|
|
On March 31 2017 16:13 nojok wrote:I'm not sure I would want more group matches at the world cup, the first phase is already long enough and good games relatively rare during it. Diluting the number of good teams during the longest phase of the competition is a bad move imo. A world cup without even one group of death? No thanks. + Show Spoiler +I would still happily watch, who am I kidding? Lucky for you, the total number of groupstage matches remains unchanged even when there are more teams.
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51490 Posts
On March 31 2017 17:25 sharkie wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2017 16:43 Dingodile wrote: another evidence that they follow money & fantasy and not football quality. Handball has this "problem" for decades. Euro is far more stacked than WC in Handball. and yet scrub nations have won the Euro several times but a WC has always been won by a powerhouse (in football). I would never call the Euro more stacked than a WC Well you could say that it's European heavy. European World Cup Winners = 11 South American (aka rest of winners) = 9
EUROPE EUROPE :D
|
On March 31 2017 17:50 Pandemona wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2017 17:25 sharkie wrote:On March 31 2017 16:43 Dingodile wrote: another evidence that they follow money & fantasy and not football quality. Handball has this "problem" for decades. Euro is far more stacked than WC in Handball. and yet scrub nations have won the Euro several times but a WC has always been won by a powerhouse (in football). I would never call the Euro more stacked than a WC Well you could say that it's European heavy. European World Cup Winners = 11 South American (aka rest of winners) = 9 EUROPE EUROPE :D Not sure how you can be proudly chanting Europe when Article 50 has been triggered
+ Show Spoiler +
|
On March 31 2017 17:41 Mafe wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2017 16:13 nojok wrote:I'm not sure I would want more group matches at the world cup, the first phase is already long enough and good games relatively rare during it. Diluting the number of good teams during the longest phase of the competition is a bad move imo. A world cup without even one group of death? No thanks. + Show Spoiler +I would still happily watch, who am I kidding? Lucky for you, the total number of groupstage matches remains unchanged even when there are more teams. Yeah but it means 3 teams groups iirc so the chances there are 0 big clash during the whole group phase are pretty high.
|
On March 31 2017 21:33 nojok wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2017 17:41 Mafe wrote:On March 31 2017 16:13 nojok wrote:I'm not sure I would want more group matches at the world cup, the first phase is already long enough and good games relatively rare during it. Diluting the number of good teams during the longest phase of the competition is a bad move imo. A world cup without even one group of death? No thanks. + Show Spoiler +I would still happily watch, who am I kidding? Lucky for you, the total number of groupstage matches remains unchanged even when there are more teams. Yeah but it means 3 teams groups iirc so the chances there are 0 big clash during the whole group phase are pretty high. Well that will depend on how crazy they get with seeding, but I'm assuming that as trade off for UEFA only claiming 16 spots, there would be an UEFA only pot. And if they don't mess with seeds in addition to that several rough Europe vSouth America groups might be possible.
|
On March 31 2017 22:13 sneirac wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2017 21:33 nojok wrote:On March 31 2017 17:41 Mafe wrote:On March 31 2017 16:13 nojok wrote:I'm not sure I would want more group matches at the world cup, the first phase is already long enough and good games relatively rare during it. Diluting the number of good teams during the longest phase of the competition is a bad move imo. A world cup without even one group of death? No thanks. + Show Spoiler +I would still happily watch, who am I kidding? Lucky for you, the total number of groupstage matches remains unchanged even when there are more teams. Yeah but it means 3 teams groups iirc so the chances there are 0 big clash during the whole group phase are pretty high. Well that will depend on how crazy they get with seeding, but I'm assuming that as trade off for UEFA only claiming 16 spots, there would be an UEFA only pot. And if they don't mess with seeds in addition to that several rough Europe vSouth America groups might be possible. I love to do such speculations, so here's what I see happening. The last few time the basic principle for seeding pots were always. -seeded teams -rest of european teams -rest of south american +african teams -asia/north america
Assuming we have one south american or african team qualifying from playoffs (in which case south america and africa have a cmobined 16 teams) this principle could be retained as -seeded teams, presumably europe and south america only -rest of european teams, drawn to south american seeds. -rest of south american + african teams, drawn into groups with european seeds -rest of the world. Basically, we will have group(s) of death if USA/mexico/australia end up with a south american seed and european team. And a few who-cares groups with the lower european seeds, a self-destructing african team and some asian minnow. Basically, not much different from what we see now.
