• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:52
CET 19:52
KST 03:52
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!9[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Evil Geniuses - shutting down15ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier5Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins1[$1250] International ShieldBattery League77Weekly Cups (October 5-11): Farewell to 5.0.167
StarCraft 2
General
REPORT: StarCraft 2: Remastered In Development Evil Geniuses - shutting down How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR? Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners No more SC2 streamers on team liquid?
Tourneys
ScienceCraft (October 24-25) - Live Event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier WORTEX Challenger Series — Open SC2 LAN in Budapes
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[G] How to playtest arcade maps [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Sweltering Sands
External Content
Mutation # 549 Endless Sparkles The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 548 Shining Bright Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror
Brood War
General
Recent recommended BW games [Megathread] Daily Funny Videos Hands of Pluto Oceanic Brood War - Join and chat! Bot on ladder
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [$1250] International ShieldBattery League [ASL22] Grand Finals [BSL23] RO24 Group C
Strategy
50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Mobile Legends: Bang Bang Armies of Exigo - YesYes? General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Reynor Fan Club The Flash Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 8878 users

Blizzard explains patch 11 - Page 5

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 Next All
Windmonk
Profile Joined May 2009
Canada93 Posts
May 07 2010 01:45 GMT
#81
On May 07 2010 10:42 Zhou wrote:
I kinda wish they would look at immortals and marauders a little bit... But oh well. This is a good start.



They somewhat nerfed the immortals, by increasing the thors attack speed. But godamn, they still hurt like a truck.
~Watch and Learn~
mOnion
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States5660 Posts
May 07 2010 01:47 GMT
#82
On May 07 2010 10:45 Windmonk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2010 10:42 Zhou wrote:
I kinda wish they would look at immortals and marauders a little bit... But oh well. This is a good start.



They somewhat nerfed the immortals, by increasing the thors attack speed. But godamn, they still hurt like a truck.


yeh, thats why they are as expensive AS a truck.

you cant make a unit 250/100 and make it not hurt a lot. theyre gonna do damage. get used to it. make more units. dont make a THOR to kill immortals T_T

☆★☆ 7486!!! Join the Ban mOnion Anti-Trolling Initiative! - Caller | "on a scale of machine to 10, how bad is that Zerg?" - LZgamer | you are the new tl.net bonjwa monion, congrats - Rekrul | "Cheeseburgers dynamite lilacs" - Chill
Veetz
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada109 Posts
May 07 2010 01:47 GMT
#83
On May 07 2010 07:19 HydroXy wrote:
Okay, point taken on the static part (edited my post). But why wasn't 6 seconds already reasonable?
And on relative power of the defenses: Cannons are more powerful, and turrets I would guess are more powerful than spores (especially with upgrade), and bunkers have way more utility than a spine crawler.


i've seen some replays of high level games in zvz where the guy actually brought drones and built spine crawlers at his opponents expo while he attacked and killed the expo etc.. but then he brings the spine crawlers into the main and just rooted them and started poking at his hatch. i mean i didn't really have a problem with spine crawlers before.. maruders and immortals take them out so fast.. but i dont think zerg has a good unit for that so this nerf will help against this matchup.
Z3kk
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
4099 Posts
May 07 2010 01:56 GMT
#84
On May 07 2010 10:45 newbcake wrote:
I'm pissed if the bulk of their rationale for changing infestors and thors was because of ultralisks. The changes to thors make them substantially less useful as a harass / map control unit, and their reduced initial damage makes them just another attack-move unit instead of something you'd actually want to control. And the infestor change was just dumb, having it be 100 mana and require research way more than counteracts its ability to use it on air. If blizzard wanted to make ultras more useful, then buff ultras and make them more useful, not nerf two other units and make them worse against the ~33 other unit vs unit matchups.


Thors are still capable of one-shotting worker units, as far as I know, so it's now easier to get off multiple shots in a thor drop with the quicker rate of fire.
Failure is not falling down over and over again. Failure is refusing to get back up.
lololol
Profile Joined February 2006
5198 Posts
May 07 2010 01:57 GMT
#85
On May 07 2010 10:31 Z3kk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2010 10:29 lololol wrote:
On May 07 2010 10:22 Z3kk wrote:
Very, very nice changes, but I'll have to get used to the sentry and colossus nerfs....especially the sentry nerf. I was just starting to get used to used sentries to defend against mutas, and now stalkers+sentries will have a harder time holding off mutas, and I'm not likely to begin making mass archons just yet.....

Um, can anyone explain to me how moving and firing at the same time is accomplished? Do you use patrol towards enemies and then move away after the shot?


It's completely automatic. If a unit is in range, the Phoenix will fire at it, even if given a move command.


Whoa, thanks. So I can just move-click and my phoenixes will fire automatically, even while moving? If I move-click rapidly, will the shots get interrupted?

