[OSL] RO8 Day 2 WCS Korea Season 2 2013 - Page 51
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Chr15t
Denmark1103 Posts
| ||
mikedebo
Canada4341 Posts
| ||
IMoperator
4476 Posts
| ||
tshi
United States2495 Posts
| ||
bo1b
Australia12814 Posts
| ||
Schelim
Austria11528 Posts
| ||
AgentW
United States7725 Posts
On July 25 2013 20:25 DJHelium wrote: Artosis going full retard again! | ||
DidYuhim
Ukraine1905 Posts
On July 25 2013 18:11 DidYuhim wrote: Bomber hype? ![]() | ||
Chr15t
Denmark1103 Posts
| ||
herMan
Japan2053 Posts
| ||
Monsen
Germany2548 Posts
| ||
Erraa93
Australia891 Posts
| ||
ViperPL
Poland1775 Posts
| ||
Wintex
Norway16835 Posts
| ||
Chr15t
Denmark1103 Posts
| ||
papaz
Sweden4149 Posts
Aren't people tired of seeing bio vs colossi and/or storms? | ||
Heartland
Sweden24578 Posts
On July 25 2013 20:25 Scarecrow wrote: It's either the bunkers get repaired and it does very minimal damage or he basically wins outright, there's very little middle ground with an attack like that. Even if he kills a few scv's and some bio his tech's going to be badly delayed vs a triple orbital terran with stim and medivacs He would probably have backed off or just danced around without committing if he saw that SCV:s had been pulled, and thus not do as many warpins there. I'm not saying that he wouldn't have been behind if that happened, though. I'm saying that being behind after a failed attack =/= all-in. | ||
liberate71
Australia10252 Posts
| ||
Sissors
1395 Posts
On July 25 2013 20:17 NarutO wrote: While proleague stats show such balance breaking results, look into it. I am not saying TvZ is imbalanced or Zerg favored to begin with, but over 50% of the wins from Terran are thanks to INnoVatioN and Flash. I believe there are players outstanding that just happen to be ahead of their time. i.e Rain in WoL when Protoss really didn't do too well, he destroyed Terrans. I think Blizzard will take a good look into it, because what are you going to take away from Terran that helps Zerg? And thats the problem, all those stats simply aren't statistically significant in any way. People look at the number of games involved to get the stats, and it looks more than enough to be significant. However they are played by only a few people: For example your data really doesn't become more significant when you get another 100 TvPs by letting innovation play vs Grubby. You only can figure out accurately what the chance is innovation beats grubby, but you won't get significant data for the matchup. | ||
Chobra
131 Posts
Welp, my bad. Plz don't stab me with pitchforks On a side note, I understand LoL players call it scrims, but I used to call them scrims way before LoL when I was playing shooters with my amateur team...=[ habits die hard! | ||
| ||