On November 03 2018 10:55 IshinShishi wrote: dark is simply slower than serral, he chose good builds, got early advantages, but still lost to 3 roaches here, 4 roaches there in every game as according to keikaku.
I give sOs an exact 0.0001% chance vs Serral.
But if we talk about Dark being not fast enough then it probably stopped being a strategy game ;p and now it's all about being as fast as possible
yes, turns out a mechanical god wins everything in sc2, look at Maru, little brains all bot.
On November 03 2018 10:55 IshinShishi wrote: dark is simply slower than serral, he chose good builds, got early advantages, but still lost to 3 roaches here, 4 roaches there in every game as according to keikaku.
I give sOs an exact 0.0001% chance vs Serral.
But if we talk about Dark being not fast enough then it probably stopped being a strategy game ;p and now it's all about being as fast as possible
yes, turns out a mechanical god wins everything in sc2, look at Maru, little brains all bot.
if you have at least basic understanding of strategies and you are not stubborn ;p Serral is the perfect bot
On November 03 2018 10:59 deacon.frost wrote: WTF? Game 1 - Dark went into spire and didn't scout the Serral's one. Got behind BO-wise. Lost.
That's kinda underselling it. Dark's response to finding himself behind was really strong and he almost managed to seize the win.
Yeah, but the original post is important. Serral was ahead, defended properly and won the game. Dark was behind and didn't win. But saying that no other Zergs cannot win such games is just pure fanboyism.