|
On July 25 2013 20:21 NarutO wrote:Show nested quote +On July 25 2013 20:20 Wintex wrote:On July 25 2013 20:20 bo1b wrote: Why is bombers macro below 100 Cause the people doing the ratings are bad. If its a scale 0-100 , 100 would be the best there is. Bomber doesn't have the best macro there is in Starcraft 2. So 100 would be wrong. He does have sufficient enough to be at the 90s+. high 90s is pretty good anyway.
|
On July 25 2013 20:21 Scarecrow wrote:Show nested quote +On July 25 2013 20:20 DJHelium wrote:On July 25 2013 20:18 Scarecrow wrote: To all the people who don't get PvT. Going a fast 10+ stalkers with no blink in sight vsT going mmm is going to get shat on once the T gets to any stim + medivac timing. Supernova could've floated his third down once he had stim and denied Rain's for ages if not just killed him with drops or an scv all-in. I like Rain alot but it was pretty all-in. Very true! Also worth saying is that it's sort of an reactive all in, he did it as a response to the fast third and vurnable third, thus a very late tech. True, it wasn't blind and he deserves credit for having the balls to go for it. Taking a leaf out of stardusts book
|
Ok I think that Artosis and Tasteless are setting up Bomber to advance to the next round.
|
On July 25 2013 20:22 Emzeeshady wrote:Show nested quote +On July 25 2013 20:20 Wintex wrote:On July 25 2013 20:20 bo1b wrote: Why is bombers macro below 100 Cause the people doing the ratings are bad. Apparently Fantasy has better macro then Bomber according to Korean journalists... Maybe they know about some helpful effects of getting supply blocked that we don't. Fantasy is really good at getting high minerals...
|
Either 3 Terrans in the top 4. Or a representant of my favorite team in the top 4.
I think i'll just enjoy these games ;D
|
I've seen the stats, back over to ogn stream
|
On July 25 2013 20:22 Emzeeshady wrote:Show nested quote +On July 25 2013 20:20 Wintex wrote:On July 25 2013 20:20 bo1b wrote: Why is bombers macro below 100 Cause the people doing the ratings are bad. Apparently Fantasy has better macro then Bomber according to Korean journalists... Maybe they know about some helpful effects of getting supply blocked that we don't.
Supply blocks, does that make me 100 macro because i do that all the time!
|
On July 25 2013 19:58 edgeOut wrote: Rain's play is still weird, don't believe he can win against Bomber.
Lol he already did in ro16
|
What does those number means? Who established them? Is there any objective number behind them?
|
|
On July 25 2013 20:23 nojok wrote: What does those number means? Who established them? Is there any objective number behind them? They use otters to randomly pick them, so they're extremely legit.
|
Is Bomber a Royal Road candidate for OSL? He didn't play in OSL during BW, but what about the SC2?
|
On July 25 2013 20:23 nojok wrote: What does those number means? Who established them? Is there any objective number behind them?
They asked korean esports journalists to make the ratings. Then they asked them again after some time had passed, that's why the numbers change. So no, they're not objective in that sense.
|
On July 25 2013 20:23 BackSideAttack wrote:Show nested quote +On July 25 2013 19:58 edgeOut wrote: Rain's play is still weird, don't believe he can win against Bomber. Lol he already did in ro16
We're about to see if Bomber improved his TvP. Thus far he's mainly been living off of his inflated WoL TvP stats imo.
|
On July 25 2013 20:24 Cokefreak wrote:Show nested quote +On July 25 2013 20:23 nojok wrote: What does those number means? Who established them? Is there any objective number behind them? They use otters to randomly pick them, so they're extremely legit.
blah blah blah, alex garfield reference, blah blah blah
|
lol what was it that Tasteless brings up all the time? i missed that.
|
On July 25 2013 20:22 Heartland wrote:Show nested quote +On July 25 2013 20:20 DJHelium wrote:On July 25 2013 20:18 Scarecrow wrote: To all the people who don't get PvT. Going a fast 10+ stalkers with no blink in sight vsT going mmm is going to get shat on once the T gets to any stim + medivac timing. Supernova could've floated his third down once he had stim and denied Rain's for ages if not just killed him with drops or an scv all-in. I like Rain alot but it was pretty all-in. Very true! Also worth saying is that it's sort of an reactive all in, he did it as a response to the fast third and vurnable third, thus a very late tech. The thing is that he didn't need to win with that push. He needed to do damage, sure. But he had all the possibility of teching up, expanding, building gates and otherwise advancing his macro at home. What he did was a timing attack. You also need to do damage when you do timings. It's either the bunkers get repaired and it doesn't do enough damage or he basically wins outright, there's very little middle ground with an attack like that. Even if he kills a few scv's and some bio his tech's going to be badly delayed vs a triple orbital terran with stim and medivacs
|
Firsts skin had a rough time in puberty
|
|
Artosis going full retard again! :D
|
|
|
|