10 GMT
#51458
On November 26 2012 11:13 itmeJP wrote:
Hey guys!

Sorry for the lack of updates -- been busy with ESPORTS and this crazy ass end-of-year-extravaganza; and Thanksgiving!

We probably won't be able to do a show this upcoming week either due to IPL5 occurring and I fly out Monday morning at 7AM. Will try and do a show the following week! Thanks!

thanks for the update
When they see MC Probe, all the ladies disrobe.
Domus
Profile Joined March 2011
510 Posts
November 30 2012 12:49 GMT
#51459
On November 26 2012 12:14 Liquid`NonY wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 26 2012 11:35 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 11:23 sharky246 wrote:
On November 26 2012 10:28 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 10:17 Fyodor wrote:
On November 26 2012 09:21 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 08:29 kckkryptonite wrote:
On November 26 2012 02:41 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 01:04 gruff wrote:
On November 24 2012 11:20 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
The thing is that he's tended to be right more often than not. Generally the sequence has gone: Idra makes a controversial prediction or statement -> it doesn't happen -> everyone LOLs -> it happens -> everyone has already forgotten.

Show me your statistical analysis of Idra's statements/predictions then.


No. Do your own damn work.

Except the claim wasn't made by him...


If he cares enough to want an analysis, then he's more than welcome to it.

sure, but it's your work since you brought it up. You're the one being lazy.


Just because there's not a quote in my post doesn't mean I wasn't responding to folks.

And frankly, I've got nothing invested in that statement and I intend to keep it that way. This isn't science or maths. It's the internet, and I'm not required to show my work.

This is teamliquid, where posters in general are expect to maintain certain standards. That means backing up a claim with abit of evidence. If people could post whatever they're thinking without some proof behind it, well this site would be as bad as reddit, which it isn't, because people here engage in more intellectual discussions.


This entire discussion has been nothing but a series of short posts, started by a fairly simple and obtuse characterization of Inside the Game. There aren't any groundbreaking moments here. There are some attempts to read meaning into other people's words, if you're interested in those. Other than that, there's really nothing backing anything at all up. One guy thinks it's bad that a player says things about another player. Another guy doesn't. And that's really all there is to see. If someone is interested enough in the statistical probability of that one guy's assertions being truthful to ask for an analysis, he should pick up Matlab and do it himself.


It's funny that an endless amount of unsupported claims can be made without anybody caring until someone makes a claim which has an obvious line of investigation and then all of the sudden that investigation must be done or else that claim ought to be thrown out and the author ought to be ashamed. Claims that are investigatable ought to be respected more even if the investigation hasn't been done yet. Most of the things I read on TL.net, I can only respond "yeah, well, that's just like your opinion, man." If someone really cares about what they're discussing, they should be happy to discover an investigation they can do to benefit the discussion. Calling out someone else for not having done it yet is only discouraging people with good ideas (but not enough time to support them) from saying anything at all.


Hmm, it is interesting that you look at it this way. I think it is much worse to present an opinion as something that is based on false/non-existent/biased facts than to present your opinion just as it is, an opinion. It is also something that politicians like to abuse to get horrible things done. The poster presented his opinion as something based on facts, yet it was damn clear that it was his opinion clearly based on...nothing. Claims like his have nothing to do with falsifiablitity, and have no value at all.
NonY
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
8751 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-30 18:46:19
November 30 2012 18:46 GMT
#51460
On November 30 2012 21:49 Domus wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 26 2012 12:14 Liquid`NonY wrote:
On November 26 2012 11:35 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 11:23 sharky246 wrote:
On November 26 2012 10:28 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 10:17 Fyodor wrote:
On November 26 2012 09:21 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 08:29 kckkryptonite wrote:
On November 26 2012 02:41 LuckoftheIrish wrote:
On November 26 2012 01:04 gruff wrote:
[quote]
Show me your statistical analysis of Idra's statements/predictions then.


No. Do your own damn work.

Except the claim wasn't made by him...


If he cares enough to want an analysis, then he's more than welcome to it.

sure, but it's your work since you brought it up. You're the one being lazy.


Just because there's not a quote in my post doesn't mean I wasn't responding to folks.

And frankly, I've got nothing invested in that statement and I intend to keep it that way. This isn't science or maths. It's the internet, and I'm not required to show my work.

This is teamliquid, where posters in general are expect to maintain certain standards. That means backing up a claim with abit of evidence. If people could post whatever they're thinking without some proof behind it, well this site would be as bad as reddit, which it isn't, because people here engage in more intellectual discussions.


