EPT+ Show Spoiler +
![[image loading]](http://s17.postimg.org/4grmuansf/downfall.gif)
Still had this from the premier/challenger qualifiers
So, this raises the question : Who can someone qualify for dreamhack or do u have to get invited?
[DreamHack] Summer Day 2 2013 - Page 4
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
govie
9334 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + Still had this from the premier/challenger qualifiers So, this raises the question : Who can someone qualify for dreamhack or do u have to get invited? | ||
|
nkr
Sweden5451 Posts
On June 16 2013 17:28 Otolia wrote: Aligulac Shortlinks to the predictions page :
+ Show Spoiler [Detailed predictions] + + Show Spoiler [Group 1] + + Show Spoiler [Group 2] + + Show Spoiler [Group 3] + + Show Spoiler [Group 4] + + Show Spoiler [Group 5] + + Show Spoiler [Group 6] + + Show Spoiler [Group 7] + + Show Spoiler [Group 8] + + Show Spoiler [Group 9] + + Show Spoiler [Group 10] + + Show Spoiler [Group 11] + + Show Spoiler [Group 12] + + Show Spoiler [Group 13] + + Show Spoiler [Group 14] + + Show Spoiler [Group 15] + + Show Spoiler [Group 16] + that site is awesome, kudos | ||
|
nkr
Sweden5451 Posts
On June 16 2013 17:55 govie wrote: Only person missing is.. "the defender of noobterrans", "sole ruler of the terran helpme thread", "7+ times GM in EU" and allways a person that allways helps old peeps cross the street... The Downfall! + Show Spoiler + Still had this from the premier/challenger qualifiers So, this raises the question : Who can someone qualify for dreamhack or do u have to get invited? it should be "always helps old peeps across the creep" D: | ||
|
JoeCool
Germany2520 Posts
On June 16 2013 17:34 AstroPegnuin wrote: Naniwa when playing at his best is perhaps one of the if not the best Protoss in the world... but Naniwa on tilt however is not a very pleasant viewing experience for all parties involved, I feel like if he'd just work on his mental game he'd play a ton more consistent That´s a little much, don´t you think? Naniwa is one of the few players I always support and root for when they´re playing but he´s nowhere near the best P in the world not even if he´s in top shape. Just think about Rain, sOs, Parting, Squirtle and so on playing at their best.... He might be the best P in europe but I don´t even know if thats true since his PvP and PvZ vs europeans isn´t that stellar either. Don´t know about his PvT. Well, still I hope he comes out second  | ||
|
doffe
Sweden636 Posts
On June 16 2013 18:07 JoeCool wrote: That´s a little much, don´t you think? Naniwa is one of the few players I always support and root for when they´re playing but he´s nowhere near the best P in the world not even if he´s in top shape. Just think about Rain, sOs, Parting, Squirtle and so on playing at their best.... He might be the best P in europe but I don´t even know if thats true since his PvP and PvZ vs europeans isn´t that stellar either. Don´t know about his PvT. Well, still I hope he comes out second I'd say hes upp there at his peak.. sadly he tilts after one loss more or less. But if he plays his best starcraft he can definitely compete with anyone else playing their best starcraft. I guess this can be said about several players though. But best P outside Korea I think is pretty fair to claim. | ||
|
govie
9334 Posts
On June 16 2013 18:05 nkr wrote: it should be "always helps old peeps across the creep" D: haha, thats funny | ||
|
AstroPegnuin
293 Posts
On June 16 2013 18:07 JoeCool wrote: That´s a little much, don´t you think? Naniwa is one of the few players I always support and root for when they´re playing but he´s nowhere near the best P in the world not even if he´s in top shape. Just think about Rain, sOs, Parting, Squirtle and so on playing at their best.... He might be the best P in europe but I don´t even know if thats true since his PvP and PvZ vs europeans isn´t that stellar either. Don´t know about his PvT. Well, still I hope he comes out second yeah my opinion definitely subjective in that sense, If you judge based off results than I am really far off field but from personal opinion of what I observe in his games and correlate with my own experience in playing I see a lot of skill that I would rate very high up in contrast to other top end Protoss, I've always had a huge respect for his style and approach to the game because I feel like he takes the whole timing and all in aspect of Protoss and incorporates it into really clean and refined macro play | ||
|
furo
Germany449 Posts
| ||
|
Sumahi
Guam5609 Posts
| ||
|
niekoz
Netherlands350 Posts
Shaun Clark @ApolloSC2 3m 1.Naniwa vs Suppy 2.Thorzain vs Sting 3.Life vs theSTC ----1hourbreak---- 4.Jaedong vs Elfi 5.Gumiho vs Taeja 6. Stephano vs Tod | ||
|
AlternativeEgo
Sweden17309 Posts
| ||
|
Aim Here
Scotland672 Posts
