|
A thread was created with a list of all the known diamond league players. http://sc2.vacau.com/sc2/index.php
I decided to go through each of the top 100 players and see what races they are. Here are my findings.
Protoss: 38
Terran: 36
Zerg: 22
Random: 4
Edit: I quickly went through the next 100. so here is a pool of the top 200 players.
Protoss: 75
Terran: 68
Zerg: 47
Random: 10
Went through the data real quick with excel, here's the numbers as of July 18th, 2010 1PM PDT
1120 Protoss
921 Terran
891 Zerg
440 Random
**Thanks to Primadog
http://sc2.vacau.com/sc2/krranks.php
Thanks for the link, jokah, and thanks to martinni for updating the list.
Of the 3635 players in asia diamond division 1v1.
* 1244 are protoss
* 1187 are terran
* 750 are zerg
* 454 are random
So
* 34.22% are protoss
* 32.65% are terran
* 20.63% are zerg
* 12.49% are random
|
Someone should put up the EU top 100 too!
And Asia.
|
This proves that random is overpowered
|
I'm loving all the datamining going on.
I hope to see a lot more soon 
(Also, a nod to, and inb4, the low Zerg count! I would also love to see the stats for EU/Asia as well to see if the ratios are similar)
|
Thanks for this. Maybe the OP threads will simmer down now. Although yeah, Random is OP. Lol. :p
|
haha and terran is so overpowered!!! riiiiight lol :D
|
whats the point of such a list aslong you get 5-30 times more ELO for a win then a loss?
|
On July 17 2010 09:18 Rea wrote:
whats the point of such a list aslong you get 5-30 times more ELO for a win then a loss?
Once you play a lot of games that stops happening.
|
On July 17 2010 09:18 Rea wrote:
whats the point of such a list aslong you get 5-30 times more ELO for a win then a loss?
Uh what.
Maybe if you're in bronze. I'm getting about even.
|
On July 17 2010 09:25 3clipse wrote:Show nested quote +On July 17 2010 09:18 Rea wrote:
whats the point of such a list aslong you get 5-30 times more ELO for a win then a loss? Uh what. Maybe if you're in bronze. I'm getting about even.
what league? I'm getting +12 / -14..? is that just me lol? and I guess a +2 because of bonus pool
|
On July 17 2010 09:25 3clipse wrote:Show nested quote +On July 17 2010 09:18 Rea wrote:
whats the point of such a list aslong you get 5-30 times more ELO for a win then a loss? Uh what. Maybe if you're in bronze. I'm getting about even.
yea really. wtf is that guy talking about lol. maybe with a shitload of bonus pool.
Im nearing 600 rating and almost always losses take more than wins give . but thats how it should be, obviously.
|
Loss for me is -12 and a win is +10
|
i also thought that terran is imbalanced. but idk, maybe the 4 gate has to do with a lot of these.
|
it was like this in BW too
protoss is the most straight-forward
terran is a little less straight-forward
and zerg is the least straight-forward
people are going to change, and later on in the highest level, zerg is going to OP the crap out of all the other races
|
Protoss all-ins and early aggression account for a lot of the protoss success up to mid level diamond, really.
|
Lol oh yeah, rank 200 and I havent played a game since the third day of beta. Protoss is too easy, Most games come down (ZvP) either a all in 4gate, or a gateway forgebuild into a hard to stop 2base collosus. It's so easy to do either of these builds, and it's truly really hard for a zerg to come out ahead.. Dealing with collosus with roach hydra is hard, and if you make 5 too many drones, you lose to a good timing push. It's too demanding in comparison to the protoss strategy. Roaces need a buff against collossi. Hydras are completely useless by any sort of collosus micro.
|
17070 Posts
On July 17 2010 09:39 Nal_rAwr wrote:
it was like this in BW too
protoss is the most straight-forward
terran is a little less straight-forward
and zerg is the least straight-forward
people are going to change, and later on in the highest level, zerg is going to OP the crap out of all the other races
I'd actually argue that Terran is more straight-forward than Protoss is, especially in their macro mechanic.
|
On July 17 2010 09:39 Nal_rAwr wrote:
it was like this in BW too
protoss is the most straight-forward
terran is a little less straight-forward
and zerg is the least straight-forward
people are going to change, and later on in the highest level, zerg is going to OP the crap out of all the other races
Why is zerg going to " OP the crap out of all the other races"
I do not think Zerg is considered overpowered at all. Please explain what you mean
|
On July 17 2010 09:43 Empyrean wrote:Show nested quote +On July 17 2010 09:39 Nal_rAwr wrote:
it was like this in BW too
protoss is the most straight-forward
terran is a little less straight-forward
and zerg is the least straight-forward
people are going to change, and later on in the highest level, zerg is going to OP the crap out of all the other races I'd actually argue that Terran is more straight-forward than Protoss is, especially in their macro mechanic.
Terran is straight forward macro because they can build anything. so just do 1/1/1. Protoss has to commit to something
|
On July 17 2010 09:44 FatkiddsLag wrote:Show nested quote +On July 17 2010 09:43 Empyrean wrote:On July 17 2010 09:39 Nal_rAwr wrote:
it was like this in BW too
protoss is the most straight-forward
terran is a little less straight-forward
and zerg is the least straight-forward
people are going to change, and later on in the highest level, zerg is going to OP the crap out of all the other races I'd actually argue that Terran is more straight-forward than Protoss is, especially in their macro mechanic. Terran is straight forward macro because they can build anything. so just do 1/1/1. Protoss has to commit to something
Protoss can chronoboost probes, put gates anywhere, not build units in battles, and then boom, 13 zealots warping in... I believe protoss is by far easier to macro than terran.
Also cannons, although not commonly used, easier to do than bunkers imo,
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
