EPT[WCS AM] Group E Challenger Season 2 2013 - Page 4
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
OminouS
Sweden1343 Posts
| ||
|
m0ck
4194 Posts
| ||
|
Heavenlee
United States966 Posts
On September 03 2013 09:34 figq wrote: Lol, Hyun advances with negative 2-3 score from that day. Usually at least in such case one has beaten the other loser in the loser's match, but here even this was just forfeit so it doesn't count. That's one way of wording what happened lol. Or you can say that State lost 2 bo3's and had a negative map score and HyuN only lost one, which is the case...If HyuN lost his two bo3's he would've been out. Why does map score matter? Amusingly you are pretty much saying that we should go by extended series format again..but oh wait, back when fan favorites lost in that format it was considered the worst thing to ever befall esports. | ||
|
m0ck
4194 Posts
| ||
|
NoGasfOu
United States1117 Posts
| ||
|
Arghmyliver
United States1077 Posts
On September 03 2013 09:49 NoGasfOu wrote: lol so many angry foreigners in this thread taking map score but ignoring series win/loss. I think the main issue for the "foreigners" in this case is that one of the series "wins" for Hyun was a W.O. where he did not actually have to do anything (actually just time for him to study State's reps) whereas State was required to play an actual human opponent in all of the three series he played back to back today. | ||
lichter
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
 ty for thread | ||
|
jonich0n
United States1982 Posts
On September 03 2013 09:54 Arghmyliver wrote: I think the main issue for the "foreigners" in this case is that one of the series "wins" for Hyun was a W.O. where he did not actually have to do anything (actually just time for him to study State's reps) whereas State was required to play an actual human opponent in all of the three series he played back to back today. well bring that up with WCS AM and Violet consistently having to forfeit his spot. it's impossible to advance from one of these groups when all 4 players are there without getting an at least 50:50 overall map score. with 3 players it's obviously different. I've always never liked these walk-overs in 3-man groups. would be ideal if they had a couple wildcard games or something of that ilk to fill in these spots. | ||
|
xxxxxxb
155 Posts
| ||
|
DaftFunk
194 Posts
On September 03 2013 10:47 xxxxxxb wrote: Why don't they use reserves for those kind of situations? Like, BB. He was top4 in 3 qualies. lol no one brings this up when this happened twice in the bracket already group c and d. only matters to them if its their favorite player/nationality. | ||
|
xxxxxxb
155 Posts
| ||
NovemberstOrm
Canada16217 Posts
On September 03 2013 10:43 lichter wrote: Why does no one care about WCS AM ty for thread i do but i was busy with family D: also congrats to hyun & arthur! | ||
Larkin
United Kingdom7161 Posts
| ||
|
lichter
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
On September 03 2013 11:02 xxxxxxb wrote: Sorry that I can't be here everyday to bring this up but the WO thing is bs regardless of who plays. State isn't my favorite anything. Blame the player that forfeited or the organization for not finding a solution. Don't blame the format (some people have) or the players who played for taking advantage of the WO. | ||
|
vthree
Hong Kong8039 Posts
On September 03 2013 10:47 xxxxxxb wrote: Why don't they use reserves for those kind of situations? Like, BB. He was top4 in 3 qualies. I agree, they should have a 'points' system for the players that don't qualify but do get far. Then if replacements are needed, they can just pick the player at the top. | ||
Yhamm
France7248 Posts
On September 03 2013 10:43 lichter wrote: Why does no one care about WCS AM ty for thread challenger and only 3 players | ||
|
lichter
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
I mean no one bothered to make the thread early again x_x | ||
|
fuzzylogic44
Canada2633 Posts
On September 03 2013 10:43 lichter wrote: Why does no one care about WCS AM ty for thread WCS AM Challenger * | ||
|
Bagration
United States18282 Posts
| ||
|
Yhamm
France7248 Posts
On September 03 2013 11:41 lichter wrote: I mean no one bothered to make the thread early again x_x same answer | ||
| ||
