EPT[ASUS ROG] Assembly Summer 2019 - Championship Sat - Page 29
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
IshinShishi
Japan6156 Posts
| ||
|
BerserkSword
United States2123 Posts
On August 04 2019 02:14 Z3nith wrote: Honestly, the nerf to infested terrans can't come soon enough the nerf to infested terrans wont do anything for the state of PvZ lategame the carrier "buff" and infested terran bug fix will be inconsequential. Zerg will still decimate protoss lategame | ||
|
yht9657
1810 Posts
On August 04 2019 02:13 BerserkSword wrote: Been saying this for a while remove the tempest and give immortals an air attack that combats armor/massive units I would trade the entire Stargate techtree for Zeratul's immortals. | ||
|
Jasper_Ty
101 Posts
On August 04 2019 02:14 IshinShishi wrote: I cant help but think that sometimes Serral tries suboptimal strats on purpose to maybe lose and make it interesting, I know it sounds crazy, but maybe he is trying to save sc2 and to profit as long as possible lmao. or maybe he like, makes mistakes or something, i dont know  | ||
|
yht9657
1810 Posts
On August 04 2019 02:14 IshinShishi wrote: I cant help but think that sometimes Serral tries suboptimal strats on purpose to maybe lose and make it interesting, I know it sounds crazy, but maybe he is trying to save sc2 and to profit as long as possible lmao. Then he should have let TIME win. | ||
|
BerserkSword
United States2123 Posts
On August 04 2019 02:15 yht9657 wrote: I would trade the entire Stargate techtree for Zeratul's immortals. o0o i had no idea about zeratul's immortals...im assuming they can hit air units | ||
|
MarianoSC2
Slovakia1855 Posts
On August 04 2019 02:14 IshinShishi wrote: I cant help but think that sometimes Serral tries suboptimal strats on purpose to maybe lose and make it interesting, I know it sounds crazy, but maybe he is trying to save sc2 and to profit as long as possible lmao. :D :D ;D | ||
|
Penev
28483 Posts
| ||
|
Need
566 Posts
On August 04 2019 02:15 BerserkSword wrote: the nerf to infested terrans wont do anything for the state of PvZ lategame the carrier "buff" and infested terran bug fix will be inconsequential. Zerg will still decimate protoss lategame Dunno if the patch will solve it, but IT are definitely the most OP part of lategame ZvP and what it should be targeted first | ||
|
Jasper_Ty
101 Posts
| ||
|
Malongo
Chile3472 Posts
On August 04 2019 02:09 Ej_ wrote: It's not that people don't try to use disruptors, it's that every single unit is hopeless vs infestor/spore holding 1 choke point and 30 cracklings controlling the rest of the map. You get always forced into a defensive position. It is actually a case of offense advantage (you get to choose the engagement time/place and you get the better trade). Basically creep+static is way too good in that situation. | ||
|
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
| ||
|
Jasper_Ty
101 Posts
| ||
|
RealityTheGreat
China564 Posts
On August 04 2019 02:08 yyltyler wrote: GGlords and winfestor  throws back to the good old days in 2012historicism 2010-2017 2011-2018 2012-2019 | ||
|
WombaT
Northern Ireland25585 Posts
On August 04 2019 02:10 ZigguratOfUr wrote: I mean it does do a good job at preventing zerg from just pushing onto your army and killing you, but zerg still has free reign over the rest of the map, and there's only so much you can do down three bases. Aye that’s true, same with what Ej said I think going toe to toe into lategame is pretty hopeless unless there’s a big skill disparity, but I’d at least like to see people experiment before whining too hard. It’s almost so hard that Protoss don’t even try to go there, which means viewers don’t see it and spam whine about it, so it’s off the balance change radar despite being IMO up there as the least balanced phase of any matchup | ||
|
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
On August 04 2019 02:19 Wombat_NI wrote: Aye that’s true, same with what Ej said I think going toe to toe into lategame is pretty hopeless unless there’s a big skill disparity, but I’d at least like to see people experiment before whining too hard. It’s almost so hard that Protoss don’t even try to go there, which means viewers don’t see it and spam whine about it, so it’s off the balance change radar despite being IMO up there as the least balanced phase of any matchup I mean they might experiment on ladder, but in tournament play you're not going to go for it unless your winrate is sorta decent. | ||
|
Need
566 Posts
On August 04 2019 02:19 Wombat_NI wrote: Aye that’s true, same with what Ej said I think going toe to toe into lategame is pretty hopeless unless there’s a big skill disparity, but I’d at least like to see people experiment before whining too hard. It’s almost so hard that Protoss don’t even try to go there, which means viewers don’t see it and spam whine about it, so it’s off the balance change radar despite being IMO up there as the least balanced phase of any matchup I don't know if the best way to go about is for pros to sabotage their chances to win a tournament to convince the viewers about balance decisions | ||
|
HolydaKing
21254 Posts
| ||
|
Tayar
United States1439 Posts
| ||
|
HeroSandro
531 Posts
| ||
| ||