For group stage 1, there were 62 Zergs, 38 Protoss and 27 Terrans, and 1 random entering the tournament. 31 Zergs, 19 Toss, 14 Terrans and no randoms qualified for group stage 2. The group 2 racial distribution figures are half of the group 1 figures, taking into account rounding of odd numbers. The races qualified from their groups in the *exact* proportion to how they showed up. The qualifiers couldn't have been any better balanced. I'm immediately going to jump to the conclusion, therefore, that Starcraft 2: Heart of the Swarm is perfectly 100% balanced, at least at the DreamHack open qualifier group stage 1 level. The numbers simply cannot lie! Any balance whine for this tournament is surely the result of a debilitating cognitive disorder, and if you perceive imbalance while watching the stream, you should seek psychiatric attention! | ||
|
govie
9334 Posts
On June 16 2013 19:32 Aim Here wrote: I noticed something about the groups, and had to share. For group stage 1, there were 62 Zergs, 38 Protoss and 27 Terrans, and 1 random entering the tournament. 31 Zergs, 19 Toss, 14 Terrans and no randoms qualified for group stage 2. The group 2 racial distribution figures are half of the group 1 figures, taking into account rounding of odd numbers. The races qualified from their groups in the *exact* proportion to how they showed up. The qualifiers couldn't have been any better balanced. I'm immediately going to jump to the conclusion, therefore, that Starcraft 2: Heart of the Swarm is perfectly 100% balanced, at least at the DreamHack open qualifier group stage 1 level. The numbers simply cannot lie! Any balance whine for this tournament is surely the result of a debilitating cognitive disorder, and if you perceive imbalance while watching the stream, you should seek psychiatric attention! I have balance whine but its a different one. why are zergs swarming the dreamhack! I would have liked too see 33/33/33% for all races | ||
|
KingAlphard
Italy1705 Posts
On June 16 2013 19:32 Aim Here wrote: I noticed something about the groups, and had to share. For group stage 1, there were 62 Zergs, 38 Protoss and 27 Terrans, and 1 random entering the tournament. 31 Zergs, 19 Toss, 14 Terrans and no randoms qualified for group stage 2. The group 2 racial distribution figures are half of the group 1 figures, taking into account rounding of odd numbers. The races qualified from their groups in the *exact* proportion to how they showed up. The qualifiers couldn't have been any better balanced. I'm immediately going to jump to the conclusion, therefore, that Starcraft 2: Heart of the Swarm is perfectly 100% balanced, at least at the DreamHack open qualifier group stage 1 level. The numbers simply cannot lie! Any balance whine for this tournament is surely the result of a debilitating cognitive disorder, and if you perceive imbalance while watching the stream, you should seek psychiatric attention! This isn't true. You would be right if all the players were at the same level, instead, in most of the groups 2 of them were almost certain to advance, regardless of the other ones' race. | ||
|
S_treaks
United States27 Posts
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv?key=0AklGLUOqCLs1dGNTSTdrUVRQTGl4MndXSEVwSWNwLWc&toomany=true So far it doesn't match Apollo's tweet, but I assume they'll keep it updated. | ||
|
ThePhan2m
Norway2751 Posts
On June 16 2013 19:32 Aim Here wrote: I noticed something about the groups, and had to share. For group stage 1, there were 62 Zergs, 38 Protoss and 27 Terrans, and 1 random entering the tournament. 31 Zergs, 19 Toss, 14 Terrans and no randoms qualified for group stage 2. The group 2 racial distribution figures are half of the group 1 figures, taking into account rounding of odd numbers. The races qualified from their groups in the *exact* proportion to how they showed up. The qualifiers couldn't have been any better balanced. I'm immediately going to jump to the conclusion, therefore, that Starcraft 2: Heart of the Swarm is perfectly 100% balanced, at least at the DreamHack open qualifier group stage 1 level. The numbers simply cannot lie! Any balance whine for this tournament is surely the result of a debilitating cognitive disorder, and if you perceive imbalance while watching the stream, you should seek psychiatric attention! Could also be used as an argument that Dreamhack group stage participants were rigged. Because pretty much 100% of the favorites to advance, did advance. Though, cool story bro and WOW, poor Naniwa again with that group. Group 2 = Group of Death | ||
|
Azhrak
Finland1198 Posts
On June 16 2013 16:22 Humanboy wrote: How are the groups are distributed throughout the streams? Whats coming up first on each stream? Look at the stream schedule. OP, you might want to add this to the topic. It updates on the go too. | ||
|
warshop
Canada490 Posts
| ||
|
Neemi
Netherlands657 Posts
| ||
|
sekalf
Sweden522 Posts
| ||
| ||
