EPTOn May 29 2010 05:46 Hans-Titan wrote:
Signed.
But do you we REALLY want cross-realm play?
Signed.
But do you we REALLY want cross-realm play?
Lets ask Frank Pearce! He should be able to tell us.
Cross Realm Conundrum - Page 25
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
3clipse
Canada2555 Posts
Lets ask Frank Pearce! He should be able to tell us. | ||
|
CharlieMurphy
United States22895 Posts
Dude The guy in the video was lying. Warcraft 3 was a 3d game and it supported cross realm play and that was 7 years ago... I agree with op ofc | ||
|
Solaris.playgu
Sweden480 Posts
| ||
|
Tiazi
Netherlands761 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/kQk61.jpg) | ||
|
Deimos0
Poland277 Posts
Well said indeed. Facebook FTW - let it redeem us all. | ||
|
SiR.ZeratuS
Bulgaria2 Posts
I hope they don't do this.This is mega crazy...I wanna play with my account vs Americans and Asians. Or at least we can make cross realm custom games. | ||
|
Shouryu
Norway132 Posts
On May 29 2010 18:08 Tiazi wrote: Actually, that rock does have LAN sorta, you can play with it with your friend w/o internet connection.  Ontopic: I really don't see why they can't make the game worldwide without having to buy another client, that's just stupid. I thought the internet was supposed to be for everyone - altogether. | ||
|
Scorch
Austria3371 Posts
While we're at it, I have no idea how people are supposed to run a tournament or develop any sense of community without chat channels. I guess it has been said once or twice already  | ||
|
Aelfric
Turkey1496 Posts
The stupid thing that Blizzard doing is that they think this rts community has the same use and same needs like their mmorpg community. That's why they wan't to seperate it to 3 realms and they want to connect all those realms to wow realms so you can chat with your friend playing wow at the same time. All for just having few "cool" feature toi have. Dear Blizzard, I know you already decided about this long time ago, but just think about it one more time for the sake of your community. You may want people to think you care about your community but if you don't even care the most important need of these people, i don't think you actually care. | ||
|
Go0g3n
Russian Federation410 Posts
| ||
|
Minzy
Australia387 Posts
Though if you think about it WoW players pay around that much over a 2 year period not including expansions, maybe they assume we're all that stupid? ,== | ||
|
Drowsy
United States4876 Posts
On May 29 2010 05:36 Kennigit wrote: Listen. To. Your. Community. I think blizz forgot how to do this. Dealing with the wow community must have been traumatizing because they're so damn dumb. This is totally different and cross realm is a completely necessary feature and it's exclusion will badly hinder the competitive environment of the game. | ||
|
Warpzit
Denmark28 Posts
and rofl at facebook being more important than any of these features | ||
|
qoou
Norway145 Posts
| ||
|
fishyjoes
Germany644 Posts
| ||
|
SolHeiM
Sweden1264 Posts
Tournament realm. You pay fucking 15 dollars to get access to a "season" cross realm, and you get to duke it out regionally or against cross realm players, and you qualify through there to BlizzCon where like 8 players get to go, and the rest of the hundreds of thousands who wasted their 15 dollars get jack shit. But hey! at least you got cross realm. I would not be surprised at all if this turns out to be the case. Blizzard are all about money nowadays, and setting up a cross realm Tournament server once or twice a year would yield lots of free money for almost no work. | ||
|
zingmars
Latvia189 Posts
Either way Blizzard just needs more cash, that's all. (Also we're lucky that blizzard won't put a monthly fee for all EU servers. meh) | ||
|
agarfin
United States106 Posts
| ||
|
GoDannY
Germany442 Posts
On May 29 2010 19:06 agarfin wrote: +1 for causing a shit storm. Lets get this started! Then go to the battle.net forums and go - there are plenty of threads with high view-counters but way too less answers. Even a guy complaining about battlecruisers has more feedback :p HERE is a good place to start. | ||
|
edahl
Norway483 Posts
Also, SIGNED. | ||
| ||
