EPTchat rooms are soooo 2002. C'mon.
Hilarious.
Blizzard: "No plans for chatrooms, crossrealm play" - Page…
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
J7S
Brazil179 Posts
chat rooms are soooo 2002. C'mon. Hilarious. | ||
|
ExoCorsair
United States48 Posts
I might actually go over to the Valve Store and make a few purchases there... using money that would have likely gone to SC2. Ridiculous, Activision-Blizzard. Public statements like that? Please. | ||
|
aimaimaim
Philippines2167 Posts
sooo fucking blind .. HoN came out and there isn't a single issue .. and its fucking 3rd cross-realm play general chat low ping i just dont get it why that guy who was interview'd told us .. "do you really want general chat?" and "the technology isn't there yet" WTF MAN WAS ABLE TO REACH THE MOON BACK 40 YEARS AGO AND YOUR SAYING WE ARENT THERE YET WHEN IT COMES TO CONNECTIVITY WITH THE WHOLE WORLD??? | ||
|
eeniebear
United States197 Posts
| ||
|
Archerofaiur
United States4101 Posts
On June 03 2010 08:26 aimaimaim wrote: some posters here are asslicking .. making you think that they were planted by blizzard kekekeke Ok im getting real tired of arguements like this. Blizzard would not send people here. Thats not how they operate. Yes Blizzard has been feeding us bogus answers. Whether these are half truths or lies ill leave for others to debate. But the reasons for the changes are pretty simple. It all boils down to money. No chat channels = less investment risk = more money No cross realm = less pirating/kespa = more money OR No cross realm = more purchases of the game = more money OR No cross realm = delayed feature because x-realm doesnt make blizzard more money | ||
|
Noise
Australia47 Posts
| ||
|
Saturnize
United States2473 Posts
| ||
|
aimaimaim
Philippines2167 Posts
On June 03 2010 10:57 Archerofaiur wrote: Ok im getting real tired of arguements like this. Blizzard would not send people here. Thats not how they operate. you do know i was joking? | ||
|
Takkara
United States2503 Posts
On June 03 2010 10:57 Archerofaiur wrote: No chat channels = less investment risk = more money OR No cross realm = less pirating/kespa = more money OR No cross realm = more purchases of the game = more money OR No cross realm = delayed feature because x-realm doesnt make blizzard more money As much as we've butt heads in this thread, I'm totally on board with you now. It's been a fruitful discussion, I feel, so cheers. #1, #4 are totally true, I feel. #2 is a little wrong. Should read "No LAN = Less pirating/kespa = more money". #3 honestly truly honestly I promise you not true Now "more money" is not the only reason. I think they also think that the game is better all-around the way it is, but of course they're in it to make money, so they're making the best-cost decisions they can while making the game to their standards of excellence. | ||
|
Plethora
United States206 Posts
On June 03 2010 13:25 Takkara wrote: #3 honestly truly honestly I promise you not true Eh... buying additional copies of the client has been put for by Blizzard as the likely solution for playing across regions. I mean its almost like they are saying "yeah, we have cross region play, it costs extra, stop bothering us about it". | ||
|
Sharkanj
Hungary1 Post
DONT BUY THE GAME! Seriously. At least wait with the purchase. What blizzard is doing nowaday its ridiculous! They are in total disconnect with the players. We want LAN, we want chat, we want xrealm, yet their tone in latest interviews and forum posts are unbelievably arrogant. I dont know what to think since it seems they want to reinvent the fkin wheel!? This interview ringed a bell in me tho. I simply cant believe that this attitude the guy showed is real. I mean, could it be that Blizzard had enough? Could it be that they dont feel Activisions hand on their neck so comfortable anymore and try to FUCK UP the game(bnet) themselves? Dont know, but what is a fact: i wont buy the game at release like many people that i know on the intranetz. | ||
|
Saturnize
United States2473 Posts
| ||
|
Plethora
United States206 Posts
Don't buy the game, and do your best to bring down its various meta ratings. Give it 1 star on Amazon and everywhere else. Believe it or not making a significant dent in the meta-ratings really does mean something. You can be sure if SC2 comes out to ratings of ~80% or lower someone will take notice, because that will cost them sales. | ||
|
TheYellowDart
United States13 Posts
| ||
|
Noise
Australia47 Posts
On June 03 2010 15:29 Sharkanj wrote: Guys, there is really one option to show how dissatisfied you are: DONT BUY THE GAME! Oh don't worry, I won't | ||
|
Keilah
731 Posts
Huge SC fanboy ME: Will not buy SC2 | ||
|
DROPPINBOMBS
United States312 Posts
| ||
|
DROPPINBOMBS
United States312 Posts
Seriously. At least wait with the purchase. What blizzard is doing nowaday its ridiculous! They are in total disconnect with the players. We want LAN, we want chat, we want xrealm, yet their tone in latest interviews and forum posts are unbelievably arrogant. Agreed, I didnt see that earlier post. But what i feel like they did, they had all these unfair and shitty plans for the future, forced the Starcraft community to fall in love with SC2 then turn around and throw shit in our faces. I'll end with this even Hitler was fair in the beginning of his reign. | ||
|
MasterFischer
Denmark836 Posts
There is lag and latency issues for cross-play @ HoN. I myself have experienced it multiple times (I'm Euro) Playing on ANY non server.. both in retail and in beta... so yes, Latency IS a concern, and it would be for SC2 too. | ||
|
Mastermind
Canada7096 Posts
On June 03 2010 05:51 J7S wrote: Nah, but it must not be true. You guys REALLY want chat rooms? chat rooms are soooo 2002. C'mon. Hilarious. I like how they insult there fans/customers. | ||
| ||
