EPT[WCS AM] RO16 Group D Premier Season 2 2013 - Page 36
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
zeratul_jf
United States808 Posts
| ||
|
dustinth
China205 Posts
| ||
|
FabledIntegral
United States9232 Posts
On August 09 2013 10:04 eronica wrote: No difference, Crank basicly forfait his will to win, same as probe rushing or playing with one hand.... There's a massive difference. | ||
|
c0ldfusion
United States8293 Posts
There's no motivation for any one player to throw a game unless he's already eliminated. Clearly this is not the case here. | ||
|
Ventris
Germany1226 Posts
On August 09 2013 10:04 TheFiddler wrote: Probably wasn't liking his chance against Jim and threw game two, let Alicia try his luck. I think game one was just an Idra GG. Poor choice, thought that he was done once he failed the attack. Game two was a whatever, all yours Alicia. I agree with this. Still makes them look fishy though. | ||
The_Templar
your Country52797 Posts
On August 09 2013 10:04 stuchiu wrote: Alicia won 3-0? Amazing. No they both lost 2-0. | ||
|
The_Templar
your Country52797 Posts
On August 09 2013 10:05 The_Templar wrote: Poll: Recommend Losers' Match Game 3? ★- Do not see this game no matter what (11) ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (1) ★★★- Good game (1) ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (1) ★★★★- Highly recommended game (0) 14 total votes Your vote: Recommend Losers' Match Game 3? (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what | ||
|
Mozdk
Denmark6989 Posts
On August 09 2013 10:05 zeratul_jf wrote: I wanna hear what TB has to say about this He will doge as they always do. Fuck that team. They just murdered them selves. Pretty fucking stupid. | ||
|
SKTelecomT1Rain
China17 Posts
| ||
|
TT1
Canada10011 Posts
On August 09 2013 10:03 chipmonklord17 wrote: Umm didn't Catz straight up forfeit to Kane? That's significantly different yes it is, what crank did is disrespectful to the viewers. forfeiting a match is completely acceptable because its the players tourney life thats on the line, he has the right to make that call. | ||
|
ArchangelJada
Canada910 Posts
| ||
|
chipmonklord17
United States11944 Posts
On August 09 2013 10:05 Popkiller wrote: the difference is with Catz/Kane its 100% confirmed match fixing. There is no other explanation. With Crank/Alicia, can you really prove it? It isn't match fixing. Match fixing requires there to be a match to fix the result. Catz quit the tournament. Yes in theory it creates the same end, it isn't the same thing | ||
|
Iodem
United States1173 Posts
| ||
|
rasnj
United States1959 Posts
On August 09 2013 10:06 c0ldfusion wrote: Think about it guys. I know they're on the same team, but this is an individual event. There's no motivation for any one player to throw a game unless he's already eliminated. Clearly this is not the case here. Crank is team captain and some people have commented on how Crank has been spending a lot of his time managing axiom (I have no idea if they actually know what they are talking about). If they believe that Alicia is the better player, has more need of tournament experience and has greater potential in the longer term, then it makes sense. EDIT: Actually the Catz/Kane situation proves that one may want a player to advance over a playing captain, as it was confirmed that this was exactly what happened then. Personally I don't believe either action should be accepted, but basically attempting to deceive the tournament and viewers is in my opinion much worse than straight up forfeiting. | ||
|
Apoteosis
Chile820 Posts
| ||
|
zev318
Canada4306 Posts
On August 09 2013 10:07 TT1 wrote: yes it is, what crank did is disrespectful to the viewers. forfeiting a match is completely acceptable because its the players tourney life thats on the line, he has the right to make that call. well, the way i looked at catz's loss. if you're a full time player and can't even beat your own team manager, then u really dont deserve to move on. | ||
|
Popkiller
3415 Posts
On August 09 2013 10:07 chipmonklord17 wrote: It isn't match fixing. Match fixing requires there to be a match to fix the result. Catz quit the tournament. Yes in theory it creates the same end, it isn't the same thing alright, true. Wrong way to word it. | ||
|
Chemiczny84
Poland458 Posts
| ||
|
The_Templar
your Country52797 Posts
| ||
|
c0ldfusion
United States8293 Posts
On August 09 2013 10:05 zeratul_jf wrote: I wanna hear what TB has to say about this Dude, there is no benefit for throwing a match in this situation. 1. It's not like Crank is already eliminated. 2. All three players are P. It's not even a match-up thing. There no advantage gained by throwing the match. | ||
| ||
