EPTOff-Topic General Discussion - Page 5160
| Forum Index > The Shopkeeper′s Inn |
|
Fildun
Netherlands4123 Posts
| ||
|
GhandiEAGLE
United States20754 Posts
On June 09 2015 03:47 Fildun wrote: As soon as he'd cut his hair he'd get a 5-some with 5 girls. Because he wouldn't be a man if he did so. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
On June 09 2015 03:47 Fildun wrote: As soon as he'd cut his hair he'd get a 5-some with 5 girls. So he'd just be watching then? | ||
|
Zdrastochye
Ivory Coast6262 Posts
| ||
|
Scip
Czech Republic11293 Posts
I argued on skype that the best formula for orgies is 1 man and n girls where n is a natural number. But someone said that the best type of 5-person orgy is 5 girls, which contradicts my formula (it should be 4 girls and a 1 guy) | ||
|
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
What makes that the best formula for orgies? | ||
|
ComaDose
Canada10357 Posts
| ||
|
Gahlo
United States35171 Posts
On June 09 2015 03:28 MooMooMugi wrote: Guys, what should I eat for lunch today? Costco or Subways You're going to ask that in OT? Of course the answer will be Costco. | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
On June 09 2015 04:03 Scip wrote: I argued on skype that the best formula for orgies is 1 man and n girls where n is a natural number. But someone said that the best type of 5-person orgy is 5 girls, which contradicts my formula (it should be 4 girls and a 1 guy) i dunno bout you but i'd love to see an orgy with an irrational number of girls Ey gurl let's have a creampi | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
On June 09 2015 04:08 Dandel Ion wrote: i dunno bout you but i'd love to see an orgy with an irrational number of girls Ey gurl let's have a creampi What about i girls? That's probably well within Scip's reach. (Come on you knew it was coming) | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
unlike scip | ||
|
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
On June 09 2015 04:10 WaveofShadow wrote: What about i girls? That's probably well within Scip's reach. (Come on you knew it was coming) All he'd have to do is square her and he'd have one less girl than before! On June 09 2015 04:08 Dandel Ion wrote: i dunno bout you but i'd love to see an orgy with an irrational number of girls Ey gurl let's have a creampi hah, nice | ||
|
Scip
Czech Republic11293 Posts
On June 09 2015 04:06 jcarlsoniv wrote: I'm probably going to regret asking this... What makes that the best formula for orgies? okay, my logic is this, and tell me if you think it's flawed: imagine, if you will, that you are having sex in your room. Do you think the experience would be improved if there was another guy having sex with someone else in that room as well? And does the answer change depending on how many girls you're having sex with at the same time? If the answer to both questions is no (and it would undoubtedly be for me) then, assuming you don't like amputees, the natural number of girls + 1 guy clearly follows. Also, I think that squaring a girl was one of the ancient greek problems, but I'm not sure if it's been proven to be impossible. | ||
|
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
On June 09 2015 04:24 Scip wrote: okay, my logic is this, and tell me if you think it's flawed: imagine, if you will, that you are having sex in your room. Do you think the experience would be improved if there was another guy having sex with someone else in that room as well? And does the answer change depending on how many girls you're having sex with at the same time? If the answer to both questions is no (and it would undoubtedly be for me) then, assuming you don't like amputees, the natural number of girls + 1 guy clearly follows. Well, it's inherently flawed because it fails to take into account the most important variable of all - the sexual preferences of all parties involved. The fact that you have to propose all of those questions exemplifies that itself. Stating that there is an optimal formula for something that is entirely subjective is and always will be greatly flawed. | ||
|
Ethelis
United States2397 Posts
| ||
|
TheHumanSensation
Canada1210 Posts
| ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
On June 09 2015 04:24 Scip wrote: okay, my logic is this, and tell me if you think it's flawed: imagine, if you will, that you are having sex in your room. Do you think the experience would be improved if there was another guy having sex with someone else in that room as well? And does the answer change depending on how many girls you're having sex with at the same time? If the answer to both questions is no (and it would undoubtedly be for me) then, assuming you don't like amputees, the natural number of girls + 1 guy clearly follows. Also, I think that squaring a girl was one of the ancient greek problems, but I'm not sure if it's been proven to be impossible. You're also discounting physiological/psychological factors like performance anxiety (do you think it is inherently easier to perform for/with one girl versus 4) and stamina. On June 09 2015 04:30 Ethelis wrote: Is it just me or does anyone else read Scip's posts in his voice? Always. | ||
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
| ||
|
JonGalt
Pootie too good!4331 Posts
On June 09 2015 04:24 Scip wrote: okay, my logic is this, and tell me if you think it's flawed: imagine, if you will, that you are having sex in your room. Do you think the experience would be improved if there was another guy having sex with someone else in that room as well? And does the answer change depending on how many girls you're having sex with at the same time? If the answer to both questions is no (and it would undoubtedly be for me) then, assuming you don't like amputees, the natural number of girls + 1 guy clearly follows. Also, I think that squaring a girl was one of the ancient greek problems, but I'm not sure if it's been proven to be impossible. I think there is a certain threshold where 1) There are too many women for you to stimulate/satisfy which would then naturally lead them to pleasure themselves (assuming they just don't sit around and watch) which leads to the threshold of 2) Being able to enjoy the visual experience of said women pleasuring themselves without sacrificing your performance. I believe it is at this threshold (I won't pretend like I even know what that is as I am a sexual plebian only having the pleasure and sexual comeptency to be with one woman at a time) that another man can be brought in to the equation. Especially if said man is a close friend of yours who you trust and feel comfortable around. Now I personally would not want to have any sexual contact with this man, not that there is anything wrong with that, but I have no qualms sharing the fruits of my orgy with a close friend - and if we are being honest here I think it would intensify the experience knowing that I was sharing this seemingly heavenly situation with a buddy of mine. And if we are talking pure theory here I think 4 women is the threshold for one man. Your mouth, two hands, and your little soniv could all be doing god's work given that you have the sexual skills of Pootie Tang. | ||
|
red_
United States8474 Posts
On June 09 2015 04:31 WaveofShadow wrote: You're also discounting physiological/psychological factors like performance anxiety (do you think it is inherently easier to perform for/with one girl versus 4) and stamina. I dunno about making a formula that accounts for growth in numbers beyond 3/4, but a foursome has some obvious benefits over a threesome because of the pairing options. There are still a bunch of complicating factors that arise from sexual preference and some psychology(subconsciously picking favorites, jealousy, etc), but those are present in a threesome as well. The major downside is finding a third willing woman with the required sexual preference, something that's already a major limiting factor in a threesome to begin with. | ||
| ||
