Real names in forums canceled - Page 20
Forum Index > SC2 General |
Zona
40426 Posts
| ||
Saturnize
United States2473 Posts
On July 10 2010 12:14 Spiffeh wrote: Blizzard has listened to its fans from day 1. How can anyone be surprised by this? Well they still have no LAN and No cross realm play so i guess I would expect to see alot of people happy about this news. But this still doesn't make me want to buy the game, come on blizzard why aren't you trying to win over your core audience by adding these key features that were in BW? | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
On July 10 2010 15:54 Saturnize wrote: Well they still have no LAN and No cross realm play so i guess I would expect to see alot of people happy about this news. But this still doesn't make me want to buy the game, come on blizzard why aren't you trying to win over your core audience by adding these key features that were in BW? They're working on X-Realm play. LAN isn't a big deal for me, but I understand why some are upset. Though at the same time, pirating + LAN + Hamachi is pretty widespread with War3, so I can understand why Blizzard would be slow to add LAN. | ||
bodycount
Poland36 Posts
| ||
Blizzard_torments_me
Romania199 Posts
| ||
Seam
United States1093 Posts
On July 10 2010 15:54 Saturnize wrote: Well they still have no LAN and No cross realm play so i guess I would expect to see alot of people happy about this news. They havn't had 50k posts in about a day over LAN, and they said they are working on Cross Realm play. | ||
leveller
Sweden1840 Posts
But props for taking this change back. | ||
knL
Germany400 Posts
| ||
nttea
Sweden4353 Posts
On July 10 2010 20:19 knL wrote: Iam extremly suprised that they canceld it. I cant remember such a "big thing" has been canceld before by Blizzard. i've never seen such an epic shitstorm either... | ||
Archerofaiur
United States4101 Posts
On July 10 2010 13:39 Zeromadcowz wrote: how is facebook integration harming you? just ignore it and its fine Its not the integration itself so much as the general direction of the company since merging with Activision. | ||
StorrZerg
United States13911 Posts
Guess if enough of an uproar is made they move a little bit faster. | ||
Archerofaiur
United States4101 Posts
| ||
thehitman
1105 Posts
| ||
Furycrab
Canada456 Posts
Its not the integration itself so much as the general direction of the company since merging with Activision. Activision... and I repeat... has nothing to do with the game, the games direction, or any changes they might be attempting. Blizzard hasn't been changing or attempting new things because they merged with a bigger publisher, they are changing because it is 2010 and you need to change to stay sharp and ahead in any field. | ||
The Storyteller
Singapore2486 Posts
This story has made it to the Economist! The comment about targeted advertising at the end is interesting. | ||
tnud
Sweden2233 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + I'm an atheist... THANK GOD | ||
snpnx
Germany454 Posts
| ||
prototype.
Canada4189 Posts
the ability to rate posts up or down kufufufufufuuu~ Post disagrees with your opinion? DOWN. Don't like a user's attitude towards you? DOWN. This pos- DOWNDODWNDOWDNWO!! Many of blizzard's new ideas are quite concerning... Sure they took away real ID after some endless negative feedback, but the fact that they believed it was a good idea at one point is kinda... ya... | ||
arnold(soTa)
Sweden352 Posts
On July 10 2010 02:04 AyJay wrote: http://forums.wow-europe.com/thread.html?topicId=13816839821&sid=1 yey! now I might actually consider posting on those forums...well maybe not, but still yey! | ||
driftme
United States360 Posts
But... apparently someone there screwed up and the email displayed ALL the emails of the people they responded to lol... Here's the content of their apology email I got yesterday: Yesterday we sent an e-mail to a number of consumers who wrote to us in recent days expressing their concern with respect to Blizzard's Real ID program. Given the large number of messages we received, we decided to respond with a mass e-mail so those who'd written us would receive our response as quickly as possible - rather than responding to each message individually, as is our usual practice. Through an unfortunate error by one of our employees, some recipients were able to see the e-mail addresses of others who wrote on the same issue. Needless to say, it was never our intention to reveal this information and for that we are genuinely sorry. Those who write to ESRB to express their views expect and deserve to have their contact and personal information protected. In this case, we failed to do so and are doing everything we can to ensure it will not happen again in the future. The fact that our message addressed individuals' concerns with respect to their privacy underscores how truly disappointing a mistake this was on our part. We work with companies to ensure they are handling people's private information with confidentiality, care and respect. It is only right that we set a good example and do no less ourselves. We sincerely apologize to those who were affected by this error and appreciate their understanding. Sincerely, Entertainment Software Rating Board | ||
| ||