• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:56
CEST 15:56
KST 22:56
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments0[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence10Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon9[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent10Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12
Community News
BSL 2025 Warsaw LAN + Legends Showmatch0Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups4WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments1SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia8Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues29
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy SpeCial on The Tasteless Podcast Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion ASL20 General Discussion ASL TICKET LIVE help! :D Soulkey on ASL S20 NaDa's Body
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro16 Group D [ASL20] Ro16 Group C [Megathread] Daily Proleagues BSL 2025 Warsaw LAN + Legends Showmatch
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Borderlands 3 General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine UK Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
i'm really bored guys
Peanutsc
I <=> 9
KrillinFromwales
The Personality of a Spender…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1392 users

Scouting vs. Random analysis

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
1 2 3 Next All
Oracle
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Canada411 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-10 01:19:12
April 20 2010 20:49 GMT
#1
Preamble:

As far as the search goes, there hasn't been a clear answer to this question: when do I scout against random?

I provide here a small analysis which, not necessarily says anything groundbreaking, but shows the implications in terms of mineral advantage when you scout.
Note: for these calculations we assume that the random player scouts after 10

Proof:
+ Show Spoiler +

Scenario: You send one of your first 6 SCVs to scout

Let us assume that for the first 10~ scvs, your mineral income per minute per scv can be represented as this:

g(n) = k*n

where k is an arbitrary value of the average income each scv makes per second. depending on the type of speed you play SC on, it is around 2/3.

Of course, as soon you add in more than 10 scvs, this function needs a piecewise-representation, as the return diminishes the more scvs you have. Furthermore, this function assumes there is a linear relationship of the amount of minerals recieved for the first 10 scvs, which does create a margin of error, but it is not that bad.

Thus, we say that:

[image loading]


Now, when you scout, you are effectively down by one scv, let us define the income of the opponent as

[image loading]


If we assume that both players continuously pump scvs for the first 10 supply, we can say that the number of SCVs with respect to time (in minutes) can be modelled by the function:

[image loading]


That is to say, number of SCVs for the first 100 seconds of the game can be calculated by floor(time / 20).
Because it takes 20 seconds to build an scv. I put a restriction of 100 seconds because in 100 seconds 5 scvs are produced, which brings our total count of SCVs to 11. However, one will be surely sent to build a structure by then, which fulfills our restriction of a maximum of 10 scvs mining the minerals at a time.

which we can substitute:

[image loading]


Now that we have the rate of income at time t of each player, we can integrate and find the total amount of money each player has gotten (from the new scvs), with respect to time

Thus now we can approximate the accumlated minerals gathered (by the new scvs) for the first 100 seconds can be modelled like this for each player.

[image loading]



We can find the advantage of Player 1's total minerals over Player 2's total minerals if player two starts off with 1 less scv (scout) by

[image loading]


If we plot this graph, we can see how big of an advantage, that your opponent has over you, if you sent one of your first 6 SCVs out right away. For these plots we will assume K = 4/6 minerals per second

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Thus if player two sends one of his initial six scvs to scout, by the 100 second mark, player one will have a 200/3 mineral advantage over player one.

This indeed makes sense, seeing as if the opponent has an extra scv over me for 100 seconds, and the scv gains an average of 4/6 minerals a second, he should have 4/6 * 100 minerals over me. This case is proven true.

But now we want to know, what happens if I send the 7th scv instead of the 6th? Or the 8th? Or the 9th?

Then we can model MY income by:

[image loading]


Where x is the time for which I sent my scouting SCV out. If it my 7th SCV, this is 20 seconds into the game. 8th SCV, 40 seconds in. Etc.

This makes sense because my income and my opponents income are exactly the same (note the f(x) part) up until i send my scout out (at time x). Then my mineral income diverges from my opponents, and I have the g(t) function which implies i have 1 less scv thereafter.

This creates the relationship of my total gathered minerals versus the total gathered minerals of my opponent. obviously, the later i send my scout out, the closer my mineral income is to his:

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Now for the real stuff; I want to know 100 seconds in, how much each of these options costs me, so I can draw some sort of application.

My opponents final income will always be the best case scenario, lets say f(100) in this case. I want to know how much greater his income will be over me depending on when I send my SCV scout out.

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


There you have it; If i send one of my first 6 SCV scouts i will be at a defecit of 200/3 minerals by the 100 second mark. And so on...



Observations:
This creates the table:

[image loading]

From the 100 second point and onwards, my opponent suffers diminishing returns, and thus his advantage will slowly converge to zero.

Note: this is assuming your opponent does NOT send a scout until at least 11 scvs have been produced. (Which is usually the case when you play vs random)


personally, since im terran, scouting at 7 catches two bases before I decide whether or not i want to tech/mass/FE. At a loss of 40 minerals, doesnt seem like a bad idea.

More implications:

Question:
On April 21 2010 06:35 puckthecat wrote:
The key with this will be how it affects your gathering enough minerals to make essential early structures and still maintain constant worker production. If you have to delay or cut a worker in order to make a Depot or Barracks, the ultimate costs will be more significant than what's shown above.

