Barry Bonds is a sham

On December 11 2004 17:57 Sharkey wrote:
Obviously you haven't read the Skip article at ESPN.

>_>

On December 12 2004 03:10 SurG wrote:
Don't you think that some halloffamers also used steroids, or you just think it's only Bonds? The story is way overblown. It's a league business to take care of problems like that and dish out appropriate judgements and punishments. It's just convinient for media to speculate on the issue and Bonds is quite a convinient target. All this "before and after photos" nonsense. Hell, I gained 50 pounds in last 3 years - I must be on steroids =)

On December 12 2004 11:05 SickofLife wrote:


He has admitted to using a steroid cream, though he claims he didn't know it was a steroid.

On December 12 2004 00:11 Hot_Bid wrote:
did anyone really believe that he was clean? i mean it's like denial, we all want to believe in great things and great people but seriously, he like doubled in size and his head is massive. there's like NO other explanation for a middle aged person's head to grow so large. it's not surprising, just disappointing.

On December 12 2004 12:53 XaI)CyRiC wrote:
I'm not very familiar with the rules of baseball, but if it's against the rules to take "performance-enhancing" drugs then there should be no reason that certain records be noted or invalidated. Assuming steroids are illegal, the prevalence of this form of "cheating" should have no effect on how wrong it is or to what degree it should be punished. Whether a player makes a homerun record with steroids or an illegal bat (different weight or composition) or bribes pitchers to give them good pitches, it's all cheating and should invalidate their "accomplishments". Whether that's done by removal from the records or just an asterisk is up to the league, but it seems wrong to overlook these factors when they're admitted to or proven.

Again, this is all assuming it was against the rules