What is way more interesting for the later stages is if the seeded teams will be further separated, as there are now 16 of them. Because assuming every seeded team wins its group, they can now meet in the ro16. So an unlucky draw can imply that for example the likely ro16 matches include 1st vs 2nd seed and 15th vs 16th seed, which looks very wrong to me, would increase the likelihood of teams throwing a game for a better knockout stage bracket.
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51490 Posts
On March 31 2017 19:07 nayumi wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2017 17:50 Pandemona wrote:On March 31 2017 17:25 sharkie wrote:On March 31 2017 16:43 Dingodile wrote: another evidence that they follow money & fantasy and not football quality. Handball has this "problem" for decades. Euro is far more stacked than WC in Handball. and yet scrub nations have won the Euro several times but a WC has always been won by a powerhouse (in football). I would never call the Euro more stacked than a WC Well you could say that it's European heavy. European World Cup Winners = 11 South American (aka rest of winners) = 9 EUROPE EUROPE :D Not sure how you can be proudly chanting Europe when Article 50 has been triggered + Show Spoiler + Haha true xD Guess its 10 vs 9 vs 1 lone island winners :3
|
On March 31 2017 23:50 Pandemona wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2017 19:07 nayumi wrote:On March 31 2017 17:50 Pandemona wrote:On March 31 2017 17:25 sharkie wrote:On March 31 2017 16:43 Dingodile wrote: another evidence that they follow money & fantasy and not football quality. Handball has this "problem" for decades. Euro is far more stacked than WC in Handball. and yet scrub nations have won the Euro several times but a WC has always been won by a powerhouse (in football). I would never call the Euro more stacked than a WC Well you could say that it's European heavy. European World Cup Winners = 11 South American (aka rest of winners) = 9 EUROPE EUROPE :D Not sure how you can be proudly chanting Europe when Article 50 has been triggered + Show Spoiler + Haha true xD Guess its 10 vs 9 vs 1 lone island winners :3 However much you crazy English might wish otherwise, leaving the EU does not mean you leave Europe. You should start digging up spades of dirt on the east side of your island and dumping it on the west side. Eventually you'll reach America and you can truly leave "the continent" behind you. Of course, Ireland might object but when have you ever cared about what the Irish have to say about anything?
|
|
On April 01 2017 00:18 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2017 23:50 Pandemona wrote:On March 31 2017 19:07 nayumi wrote:On March 31 2017 17:50 Pandemona wrote:On March 31 2017 17:25 sharkie wrote:On March 31 2017 16:43 Dingodile wrote: another evidence that they follow money & fantasy and not football quality. Handball has this "problem" for decades. Euro is far more stacked than WC in Handball. and yet scrub nations have won the Euro several times but a WC has always been won by a powerhouse (in football). I would never call the Euro more stacked than a WC Well you could say that it's European heavy. European World Cup Winners = 11 South American (aka rest of winners) = 9 EUROPE EUROPE :D Not sure how you can be proudly chanting Europe when Article 50 has been triggered + Show Spoiler + Haha true xD Guess its 10 vs 9 vs 1 lone island winners :3 However much you crazy English might wish otherwise, leaving the EU does not mean you leave Europe. You should start digging up spades of dirt on the east side of your island and dumping it on the west side. Eventually you'll reach America and you can truly leave "the continent" behind you. Of course, Ireland might object but when have you ever cared about what the Irish have to say about anything?
The Scots are giving them way more shit then the Irish though. Cant blame em.
|
I'm just losing my faith in democracy in genral Trump and Brexit, turns out people are stupid, who knew. We really need some football to discuss. Thank god it's Saturday and there will be some action to watch when I get home from work this evening. Wait, China it's Saturday why do I have to work?
|
|
If only liverpool could play like that vs mediocre teams
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51490 Posts
Lol this Everton team today was medicore but with there full 11 they are pretty good. Reason Liverpool won cuz they were a top 7 side xD
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51490 Posts
Cesc so good <3
Lol Chelsea
|
Costa going pretty close there.
edit: It's an absolute siege on the Palace penalty area.
Edit 2: Finally the break through!
Exeter score with the last kick of the game.
|
|
Well not really surprised that United drew at home but didn't expect Chelsea to lose. The title race could still be on!
|
Ah fuck. Oh well my shirt's 100% undefeated record is over......
Sakho was a beast yet again. Klopp's a fool.
think RLC should have come on earlier. Probably instead of batman.
Congrats crystal palace. We had no answer to zaha. Great defending, solid game plan.
|
I was counting some anxcious seconds to hit post. That referee can go suck a dick.
|
|
|
|