Proof:

+ Show Spoiler +
Lets say we don't scout until after 10;

80 seconds in you have made 4 scvs, which brings you to a total of 10. You start with 50 minerals. 4 Scvs also cost 50 minerals each. By the time your 10th scv is out, you have gained f(80) minerals.

Thus, how much minerals you have when your 10th SCV comes out is:

f(80) + 50 - 50*4 = 350/3 = 117


This means, under optimal conditions, as soon as your 10th SCV pops out, you should have 117 minerals ready to spend on the first supply depot. I can spare 17 minerals without losing any efficiency.

So if i decide to scout at 6, when my 10th scv comes out, I will have this many minerals:

b(0,80) + 50 - 4*50 = 190/3 or 64 minerals.
Thus, I am behind by 36 minerals to making my supply depot.

Currently, I have 9 SCVs mining. If my rate of income is g(t) = [(2/3)*t]*9, and g(t) = 36, then t must be 6 seconds.

I will have to wait 6 extra seconds to make my supply depot if i scout on 6.

Similarily, we can continue this for every individual variable for which SCV scout was sent.


This creates the following table:

[image loading]
nedsat
Profile Joined April 2010
27 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-20 21:03:25
April 20 2010 21:02 GMT
#2
Good reading. You did a fine job sir.
I would have thought you would lose more scouting already at 7-8.
Sentient
Profile Joined April 2010
United States437 Posts
April 20 2010 21:14 GMT
#3
Thank you, this is very useful. I'm always hesitant to send an early scout, but it seems the cost isn't as much as I thought it was.
puckthecat
Profile Joined April 2010
United States18 Posts
April 20 2010 21:35 GMT
#4
The key with this will be how it affects your gathering enough minerals to make essential early structures and still maintain constant worker production. If you have to delay or cut a worker in order to make a Depot or Barracks, the ultimate costs will be more significant than what's shown above.
Clearout
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Norway1060 Posts
April 20 2010 21:48 GMT
#5
Wow well done
really?
Oracle
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Canada411 Posts
April 20 2010 21:49 GMT
#6
On April 21 2010 06:35 puckthecat wrote:
The key with this will be how it affects your gathering enough minerals to make essential early structures and still maintain constant worker production. If you have to delay or cut a worker in order to make a Depot or Barracks, the ultimate costs will be more significant than what's shown above.


Very keen observation
Lets say we don't scout until after 10;

80 seconds in you have made 4 scvs, which brings you to a total of 10. You start with 50 minerals. 4 Scvs also cost 50 minerals each. By the time your 10th scv is out, you have gained f(80) minerals.

Thus, how much minerals you have when your 10th SCV comes out is:

f(80) + 50 - 50*4 = 350/3 = 117


This means, under optimal conditions, as soon as your 10th SCV pops out, you should have 117 minerals ready to spend on the first supply depot. I can spare 17 minerals without losing any efficiency.

So if i decide to scout at 6, when my 10th scv comes out, I will have this many minerals:

b(0,80) + 50 - 4*50 = 190/3 or 64 minerals.
I am behind by 36 minerals to making my supply depot. Currently, I have 9 SCVs mining. If my rate of income is g(t) = 2/3*t/9, and g(t) = 36, then t must be 6 seconds.

I will have to wait 6 extra seconds to make my supply depot if i scout on 6.
Stopdroproll
Profile Joined March 2010
United States101 Posts
April 20 2010 22:13 GMT
#7
Very interesting, I've always wondered how early scouting can affect minerals mining.
But at what cost?
mOnion
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States5657 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-20 22:18:50
April 20 2010 22:16 GMT
#8
awwwww I LOVE all these math wizards who are figuring all this shit out!

great read! ^__^

this is actually more interesting for scouting against players who's race you know, because then you have more of an emphasis on your economy as you already know what race your opponent is

but for random players you wanna see what you're up against asap even if it means sacking some econ.
☆★☆ 7486!!! Join the Ban mOnion Anti-Trolling Initiative! - Caller | "on a scale of machine to 10, how bad is that Zerg?" - LZgamer | you are the new tl.net bonjwa monion, congrats - Rekrul | "Cheeseburgers dynamite lilacs" - Chill
DrSmoke
Profile Joined April 2010
United States175 Posts
April 20 2010 22:18 GMT
#9
Wow holy math batman!

"The more you know..."
Osmoses
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
Sweden5302 Posts
April 20 2010 22:19 GMT
#10
Just thought I'd drop in and let you know the thread title reads "Scouting vs. Random anal" in the menu bar. Other then that, I think this information is pretty interesting, I've often found myself scewing up my builds because I forgot what race I was playing against and had to early scout.

Carry on.
Excuse me hun, but what is your name? Vivian? I woke up next to you naked and, uh, did we, um?
Oracle
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Canada411 Posts
April 20 2010 23:06 GMT
#11
On April 21 2010 07:19 Osmoses wrote:
Just thought I'd drop in and let you know the thread title reads "Scouting vs. Random anal" in the menu bar. Other then that, I think this information is pretty interesting, I've often found myself scewing up my builds because I forgot what race I was playing against and had to early scout.

Carry on.


