EPTDo you think it was worth it
2019 - 2020 Football Thread - Page 146
| Forum Index > Sports |
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34492 Posts
Do you think it was worth it | ||
|
sharkie
Austria18429 Posts
| ||
|
Warfie
Norway2846 Posts
On February 18 2020 06:39 Firebolt145 wrote: How much do you think Verizon paid to have VAR 'brought you to by Verizon' Do you think it was worth it thought the same, why would you want your logo next to something that 50% of the audience is guaranteed to be pissed off at lmao | ||
|
sharkie
Austria18429 Posts
| ||
|
sneirac
Germany3464 Posts
On February 18 2020 06:58 sharkie wrote: So will Maguire get punished retroactively since the referee didnt see the incident? So reddit was talking about this like it was guaranteed, however VAR didn't miss it, it was checked. Don't think that s happened before | ||
|
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34492 Posts
I'm biased but I agree with him | ||
|
sharkie
Austria18429 Posts
| ||
|
sneirac
Germany3464 Posts
https://gfycat.com/welcomesilkycobra-manchester-united-chelsea-soccer | ||
|
DropBear
Australia4360 Posts
| ||
|
evilfatsh1t
Australia8683 Posts
| ||
|
Dante08
Singapore4128 Posts
| ||
|
Rebs
Pakistan10726 Posts
On February 18 2020 12:42 evilfatsh1t wrote: yeah sons one still looks way worse only through Red Devil tinted goggles. On February 18 2020 13:21 Dante08 wrote: Is it me or is Son's foul not even that bad? I've seen just yellow for much worse. it is that bad, you kick out like that you should get a red. I dont even care if you miss. | ||
|
sharkie
Austria18429 Posts
| ||
|
Bacillus
Finland1952 Posts
On February 18 2020 07:08 Firebolt145 wrote: Maguire's explanation was that it was a natural extension of his leg when he thought the Chelsea player was going to fall onto him, and he instantly recognised what it looked like I'm biased but I agree with him I think his body language looks calm and could support that kind of stuff. I'm not completely sure what the natural extension in situation like that is though. Basically I can see an interpretation where there was no malice involved, but it might still be a red. | ||
|
Harris1st
Germany6934 Posts
This game had it all xD Maguire: Puh. Dunno. Really hard to call. First I thought red for sure. But after watching it a few times not so sure anymore. His explanation is pretty good, too. First Chelsea goal: Ye that should have counted for sure. Second Chelsea goal: Offside is offside Ofc Maguire goes on to make the 0:2 | ||
|
Twisted
Netherlands13554 Posts
| ||
|
evilfatsh1t
Australia8683 Posts
On February 18 2020 14:11 Rebs wrote: only through Red Devil tinted goggles. it is that bad, you kick out like that you should get a red. I dont even care if you miss. ummm. no even maguire admitted it looked bad and he knew it the moment it happened, but stretching your leg out to support a man falling on top of you is nowhere near as bad as sons kick into the air up the side of the opponents body. the only thing that makes maguires incident even remotely debatable was that his foot happened to be in the chelsea players nuts. if it was the torso then no one could reasonably say that maguire was "kicking" into the torso. | ||
|
kyllinghest
Norway1607 Posts
| ||
|
sharkie
Austria18429 Posts
On February 18 2020 19:26 evilfatsh1t wrote: ummm. no even maguire admitted it looked bad and he knew it the moment it happened, but stretching your leg out to support a man falling on top of you is nowhere near as bad as sons kick into the air up the side of the opponents body. the only thing that makes maguires incident even remotely debatable was that his foot happened to be in the chelsea players nuts. if it was the torso then no one could reasonably say that maguire was "kicking" into the torso. stabilising with your leg? wth, use your arms | ||
|
evilfatsh1t
Australia8683 Posts
| ||
| ||
