Official State of the Game Podcast Thread - Page 1561
Forum Index > SC2 General |
JustPassingBy
10776 Posts
| ||
Daralii
United States16991 Posts
On September 19 2011 06:53 darkscream wrote: Player knocked out of tournament - Fans debate for hours and hours whether or not he sucks! More at 11. This is SC2news. Only seems to happen with zerg players, really. Never go into an LR thread for at least 2 hours after IdrA gets knocked out. | ||
GreyKnight
United States4720 Posts
On September 19 2011 06:55 JustPassingBy wrote: I hope artosis talks a little bit about sixjax, especially what his duties as a coach was, why there are so few coaches in foreign teams compared to Korean teams, whether he think what coaches contributes to the development of a player. He wasn't a coach and whatever position he had was basically give them a sponsor shoutout and have the sixjax intro for his videos...I doubt he will talk about that as it will make him look a little stupid | ||
Slusher
United States19143 Posts
| ||
gullberg
Sweden1301 Posts
On September 19 2011 06:55 JustPassingBy wrote: I hope artosis talks a little bit about sixjax, especially what his duties as a coach was, why there are so few coaches in foreign teams compared to Korean teams, whether he think what coaches contributes to the development of a player. I'm interested in this aswell, him talking about sixjax seems like a given. | ||
ronpaul012
United States769 Posts
On September 19 2011 04:09 Numy wrote: Why is opening up standard a bad move? If that's where a player plays his best then it is the best move. Standard is standard for that exact reason. It doesn't rely on gimmicks. It's purely how you play. Sure he could have gone for some gimmicky opening in order to try throw DRG off and gain an advantage that way but to say you have to be "different" in order to beat a player like DRG isn't really true. You just have to be up to his level in the standard. I did not explain my point clearly enough. Opening up standard is not necessarily bad if you can pull it off. However, for terran MOST openings are there to do 1 of 3 main things. 1. damage the zerg to force out more lings, and so they can not make more workers. 2. give you map control, and hopefully kill some lings and force zerg to be defensive. Or 3. give you a economic lead(1rax fe). In game 1, he 2 raxed where the main goal is to try and kill some workers or lings, and force lings. He failed to do either, and drg gained a pretty large economic lead where he didn't look back. Game 2 he attempted a hellion opening. The main goal early is to get in and kill some lings and drones. That failed, so the next step is to just get map control. He failed in this as well. So, I guess my point is that DRG clearly knew exactly how to stop these. Standard is good, as long as you succeed in what your trying to do. However when playing somebody with such high caliber, I personally feel as if it would be smarter to change something up, but thats just my personal opinion. | ||
Rasun
United States787 Posts
On September 19 2011 07:04 gullberg wrote: I'm interested in this aswell, him talking about sixjax seems like a given. On September 19 2011 06:55 JustPassingBy wrote: I hope artosis talks a little bit about sixjax, especially what his duties as a coach was, why there are so few coaches in foreign teams compared to Korean teams, whether he think what coaches contributes to the development of a player. Ostijoy did a blog where he talked about Sixjax disbanding, this is a quote from that blog concerning Artosis. Just to clear it up he had very little to do with the team, and was brought on to attract attention to the name. I don't have anything against him I just get annoyed at this misconception that he was the core of the team. http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=265933 | ||
Umpteen
United Kingdom1570 Posts
As you were. | ||
JEEPFiretruck
Australia106 Posts
| ||
Agnosthar
631 Posts
On September 19 2011 06:59 Slusher wrote: Just wanted to post in support of a BW centric episode jp mentioned on twitter, really looking forward to it. I thought that was a joke, due to the already high number of times BW gets referenced. | ||
Sandro
897 Posts
| ||
dcemuser
United States3248 Posts
On September 20 2011 02:37 Sandro wrote: I wonder if they'll talk about anything outside of Wait... there are places other than America? (I'm sorry, I just know that's what JP would say :D) | ||
Talin
Montenegro10532 Posts
| ||
![]()
NonY
8748 Posts
On September 20 2011 02:37 Sandro wrote: I wonder if they'll talk about anything outside of We will definitely follow up on the DH discussion we started last week. | ||
iNcontroL
![]()
USA29055 Posts
On September 20 2011 02:37 Sandro wrote: I wonder if they'll talk about anything outside of I wonder if the | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On September 20 2011 02:42 Liquid`Tyler wrote: We will definitely follow up on the DH discussion we started last week. How about Starcraft theme wiskey? These are the topics that need answering! I need to know when we can purchase this. | ||
Bleak
Turkey3059 Posts
On September 20 2011 02:42 Liquid`Tyler wrote: We will definitely follow up on the DH discussion we started last week. What about covering the OSL Finals? Jangbi and all, man those finals were amazing. | ||
Choboo
Sweden2088 Posts
On September 20 2011 02:45 iNcontroL wrote: I wonder if the You better talk about Mana. Best PvT in the world needs some recognition ^^. Signed, angry European | ||
The KY
United Kingdom6252 Posts
On September 20 2011 02:45 iNcontroL wrote: I wonder if the I wonder if the whiney europeans will get their hearing fixed this week. For serious though guys I'm gonna need you to watch every VOD of every European online cup for the past month and do an in depth evaluation of the play of all the winners. Don't worry that'll only take you about 4 straight days, you still have time for a few hours practise of the game you play as a job. | ||
Deadlyfish
Denmark1980 Posts
Also the American scene has more drama and just more interesting overall. I guess i might be the only EU-er who feels like this though ![]() | ||
| ||