Lol youre right

If i could edit the threads name I would, its not even named well :x
Been in a rush to move out, just jotted stuff down asap.
Husky
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3362 Posts
April 20 2010 23:08 GMT
#12
I never scout that early against random. Then again I'm really bad.

+ Show Spoiler +
I love random anal
Commentaries: youtube.com/HuskyStarcraft
No_Roo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States905 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-21 00:20:58
April 20 2010 23:39 GMT
#13
Haha, yes this was some tragic thread title truncation, was going to screenshot it on the main page but looks like every one else already noticed it.

Good thread though, nice to see the numbers.


EDIT: Reminds me of a programming class I had to take last year...
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]
(US) NoRoo.fighting
junemermaid
Profile Joined September 2006
United States981 Posts
April 20 2010 23:47 GMT
#14
Don't want to be a debbie downer here, but you didn't need integrals and fancy equations to figure this out...

Regardless, cool implications and well done.
the UMP says YER OUT
zomgzergrush
Profile Joined August 2008
United States923 Posts
April 20 2010 23:53 GMT
#15
Nice read, but how does map specifics play into this? 1v1 maps, 4p maps, various scouting path distances, etc?
Bronze skipping straight to Diamond in 40 games retail release. Bnet 2.0 ladder really takes it's sweet time to think about that league placement.
Oracle
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Canada411 Posts
April 21 2010 00:15 GMT
#16
On April 21 2010 08:47 junemermaid wrote:
Don't want to be a debbie downer here, but you didn't need integrals and fancy equations to figure this out...

Regardless, cool implications and well done.

yeah there would be a couple ways.

the "easiest" would probably be empirical data, but a 30 minute write-up along with half an hour of testing would take much longer than just a 30 minute write-up

another way you can do it is by using differential equations, but thats more advanced than just integration, especially with floor calls

I realize i made it seem very complicated, truth is its just one small integration problem, then using relations between the functions to get what you want. im bad at writeups when im in a hurry.

Don't really know another way i could've made these conclusions without using these methods.

I chose my method because I thought itd be the easiest to express, and this way we get pretty graphs where we can pinpoint things and see relations

not to mention, by using functions its easier (at least for me) to see some of the connections

either way, thanks ^^
Chronopolis
Profile Joined April 2009
Canada1484 Posts
April 21 2010 00:32 GMT
#17
The word Analaysis has turned to anal in the sidebar countless times lol. @ the OP, while the mineral loss for early scout is small @ 100 seconds, if it delays a key building it will slow down the entire build by that much.
Oracle
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Canada411 Posts
April 21 2010 23:00 GMT
#18
All done moving...

Anyways, since i dont have the SC2 beta, it would be great if someone could give me some of the following information so i can make more conclusions:

Time it takes to scout each base on a map,
Ie. On lost temple, scouting close would take X time,
scouting second closest would be Y time
Scouting across would be Z time

etc.

I would also like to know for three player and two player maps (if they exist)



Erucious
Profile Joined March 2010
Norway393 Posts
April 21 2010 23:14 GMT
#19
i didnt read it all... But the math in this thread just got me REALLY hard.

<3
I'm Norwegian/Dutch. Just the awesome parts of them though :D
Amazn
Profile Joined March 2010
United States83 Posts
April 21 2010 23:32 GMT
#20
You baneling busted by brain
Let fear be your compass.
1 2 3 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
The PondCast
13:00
Episode 63
CranKy Ducklings47
Liquipedia
Map Test Tournament
11:00
$450 3v3 Open Cup
WardiTV750
IndyStarCraft 200
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
IndyStarCraft 200
Rex 106
mcanning 49
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 58418
Calm 8050
Horang2 5202
Bisu 2172
EffOrt 564
Hyuk 551
actioN 451
Light 351
Mini 322
Pusan 259
[ Show more ]
ZerO 226
Soma 137
Soulkey 122
Snow 107
hero 89
Hyun 75
Rush 70
Mind 66
ggaemo 66
Sea.KH 52
ToSsGirL 34
Free 33
sorry 33
Sharp 30
HiyA 28
JYJ27
Sexy 22
scan(afreeca) 17
Aegong 12
Icarus 12
Terrorterran 10
SilentControl 10
IntoTheRainbow 6
Dota 2
Gorgc5257
singsing3374
qojqva2482
Dendi918
XcaliburYe172
Fuzer 168
Counter-Strike
zeus709
hiko476
markeloff171
oskar102
edward0
Other Games
gofns20837
tarik_tv16170
olofmeister1154
B2W.Neo987
DeMusliM314
Lowko294
Hui .214
XaKoH 137
ArmadaUGS94
QueenE61
NeuroSwarm37
Trikslyr26
ZerO(Twitch)10
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix5
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis3852
• Jankos1574
Other Games
• WagamamaTV229
• Shiphtur101
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
20h 5m
Zoun vs Classic
Korean StarCraft League
1d 13h
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
1d 18h
RSL Revival
1d 20h
Reynor vs Cure
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
Online Event
3 days
Wardi Open
3 days
Monday Night Weeklies
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
[ Show More ]
LiuLi Cup
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-09-10
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL World Championship of Poland 2025
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.