I might actually contemplate using phoenixes now especially after that SENTRY NERF (%^$#%!).

EDIT: And can we just move-click, or must we attack-move?


Yes. No.
Yes, you just issue a move command/right click.
I'll call Nada.
wishbones
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada2600 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-07 01:59:44
May 07 2010 01:59 GMT
#86
On May 07 2010 07:13 Seiuchi wrote:
"The Thor Strike Cannons have become an upgrade to try to help out the Ultralisk, who is countered so hard by this attack that we see very few Ultralisks in Terran vs. Zerg."

I guess I am satisfied they understand the Ultra needs more fixes, but hopefully they understand the reason Ultras are so bad is because Marauders destroy them so badly and they've made it so that mass Marauder is so prevalent?

WOW, i never thought about an already slow ultra, being slowed down even more. I lol'd at this one.
joined TL.net in 2006 (aka GMer) - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=41944#2
Sputty
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada161 Posts
May 07 2010 02:01 GMT
#87
On May 07 2010 10:59 wishbones wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2010 07:13 Seiuchi wrote:
"The Thor Strike Cannons have become an upgrade to try to help out the Ultralisk, who is countered so hard by this attack that we see very few Ultralisks in Terran vs. Zerg."

I guess I am satisfied they understand the Ultra needs more fixes, but hopefully they understand the reason Ultras are so bad is because Marauders destroy them so badly and they've made it so that mass Marauder is so prevalent?

WOW, i never thought about an already slow ultra, being slowed down even more. I lol'd at this one.


I'm not sure if you're being sarcastic or not but ultras don't get slowed, marauder slow doesn't work on massive units
marauders just do a lot of damage to armoured units
alphafuzard
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States1610 Posts
May 07 2010 02:01 GMT
#88
great change to the phoenix. good buffing the bc, archon, siege tank and ultra. good nerfing the spine crawler and sentry. not sure about hellion and thor changes.

the elephant in the room is void rays, which clearly needed a nerf. the whole concept of void rays is that they are good against large units, but fail against lots of little units, but this is currently not the case. not too bad of a patch, glad blizzard is listening for the large part.
more weight
Kennigit *
Profile Blog Joined October 2006
Canada19447 Posts
May 07 2010 02:08 GMT
#89
[url="http://www.mtv.com/shows/jersey_shore/cast_member.jhtml?personalityId=13195"]Link to the REAL Situation Report[/url]
Xxio
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Canada5565 Posts
May 07 2010 02:09 GMT
#90
This is really awesome of them, I mean it would have been nice from the beginning to have a Situation Report but I'm just glad they're doing it now
KTY
severN
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada15 Posts
May 07 2010 02:13 GMT
#91
Wow, huge patch in terms of balancing changes.
Destruction=Rebirth
kxr1der
Profile Joined March 2009
United States213 Posts
May 07 2010 02:13 GMT
#92
On May 07 2010 07:27 Zelniq wrote:
i really like how theyre doing this situation report

that being said, WTF @ some of their explanations:


Sentry- The damage has been decreased from 8 to 6.

We are seeing a lot of Force Fields which we really, really like. We don’t want to see fewer Force Fields, but we do want to see a higher cost for those Force Fields. By reducing Sentry damage we believe that Protoss players will have to be more careful about the number of Sentry they make.


I thought this was strange also... they say they don't want less force fields to be used so thats why they didn't change force field itself but then they go and make a change that will mean players make less sentries and thus... less forcefields.
shiroinohito
Profile Joined February 2010
United States38 Posts
May 07 2010 02:16 GMT
#93
i didnt know NP an ultralisk was a problem
wooo...?
Zeke50100
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States2220 Posts
May 07 2010 02:18 GMT
#94
On May 07 2010 11:16 shiroinohito wrote:
i didnt know NP an ultralisk was a problem


It isn't right now, but it might have been a problem if they added the Ultralisk changes they have in mind without first nerfing NP.

But to be honest, you guys know that NP is ridiculously good >.>
forgotten0ne
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States951 Posts
May 07 2010 02:22 GMT
#95
Anyone else feel like they're balancing 2v2, and not so much 1v1?
"Well it’s obvious that these Terran gamers are just extremely gifted when it comes to RTS games" -Ret, in regards to the first months of SC2
lololol
Profile Joined February 2006
5198 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-07 02:24:16
May 07 2010 02:23 GMT
#96
It's funny they are suggesting to use it against Void Rays, when it was nerfed to supposedly make Ultras more viable, and they are a much later tech than Void Rays, so they will still be useless compared to a roach/hydra ball with some infestor support.
I'll call Nada.
Fraud
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada108 Posts
May 07 2010 02:24 GMT
#97
<sarcasm>Maybe the mass Ultralisk strategy is why Korean Zerg are doing so much better than NA and EU Zerg</sarcasm>
lololol
Profile Joined February 2006
5198 Posts
May 07 2010 02:24 GMT
#98
On May 07 2010 11:24 Fraud wrote:
<sarcasm>Maybe the mass Ultralisk strategy is why Korean Zerg are doing so much better than NA and EU Zerg</sarcasm>


