2013 NBA Finals - Page 7
Forum Index > Sports |
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
| ||
Roggay
Switzerland6320 Posts
On June 07 2013 11:09 On_Slaught wrote: Duncan is absolutely beasting it up this game. Once he started making his shots that he normally makes he's been on fire. And blocking shots, and rebounding like a boss. | ||
icystorage
Jollibee19343 Posts
| ||
DystopiaX
United States16236 Posts
On June 07 2013 11:09 On_Slaught wrote: Duncan is absolutely beasting it up this game. Once he started making his shots that he normally makes he's been on fire. I was thinking about this earlier today and I think Duncan is possibly the only top 10 player of all time in any sport who is so criminally underrated. | ||
Gentso
United States2218 Posts
On June 07 2013 11:11 DystopiaX wrote: I was thinking about this earlier today and I think Duncan is possibly the only top 10 player of all time in any sport who is so criminally underrated. He isn't underrated, though.. under appreciated maybe. | ||
DystopiaX
United States16236 Posts
| ||
Roggay
Switzerland6320 Posts
| ||
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
| ||
slyboogie
United States3423 Posts
| ||
xavierofsparta
United States84 Posts
Edit: Halftime stats: 12 pts 9 rbd 3ast 2 blk | ||
icystorage
Jollibee19343 Posts
| ||
TheKefka
Croatia11752 Posts
On June 07 2013 11:11 DystopiaX wrote: I was thinking about this earlier today and I think Duncan is possibly the only top 10 player of all time in any sport who is so criminally underrated. I don't think he is,at least not by people who know at least something about basketball | ||
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
| ||
DystopiaX
United States16236 Posts
On June 07 2013 11:12 Gentso wrote: He isn't underrated, though.. under appreciated maybe. There are people who will debate him even being called top 10 all time. They say he had a lot of help but forget when he won a championship with Old Robinson and Parker/Ginobili/SJax shooting like 39% the whole time. They'll say Kobe was better with less/the same amount of help in the early 00s, which is BS because Shaq is/was far better help than anyone Duncan had in the 2000s. | ||
DystopiaX
United States16236 Posts
On June 07 2013 11:14 TheKefka wrote: I don't think he is,at least not by people who know at least something about basketball I mean not by staticians and stuff but by ESPN talking heads and the public in general. | ||
Itsmedudeman
United States19229 Posts
| ||
VayneAuthority
United States8983 Posts
| ||
RowdierBob
Australia12800 Posts
| ||
DystopiaX
United States16236 Posts
On June 07 2013 11:15 Itsmedudeman wrote: Lol it was Shaq with Kobe, not the other way around. Not for the first couple. And you can argue it from a public perception/team leadership point but from a basketball standpoint? Shaq no question. | ||
RowdierBob
Australia12800 Posts
On June 07 2013 11:14 DystopiaX wrote: There are people who will debate him even being called top 10 all time. They say he had a lot of help but forget when he won a championship with Old Robinson and Parker/Ginobili/SJax shooting like 39% the whole time. They'll say Kobe was better with less/the same amount of help in the early 00s, which is BS because Shaq is/was far better help than anyone Duncan had in the 2000s. Kobe was helping Shaq, yo! ![]() | ||
| ||