This entire discussion has been nothing but a series of short posts, started by a fairly simple and obtuse characterization of Inside the Game. There aren't any groundbreaking moments here. There are some attempts to read meaning into other people's words, if you're interested in those. Other than that, there's really nothing backing anything at all up. One guy thinks it's bad that a player says things about another player. Another guy doesn't. And that's really all there is to see. If someone is interested enough in the statistical probability of that one guy's assertions being truthful to ask for an analysis, he should pick up Matlab and do it himself.


It's funny that an endless amount of unsupported claims can be made without anybody caring until someone makes a claim which has an obvious line of investigation and then all of the sudden that investigation must be done or else that claim ought to be thrown out and the author ought to be ashamed. Claims that are investigatable ought to be respected more even if the investigation hasn't been done yet. Most of the things I read on TL.net, I can only respond "yeah, well, that's just like your opinion, man." If someone really cares about what they're discussing, they should be happy to discover an investigation they can do to benefit the discussion. Calling out someone else for not having done it yet is only discouraging people with good ideas (but not enough time to support them) from saying anything at all.


Hmm, it is interesting that you look at it this way. I think it is much worse to present an opinion as something that is based on false/non-existent/biased facts than to present your opinion just as it is, an opinion. It is also something that politicians like to abuse to get horrible things done. The poster presented his opinion as something based on facts, yet it was damn clear that it was his opinion clearly based on...nothing. Claims like his have nothing to do with falsifiablitity, and have no value at all.

It's based on his knowledge and memory and ability to see patterns. It is reasonable for us to not put much value in that because we have no way to judge how valuable those skills of his are. But it's also reasonable for him to not investigate further if he himself is comfortable and confident with his judgment. If his life was on the line, I'm sure he'd investigate and present everything he found but his life isn't on the line and he's allowed to commit however little he wants to as long as he isn't hurting anyone. His post still has value because, like I said, it can spark an investigation if someone deems it a hypothesis worth the time and it can also spark readers to reference their own knowledge and memory and make their own judgment. That is, instead of experimenting and researching, you could search your feelings and know it to be true! Or not. But still it's a valuable contribution and I'm laughing at the fact that this particular type of contribution, even though it's valuable, is scorned because it's not valuable enough, while other types of posts are less valuable and do not rile anyone.
"Fucking up is part of it. If you can't fail, you have to always win. And I don't think you can always win." Elliott Smith ---------- Yet no sudden rage darkened his face, and his eyes were calm as they studied her. Then he smiled. 'Witness.'
Prev 1 2571 2572 2573 2574 2575 2731 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 41m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
Hyuk 2955
Calm 2897
Pusan 336
Stork 287
ZerO 202
Soma 143
Snow 141
Rush 127
Killer 124
hero 73
[ Show more ]
ToSsGirL 48
Free 47
Sharp 32
Shine 26
Sexy 20
Terrorterran 14
Noble 13
sSak 12
Dota 2
XaKoH 396
XcaliburYe58
League of Legends
JimRising 412
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1197
shoxiejesuss653
allub267
Other Games
summit1g15464
ceh9624
Pyrionflax111
NeuroSwarm36
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick558
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 507
Other Games
BasetradeTV45
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 9
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Light_VIP 78
• LUISG 44
• Adnapsc2 7
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 2
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Stunt877
Other Games
• Scarra1291
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Korean Royale
1h 41m
OSC
6h 41m
Replay Cast
12h 41m
Replay Cast
22h 41m
Kung Fu Cup
1d 1h
Classic vs Solar
herO vs Cure
Reynor vs GuMiho
ByuN vs ShoWTimE
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
1d 12h
The PondCast
1d 23h
RSL Revival
1d 23h
Solar vs Zoun
MaxPax vs Bunny
Kung Fu Cup
2 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
2 days
[ Show More ]
PiGosaur Monday
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
Classic vs Creator
Cure vs TriGGeR
Kung Fu Cup
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
herO vs Gerald
ByuN vs SHIN
Kung Fu Cup
4 days
BSL 21
4 days
Tarson vs Julia
Doodle vs OldBoy
eOnzErG vs WolFix
StRyKeR vs Aeternum
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Reynor vs sOs
Maru vs Ryung
Kung Fu Cup
5 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
5 days
BSL 21
5 days
JDConan vs Semih
Dragon vs Dienmax
Tech vs NewOcean
TerrOr vs Artosis
Wardi Open
6 days
Monday Night Weeklies
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-11-07
Stellar Fest: Constellation Cup
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual

Upcoming

SLON Tour Season 2
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
RSL Revival: Season 3
META Madness #9
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.