Yeah, their ZvZ win rate is insane!
I'll call Nada.
Icemind
Profile Joined May 2010
Germany570 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-07 02:28:44
May 07 2010 02:27 GMT
#99
On May 07 2010 10:37 Fayth wrote:
battlecruisers are actually cost effective vs corruptors, thanks to yamato gun lol


Iam afraid they are not simply because corruptors have 2 base armor while BCs only deal 6 damage per shot against air, meaning that if we assume equal upgrade levels on terran ship wepons and zerg air carapace the bcs will always deal only 4 damage per shot to a 200 hp corruptor (even with their fire rate a cruiser takes quite some time to get 50 shots off)
Assuming the case of 3 bcs against 8 corruptors (1200 mins 900 gas for the bcs and 1200 mins 800 gas for the corruptors so those 8 corrupts are still 100 gas cheaper) you may take out 3 corrupts with yamato at the beginning of the fight and the bcs will still lose with 3 corrupts survivng

I actually know this since iam a huge bc fan and made a ton of test on them once and corruptor actually came out to be one of the best counters against bcs the there is thanks to their high base armor.
The only unit that is more efficient are pre-charged voidrays (the pre charge is really important here because without it and counting yamato they are hardly cost effective at all) where one void ray can take out one bc with about 10-20 hp left.
Of course this is not counting possibilities viking micro-range-abuse which has the possibility to make them the most efficient counter (though they have the drawback to be very vulnerable to some stimmed marines running under the cruisers)
Most ground units are not cost efficient against bcs (by themselves anyway) since they may only deal 6 damage to air but deal 10 to ground.

but iam getting a little off-topic here, maybe i should post a little bc-analysis thread in strategy at some point

overall iam not shure weither i like this patch or not ... but what i do like is the thought of a protoss attacking a zerg with a supporting mothership and no observer anywhere close:
protoss: haha i will destroy him easily *fight starts*
*burrowed infestor pops out and NPs the mothership*
zealot: "what the hell is all this distortion in the air arround me? and where did all those zerg suddenly go i didnt see no vortex . . . oh shi..."

Muhweli
Profile Joined September 2002
Finland5328 Posts
May 07 2010 02:27 GMT
#100
Hmmn, yeah I think tanks aren't good enough, they should add an ability for them to shoot air units. Also add some more HP so they can get those extra hits off. I mean it's just one extra hit tho, amirite? Just one extra dead unit?

Hellion+Tank appears to be friggin' strong right now, add a few seeker missiles for the nerfed brood lords and BAM. Dead Zerg.

Even though I currently play Terran in the ladder, I think castrating zerg even further doesn't really seem like the most obvious choice. ZvT seemed fairly balanced before this, now u can just mass hellions and rape everything :D Hallelujah!
River me timbers.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
IntoTheTV X SOOP
02:00
Group C Replay Cast
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 337
BRAT_OK 68
JuggernautJason41
EmSc Tv 15
MindelVK 14
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 21075
Shuttle 257
Dewaltoss 167
firebathero 137
Zeus 53
White-Ra 46
Trap 37
910 25
Sharp 24
ProTech19
[ Show more ]
HiyA 14
Sacsri 7
Dota 2
qojqva3225
League of Legends
Trikslyr40
Counter-Strike
pashabiceps1114
Super Smash Bros
C9.Mang068
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu566
Other Games
Grubby2965
FrodaN1075
shahzam301
B2W.Neo181
KnowMe91
QueenE62
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL44131
Other Games
WardiTV207
StarCraft 2
EmSc Tv 15
EmSc2Tv 15
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Adnapsc2 10
• Reevou 4
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 37
• FirePhoenix26
• Pr0nogo 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis2618
• TFBlade499
Other Games
• imaqtpie860
• Shiphtur720
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Cup
5h 38m
IntoTheTV X SOOP
7h 8m
TaKeTV 362
The PondCast
15h 8m
Kung Fu Cup
16h 8m
IntoTheTV X SOOP
1d 16h
SHIN vs GuMiho
Clem vs Classic
OSC
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
GSL
2 days
Epic.LAN
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Epic.LAN
3 days
Yamato Cup
4 days
Map Test Tournament
5 days
WardiTV Weekly
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Rogue vs Classic
Patches Events
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #5 - GSC
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
International ShieldBattery League
BSL Season 23
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026

Upcoming

IPSL Winter 2026-27
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.