| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Wintex
Norway16838 Posts
On July 25 2013 20:21 NarutO wrote: If its a scale 0-100 , 100 would be the best there is. Bomber doesn't have the best macro there is in Starcraft 2. So 100 would be wrong. He does have sufficient enough to be at the 90s+. high 90s is pretty good anyway. | ||
|
bo1b
Australia12814 Posts
On July 25 2013 20:21 Scarecrow wrote: True, it wasn't blind and he deserves credit for having the balls to go for it. Taking a leaf out of stardusts book | ||
|
Qwerty85
Croatia5536 Posts
| ||
|
bo1b
Australia12814 Posts
On July 25 2013 20:22 Emzeeshady wrote: Apparently Fantasy has better macro then Bomber according to Korean journalists... Maybe they know about some helpful effects of getting supply blocked that we don't. Fantasy is really good at getting high minerals... | ||
|
Chr15t
Denmark1103 Posts
I think i'll just enjoy these games ;D | ||
|
bo1b
Australia12814 Posts
| ||
|
Erraa93
Australia891 Posts
On July 25 2013 20:22 Emzeeshady wrote: Apparently Fantasy has better macro then Bomber according to Korean journalists... Maybe they know about some helpful effects of getting supply blocked that we don't. Supply blocks, does that make me 100 macro because i do that all the time! | ||
|
BackSideAttack
1103 Posts
On July 25 2013 19:58 edgeOut wrote: Rain's play is still weird, don't believe he can win against Bomber. Lol he already did in ro16 | ||
|
nojok
France15845 Posts
| ||
|
govie
9334 Posts
http://aligulac.com/players/12/results/?after=&before=&race=p&nats=all&bo=all&offline=both&game=HotS | ||
|
Cokefreak
Finland8095 Posts
On July 25 2013 20:23 nojok wrote: What does those number means? Who established them? Is there any objective number behind them? They use otters to randomly pick them, so they're extremely legit. | ||
|
DidYuhim
Ukraine1905 Posts
| ||
|
Heartland
Sweden24581 Posts
On July 25 2013 20:23 nojok wrote: What does those number means? Who established them? Is there any objective number behind them? They asked korean esports journalists to make the ratings. Then they asked them again after some time had passed, that's why the numbers change. So no, they're not objective in that sense. | ||
|
FrostedMiniWheats
United States30730 Posts
We're about to see if Bomber improved his TvP. Thus far he's mainly been living off of his inflated WoL TvP stats imo. | ||
|
Heartland
Sweden24581 Posts
On July 25 2013 20:24 Cokefreak wrote: They use otters to randomly pick them, so they're extremely legit. blah blah blah, alex garfield reference, blah blah blah | ||
|
Schelim
Austria11528 Posts
| ||
|
Scarecrow
Korea (South)9172 Posts
On July 25 2013 20:22 Heartland wrote: The thing is that he didn't need to win with that push. He needed to do damage, sure. But he had all the possibility of teching up, expanding, building gates and otherwise advancing his macro at home. What he did was a timing attack. You also need to do damage when you do timings. It's either the bunkers get repaired and it doesn't do enough damage or he basically wins outright, there's very little middle ground with an attack like that. Even if he kills a few scv's and some bio his tech's going to be badly delayed vs a triple orbital terran with stim and medivacs | ||
|
bo1b
Australia12814 Posts
 | ||
|
Killmouse
Austria5700 Posts
| ||
|
DJHelium
Sweden13480 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
LiuLi Cup
BSL Team Wars
Team Hawk vs Team Dewalt
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
SC Evo League
WardiTV Summer Champion…
Classic vs Percival
Spirit vs NightMare
CSO Cup
[BSL 2025] Weekly
Sparkling Tuna Cup
SC Evo League
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
