EPTNBA 2013-14 Season - Page 204
| Forum Index > Sports |
|
RowdierBob
Australia13297 Posts
| ||
|
jmbthirteen
United States10734 Posts
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/sources--clippers-are-frontrunners-to-land-danny-granger-220910360-nba | ||
|
AgentW
United States7725 Posts
| ||
|
jmbthirteen
United States10734 Posts
On February 27 2014 07:23 RowdierBob wrote: Isn't this the issue though: Mo was better by virtue of playing with LeBron. Can we say any T Wolves players are better by virtue of playing with Love? I'm not sure. I think it could be argued Pekovic wouldn't get as good of looks if Love weren't there. This season Love hasn't played in three games, they have lost all three. But those three have also been against Miami, OKC and Portland. Pekovic specifically only played in one of those games, the Miami one, which happened to be the worst of the losses. He went for 18 and 12 but only shot 7-18. Obviously too small of a sample size. But Miami has a weak front court, you would hope without Love that Pekovic would have performed better. | ||
|
RowdierBob
Australia13297 Posts
On February 27 2014 07:31 jmbthirteen wrote: I think it could be argued Pekovic wouldn't get as good of looks if Love weren't there. This season Love hasn't played in three games, they have lost all three. But those three have also been against Miami, OKC and Portland. Pekovic specifically only played in one of those games, the Miami one, which happened to be the worst of the losses. He went for 18 and 12 but only shot 7-18. Obviously too small of a sample size. But Miami has a weak front court, you would hope without Love that Pekovic would have performed better. But aren't these separate issues. Love is a great player so taking him out of the team will obv impact on their chances of winning. No chance they can cover his individual production. But does he make his team mates better? It's an interesting concept because it's somewhat difficult to define. There are obvious examples, LeBron, but others that are tough to say. The same criticism is levelled at Kyrie: great individual but what does he do to elevate performance of team mates? It is something that exists. MJ said he made a concerted effort to involve his team mates more often, rather than just focusing on his game, after failing to get over the Pistons hurdle. It helped that he had an awesome team but it appears a star's true value is not just in his individual game but his influence on those around him. Does K Love have this level of influence? | ||
|
AgentW
United States7725 Posts
I didn't realize how good of a shooter Williams was. 43% is nothing to sneeze at, in fact, it's extremely good. It's much closer than I previously thought, and I don't know enough about Williams's defense to make an accurate call. On February 27 2014 07:31 jmbthirteen wrote: I think it could be argued Pekovic wouldn't get as good of looks if Love weren't there. This season Love hasn't played in three games, they have lost all three. But those three have also been against Miami, OKC and Portland. Pekovic specifically only played in one of those games, the Miami one, which happened to be the worst of the losses. He went for 18 and 12 but only shot 7-18. Obviously too small of a sample size. But Miami has a weak front court, you would hope without Love that Pekovic would have performed better. To be fair, without Love, Pekovic is the only guy who can score with any consistency, unless Kevin Martin from three years ago shows up. I'd expect him to be bottled up by Miami in that situation. On February 27 2014 08:05 RowdierBob wrote: It is something that exists. MJ said he made a concerted effort to involve his team mates more often, rather than just focusing on his game, after failing to get over the Pistons hurdle. It's all The Secret. | ||
|
Doraemon
Australia14949 Posts
| ||
|
AgentW
United States7725 Posts
On February 27 2014 08:14 Doraemon wrote: i honestly think if minni get's a even average FG% point guard they'd do so much better, collison comes to mind. i've seen so many games where the opposing PG just gives rubio 2m spaces and cramps up the paint, you're literally playing 4v5 on offense. I personally believe that's the problem with them. He's just a zero on offense. | ||
|
kidleaderr
365 Posts
| ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
Scarecrow
Korea (South)9172 Posts
On February 27 2014 10:03 zulu_nation8 wrote: So after buying out Granger, the Sixers pretty much just traded away Evan Turner, their top pick who's finally developing into a decent player but due to be a FA, for literally nothing. He's due to be a FA, won't stay, and they got another 2nd round pick out of it. Seems fine to me. | ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
seiferoth10
3362 Posts
| ||
|
AgentW
United States7725 Posts
Turner's going to be an RFA. The 76ers could have had him back if they really wanted him. | ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
AgentW
United States7725 Posts
| ||
|
tokinho
United States792 Posts
Sorry D'Antoni. You don't help your bigs. You DON'T understand that run and gun ball doesn't win championships. Hashtag FIREDANTONI,GOLAKERS. | ||
|
RowdierBob
Australia13297 Posts
They clearly had no intention to resign him. Pretty obv they're going hard for Wiggins and clearing roster to maxmise his development. | ||
|
RowdierBob
Australia13297 Posts
He's barely worth half that IMO. | ||
|
Doraemon
Australia14949 Posts
On February 27 2014 11:37 RowdierBob wrote: Turner won't sniff $10 mill in FA. He's due $8.7 mill next year per his QO and that's way overpriced. He's barely worth half that IMO. derozan is getting 9M a year from memory...if waiters chucked that many shots he'd average 20 a game too. turner gonna get paid, what people are worth hardly ever reflects how much they get paid. bulls really dunno how to tank. and for all the hype the dubs get, they're only like 2 games above 9th (memphis) not watching the game, but why did westbrook take another crunchtime 3? | ||
| ||
