[D] Zerg and Spawn Larva - Page 10

On April 11 2010 14:47 w_Ender_w wrote:
In my mind, this really just reinforces what I've been saying. Zerg don't need a low Spawn Larvae cap because the way it is now is essential to us being competitive. What they really need are more microable units so we can use that instead of spamming out units and winning with macro. There simple are not very many microable units at all for Zerg. Hydras may be the worst because they are such a pathetic shell when it comes to control... sure, they have decent stats, but they are so absurdly slow off creep that it's sad.

On April 11 2010 13:35 Floophead_III wrote:
Yes but the mule still is limited because you only get the benefit of more minerals, which equates to more CCs, supply depots, scvs, marines, hellions, and barracks. That's it. Zerg's extra larva allows them to make more of any unit they want. If terran is making gas heavy units, they could care less about mules. You could argue that means they can expand more with the minerals, but not when they can't hold them.

It's comparing apples to oranges is my point. They work so differently that it's rather meaningless to compare them.

On April 13 2010 02:48 Lollersauce wrote:
Make the roach NOT a super-unit and trust me spawn larva won't seem nearly as broken.

On April 11 2010 19:50 Art_of_Kill wrote:
so much blabla, from player who lacks any skill

larva injection, have nothing imba in it, ZERG IS THE RACE WHO EXPANDS FASTER AND BUILD FASTER THE MASS
it was in bw that way and it is in sc2 that way and it will stay that way

when i read bullshit like "he build in 1min 50units", good newb learn how to play, my opponents never build somany unit in 1min, why? because i play the game and dont sit afk in my base 20min and think one attack gg

comeon dont waste your time with useless post, go and play once you reach 1500+ in platin, then you have a little understanding of the game and can start talk about balances
but even at this point some poeple oppinion is nothing worth (morrow best example, crys about every crap like TvZ is so fucking imba (then one day later demuslim wins zotac, right a Terran who raped dimaga in final))
instead of crying about not imbalanced stuff, just use your brain while gaming

from my experiance lucifron is the best player (lost 0-3 to him in ladder, and nobody else who i didnt beat atleast once when played) and he is not zerg player
and if zerg is so fucking imba with its larva injection, then why i have 80% winrating in pvz?
i am 1670protoss in platin

now waiting for some bronze player to reply ^__^

On April 13 2010 03:49 zomgzergrush wrote:

Roach might actually be a super unit if mauraders and immortals weren't such a hard counter to it.

On April 13 2010 05:53 CandelaSC2 wrote:
Completly stupid reasoning my friend, game is so close to be balanced right now

what unit like thor or helins does the zerg have?

what unit like the banshee? how fast a terran can get banshees harrasing whit hellions?

how you stop a mass marauder + hellion rush ?, dont say mutal cause if you say so your just retarded

the roach nerf was HUGE so pease dont say ridicoulous things and learn how to play

On April 09 2010 01:35 Floophead_III wrote:

With the spawn larva fix we'll be able to actually balance the game instead of provide a pseudo balance by making cheese the counter to zerg. Then we can go and fix all the cheese strats that are keeping zerg from winning everything right now. Once all the rushes and cheeses are balanced, and zerg is balanced in the macro game, we'll have a much better game than we started with.